scholarly journals Prevalence and associated predictors for patients developing chronic neuropathic pain following burns

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M Klifto ◽  
A Lee Dellon ◽  
C Scott Hultman
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Chronic Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Background Chronic pain, unrelated to the burn itself, can manifest as a long-term complication in patients sustaining burn injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) and compare burn characteristics between patients who developed CNP and patients without CNP who were treated at a burn center. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of 1880 patients admitted to the adult burn center was performed from 1 January 2014 to 1 January 2019. Patients included were over the age of 15 years, sustained a burn injury and were admitted to the burn center. CNP was diagnosed clinically following burn injury. Patients were excluded from the definition of CNP if their pain was due to an underlying illness or medication. Comparisons between patients admitted to the burn center with no pain and patients admitted to the burn center who developed CNP were performed. Results One hundred and thirteen of the 1880 burn patients developed CNP as a direct result of burn injury over 5 years with a prevalence of 6.01%. Patients who developed CNP were a significantly older median age (54 years vs. 46 years, p = 0.002), abused alcohol (29% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), abused substances (31% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), were current daily smokers (73% vs. 33%, p < 0.001), suffered more full-thickness burns (58% vs. 43%, p < 0.001), greater median percent of total body surface area (%TBSA) burns (6 vs. 3.5, p < 0.001), were more often intubated on mechanical ventilation (33% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), greater median number of surgeries (2 vs. 0, p < 0.001) and longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (10 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), compared to those who did not develop CNP, respectively. Median patient follow-up was 27 months. Conclusions The prevalence of CNP over 5 years was 6.01% in the burn center. Older ages, alcohol abuse, substance abuse, current daily smoking, greater percent of total body surface area (%TBSA) burns, third degree burns, being intubated on mechanical ventilation, having more surgeries and longer hospital LOS were associated with developing CNP following burn injury, compared to patients who did not develop CNP following burn injury.

Assessment of burn surface area

2019 ◽  
pp. 67-76
Author(s):  
Rowan Pritchard-Jones ◽  
Kayvan Shokrollahi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Injured Patient ◽  
Crucial Step ◽  
Total Body

Assessment of total body surface area of a burn injured patient is a crucial step in managing burn injury. The chapter describes a number of techniques from using the size of the patient’s palm as an estimate of 1% to the gold standard Lund and Browder Chart. Key caveats are explained, copies of the charts included as well as the use of the CE certified app Mersey Burns.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Outcomes Following the Use of Nebulized Heparin for Inhalation Injury (HIHI2 Study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1004-1008
Author(s):  
Courtney L Cox ◽  
Allyson M McIntire ◽  
Kimberly J Bolton ◽  
David R Foster ◽  
Andrew C Fritschle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Inhalation Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Inhalation injury causes significant morbidity and mortality secondary to compromise of the respiratory system as well as systemic effects limiting perfusion and oxygenation. Nebulized heparin reduces fibrin cast formation and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with inhalation injury. To date, no study has compared both dosing strategies of 5000 and 10,000 units to a matched control group. This multicenter, retrospective, case-control study included adult patients with bronchoscopy-confirmed inhalation injury. Each control patient, matched according to age and percent of total body surface area, was matched to a patient who received 5000 units and a patient who received 10,000 units of nebulized heparin. The primary endpoint of the study was duration of mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days in the first 28 days, difference in lung injury scores, length of hospitalization, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and rate of major bleeding. Thirty-five matched patient trios met inclusion criteria. Groups were well-matched for age (P = .975) and total body surface area (P = .855). Patients who received nebulized heparin, either 5000 or 10,000 units, had 8 to 11 less days on the ventilator compared to controls (P = .001). Mortality ranged from 3 to 14% overall and was not statistically significant between groups. No major bleeding events related to nebulized heparin were reported. Mechanical ventilation days were significantly decreased in patients who received 5000 or 10,000 units of nebulized heparin. Nebulized heparin, either 5000 units or 10,000 units, is a safe and effective treatment for inhalation injury.

