scholarly journals Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care of patients with acute aortic conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
X Yuan ◽  
U Rosendahl ◽  
G Asimakopoulos ◽  
C Quarto ◽  
B Rosser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Record System ◽  
Emergent Operation ◽  
Acute Aortic Syndromes ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Urgent Operation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic catastrophically interrupted medical care systems causing substantial decrease in the admission of patients and consecutively a sharp decline in the number of surgeries and interventions. In several European countries, the nationwide lockdown severely restricted movement which may have contributed to this phenomenon on top of anxiety of patients to contract COVID-19 when admitted to hospital. Purpose The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic onto acute and elective thoracic aortic surgeries and interventions and to compare the data with the same period in 2019 in a single aortic centre. Methods Information on admission and surgery/intervention was extracted from hospital electronic record system. Patients who were admitted for treatment of aortic conditions between January 1st to June 30th both in 2019 and 2020 were identified and selected for this analysis. The time from referral to admission and surgery/intervention was noted for service delay analysis. Aortopathies were classified as type A aortic dissection, type B aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm and others. In a daily central hub meeting, urgency was defined as emergent (operation required before the next working day), urgent (operation needed within 48 hours), and elective. Patients' condition and comorbidities were represented by ACEF II score. Results Total case volume of 81 in 2019 reference period was reduced to 70 in 2020 (−14%). Elective cases significantly declined from 59 (72.8%) in 2019 to 30 (42.8%) in 2020 (−49%). Urgent and emergent cases were performed more frequently in 2020 with 40 cases versus 22 in 2019 (+45%). The ACEF II score showed no difference for patients in both periods (2.1±1.9 vs. 2.5±2.1, p=0.221), however, a trend to higher ACEF II score in 2020 consistent with a higher proportion of urgent and emergent cases. The overall in-hospital delay (from admission to surgery) was not significant affected with 1 (IQR 1–2) versus 1 (IQR 0–2); p=0.991. However, with the official declaration of a pandemic and introduction of restrictions, no in-hospital delay was documented. In-hospital mortality was observed lower in 2019 as compared in 2020 (6.1% vs 11.4%, P=0.251). Conclusion The first wave of COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the aortic service, however, acute care for urgent thoracic aortic conditions and subsequent procedures even increased compared to 2019 as a result of both centralised allocation system and decline of elective cases. Acute aortic syndromes were managed despite COVID-19 according to current guidelines. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Impact of COVID on aortic case load

Abstract 14747: Dwindling Trends of Cardiology Admissions Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Center of Pakistan

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamshed Ali ◽  
Osman Faheem ◽  
Pirbhat Shams ◽  
ghufran adnan ◽  
Maria Khan
Keyword(s):  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Medical Attention ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Record System ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Social containment measures have been adopted globally to control COVID-19 outbreak. Reduction in hospital visits and inpatient admission rates have become cause for concern. Through this study we aimed to analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus Outbreak on cardiology inpatient admissions at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Hypothesis: COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant decline in cardiology admissions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at our center. Admission log was accessed via electronic record system. Comparison was made for same months of 2019 and 2020 with regard to cardiology inpatient admissions. Results: A total of 239 patients were admitted to cardiology services in 2019 period and 106 in 2020 period with resultant reduction of 55.6%. Number of patients admitted to the coronary care unit were 179 and 78 respectively where as the numbers declined to 28 from 60 for cardiac step down. Reduction for admission numbered to 52.4% for males and 38.89% for females. 9.3% patients left against medical advice in 2019 and 3.4% in 2020. Conclusions: Our study concludes that numbers of cardiology admissions have dwindled. Possible explanation for this can be implementation of social containment and fear of acquiring infection. This has raised a question of whether a significant number of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has occurred without seeking medical attention and has went unrecorded during the pandemic. This calls for stringent diagnostic measures in future to diagnose previously unrecorded burden.

scholarly journals Electronic Clinical Records for Physiotherapists

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Barry ◽  
Mark Jones ◽  
Karen Grimmer
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Data Retrieval ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Electronic Records ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Record System ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Electronic Record System

