Impact of Puberty and Age on Adolescent Inhibition Over Time
Abstract Objective We measured how puberty impacted inhibition over three years. We hypothesized that age and puberty development would predict inhibition at each time point. Results revealed differential effects of puberty and age over time. Method Participants from Southern Idaho were 245 adolescents at Time 1 (T1) (M = 10.4, SD = 1.5, 50% female, 64% Caucasian), 196 adolescents at Time 2 (T2) (M = 11.8, SD = 1.5, 50% female, 81% Caucasian), and 87 adolescents at Time 3 (T3) (M = 13, SD = 1.5, 56% female, 82% Caucasian). Participants completed a physical exam with a registered nurse, which included the Tanner Scale (Apter & Hermanson, 2002; Tinggaard et. al., 2012) and the Puberty Development Scale (Petersen et al., 1988). Inhibition was assessed using stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) within the Stop-it Task (Logan, Cowan, & Davis, 1984). Results Using structural equation modeling, for T1, the overall model demonstrated a good fit, χ2(3) = 1.23, p = .75, RMSEA = .00, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.04. Puberty significantly predicted inhibition (β = -.21, p < .05), i.e., higher puberty scores predicted stronger inhibition. However, age was not a significant predictor. At T2, the model demonstrated a good fit, χ2(7) = 7.77, p = .35, RMSEA = .03, CFI = 1.00, TLI = .99. Age significantly predicted inhibition (β=-.39, p < .001). However, puberty was not a significant predictor. In T3, neither age nor puberty predicted inhibition. Conclusions Our results indicate that early adolescent increases in inhibition may be due to puberty development rather than age. As one ages, puberty has less effect, and chronological age becomes more significant. Finally, in mid-adolescence, neither age nor puberty significantly affects inhibition. These findings highlight the changing effects of age and puberty on inhibitory control across adolescence.