Evaluating Discrepancies in Percent Total Body Surface Area Burn Assessments Between Prehospital Providers and Burn Center Physicians

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duy P Tran ◽  
Donald H Arnold ◽  
Callie M Thompson ◽  
Neal J Richmond ◽  
Stephen Gondek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Burns are routinely assessed at the scene of the incident by prehospital or emergency medical services providers. The initial management of burns is based on the calculation of the extent of the injury, reported as percent total body surface area. This study evaluates discrepancies in estimation of total body surface area (TBSA) between prehospital providers and burn team physicians over a 3-year period at an academic, university medical center serving as the regional burn center. A total of 120 adult and 27 pediatric patients (less than age 16 years) were included, with 95 (65%) male, 67 (45.6%) Caucasian, 62, median age 35 years (Interquartile Range 27). The most common etiology of burns was hot liquid, 39 (26.5%). Median [IQR] and mean (SD) estimated TBSA (%) were 4[1, 10] and 8.6 (12.8) for prehospital providers, and 2 [1, 6] and 5.9 (9.9) for burn team physicians. Bland-Altman plots evaluating 2nd and 3rd degree burns separately and combined demonstrated that, as burns involved more surface area, agreement decreased between emergency medical service providers and burn physicians. Agreement between pre-hospital providers and burn physicians decreased as total body surface areas of burns increased. This finding reaffirms the need for more standardized education and training for all medical personnel.

Hand sanitiser–fuelled fire performance and thermal injury: case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e235106
Author(s):  
Samantha T Murphy ◽  
Leopoldo C Cancio
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Performance Art ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Thermal Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Fire Performance ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Total Body

A 23-year-old man presented to our burn center after sustaining a 62.5% total body surface area burn during a fire performance, in which he applied alcohol-based hand sanitiser to his body and ignited it. The patient underwent 6 operations at this facility and was discharged after 41 days. Fire-performance art is a growing pastime and profession. This case demonstrates the hazards of using hand sanitiser during such activities.

scholarly journals Recovery from an Eighty-Percent Total Body Surface Area Burn Injury Sustained at Work

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-226
Author(s):  
Helga Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Hot Water ◽  
Total Body

Recovery from an Eighty-Percent Total Body Surface Area Burn Injury Sustained at WorkThis article presents a case of severe burn injury at work involving 80 % of body surface area and patient treatment and rehabilitation, which resulted in preserved working ability. The worker was injured by hot water and steam. After initial treatment in the intensive care unit, he underwent comprehensive clinical and outpatient rehabilitation that took 92 weeks, after which he returned to work. His working disability was 100 % after the initial treatment in the intensive care unit, but rehabilitation improved it to 50 %. It should always be kept in mind that even patients with serious or life-threatening injuries can be reintegrated into the workforce if patients, physicians, occupational physicians, and employers all work together.

Total Body Surface Area Overestimation at Referring Institutions in Children Transferred to a Burn Center

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas S. Swords ◽  
Edmund D. Hadley ◽  
Katrina R. Swett ◽  
Thomas Pranikoff
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Trauma Registry ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Demographic Variables ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Center ◽  
Total Body

Total body surface area (TBSA) burned is a powerful descriptor of burn severity and influences the volume of resuscitation required in burn patients. The incidence and severity of TBSA overestimation by referring institutions (RIs) in children transferred to a burn center (BC) are unclear. The association between TBSA overestimation and overresuscitation is unknown as is that between TBSA overestimation and outcome. The trauma registry at a BC was queried over 7.25 years for children presenting with burns. TBSA estimate at RIs and BC, total fluid volume given before arrival at a BC, demographic variables, and clinical variables were reviewed. Nearly 20 per cent of children arrived from RIs without TBSA estimation. Nearly 50 per cent were overestimated by 5 per cent or greater TBSA and burn sizes were overestimated by up to 44 per cent TBSA. Average TBSA measured at BC was 9.5 ± 8.3 per cent compared with 15.5 ± 11.8 per cent as measured at RIs ( P < 0.0001). Burns between 10 and 19.9 per cent TBSA were overestimated most often and by the greatest amounts. There was a statistically significant relationship between overestimation of TBSA by 5 per cent or greater and overresuscitation by 10 mL/kg or greater ( P = 0.02). No patient demographic or clinical factors were associated with TBSA overestimation. Education efforts aimed at emergency department physicians regarding the importance of always calculating TBSA as well as the mechanics of TBSA estimation and calculating resuscitation volume are needed. Further studies should evaluate the association of TBSA overestimation by RIs with adverse outcomes and complications in the burned child.