Purpose: This pilot study compared traditional (paper-based) and electronic (computerized) clinical physiotherapy records. The content of the records and the software’s user acceptability were considered. Methods: A neuro-musculoskeletal patient scenario involving two encounters (initial and follow-up) was scripted and role-played to each of three experienced physiotherapists (A, B and C). Participants assessed the patient and made traditional clinical records. After basic training in an electronic record system, they repeated the assessments and made electronic records via a laptop computer. Three experienced physiotherapists (A, D and E) each used their usual method to write a clinical report and an electronic record to write a report with the aid of the software’s report tool. The two participants who wrote reports but did not assess the patient (D and E) received a brief software demonstration just prior to writing the electronic record report. The electronic and traditional clinical records and reports were compared regarding their content and completion time. Participants recorded their expectations and experience of learning and using the electronic record system via questionnaires. Results: Participants expressed initial apprehension regarding an unfamiliar documentation system, but generally found the electronic system easy to learn and use. Some would have preferred additional customization options. All traditional records contained pages that lacked patient identification details. The electronic records contained more details related to symptoms, social circumstances and physical examination findings. The participants used more time for assessment and recording the initial examination when using the electronic system. Participants reported easier data retrieval from the computerized records than from the traditional records. Conclusions:The electronic clinical record system may prompt more complete recording and facilitate better patient record identification. These effects have implications for patient care, communication between providers and clinicians’ medico-legal protection. Further research is needed to determine the system’s efficiency and to clarify the impact of other characteristics of electronic record systems for physiotherapists.

scholarly journals P070 THE IMPACT OF THE COVID 19 PANDEMY ON HERNIA SURGERY IN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IN CZECH REPUBLIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbora Jíšová ◽  
Jakub Woleský ◽  
Barbora East
Keyword(s):  
Czech Republic ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hernia Surgery ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Record System ◽  
Medical Record System ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim The SARS- CoV-2 pandemic has greatly affected health care systems worldwide, including the Czech Republic. However, the degree to which Covid-19 has impacted on hernia surgery is unknown. The aim of this study was to review the hernia surgery workload in a large university teaching hospital department. Material and Methods A computer based medical record system was used to identify all patients undergoing elective and emergency hernia repair of all types from March 1 to November 30, 2020 and for a similar time period in 2019 at the Motol University Hospital, Prague. Results 194 elective hernia operations were undertaken over the study period in 2020, a reduction from the 285 over a similar period in 2019. The number of emergency hernia operations in 2020 was 13 compared to 25 in 2019. Conclusions The SARS –CoV- 2 pandemic has reduced both the number of elective and emergency hernia operations in 2020 compared to 2019. Time will tell if the reduced elective workload will subsequently increase the emergency hernia workload during the recovery from the pandemic.

scholarly journals Real-time assessment of COVID-19 impact on global surgical case volumes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas N. O’Reilly-Shah ◽  
Wil Van Cleve ◽  
Dustin R. Long ◽  
Vanessa Moll ◽  
Faye M. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Surgical Volume ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Surgical Case ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Usage Data

AbstractImportanceThe COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted global surgical capacity. The impact of the pandemic in low and middle income countries has the potential to worsen already strained access to surgical care. Timely assessment of surgical volumes in these countries remains challenging.ObjectiveTo determine whether usage data from a globally used anesthesiology calculator mobile application can serve as a proxy for global surgical case volume and contribute to monitoring of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in World Bank low income countries where official data collection is not currently practical.DesignSubset of data from an ongoing observational cohort study of users of the application collected from October 1, 2018 to April 18, 2020.SettingThe mobile application is available from public sources; users download and use the application per their own clinical needs on personal mobile devices.ParticipantsNo user data was excluded from the study.Exposure(s)Events with impacts on surgical case volumes, including weekends, holidays, and the COVID-19 pandemic.Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)It was previously noted that application usage was decreased on weekends and during winter holidays. We subsequently hypothesized that more detailed analysis would reveal impacts of country-specific or region-specific holidays on the volume of app use.Results4,300,975 data points from 92,878 unique users were analyzed. Physicians and other anesthesia providers comprised 85.8% of the study population. Application use was reduced on holidays and weekends and correlated with fluctuations in surgical volume. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with substantial reductions in app use globally and regionally. There was strong cross correlation between COVID-19 case count and reductions in app use. By country, there was a median global reduction in app use to 58% of baseline (interquartile range, 46%-75%). Application use in low-income continues to decline but in high-income countries has stabilized.Conclusions and RelevanceApplication usage metadata provides a real-time indicator of surgical volume. This data may be used to identify impacted regions where disruptions to surgical care are disproportionate or prolonged. A dashboard for continuous visualization of these data has been deployed.Key PointsQuestionCan usage data from a globally used anesthesiology calculator mobile application contribute to monitoring of the impacts to global surgical case volume caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in resource-limited environments such as World Bank low income countries?FindingsIn this ongoing observational cohort study, application usage data from 92,878 unique users in 221 countries was found to serve well as a qualitative proxy for surgical case volume, with clear impacts to app use during weekend, holidays, and during the COVID-19 pandemic.MeaningThis proxy of surgical volume will provide insight into the impact of and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic where official data collection is not currently practical. A real time dashboard tracking this proxy of global surgical volume is live and under continued development.

