scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic mitral or aortic valve replacement-a meta analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
Y Sattar ◽  
S Pothuru ◽  
K Theja Reddy ◽  
K Teja Challa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Mechanical Valves ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background- Bioprosthetic valve (BPV) implantation is preferred over mechanical valves for aortic and mitral valve replacement. BPV can have concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). Primary advantage of BPV is the limited need of anticoagulation (AC) as compared to mechanical valves. However, recommendations for use of AC in BPV are not clear. Purpose We studied direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) cardiovascular efficacy and safety in BPV as compared to Vitamin K antagonist (VKA, or warfarin). Methods- Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to  November 28th, 2020. Using a generic invariance weighted fixed effects model, Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from individual studies were converted to Log HRs and corresponding standard errors, which were then pooled. The primary outcome of interest was  stroke or systemic embolisation (SSE), major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Results- A total of four studies with 1386 participants (DOACs n = 723  ; VKA n = 656) were included in analysis. Mean age was 63.7 and 62.4 years in the DOACs and VKA group respectively. Average follow-up period was 1 year and 4 months. DOACs were more efficacious than VKAs in stroke or  thromboembolism prevention (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.20-0.94; p = 0.03). There was no difference in efficacy of DOACs as compared to VKAs in terms of major bleeding (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.34-1.39; p = 0.09) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.57-1.7; p = 0.97) (Figure 1). We had no publication bias in our results (Egger’s regression p > 0.05). Conclusion- DOACs have similar mortality, and major bleeding risks as that of VKA at a benefit of higher stroke/thromboembolism prevention in patients with concurrent BPV and AF. Abstract Figure. A)SSE B)Major Bleeding C)Mortality

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Valerio Mariani ◽  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
Martina Straito ◽  
Agostino Piro ◽  
Paolo Severino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended as first-line anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with cancer and AF the efficacy and safety of DOACs are not well established. Objective We performed a meta-analysis comparing available data regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in cancer patients with non-valvular AF. Methods An online search of Pubmed and EMBASE libraries (from inception to May, 1 2020) was performed, in addition to manual screening. Nine studies were considered eligible for the meta-analysis involving 46,424 DOACs users and 182,797 VKA users. Results The use of DOACs was associated with reduced risks of systemic embolism or any stroke (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52–0.81; p 0.001), ischemic stroke (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.74–0.95; p 0.007) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52–0.71; p 0.00001) as compared to VKA group. DOAC use was associated with significantly reduced risks of major bleeding (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50–0.92; p 0.01) and intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.47–0.88; p 0.006). Compared to VKA, DOACs provided a non-statistically significant risk reduction of the outcomes major bleeding or non-major clinically relevant bleeding (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.13; p 0.50) and any bleeding (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78–1.06; p 0.24). Conclusions In comparison to VKA, DOACs were associated with a significant reduction of the rates of thromboembolic events and major bleeding complications in patients with AF and cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

3054Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Cavallari ◽  
G Verolino ◽  
G Patti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Anticoagulation in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) is particularly challenging given the higher risk of both thrombotic and bleeding complications in this setting. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in AF patients with malignancy remain unclear. Purpose In the present meta-analysis we further investigate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin in patients with AF and cancer assuming that available studies may be individually underpowered for endpoints at low incidence, i.e. stroke, major and intracranial bleeding. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the use of NOACs vs. warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Efficacy outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism and mortality. Safety outcome measures were major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Results We pooled data from 6 identified studies enrolling a total of 31,756 AF patients with cancer. Mean follow-up was 1.7 years. Patients with cancer had significantly increased annualized rates of venous thromboembolism (1.38% vs. 0.74%), major bleeding (9.01% vs. 5.13%), in particular major gastrointestinal bleeding (2.38% vs. 1.60%), and all-cause mortality (17.73% vs. 8.50%) vs. those without (all P values <0.001), whereas the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ. Compared with warfarin, treatment with NOACs nominally decreased the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (5.41% vs. 2.70%; odds ratio, OR; 95% confidence intervals, CI 0.51, 0.26–1.01; P=0.05; Figure), mainly of ischemic stroke (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.89; P=0.01), and the risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.42–0.61; P<0.001). In cancer patients receiving NOACs there was a significant reduction of major bleeding (3.95% vs. 4.66%; OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94; P=0.02; Figure) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.26% vs. 0.66%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.82; P=0.02) vs. warfarin, with no difference in gastrointestinal major bleeding rates. Conclusion AF patients on oral anticoagulation and concomitant cancer are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and all-cause mortality. NOACs may represent a safer and more effective alternative to warfarin also in this setting of patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2066-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Ganse ◽  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Isabelle Mahé ◽  
Olivier Hanon ◽  
Flore Jacoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Large Population ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Safety Effectiveness

