scholarly journals P-B04 Restarting bariatric surgery after the Covid-19 pandemic: a template for safe practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Michel ◽  
Helen Fifer ◽  
Emily Moran ◽  
Ala Saab ◽  
Felix Hammett ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bariatric surgery virtually ceased with the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic and has been amongst the last sector of operative practice to restart. There have been understandable concerns about restarting bariatric surgery including the risks to patients of contracting Covid infection in the peri-operative period, potential de-skilling of surgeons and theatre teams and the appropriateness of directing scarce and limited resources to bariatric surgery when every surgical specialty is experiencing rapidly rising waiting times and ever lengthening waiting lists.  This study describes the restart programme at our NHS bariatric unit and offers a template for safe commencement of complex benign surgeries in the current era. Methods In the months after the pandemic started, our Bariatric MDT reviewed every case on the waiting list and contacted each patient to explain the current waiting times and the importance of not gaining weight to be eligible for surgery when surgical practice resumed. Group education and Support Group sessions were moved from face-to-face appointments to online classrooms and regular input was sought from specialist dieticians, nurses and psychologists. The expected waiting times for patients was pro-actively submitted to the Executive Board of the Trust with details about >104-week waiting patients being clearly articulated. Once approval was given to restart bariatric surgery, every patient was assessed and prioritised in terms of waiting time and clinical need. A bariatric theatre team was brought together and engaged in pre-operative training and a local refresher course on equipment and the planned surgeries. There was engagement with industry to provide on-the-ground support for the first lists to ensure proper and safe use of energy and stapling devices. Each list had two consultant surgeons assigned to it and just two cases per day were planned and patients were managed on an entirely green pathway within the NHS hospital . Results The bariatric restart programme commenced in May 2021; between May 2021 and August 2021, there have been 27 operations carried out (25 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 2 sleeve gastrectomy) and two cancellations on the day (both due to patient choice). Each operating list finished between two and three hours before the planned finish time. Formal debrief sessions after each list identified no problems with the operations of the equipment and none of the patients had any post-operative complications. Length of stay was between 1 to 2 days for the entire cohort.  Since the restart programme commenced, the requirement for dual consultant operating has ceased and the last 5 cases have been entirely training cases for the operating registrar, again without complication. Each list is now planned to increase to pre-pandemic levels of activity with four cases per list. Conclusions Restarting complex benign surgical practice is complicated and requires engagement with management, theatre and nursing colleagues to ensure that cases are not ‘left behind'. It is important to reduce the risk of complications and of peri-operative covid-19 infection in bariatric patients and development of a pathway that all members of the theatre team have input in to meant that there were few problems or issues with either the planning of the lists or the running of the lists. Such an approach could be considered for restarting any high volume, complex benign surgical practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Justyna Rymarowicz ◽  
Michał Pędziwiatr ◽  
Piotr Major ◽  
Bryan Donohue ◽  
Karol Ciszek ◽  
...  

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made changes to the traditional way of performing surgical consultations. The aim of the present study was to assess the need for surgical care performed by various surgical specialties among patients infected with COVID-19 hospitalized in a COVID-19 dedicated hospital. All surgical consultations performed for patients infected with COVID-19 in a COVID dedicated hospital in a seven month period were evaluated. Data on demographics, surgical specialty, consult reason, procedure performed, and whether it was a standard face to face or teleconsultation were gathered. Out of 2359 COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital in the seven month period, 229 (9.7%) required surgical care. Out of those 108 consultations that did not lead to surgery, 71% were managed by telemedicine. A total of 36 patients were operated on while suffering from COVID-19. Out of them, only three patients admitted primarily for COVID-19 pneumonia underwent emergency surgery. The overall mortality among those operated on was 16.7%. Conclusions: Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 may require surgical care from various surgical specialties, especially during peaks of the pandemic. However, they rarely require a surgical procedure and only occasionally require major surgery. A significant portion of potentially surgical problems could be managed by teleconsultations.