scholarly journals Impact of COVID-19 on Cleft Surgical Care

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162199600
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Ferry ◽  
Han Zhuang Beh ◽  
Rami P. Dibbs ◽  
Lesley W. Davies ◽  
Amy S. Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgical Volume ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Volume Number ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
The Impact

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has greatly impacted pediatric healthcare facilities throughout the United States due to widespread case rescheduling and the implementation of supplementary COVID-19 perioperative protocols. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the impact of COVID-19 on case volume, surgical timing, or operational aspects of cleft surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact that COVID-19 has had on cleft surgical care at our institution. Methods: A retrospective study comparing cleft surgical care in 2019 (the pre-pandemic cohort) and 2020 (the COVID-19 cohort) was designed. All patients who underwent a cleft surgical procedure from April 1st to August 31st in 2019 and 2020 were included for analysis. Procedures were stratified into 4 groups: primary cleft lip repairs, primary cleft palate repairs, alveolar bone grafting procedures, and revisional/secondary repair procedures. Variables investigated in this study included: surgical volume, number of patients receiving timely surgery, causes for untimely surgery, number of combined cases, number of delayed cases, delay time, time under anesthesia, and procedure length. Results: A total of 191 cleft surgeries, 102 in 2019 and 89 in 2020, were identified during the study period. We observed no statistically significant differences in cleft surgical volume and other investigated variables across all surgical subgroups from 2019 to 2020. Conclusion: Cleft surgical care was largely unaffected by COVID-19 despite high rates of case rescheduling and the addition of supplementary perioperative safety protocols. More studies are needed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on cleft surgical care at other cleft centers and to investigate the long-term outcomes of these patients.

Clavien-Dindo Analysis of NSQIP Data Objectively Measures Patient-Focused Quality

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 789-793
Author(s):  
Lori A. Gurien ◽  
Jin H. Ra ◽  
Marie Crandall ◽  
Andrew J. Kerwin ◽  
Joseph J. Tepas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Interval Change ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity ◽  
Improved Performance ◽  
The Impact

Current quality measures intended to drive improved clinical performance are perceived as an inappropriate administrative burden. Surgeon-constructed quality measures, including the NSQIP, are more closely aligned with provider performance and relevant outcome. We hypothesized that NSQIP participation would be associated with measurable improvement in surgical outcomes. Elective general surgical cases were compared by case volume and incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs) from 2014 to 2017. Using the Clavien-Dindo severity scaling system, we summed the grades for each AE and defined the patient population burden of these AEs as this sum divided by case volume. Case volume samples increased 67 per cent from 2014 (n = 526, 30 day complete) to 2017 (n = 878). Ratio of patient burden to case volume improved from 0.92 (2014) to 0.73 (2017). Comparison of AE incidence was not significantly different; however, the majority decreased over time. Analysis of individual AE interval change identified sepsis-related respiratory care as the top priority performance improvement target. These data reflect improved performance for a growing volume of surgical procedures. The impact of perioperative morbidity and their associated burden on affected patients has decreased, demonstrating the value of combining NSQIP with Clavien-Dindo to measure the quality of surgical care in objective and patient-specific terms.

