Epinephrine administration for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with refractory shockable rhythm: time-dependent propensity score-sequential matching analysis from a nationwide population-based registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasuku Matsuyama ◽  
Sho Komukai ◽  
Junichi Izawa ◽  
Koichiro Gibo ◽  
Masashi Okubo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Population Based Registry ◽  
Sequential Matching ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Aims Little is known about the effect of prehospital epinephrine administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with refractory shockable rhythm, for whom initial defibrillation was unsuccessful. Methods and results This study using Japanese nationwide population-based registry included all adult OHCA patients aged ≥18 years with refractory shockable rhythm between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients with or without epinephrine during cardiac arrest were sequentially matched using a risk set matching based on the time-dependent propensity scores within the same minute. The primary outcome was 1-month survival. The secondary outcomes included 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category scale: 1 or 2) and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Of the 499 944 patients registered in the database during the study period, 22 877 were included. Among them, 8467 (37.0%) received epinephrine. After time-dependent propensity score-sequential matching, 16 798 patients were included in the matched cohort. In the matched cohort, positive associations were observed between epinephrine and 1-month survival [epinephrine: 17.3% (1454/8399) vs. no epinephrine: 14.6% (1224/8399); RR 1.22 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.13–1.32)] and prehospital ROSC [epinephrine: 22.2% (1868/8399) vs. no epinephrine: 10.7% (900/8399); RR 2.07 (95% CI: 1.91–2.25)]. No significant positive association was observed between epinephrine and favourable neurological outcome [epinephrine: 7.8% (654/8399) vs. no epinephrine: 7.1% (611/8399); RR 1.13 (95% CI 0.998–1.27)]. Conclusion Using the nationwide population-based registry with time-dependent propensity score-sequential matching analysis, prehospital epinephrine administration in adult OHCA patients with refractory shockable rhythm was positively associated with 1-month survival and prehospital ROSC.

scholarly journals Pre-hospital advanced airway management for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: nationwide cohort study

BMJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. l430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichi Izawa ◽  
Sho Komukai ◽  
Koichiro Gibo ◽  
Masashi Okubo ◽  
Kosuke Kiyohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Adjusted Risk Ratio ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Sequential Matching ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Objective To determine survival associated with advanced airway management (AAM) compared with no AAM for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Design Cohort study between January 2014 and December 2016. Setting Nationwide, population based registry in Japan (All-Japan Utstein Registry). Participants Consecutive adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, separated into two sub-cohorts by their first documented electrocardiographic rhythm: shockable (ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia) and non-shockable (pulseless electrical activity or asystole). Patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were sequentially matched with patients at risk of AAM within the same minute on the basis of time dependent propensity scores. Main outcome measures Survival at one month or at hospital discharge within one month. Results Of the 310 620 patients eligible, 8459 (41.2%) of 20 516 in the shockable cohort and 121 890 (42.0%) of 290 104 in the non-shockable cohort received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. After time dependent propensity score sequential matching, 16 114 patients in the shockable cohort and 236 042 in the non-shockable cohort were matched at the same minute. In the shockable cohort, survival did not differ between patients with AAM and those with no AAM: 1546/8057 (19.2%) versus 1500/8057 (18.6%) (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.07). In the non-shockable cohort, patients with AAM had better survival than those with no AAM: 2696/118 021 (2.3%) versus 2127/118 021 (1.8%) (adjusted risk ratio 1.27, 1.20 to 1.35). Conclusions In the time dependent propensity score sequential matching for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults, AAM was not associated with survival among patients with shockable rhythm, whereas AAM was associated with better survival among patients with non-shockable rhythm.

Abstract 340: Effect of the 2015 CPR Guidelines for Patients With Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Non-Shockable Rhythm: Results From the All-Japan Utstein Registry