Background and Purpose: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated. Results: Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS–matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40–0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63–0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81–1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56–0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78–1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with superior safety, effectiveness, and lower mortality than VKAs; with superior safety than rivaroxaban and similar safety to dabigatran; and with similar effectiveness when compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. These observational data suggest potentially important differences in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants, which should be explored in randomized trials.

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Octogenarians with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5268
Author(s):  
Clara Bonanad ◽  
Sergio García-Blas ◽  
Javier Torres Llergo ◽  
Rosa Fernández-Olmo ◽  
Pablo Díez-Villanueva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Warfarin Group

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been demonstrated to be more effective and safer than vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of DOACS vs. VKA in patients ≥ 80 and AF. Primary endpoints were stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause death. Secondary endpoints included major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding. A random-effects model was selected due to significant heterogeneity. A total of 147,067 patients from 16 studies were included, 71,913 (48.90%) treated with DOACs and 75,154 with VKA (51.10%). The stroke rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group (Relative risk (RR): 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–0.82; p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower in DOACs group compared with warfarin group (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70–0.96; p = 0.012). Compared to warfarin, DOACs were not associated with reductions in major bleeding (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.69–1.04; p = 0.108) or gastrointestinal bleeding risk (RR: 1.08, 95% CI 0.76–1.53; p = 0.678) but a 43% reduction of intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.47, IC 95% 0.36–0.60; p < 0.001) was observed. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that DOACs are effective and safe with statistical superiority when compared with warfarin in octogenarians with AF.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1166-1166
Author(s):  
Talha Aijaz ◽  
Okechukwu Nwabueze Obi ◽  
Nida Khokhar ◽  
Prasanth Lingamaneni ◽  
Muhammad Zain Farooq
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Control

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) were recently approved for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation for prevention of stroke and patient with venous thromboembolism (VTE) for the prevention of recurrent VTE. They have shown comparable efficacy and safety compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA). DOACS have uniform pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; hence, regular monitoring is not required. The morbidly obese patients may have increased volume of distribution and altered clearance which may alter the pharmacokinetics and consequently efficacy and safety of DOACS in these patients. 2016 International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis guideline recommends avoiding DOACS in a patient with body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 or with body weight >120 kg due to lack of clinical trials. There is no sizeable randomized control trial to study the outcome of DOACS in morbidly obese patients, but subgroup analysis of a major randomized control trials and observational studies may provide the data on the efficacy and safety of DOACS. We intend to utilize this data in this meta-analysis to study the effectiveness and safety of DOACS in morbidly obese patients. Methods: Eligibility Criteria- Randomized control trial, observational studies including patients above 18 years with BMI>40kg/m2, body weight>120 kg and history of atrial fibrillation or VTE who are taking DOACS or warfarin for therapeutic purpose were included in the analysis. Study Selection- We searched Medline and Cochrane database. 52 studies were identified and 43 remained after removing duplicates. After assessing full text for eligibility 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Statistical analysis- Statistical analysis was performed with Review manager 5.3 by the Cochrane Collaboration. Forest plot was used to analyze publication bias. Heterogeneity in the studies were analyzed with Cochran Q analysis and I2 statistics. Results: Population characteristics were available in four studies. The mean age of the population ranged from 61.7 to 66.8 years, and mean BMI ranged from 44.8 to 46.7 kg/m2 . I2 analysis showed that the studies included were homogeneous, so fixed-effect model was applied. The incidence of recurrent VTE, stroke, or death ranged from 1.5% to 7.3% in DOACS compared to 1.2% to 7.9% in warfarin except in one study by Kalani et al. where it was 26% in DOACS vs. 20% in warfarin. Relative risk was 0.96 (confidence interval 0.75 - 1.28, p 0.78) indicating there was no significant difference in the primary efficacy outcome between the two groups. The incidence of major bleeding ranged from 1.5% to 4.8% in DOACS compared to 2.6% to 6.1% in warfarin. Relative risk was 0.72 (confidence interval 0.56 - 0.93, p 0.01) indicating that the risk of major bleeding was low among patient using DOACS. Conclusion: Efficacy of DOACS is similar compared to VKA when used for prevention of recurrence in VTE or prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation in the patients with BMI>40 kg/m2 or bodyweight >120 kg. There was a trend towards a lower risk of bleeding in the patients with DOACS which is similar to the risk of major bleeding reported in non-obese patients in landmark randomized clinical trials. Only two studies included the patients with VTE, and additional studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of DOACS among morbidly obese individuals with VTE. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mhanna ◽  
A Beran ◽  
A Al-Abdouh ◽  
O Srour ◽  
W Abdulsattar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Warfarin Group

