5951The impact of regulatory T lymphocytes on long-term survival in patients with ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Sulzgruber ◽  
L Koller ◽  
S Blum ◽  
A Hammer ◽  
N Kazem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Heart failure with reduce ejection fraction (HFrEF) constitutes a global health issue representing a prevalent clinical syndrome. While pro-inflammatory cytokines proved to have a pivotal role in the development and progression of HFrEF, less attention has been paid to the cellular immunity. Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) seem to have an important role in the induction and maintenance of immune homeostasis especially in patients after acute coronary syndrome and coronary vessel disease. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of Tregs on the outcome of patients presenting with ischemic HFrEF. Methods We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with HFrEF defined by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class >II and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%. Patients were stratified in ischemic (iHFrEF, n=57) and dilated etiology (dHFrEF, n=55). Cells from fresh heparinized blood were stained and analyzed using BD FACS Canto II flow cytometry. Cox regression hazard analysis was used to assess the influence of Tregs on survival. The multivariate model was adjusted forage and gender. Results Comparing patients with iHFrEF to dHFrEF we found a significantly lower fraction of Tregs within lymphocytes in the ischemic subgroup (0.42% vs. 0.56%; p=0.009). After a mean follow-up time of 4.5 years 32 (28.6%) patients died due to cardiovascular causes. We found that Tregs were significantly associated with cardiovascular survival in the entire study cohort with an adjusted HR per one standard deviation (1-SD) of 0.60 (95% CI 0.39–0.92; p=0.017). Interestingly while there was no association with cardiovascular survival independently in the dHFrEFsubgroup (adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.62 (95% CI 0.17–2.31); p=0.486), we found a significant inverse association of Tregs and cardiovascular survival in patients with iHFrEFwith an adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.59 (95% CI 0.36–0.96; p=0.034). Figure 1. Survival Curves of Cardiovascular Mortality. Kaplan-Meier plots showing survival free of cardiovascular mortality in the total study collective (A) and patients stratified in ischemic CMP (B) as well dilative CMP (C) according to tertiles of frequencies of regulatory T cells. Tertile 1 = high; Tertile 2 = mid; Tertile 3 = low. Conclusion Our results indicate a potential influence of Tregs in the pathogenesis and progression of iHFrEF, fostering the implication of cellular immunity in iHFrEF pathophysiology and proving Tregs as a predictor for long-term survival among iHFrEF -patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Andreas Hammer ◽  
Patrick Sulzgruber ◽  
Lorenz Koller ◽  
Niema Kazem ◽  
Felix Hofer ◽  
...  

Background. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) constitutes a global health issue. While proinflammatory cytokines proved to have a pivotal role in the development and progression of HFrEF, less attention has been paid to the cellular immunity. Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs) seem to have an important role in the induction and maintenance of immune homeostasis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of Tregs on the outcome in HFrEF. Methods. We prospectively enrolled 112 patients with HFrEF and performed flow cytometry for cell phenotyping. Individuals were stratified in ischemic (iHFrEF, n=57) and nonischemic etiology (niHFrEF, n=55). Cox regression hazard analysis was used to assess the influence of Tregs on survival. Results. Comparing patients with iHFrEF to niHFrEF, we found a significantly lower fraction of Tregs within lymphocytes in the ischemic subgroup (0.42% vs. 0.56%; p=0.009). After a mean follow-up time of 4.5 years, 32 (28.6%) patients died due to cardiovascular causes. We found that Tregs were significantly associated with cardiovascular survival in the entire study cohort with an adjusted HR per one standard deviation (1-SD) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.39-0.92; p=0.017). A significant inverse association of Tregs and cardiovascular mortality in patients with iHFrEF with an adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.36-0.96; p=0.034) has been observed, while this association was not evident in the nonischemic subgroup (adj. HR per 1-SD of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.17-2.31); p=0.486). Conclusion. Our results indicate a potential influence of Tregs in the pathogenesis and progression of iHFrEF, fostering the implication of cellular immunity in iHFrEF pathophysiology and proving Tregs as a predictor for long-term survival among iHFrEF patients. A preview of this study has been presented at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology earlier this year.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Sargento ◽  
Andre Vicente Simões ◽  
Susana Longo ◽  
Nuno Lousada ◽  
Roberto Palma dos Reis