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
Naohiro Yonemoto ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Population Based Registry ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The 2015 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines have stressed that high-quality CPR improves survival from cardiac arrest (CA). In particular, the guidelines recommended that it is reasonable for rescuers to perform chest compressions at a rate of 100 to 120/min in adult CA patients. However, it is unknown whether the 2015 guidelines contributed to favorable neurological outcome in adult CA patients. The present study aimed to clarify the effects of the 2015 guidelines in adult CA patients, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of out-of-hospital CA (OHCA). Methods: From the data of this registry between 2011 and 2016, we included adult witnessed OHCA patients due to cardiac etiology, who had non-shockable rhythm, PEA and asystole, as an initial rhythm. Study patients were divided into two groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G), and the era of the 2015 guidelines (2015G). The endpoint was the favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 109,175 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 18,764 who received CPR based on 2015G and 90,411 who received CPR based on 2010G. The figure showed favorable neurological outcomes at 30 days in the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for 30-day favorable neurological outcome in 2015G patients as compared to 2010G patients was 1.28 (95%CI 1.11-1.46, p<0.001). Conclusion: In the OHCA patients with non-shockable rhythm, the 2015 guidelines were superior to the 2010 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.

scholarly journals Prior beta-blocker treatment improves outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with non-shockable rhythms

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Chun Huang ◽  
Ping-Hsun Yu ◽  
Min-Shan Tsai ◽  
Kuo-Liong Chien ◽  
Wen-Jone Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Population Based ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Medication Prescription ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractThe prognosis of out of cardiac arrest is poor and most cardiac arrest patients suffered from the non-shockable rhythm especially in patients without pre-existing cardiovascular diseases and medication prescription. Beta-blocker (ß-blocker) therapy has been shown to improve outcomes in cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, ischemia related cardiac, and brain injuries. Therefore, we investigated whether prior ß-blockers use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiac arrest and non-shockable rhythm. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using multivariate propensity score–based regression to control for differences among patients with cardiac arrest. A total of 104,568 adult patients suffering a non-traumatic and non-shockable rhythm cardiac arrest between 2005 and 2011 were identified. ß-blocker prescription at least 30 days prior to the cardiac arrest event was defines as the ß-blockers group. We chose 12.5 mg carvedilol as the cut-off value and defined greater or equal to carvedilol 12.5 mg per day and its equivalent dose as high-dose group. After multivariate propensity score–based logistic regression analysis, patients with prior ß-blockers use were associated with better 1-year survival [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.30; P = 0.031]. Compared to non-ß-blocker use group and prior low-dose ß-blockers use group, prior high-dose ß-blockers use group was associated with higher mechanical ventilator wean success rate (adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01–1.41, P = 0.042). In conclusion, prior high dose ß-blockers use was associated with a better 1-year survival and higher weaning rate in patients with non-shockable cardiac arrest.

Abstract 169: Association Between Time to First Administration of Epinephrine After Defibrillation and Outcome in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With Shockable Rhythm

Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji Kawakami ◽  
Yoshio Tahara ◽  
Teruo Noguchi ◽  
Satoshi Yasuda ◽  
Naohiro W Yonemoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients during shockable rhythm, the epinephrine administration after second defibrillation is recommended by the 2015 ILCOR/CoSTR guidelines. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the proper timing of epinephrine administration particularly in relation to defibrillation. Hypothesis: The timing of epinephrine after first defibrillation (D-E interval) was associated with clinical outcome in OHCA patients. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, we enrolled 753,025 OHCA patients from nationwide prospective population-based registry in Japan. Following exclusion criteria, a total of 1,559 patients with witnessed by bystanders and shockable rhythm on the initial electrocardiogram who administrated epinephrine after defibrillation by emergency medical service personnel and obtained return of spontaneous circulation in prehospital setting were eligible for the study. We evaluated the association between D-E interval and favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category: 1 or 2) at 30 days. To evaluate predictor for better neurological outcome, study patients were categorized as every 2 minutes up to 20 minutes, and more than 20 minutes. Results: Patients with favorable neurological outcome were 22% (N=348). Patients with favorable neurological outcome had a shorter D-E interval than those with non-favorable neurological outcome (7.9±4.1vs 10.2±5.3 min, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that D-E interval at more than 10 minutes, when D-E interval at 2 to 3 minutes as defined reference, was a significant predictor for non-favorable neurological outcome ( Table ). Conclusion: Delayed epinephrine administration after first defibrillation (D-E interval >10 minutes) was significantly associated with non-favorable neurological outcome.