Obesity Facts ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Marijn Marthe Georgine van Berckel ◽  
Saskia L.M. van Loon ◽  
Arjen-Kars Boer ◽  
Volkher Scharnhorst ◽  
Simon W. Nienhuijs

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Bariatric surgery results in both intentional and unintentional metabolic changes. In a high-volume bariatric center, extensive laboratory panels are used to monitor these changes pre- and postoperatively. Consecutive measurements of relevant biochemical markers allow exploration of the health state of bariatric patients and comparison of different patient groups. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objective of this study is to compare biomarker distributions over time between 2 common bariatric procedures, i.e., sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB), using visual analytics. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Both pre- and postsurgical (6, 12, and 24 months) data of all patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery were collected retrospectively. The distribution and evolution of different biochemical markers were compared before and after surgery using asymmetric beanplots in order to evaluate the effect of primary SG and RYGB. A beanplot is an alternative to the boxplot that allows an easy and thorough visual comparison of univariate data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 1,237 patients (659 SG and 578 RYGB) were included. The sleeve and bypass groups were comparable in terms of age and the prevalence of comorbidities. The mean presurgical BMI and the percentage of males were higher in the sleeve group. The effect of surgery on lowering of glycated hemoglobin was similar for both surgery types. After RYGB surgery, the decrease in the cholesterol concentration was larger than after SG. The enzymatic activity of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphate in sleeve patients was higher presurgically but lower postsurgically compared to bypass values. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Beanplots allow intuitive visualization of population distributions. Analysis of this large population-based data set using beanplots suggests comparable efficacies of both types of surgery in reducing diabetes. RYGB surgery reduced dyslipidemia more effectively than SG. The trend toward a larger decrease in liver enzyme activities following SG is a subject for further investigation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas H. Dreifuss ◽  
Alberto Mangano ◽  
Chandra Hassan ◽  
Mario A. Masrur

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W Foster ◽  
Sara E Badenhausen ◽  
Colleen Tewksbury ◽  
Noel N Williams ◽  
J Eduardo Rame ◽  
...  

Introduction: Heart failure patients with severe obesity endure significant morbidity and frequent hospitalizations. Bariatric surgery is proven to provide durable weight loss for those with severe obesity, but the clinical impact and safety of these procedures among patients with heart failure has not been well-demonstrated. Methods: We conducted a medical record query of patients who have a previous diagnosis of heart failure (HFpEF and HFrEF) and underwent subsequent Roux-En-Y gastric bypass or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a high-volume metabolic and bariatric surgery center. We compared clinical, demographic, and echocardiographic data captured just prior to the bariatric procedure to the most recent data available in the medical record for each patient. Results: There were 50 patients (88% had HFpEF) included in this study. Time from HF diagnosis to most recent follow-up ranged from 0.2 to 20.3 years (median 6.7 years) and there was no recorded mortality. The median time from HF diagnosis to surgery was 2.3 years and median time from surgery to recent follow-up was 2.9 years. Post-operative median decrease in BMI was 8.8 kg/m 2 , HF hospitalizations were 0.4 per patient year (PPY) to 0.15 PPY, p=0.008, and median NYHA Class was II pre-op and I post-op, p=0.048). LVEF, LVESD, and LVEDD were not significantly changed post-operatively (Table 1). Conclusion: Weight loss following bariatric surgery for patients with HF led to improvements in NYHA Class, fewer hospitalizations for HF, and was not associated with perioperative mortality. It is reasonable to consider bariatric surgery for this patient population, but further prospective investigation is warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 5119-5122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Uccelli ◽  
Giovanni Carlo Cesana ◽  
Francesca Ciccarese ◽  
Alberto Oldani ◽  
Adelinda Angela Giulia Zanoni ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Willemijn Steen ◽  
◽  
Claire van Vliet ◽  
Sebastiaan Festen ◽  
Marc G. Besselink ◽  
...  

Abstract Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is increasingly performed in high-volume centers, which may compromise waiting times. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient flow and outcome of PD within a regional oncology network of two high-volume centers. A post hoc analysis of a partially retrospective and prospective database was performed of all patients who underwent PD for pancreatic or periampullary neoplasms in both centers of the Gastrointestinal Oncology Center Amsterdam, a collaboration between an academic center and affiliated general teaching hospital, from 2010 to 2014. Outcomes included waiting time to surgery and postoperative morbidity and mortality. A total of 525 PDs were performed, 329 in the academic center (annual volume 66) and 196 in the teaching hospital (annual volume 39). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often used in the academic center, other baseline characteristics were similar. Overall time to surgery was 26 days, which was significantly less in the teaching hospital. The major postoperative morbidity rate was 38.3% (n = 201), and the 30- and 90-day mortality was 2.3% and 3.6%. A regional oncology network between an academic center and a general teaching hospital for PD can be an attractive option to safeguard waiting times in selected patients, without compromising outcome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Giudicelli ◽  
Michele Diana ◽  
Mickael Chevallay ◽  
Benjamin Blaser ◽  
Chloé Darbellay ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1785-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Trotta ◽  
Chiara Ferrari ◽  
Gabriele D’Alessandro ◽  
Giuseppe Sarra ◽  
Giovanni Piscitelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document