511 Point-of-care 3-dimensional Body Mapping for Determining Total Body Surface Area in Severely Burned Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S92-S93
Author(s):  
Julia Loegering ◽  
Kevin Webb ◽  
Jesse Ahlquist ◽  
Kevin Krause ◽  
Karen Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Mapping ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Introduction With severe burn injury, there is systemic fluid loss due to inflammatory responses in damaged tissue, leading to disruption of cellular processes. Patient fluid levels are restored with the calculation of total body surface area (TBSA). Clinically used TBSA equations are often outdated and inaccurate with error up to 20%, resulting in misinformed treatment and subsequent sequelae including prolonged hospital length of stay and increased mortality. Our objective, therefore, was to create a point-of-care (POC) system employing 3D imaging technology to accurately calculate TBSA for all patient population varieties. Methods Our team employed an iPad attachable, infrared scanner to create 3D models of the human body. From these models, TBSA can be extrapolated using scan processing software. Subject scans were collected on our device and on a gold standard scanner for comparison of TBSA output. Clinical testing on burn patients is occurring at present to establish scanning precision of TBSA in the burn care environment. Results Non-clinical verification tests of the 3D scanned TBSA revealed a 4.05% error when compared to the gold standard, and precision error of 3.8%. Additionally, we introduced the device into the burn unit for preliminary testing with a physician user and non-patient subjects. The subjects were scanned in a prone position to mimic burn care workflow. Clinician scanning error was 1.41% when compared to the gold standard scan of the same subject. Clinical precision study results are on-going in collection. Conclusions Our device introduces an improved method of TBSA estimation to assist clinicians in making accurate burn care decisions and further precision medicine with greater anthropomteric data, notably for children. This device is one of the first POC-3D scanning technologies to be used in a burn setting and may also be employed at outlying medical facilities. Destructive wildfires and combat burn injuries highlight the need for such a device to standardize the triage of burn victims with and away from experienced medical staff. Applicability of Research to Practice 3D body mapping points to an enhanced method of TBSA calculation and minimally disruptive to the burn workflow. Future developments of 3D scanning include deep learning algorithms to identify and better assess burned surface area. Additionally, further automation of TBSA scan processing to reduce user error in calculation and improve burn injury outcomes.

Referral Patterns of Burn Injury in Rural Kenya

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A Hunter ◽  
Kimutai Sylvester ◽  
Russell E White ◽  
David T Harrington ◽  
Patrick M Vivier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Travel Time ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Rural Kenya ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Burn injury represents a substantial burden of disease in resource-limited settings. Kenya has no formal trauma system and referral practices for burn injuries are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with burn injury referrals in rural Kenya. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients with burn injury from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 at a 300-bed faith-based, teaching hospital in southwest Kenya. Bivariate analysis compared referred and non-referred patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between burn severity and odds of referral adjusting for age, sex, insurance, time from injury to arrival, and estimated travel time from home to hospital. The study included 171 patients with burn injury; 11 patients were excluded due to missing referral data. Of the 160 patients, 31.9% (n = 51) were referred. Referral patients had higher average total body surface area burn (23.1 ± 2.4% vs 11.1 ± 1.2%, P &lt; .001), were more likely to have full-thickness burns (41.3% vs 25.5%, P = .05), and less likely to present to the referral hospital within 24 hours after injury (47.8% vs 73.0%, P = .005). Referral patients had longer travel time to hospital (90+ min: 52.9% vs 22.0%, P &lt; .001). Odds of referral increased 1.62 times (95% confidence interval: 1.19–2.22) for every 10% increase in total body surface area burn. Without a coordinated trauma system, referrals represent a substantial portion of burn injury patients at a hospital in rural Kenya. Referred patients present with more severe burns and experience delays to presentation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document