Abstract 155: Effect of the 2010 CPR Guidelines for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Shockable Rhythm

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoji Watanabe ◽  
Tsukasa Yagi ◽  
Ken Nagao ◽  
Shigemasa Tani ◽  
Eizo Tachibana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Population Based Registry ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: The 2010 guidelines have stressed that systematic post-cardiac arrest care after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) can improve the likelihood of patient survival with good neurological outcome. Especially, the 2010 guidelines recommended that comatose adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest should be induced therapeutic hypothermia (Class I). However, it is unknown whether the post-cardiac arrest care which was recommended by the 2010 guidelines contributed to favorable neurological outcome. The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of the 2010 guidelines in patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest due to shockable rhythm, using the data of the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: From the data of this registry between 2005 and 2015, we included adult patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest due to cardiac etiology. Study patients were divided into three groups based on the different CPR guidelines; the era of the 2000 guidelines (2000G), the era of the 2005 guidelines (2005G), and the era of the 2010 guidelines (2010G). The primary endpoint was favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA. Results: The 30,518 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised 24,729 with ROSC before arrival at the hospital and 5,789 with ROSC after hospital arrival without prehospital ROSC. Figure showed favorable neurological outcome at 30 days in the three groups. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that the 2010 guidelines were an independent predictor of favorable neurological outcome at 30 days after OHCA, respectively (Figure). Conclusion: In the patients with ROSC after out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest, the 2010 guidelines were superior to the 2005 guidelines and the 2000 guidelines, in terms of neurological benefits.

Effects of Targeted Temperature Management in Patients with Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome after an Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Caused by Hanging: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Kakizaki ◽  
Naofumi Bunya ◽  
Shuji Uemura ◽  
Takehiko Kasai ◽  
Keigo Sawamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Targeted Temperature Management ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background: Targeted temperature management (TTM) is recommended for unconscious patients after a cardiac arrest. However, its effectiveness in patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) by hanging remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between TTM and favorable neurological outcomes in patients with PCAS by hanging.Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registry between June 2014 and December 2017 among patients with PCAS admitted to the hospitals after an OHCA caused by hanging. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the propensity score and to predict whether patients with PCAS by hanging receive TTM. We compared patients with PCAS by hanging who received TTM (TTM group) and those who did not (non-TTM group) using propensity score analysis.Results: A total of 199 patients with PCAS by hanging were enrolled in this study. Among them, 43 were assigned to the TTM group and 156 to the non-TTM group. Logistic regression model adjusted for propensity score revealed that TTM was not associated with favorable neurological outcome at 1-month (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27–6.96). Moreover, no difference was observed in the propensity score-matched cohort (adjusted OR: 0, 73, 95% CI: 0.10–4.71) and in the inverse probability of treatment weighting-matched cohort (adjusted OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.15–2.69).Conclusions: TTM was not associated with increased favorable neurological outcomes at 1-month in patients with PCAS after OHCA by hanging.

Abstract 12069: Long-Term Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Refractory and Non-Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Nehme ◽  
Emily Andrew ◽  
Jocasta Ball ◽  
Karen L Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Adjusted Logistic Regression ◽  
Population Based Registry

Introduction: Although many developed countries are reporting temporal improvements in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes from initial shockable rhythms, trends in the incidence and outcome of refractory ventricular fibrillation are not well understood. Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, we performed a retrospective observational study of OHCA from a population-based registry in Victoria, Australia. We included all adult, non-traumatic OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm. Temporal trends in incidence and survival to hospital discharge were compared across non-refractory and refractory OHCA, defined as cases receiving 3 or more consecutive shocks for a persistent shockable rhythm. Risk-adjusted logistic regression models were used to describe the year-on-year change in the likelihood of refractory OHCA and survival to hospital discharge. Results: Of the 7,267 initial shockable OHCA with an attempted resuscitation, 4168 (57.4%) and 3,099 (42.6%) were non-refractory and refractory OHCA, respectively. The proportion of cases with refractory OHCA declined over the study period from 48.4% in 2010 to 40.2% in 2019 (p trend <0.001). Unadjusted survival to hospital discharge was higher in non-refractory OHCA (46.3% vs. 25.8%, p<0.001), although both populations experienced increases in survival over time (p trend <0.05 for both). After adjustment for arrest confounders, the likelihood of refractory VF decreased by 4.4% every year (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97; p<0.001). Factors reducing the likelihood of refractory OHCA were female sex, bystander CPR, arrest witnessed by emergency medical services, and public location. In the survival model, refractory OHCA was independently associated with a reduction in survival to hospital discharge (AOR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.56; p<0.001). Temporal improvements in survival were observed year-on-year (AOR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; p<0.001) and this did not differ between non-refractory and refractory OHCA (group interaction, p = 0.51). Conclusions: The incidence of refractory OHCA is declining in our region and survival outcomes are improving. Further research identifying factors contributing to the decline in refractory OHCA may help to improve outcomes further.