Background: Furosemide is associated with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Aim: To evaluate the association between daily furosemide dose prescribed during the dry state and long-term survival in stable, optimally medicated outpatients with HFrEF. Population and Methods: Two hundred sixty-six consecutive outpatients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, clinically stable in the dry state and on optimal heart failure therapy, were followed up for 3 years in a heart failure unit. The end point was all-cause death. There were no changes in New York Heart Association class and therapeutics, including diuretics, and no decompensation or hospitalization during 6 months. Furosemide doses were categorized as low or none (0-40 mg/d), intermediate (41-80 mg/d), and high (>80 mg). Cox regression was adjusted for significant confounders. Results: The 3-year mortality rate was 33.8%. Mean dose of furosemide was 57.3 ± 21.4 mg/d. A total of 47.6% of patients received the low dose, 42.1% the intermediate dose, and 2.3% the high dose. Receiver operating characteristics for death associated with furosemide dose showed an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.79; P < .001), and the best cutoff was >40 mg/d. An increasing daily dose of furosemide was associated with worse prognosis. Those receiving the intermediate dose (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.1; 95% CI: 2.57-6.64; P < .001) or high dose (HR = 19.8; 95% CI: 7.9-49.6; P < .001) had a higher risk of mortality compared to those receiving a low dose. Patients receiving >40 mg/d, in a propensity score–matched cohort, had a greater risk of mortality than those receiving a low dose (HR = 4.02; 95% CI: 1.8-8.8; P = .001) and those not receiving furosemide (HR = 3.9; 95% CI: 0.07-14.2; P = .039). Conclusion: Furosemide administration during the dry state in stable, optimally medicated outpatients with HFrEF is unfavorably associated with long-term survival. The threshold dose was 40 mg/d.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita B Khaira ◽  
Ellen Brinza ◽  
Gagan D Singh ◽  
Ezra A Amsterdam ◽  
Stephen W Waldo ◽  
...  

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.


Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (16) ◽  
pp. 1252-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Fröhlich ◽  
Niklas Rosenfeld ◽  
Tobias Täger ◽  
Kevin Goode ◽  
Syed Kazmi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo describe the epidemiology, long-term outcomes and temporal trends in mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from three European countries.MethodsWe identified 10 312 patients from the Norwegian HF Registry and the HF registries of the universities of Heidelberg, Germany, and Hull, UK. Patients were classified according to baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and time of enrolment (period 1: 1995–2005 vs period 2: 2006–2015). Predictors of mortality were analysed by use of univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.ResultsAmong 10 312 patients with stable HF, 7080 (68.7%), 2086 (20.2%) and 1146 (11.1%) were classified as having HFrEF, HFmrEF or HFpEF, respectively. A total of 4617 (44.8%) patients were included in period 1, and 5695 (55.2%) patients were included in period 2. Baseline characteristics significantly differed with respect to type of HF and time of enrolment. During a median follow-up of 66 (33–105) months, 5297 patients (51.4%) died. In multivariable analyses, survival was independent of LVEF category (p>0.05), while mortality was lower in period 2 as compared with period 1 (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91, p<0.001). Significant predictors of all-cause mortality regardless of HF category were increasing age, New York Heart Association functional class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and use of loop diuretics.ConclusionAmbulatory patients with HF stratified by LVEF represent different phenotypes. However, after adjusting for a wide range of covariates, long-term survival is independent of LVEF category. Outcome significantly improved during the last two decades irrespective from type of HF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1103-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan D. Anker ◽  
Martin Borggrefe ◽  
Hans Neuser ◽  
Marc‐Alexander Ohlow ◽  
Susanne Röger ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay G Smith ◽  
A. Selcuk Adabag ◽  
Alan K Berger ◽  
Russell V Luepker

Background: Long-term survival data on patients with heart failure (HF) in community-based populations are limited. Preserved ejection fraction (PEF) is present in 50-60% of HF patients. We examined whether trends in long-term survival differed between HF patients with preserved (ejection fraction >/= 45) and reduced ejection fraction (REF) in the context of modern treatment. Methods: The Minnesota Heart Survey, a community-based population study conducted in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, abstracted a random sample of hospital records for patients aged 35-84 with a discharge diagnosis of HF in 1995 and 2000. In the absence of a gold standard diagnosis of HF, hospitalization records that met at least four of six published classification algorithm definitions were considered HF related. Mortality was ascertained from medical records and by linkage to death certificates from the Department of Health. Kaplan-Meier was used for unadjusted survival and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Results: In 1995 1269 HF patients (PEF, n = 423; REF, n = 846) and in 2000 1103 HF patients (PEF, n = 413; REF, n = 690) were identified. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia were significantly higher in 2000; the utilization of ACE-Inhibitors, beta-blockers and revascularization were also significantly greater in 2000. In 1995, the unadjusted 9-year survival was 21% in REF and 28% in PEF; in 2000 these numbers were 28% in REF and 29% in PEF (Figure). After adjustment for sex and age the HR for 9-year mortality in 1995 was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.89) for HF patients with PEF compared to REF, p = 0.0003; in 2000 the adjusted HR for 9-year mortality in patients with PEF compared to REF was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.82 - 1.10), p = 0.48. Conclusion: Survival after a HF related hospitalization is low with less than 30% of patients surviving nine years. The increased utilization of ACE-Inhibitors and beta-blockers may partially explain the improved survival among HF patients with REF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document