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, with an estimated prevalence between 1–4%. On the other hand, obesity continued to be a prevalent health issue worldwide. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly preferred over warfarin; however, The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) recommended avoiding the use of DOACs in patients with a BMI &gt;40 or weight &gt;120 kg because of limited clinical data in these patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular AF. Method We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases from database inception through January 2021, for all the studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of DOACs in morbidly obese patients with non-valvular AF. The primary outcome of interest was stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) rate. The secondary outcome was major bleeding (MB). All meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effect model. Results A total of 10 studies including 89,494 morbidly obese patients (BMI &gt;40 or weight &gt;120 kg) with non-valvular AF on oral anticoagulation therapy (45427 on DOACs vs. 44067 on warfarin) were included in the final analysis. One included study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), another study was a post hoc analysis of an RCT and the rest were retrospective cohort studies. The mean follow-up period was 1.8 years (range 8 months to 3.1 years). The SSE rate was significantly lower in DOACs group compared to warfarin group (odds ratio (OR): 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62, 0.81; p&lt;0.0001; I2=0%). MB rate was also significantly lower in DOACs group compared to the warfarin group (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46–0.78, P&lt;0.0001, I2=86%). Subgroup analysis in the rivaroxaban and apixaban AF cohort showed a statistically significant difference in SSE and MB event rates favoring both over warfarin therapy. Dabigatran showed non-inferiority to warfarin in SSE rate but superiority in the safety outcome. Conclusions Our meta-analysis demonstrated that DOACs are effective and safe when compared to warfarin in morbidly obese patients. However, more large scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in this cohort of patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Stroke and systemic embolism events Major bleeding events

Uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists during ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Brockmeyer ◽  
Y Lin ◽  
C Parco ◽  
A Karathanos ◽  
T Krieger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Abstract Background Uninterrupted anticoagulation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAAF) became standard of care after positive results of trials investigating vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Previous studies and meta-analyses of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) vs. VKA have given controversial results. We thus aimed to elucidate the risks and benefits of uninterrupted DOAC vs. VKA during CAAF in an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing uninterrupted DOAC to VKA in patients undergoing CAAF until September 2019. Data from retrieved studies were analysed in a comprehensive meta-analysis. Primary safety outcome was major bleeding; primary efficacy outcome was stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary outcomes included a composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA, minor bleeding, acute cerebral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (ACL) and mortality. Results Six eligible RCTs comprising 2,369 patients were included. Pooled meta-analysis showed no significant differences in DOAC vs. VKA concerning the rates of major bleeding (2.2% vs. 3.8%; odds ratio (OR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–1.56; p=0.37) and stroke or TIA (0.2% vs. 0.2%; OR 0.97, CI 0.20–4.72; p=0.97). There were no significant differences found in secondary outcomes (OR 0.73, p=0.49 for composite of major bleeding and stroke or TIA; OR 1.08, p=0.52 for minor bleeding; OR 1.12, p=0.59 for ACL; and OR=0.60, p=0.64 for all-cause mortality). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation with DOAC or VKA is characterized by a similar risk/benefit ratio in patients undergoing CAAF with comparable rates of major bleeding and stroke. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Medical faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document