Dermatology in primary care: an audit of the proportion of patients who present to general practice with a dermatological problem that could be self-managed

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711053
Author(s):  
Luamar Dolfini ◽  
Yogesh Patel
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Electronic Record ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Dry Skin ◽  
Record System ◽  
Common Skin

BackgroundA considerable proportion of GPs’ workload is dermatological. It is important to investigate what common skin conditions encountered in primary care can be self-managed, in an effort to alleviate the burden on primary care.AimThe purpose of the audit was to identify the proportion of consultations that are dermatological in nature and analyse potential for self-management by patients.MethodData was collected using the patient electronic record system (EMIS) in general practice. A search was made for all consultations from the 17 April to 15 May 2019, which included all new presenting complaints that were dermatological in nature. The criteria for self-management included advising over the counter (OTC) medication or reassurance. On the other hand, a case was deemed not self-manageable if prescription only medication (POM) was prescribed or if a referral to dermatology was made.ResultsThere were a total of 2175 consultations, where 246 (11.31%) cases were dermatological. Of the 246, 80 cases (32.5%) could be self-managed. There were 46 different dermatological presenting complaints of which the 5 most common included: rash (51 cases), dermatitis (44 cases), acne vulgaris (13 cases), moles (12 cases), dry skin (11 cases). None of the acne or moles cases could be self-managed, whereas 23%, 68.2%, 72.7% of rashes, dermatitis, and dry skin cases, respectively, could be self-managed.ConclusionCertain dermatological conditions have more potential for self-management than others. Research into teledermatology as a means of addressing patient concern and providing clinical information is important in order to reduce unnecessary consultations.

Meconium peritonitis: review of literature and own clinical observations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.N. Glavatskaya , O.V. Pribushenya , N.A. Venchikova
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Premature Birth ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Intestinal Wall ◽  
Meconium Peritonitis ◽  
Review Of Literature ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Loop Expansion ◽  
The Impact

Two clinical cases of meconium peritonitis in the fetuses are presented. The diagnosis was made prenatally at 30+5 and 20+1 weeks of gestation. The main ultrasound signs were ascites, loop expansion and thickening of the intestinal wall, peritoneal calcifications, meconium pseudocysts. In one case, pregnancy was complicated by polyhydramnios. In both cases, the pregnancy ended in premature birth, followed by surgical treatment during the first days of life. A review of the literature on the topic are discussed the etiology, the spectrum and frequency of ultrasound signs suggesting this condition in the fetus, the effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis, the prognosis for the life and health of the newborn, as well as the impact of the quality and timeliness of the prenatal diagnosis on the management of pregnancy and timeliness of surgical care for the newborn.

The impact of craniotomy for brain tumor case volume on patient safety indicators and in-hospital mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 106043
Author(s):  
Paul R. Clark ◽  
Robert J. Dambrino ◽  
Sean M. Himel ◽  
Zachary S. Smalley ◽  
Wondwosen K. Yimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Patient Safety Indicators ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The negative effects of COVID-19 and national lockdown on emergency surgery morbidity due to delayed access

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco A. Ciarleglio ◽  
Marta Rigoni ◽  
Liliana Mereu ◽  
Cai Tommaso ◽  
Alessandro Carrara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Close Correlation ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background The aim of this retrospective comparative study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 and delayed emergency department access on emergency surgery outcomes, by comparing the main clinical outcomes in the period March–May 2019 (group 1) with the same period during the national COVID-19 lockdown in Italy (March–May 2020, group 2). Methods A comparison (groups 1 versus 2) and subgroup analysis were performed between patients’ demographic, medical history, surgical, clinical and management characteristics. Results Two-hundred forty-six patients were included, 137 in group 1 and 109 in group 2 (p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the peri-operative characteristics of the two groups. A declared delay in access to hospital and preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were 15.5% and 5.8%, respectively in group 2. The overall morbidity (OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.08–4.55, p = 0.03) and 30-day mortality (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.33–5.50, =0.68) were significantly higher in group 2. The delayed access cohort showed a close correlation with increased morbidity (OR = 3.19, 95% CI 0.89–11.44, p = 0.07), blood transfusion (OR = 5.13, 95% CI 1.05–25.15, p = 0.04) and 30-day mortality risk (OR = 8.00, 95% CI 1.01–63.23, p = 0.05). SARS-CoV-2-positive patients had higher risk of blood transfusion (20% vs 7.8%, p = 0.37) and ICU admissions (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.17) and a longer median LOS (9 days vs 4 days, p = 0.11). Conclusions This article provides enhanced understanding of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient access to emergency surgical care. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 changed the quality of surgical care with poorer prognosis and higher morbidity rates. Delayed emergency department access and a “filter effect” induced by a fear of COVID-19 infection in the population resulted in only the most severe cases reaching the emergency department in time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document