scholarly journals O10 REINFORCED TENSION LINE SUTURE RESULTS IN LOW INCISIONAL HERNIA RATE AFTER CRS/HIPEC OPERATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotta Wenzelberg ◽  
Ulf Petersson ◽  
Ingvar Syk ◽  
Peder Rogmark
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Suture Line ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index Score ◽  
One Year ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Karnofsky Index ◽  
Fascia Closure

Abstract Aim Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis entails several risk factors for incisional hernia (IH). At our institution fascia closure has been performed in a 4:1 manner with a 2-0 polydiaxanone suture (the PDS-group) or a 2-0 polypropylene preceded by a reinforced tension line (RTL) suture (the RTL-group). Our hypothesis was that reinforcing the suture line results in fewer IH at one year. Material and Methods Single-center retrospective study on primary CRS/HIPEC 2004-2019. CT-diagnosed IH one year ±3 months postoperative. Additional data retrieved from clinical records and a prospective CRS/HIPEC database. Results Of 193 patients, 63 were not evaluable for IH of which two, both in the PDS-group, were reoperated for fascial dehiscence (FD). 130 patients; 83 (45 women) in the PDS- and 47 (23 women) in the RTL-group, mean age 57 years (19-77) remained. RTL-patients were five years younger (54 vs 59), had a higher Karnofsky index and less bleeding (807 vs 1409 mL). No differences regarding sex, BMI, recent midline incisions, excision of midline scars, peritoneal cancer index score, complications (Clavien-Dindo 3b or higher), neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were found. Twelve IH (9%) were found, 11 (13%) in the PDS- and 1 (2%) in the RTL-group (p = 0.055). Conclusions Despite many potential IH risk factors, the overall IH-incidences do not seem higher than after laparotomies in general. The RTL-group showed 2% IH compared to 13% in the PDS-group. The PDS-group were further burdened by two FD. The results are clinically relevant, suggesting an advantage with RTL-closure for these patients.

scholarly journals Analysis of Risk Factors for Incisional Hernias and its Management

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
S R Paudel ◽  
B R Neupane ◽  
N V Gurung ◽  
A Acharya ◽  
A Chapagain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Midline Incision ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Western Regional ◽  
One Year ◽  
Age Range

Introduction: Incisional hernia is a common problem after abdominal surgery. Patients present with pain, swelling and intestinal obstruction. It may be repaired by either anatomical suturing or mesh repair.Methods: It is a prospective observational study conducted in Western Regional Hospital and Fewa City Hospital, Pokhara from 2013 to 2016. A total of consecutive 100 patients admitted in these hospitals during the study period were included.Results: Incisional hernia is more common in females (M : F = 1 : 3.8), and in 30 - 50 years age group (60%). Major risk factors were wound infection (30%), overweight (25%), and postoperative cough (10%). It is found to be more associated with gynecological (65%), than gastrointestinal operations, and more so with lower abdominal midline incision (65%). It is found to occur mostly within one year (60%) of primary surgery than later. Even 24% of the patients had first symptom within six months. Mesh repair (92%) was the preferred standard surgical treatment for incisional hernia.Conclusion: Overweight females of age range between 30 - 50 years with history of gynecological operations by lower abdominal midline incision are more prone to develop incisional hernia. This incidence increases when there is wound infection. Mesh repair is the choice of operation for incisional hernia. J-GMC-N | Volume 11 | Issue 01 | January-June 2018, Page: 16-20

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 372-376
Author(s):  
Hideaki Yano
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Good Reason ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer

AbstractPeritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) is used to be considered a systemic and fatal condition; however, it has been growingly accepted that PM-CRC can still be local disease rather than systemic disease as analogous to liver or lung metastasis.Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now considered an optimal treatment for PM-CRC with accumulating evidence. There is a good reason that CRS + HIPEC, widely accepted as a standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), could be a viable option for PM-CRC given a similarity between PM-CRC and PMP.Recent years have also seen that modern systemic chemotherapy with or without molecular targeted agents can be effective for PM-CRC. It is possible that neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy combined with CRS + HIPEC could further improve outcomes.Patient selection, utilizing modern images and increasingly laparoscopy, is crucial. Particularly, diagnostic laparoscopy is likely to play a significant role in predicting the likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction and assessing the peritoneal cancer index score.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection and Recurrence After Incisional Hernia Repair in Abdominal Transplant Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 762-767
Author(s):  
Fareed Cheema ◽  
Oya Andacoglu ◽  
Li-Ching Huang ◽  
Sharon E. Phillips ◽  
Flavio Malcher
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Incisional Hernia Repair

scholarly journals THU0254 Risk factors for back pain in a cross sectional and in a one-year follow up study in nurses

