Direct comparison of BNP and NT-proBNP for mortality prediction in patients with acute dyspnea
Abstract Background It is unclear whether BNP or NT-proBNP, their admission or discharge measurement or percentage change during hospitalization are preferable for mortality prediction in patients with acute dyspnea. Purpose To directly compare BNP and NT-proBNP regarding their potential in mortality prediction in patients with acute dyspnea and in patients with dyspnea due to AHF. Methods In a prospective multicenter diagnostic study the presence of AHF was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists among patients presenting with acute dyspnea. The levels of BNP and NT-proBNP were measured at presentation and discharge. Patients were stratified according to their natriuretic peptide response (responders vs. non-responders: natriuretic peptide decrease ≥25% vs. <25% before discharge). Prognostic accuracy for 720-day mortality was quantified using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC). Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify significant predictors for 720-day mortality. Results Among 1156 patients presenting with acute dyspnea, 353 (30.5%) died within 720 days of follow-up. Prognostic accuracy for death at 720 days was significantly higher for discharge compared to admission measurements for BNP (AUC 0.750 vs. 0.711, p<0.001) and NT-proBNP (AUC 0.769 vs. 0.720, p<0.001). When directly comparing discharge measurements, NT-proBNP levels exhibited a significantly higher accuracy (p=0.013). 632 (54.6%) and 600 (51.9%) patients were BNP and NT-proBNP non-responders, respectively. Among BNP and NT-proBNP non-responders 202 (32%) and 207 (34.5%) patients died within 720 days of follow-up. After adjusting for common covariates NTproBNP response was the strongest predictor for 720-day mortality in a Cox regression model (Hazard ratio for NT-proBNP non-responders: 2.096 (95% CI 1.550–2.835), p<0.001). Results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of 687 (59.4%) patients with adjudicated AHF. Conclusion Percentage change of NT-proBNP during hospitalization seems to be the strongest predictor for long-term mortality in patients with acute dyspnea in general and in those with dyspnea due to AHF in particular. ROC curve for direct comparison Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None