A-160 Validating the Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen as a Memory Screener in a Diverse Primary Care Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215-1215
Author(s):  
Marnina Stimmel ◽  
Emmeline Ayers ◽  
Joe Verghese ◽  
Erica Weiss

Abstract Objective Quick cognitive screeners which can be used for ethnically and educationally diverse patients are particularly useful within the primary care setting. The Picture-Based Memory Impairment Screen (PMIS) is a brief screening tool which has been validated in such a population. Here we compare the PMIS against a gold-standard memory task (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [HVLT-R]) and evaluate its utility as a stand-alone memory screener. Method In this cross-sectional study, adults over 65 with cognitive concerns were recruited at their primary care visit to complete the PMIS as part of a larger randomized controlled trial aimed at improving detection of cognitive impairment. A subset of those participants also agreed to complete neuropsychological testing in English or Spanish (including the HVLT-R). Correlations were performed. Results 108 participants (Mean age = 73; 73% female; 39% Black/AA; 58% Hispanic; 52% evaluated in Spanish; Mean years education = 10.8) completed the PMIS and HVLT-R. The PMIS was correlated with the HVLT-R Immediate Raw Score (rs = 0.229, p = 0.17) and even more strongly correlated with the HVLT-R Delayed Raw Score (rs = 0.347, p < 0.001). Conclusions Early results of this ongoing trial suggest that the PMIS is a useful memory screener which can be used to quickly identify individuals in a diverse primary care setting who are likely to have memory weakness.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Just ◽  
Marie-Therese Puth ◽  
Felix Regenold ◽  
Klaus Weckbecker ◽  
Markus Bleckwenn

Abstract Background Combating the COVID-19 pandemic is a major challenge for health systems, citizens and policy makers worldwide. Early detection of affected patients within the large and heterogeneous group of patients with common cold symptoms is an important element of this effort, but often hindered by limited testing resources, false-negative test results and the lack of pathognomonic symptoms in COVID-19. Therefore, we aimed to identify anamnestic items with an increased/decreased odds ratio for a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (CovPCR) result in a primary care setting. Methods We performed a multi-center cross-sectional cohort study on predictive clinical characteristics for a positive CovPCR over a period of 4 weeks in primary care patients in Germany. Results In total, 374 patients in 14 primary care centers received CovPCR and were included in this analysis. The median age was 44.0 (IQR: 31.0–59.0) and a fraction of 10.7% (n = 40) tested positive for COVID-19. Patients who reported anosmia had a higher odds ratio (OR: 4.54; 95%-CI: 1.51–13.67) for a positive test result while patients with a sore throat had a lower OR (OR: 0.33; 95%-CI: 0.11–0.97). Furthermore, patients who had a first grade contact with an infected persons and showed symptoms themselves also had an increased OR for positive testing (OR: 5.16; 95% CI: 1.72–15.51). This correlation was also present when they themselves were still asymptomatic (OR: 12.55; 95% CI: 3.97–39.67). Conclusions Several anamnestic criteria may be helpful to assess pre-test probability of COVID-19 in patients with common cold symptoms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maira Sayuri Sakay Bortoletto ◽  
Selma Maffei de Andrade ◽  
Tiemi Matsuo ◽  
Maria do Carmo Lourenço Haddad ◽  
Alberto Durán González ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lennard L. van Wanrooij ◽  
Edo Richard ◽  
Susan Jongstra ◽  
Eric P. Moll van Charante ◽  
Willem A. van Gool

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1264-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan T Houweling ◽  
Nanne Kleefstra ◽  
Kornelis JJ van Hateren ◽  
Klaas H Groenier ◽  
Betty Meyboom-de Jong ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1866-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIKE J.L. PETERS ◽  
MARK M.J. NIELEN ◽  
HENNIE G. RATERMAN ◽  
ROBERT A. VERHEIJ ◽  
FRANCOIS G. SCHELLEVIS ◽  
...  

Objective.To compare the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory arthritis and control subjects registered in primary care.Methods.Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to compare the CVD prevalence in patients and controls, aged 50–75 years.Results.Overall, the CVD prevalence was 66.1 per 1000 patients in inflammatory arthritis and 37.3 per 1000 patients in controls, resulting in an odds ratio of 1.83 (95% confidence interval 1.33–2.51).Conclusion.Inflammatory arthritis patients registered in primary care are associated with an increased cardiovascular burden, which emphasizes the need for cardiovascular risk management in the primary care setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document