scholarly journals Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Docosahexaenoic Acid and α-Linolenic Acid Affect Cholesterol Metabolism and Migration of Monocytes via Common and Distinct Gene Pathways

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 948-948
Author(s):  
Lisa Rodway ◽  
Samantha Pauls ◽  
Harold Aukema ◽  
Carla Taylor ◽  
Peter Zahradka

Abstract Objectives One of the earliest events in atherosclerotic plaque formation is the migration of monocytes to damaged blood vessels, and the accumulation of cholesterol in monocyte-derived macrophages. The omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is known to inhibit this process. While there is limited evidence suggesting α-linolenic acid (ALA) has a similar effect, ALA has not been directly compared to DHA. The primary objective of this study was to compare the gene expression profiles of monocytes that have been exposed to either ALA or DHA and examine the effect of these fatty acids on monocyte cholesterol content and migration in a cell culture model. Methods Transcriptome analysis was performed on total mRNA isolated from human THP-1 monocytes treated with ALA, DHA or vehicle for 48 h. Candidate genes identified via fold change and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis were validated by qPCR. Functional assays to measure total cholesterol content and migration were then performed on monocytes treated with ALA or DHA. Results Transcriptome analysis identified a series of genes associated with cholesterol metabolism and cell migration altered by ALA and DHA treatment. Changes in mRNA levels for candidate genes were validated by qPCR, with similar expression patterns as in the transcriptome analysis. Based on these data, both fatty acids were predicted to reduce cholesterol synthesis, ALA would increase migration and DHA would have no effect. Functional assays were then performed and revealed that ALA and DHA decreased cholesterol content to a similar extent. Additionally, contrary to our predictions, DHA significantly decreased migration, while ALA had no effect. Conclusions The results suggest ALA and DHA may influence monocyte migration through distinct gene pathways, while cholesterol metabolism may be regulated by a common mechanism. Furthermore, only DHA treatment reduced monocyte migration in functional assays, while both fatty acids reduced cholesterol content. Due to the critical role of monocyte migration and cholesterol content in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, it may be concluded from this study that both DHA and ALA may exert protective effects involving different mechanisms as they relate to individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease. Funding Sources CIHR, NSERC

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1272-1272
Author(s):  
Lisa Rodway ◽  
Samantha Pauls ◽  
Carla Taylor ◽  
Harold Aukema ◽  
Peter Zahradka

Abstract Objectives One of the earliest events in atherosclerotic plaque formation is the adhesion and migration of monocytes to damaged blood vessels. The fish-oil derived omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been shown to inhibit this process. There is limited evidence suggesting α-linolenic acid (ALA) has a similar effect, however, ALA has not been directly compared to DHA. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to compare the gene expression profiles of monocytes that have been exposed to either ALA or DHA and subsequently examine the effect of these fatty acids on monocyte adhesion in a cell culture model. Methods Whole transcriptome analysis was performed on total mRNA isolated from a human THP-1 monocyte cell line treated with ALA, DHA or vehicle for 48 h. Candidate genes identified via fold change and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis were validated by qPCR. An adhesion assay was subsequently performed on monocytes treated with ALA or DHA to corroborate the predicted outcomes of our analysis. Results Transcriptome analysis identified a series of genes associated with cell adhesion and migration. The change in mRNA levels for each of the candidate genes was validated by qPCR, and in all cases a similar expression pattern was obtained as observed with the gene expression analysis. Based on these data, it was predicted that these processes would be upregulated in response to ALA but not DHA. The functional assay revealed that ALA increased or had no effect on monocyte adhesion, while DHA was found to significantly decrease adhesion. Conclusions The results suggest ALA and DHA influence adhesion and migration through distinct gene pathways. Furthermore, the functional assays indicated that DHA treatment but not ALA reduces adhesion. Due to the critical role of monocyte adhesion and migration in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, it may be concluded from this study both DHA and ALA may exert protective effects in different ways as they relate to individuals at risk for cardiovascular disease. Funding Sources Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1763-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasutake Tomata ◽  
Susanna C. Larsson ◽  
Sara Hägg

Abstract Purpose Observational studies have suggested that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may decrease Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk. In the present study, we examined this hypothesis using a Mendelian randomization analysis. Methods We used summary statistics data for single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with plasma levels of n-6 PUFAs (linoleic acid, arachidonic acid) and n-3 PUFAs (alpha-linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid), and the corresponding data for AD from a genome-wide association meta-analysis of 63,926 individuals (21,982 diagnosed AD cases, 41,944 controls). Results None of the genetically predicted PUFAs was significantly associated with AD risk; odds ratios (95% confidence interval) per 1 SD increase in PUFA levels were 0.98 (0.93, 1.03) for linoleic acid, 1.01 (0.98, 1.05) for arachidonic acid, 0.96 (0.88, 1.06) for alpha-linolenic acid, 1.03 (0.93, 1.13) for eicosapentaenoic acid, 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) for docosapentaenoic acid, and 1.01 (0.81, 1.25) for docosahexaenoic acid. Conclusions This study did not support the hypothesis that PUFAs decrease AD risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document