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Brzosko ◽  
I Fiedorowicz-Fabrycy ◽  
J Fliciñski ◽  
H Przepiera-Bêdzak ◽  
K Prajs
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
One Year

Long-term effects of an intensive prevention program (IPP) after acute myocardial infarction – the IPP Follow-up and Prevention Boost Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Wienbergen ◽  
A Fach ◽  
S Meyer ◽  
J Schmucker ◽  
R Osteresch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Prevention Program ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Risk Factor Control ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background The effects of an intensive prevention program (IPP) for 12 months following 3-week rehabilitation after myocardial infarction (MI) have been proven by the randomized IPP trial. The present study investigates if the effects of IPP persist one year after termination of the program and if a reintervention after >24 months (“prevention boost”) is effective. Methods In the IPP trial patients were recruited during hospitalization for acute MI and randomly assigned to IPP versus usual care (UC) one month after discharge (after 3-week rehabilitation). IPP was coordinated by non-physician prevention assistants and included intensive group education sessions, telephone calls, telemetric and clinical control of risk factors. Primary study endpoint was the IPP Prevention Score, a sum score evaluating six major risk factors. The score ranges from 0 to 15 points, with a score of 15 points indicating best risk factor control. In the present study the effects of IPP were investigated after 24 months – one year after termination of the program. Thereafter, patients of the IPP study arm with at least one insufficiently controlled risk factor were randomly assigned to a 2-months reintervention (“prevention boost”) vs. no reintervention. Results At long-term follow-up after 24 months, 129 patients of the IPP study arm were compared to 136 patients of the UC study arm. IPP was associated with a significantly better risk factor control compared to UC at 24 months (IPP Prevention Score 10.9±2.3 points in the IPP group vs. 9.4±2.3 points in the UC group, p<0.01). However, in the IPP group a decrease of risk factor control was observed at the 24-months visit compared to the 12-months visit at the end of the prevention program (IPP Prevention Score 10.9±2.3 points at 24 months vs. 11.6±2.2 points at 12 months, p<0.05, Figure 1). A 2-months reintervention (“prevention boost”) was effective to improve risk factor control during long-term course: IPP Prevention Score increased from 10.5±2.1 points to 10.7±1.9 points in the reintervention group, while it decreased from 10.5±2.1 points to 9.7±2.1 points in the group without reintervention (p<0.05 between the groups, Figure 1). Conclusions IPP was associated with a better risk factor control compared to UC during 24 months; however, a deterioration of risk factors after termination of IPP suggests that even a 12-months prevention program is not long enough. The effects of a short reintervention after >24 months (“prevention boost”) indicate the need for prevention concepts that are based on repetitive personal contacts during long-term course after coronary events. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Stiftung Bremer Herzen (Bremen Heart Foundation)

Predicting recidivism for offenders in UK substance dependence treatment: do mental health symptoms matter?

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefien J.F. Breedvelt ◽  
Lucy V. Dean ◽  
Gail Y. Jones ◽  
Caroline Cole ◽  
Hattie C.A. Moyes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Substance Dependence ◽  
Mental Health Symptoms ◽  
Health Symptoms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Health Factors ◽  
Substance Dependence Treatment ◽  
One Year ◽  
Mental Health Factors

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess whether mental health symptoms affect one-year reoffending rates upon release from prison for participants engaging in substance dependence treatment in the UK. Design/methodology/approach – A retrospective cohort study was used to assess reconviction outcomes upon release. The Comprehensive Addiction and Psychological Evaluation (CAAPE) was administered to 667 inmates admitted to the programme. The effect of mental health, drug use, and static risk factors on reoffending was assessed at one-year post release. Findings – Logistic regression analysis showed that symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder at the start of substance dependence treatment increased the likelihood to reoffend, whilst Obsessive Compulsive Disorder symptoms and length of sentence decreased the likelihood to reoffend. Antisocial Personality Disorder symptoms show a trend towards increasing the likelihood to reoffend. In addition, previously established risk factors for reoffending, including dependence on heroin, crack/cocaine, and poly drug use significantly increased the likelihood of reconviction. Practical implications – Depressive symptomatology pre-treatment could affect reoffending outcomes for participants in substance dependence treatment in prison. An integrative approach addressing both substance misuse and mental health factors is pivotal. Future efforts to address both simultaneously can be made to improve assessment, training, treatment, and through care for prisoners in substance dependence treatment. Originality/value – Few studies have assessed the effect of mental health factors on reoffending outcomes for offenders in substance dependence treatment. A large sample was studied in an understudied population of UK prisoners in substance dependence treatment. The results have implications for clinical settings where mental health symptoms are not addressed concurrently with substance dependence. This finding can inform policy makers and practitioners who provide substance dependence treatment in prison.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document