Usability researchers and product designers stand to benefit by minimizing costs (e.g., time, overhead, recruitment costs) related to usability research. Several potential discount methods for collecting subjective data exist. This study compared four methods of collecting satisfaction data using the After-Scenario Questionnaire (ASQ). Use-Then-Measure (rating immediately after use), was used as a comparison group for the performance of three other methods: Retrospective (delayed measurement based on past use), Prospective (judging a product before use), and Watching-Others (evaluating a product based on video footage). Users were asked to use three different products (a website, a can opener, and a digital timer) and rate their satisfaction with the products using the ASQ. The Retrospective method produced mean ASQ scores that were statistically indistinguishable from the average ASQ scores produced by Use-Then-Measure. Both the Prospective and Watching-Others conditions generated mean ASQ scores higher than Use-Than-Measure. Our results, consistent with previous research, support Retrospective assessment as an alternative for collecting subjective ratings of usability. While our results did not support Watching-Others or Prospective methods, more research is needed before completely ruling them out as viable methods.