Abstract 165: Hospital Variation in Time to Administration of Epinephrine After Cardiac Arrest With Initial Non-shockable Rhythm

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Khera ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Michael W Donnino ◽  
Saket Girotra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Hospital Performance ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Hospital Variation ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: For patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests due to non-shockable rhythms, delays in epinephrine administration beyond 5 minutes is associated with worse survival. However, the extent of hospital variation in delayed epinephrine administration and its impact on hospital-level outcomes is unknown. Methods: Within Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation, we identified 103,932 adult patients (>18 years) at 548 hospitals with an in-hospital cardiac arrest due to a non-shockable rhythm who received at least 1 dose of epinephrine between 2000 to 2014. We constructed two-level hierarchical regression models to quantify hospital variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration (>5 minutes) and its association with hospital rates of survival to discharge. Results: Among the 548 hospitals, there was substantial variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration (median 13.5%, range: 0%- 53.8%). The odds of delay in epinephrine administration were 61% higher at one randomly selected hospital compared to a similar patient at another randomly selected hospitals (median odds ratio [OR] 1.61; 95% C.I. 1.54 - 1.67). After adjusting for patient characteristics, the median risk-standardized survival rate for non-shockable in-hospital cardiac arrests was 12.1% and varied significantly across hospitals (range: 5.2% to 30.9%). There was an inverse correlation between a hospital’s rate of delayed epinephrine administration and its risk-standardized survival rate for cardiac arrests due to non-shockable rhythm (ρ= -0.23, P<0.0001). Compared to hospitals in the best quartile, risk-standardized survival was 17.4% lower at hospitals in the worst quartile of delayed epinephrine administration (13.8% vs. 11.4%, P<0.0001, Figure). Conclusions: Although delays in epinephrine administration following in-hospital cardiac arrest are common, there is substantial hospital variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration. Hospitals with high rates of delayed epinephrine administration were found to have lower rates of risk-adjusted survival. Further studies are needed to determine if improving hospital performance on time to epinephrine administration, especially at hospitals with poor performance on this metric will lead to improvement in outcomes.

Abstract 168: Association Between Prehospital Advanced Airway Management for Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Okubo ◽  
Sho Komukai ◽  
Junichi Izawa ◽  
Koichiro Gibo ◽  
Kosuke Kiyohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Favorable Functional Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether prehospital advanced airway management (AAM: endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device placement) for pediatric patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) improves patient outcomes. Objective: To test the hypothesis that prehospital advanced airway management during pediatric OHCA is associated with patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide, prospective, population-based OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 years) with OHCA in whom emergency medical services (EMS) personnel resuscitated and transported to medical institutions during 2014 and 2015. The primary outcome was one-month survival. Secondary outcome was one-month survival with favorable functional outcome, defined as cerebral performance category score 1 or 2. Patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by EMS personnel at any given minute were sequentially matched with patients at risk of receiving AAM within the same minutes based on time-dependent propensity score calculated from a competing risk regression model in which we treated prehospital return of spontaneous circulation as a competing risk event. Results: We included 2,548 patients; 1,017 (39.9%) were infants (<1 year), 839 (32.9%) were children (1 year to 12 years), and 692 (27.2%) were adolescents. Of the 2,548, included patients, 336 (13.2%) underwent prehospital AAM during cardiac arrest. In the time-dependent propensity score matched cohort (n = 642), there were no significant differences in one-month survival (AAM: 32/321 [10.0%] vs. no AAM: 27/321 [8.4%]; odds ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.80 to 2.21]) and one-month survival with favorable functional outcome (AAM: 6/321 [1.9%] vs. no AAM: 5/321 [1.6%]; odds ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.41 to 5.40]). Conclusions: Among pediatric patients with OHCA, we found no associations between prehospital AAM and favorable patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document