377 Optimal timing for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients undergoing TAVI
Abstract Aims PCI timing in patients undergoing TAVI is still controversial, with most cases treated before TAVI, because of concerns about potential ischaemic complications during valve replacement. This study aims to compare procedural and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing PCI before or after TAVI. Methods and results Patients undergoing TAVI and PCI from 2010 to 2021 at Verona University Hospital were included. High-risk PCI were defined when performed in unprotected left main, proximal left anterior descending, proximal dominant right coronary artery or in 3-vessel disease. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of any TAVI procedural complication and in-hospital adverse events (VARC-3 criteria). 129/940 TAVI patients underwent PCI was performed before TAVI in 33.4% of cases. Most patients (76.4%) were at high-risk. The primary endpoint occurred in 30.2% PCI pre-TAVI vs. 23.3% post-TAVI (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.26–2.86; P = 0.671); and in 37.9% vs. 18.5% respectively, among high-risk PCI (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.86–3.76; P = 0.102). At 24 months, MACCE-free survival was comparable (PCI pre-TAVI 91.7% vs. post-TAVI 97.5%, HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.13–4.77, P = 0.765). Conclusions PCI performed after TAVI does not expose patients to higher risks of peri-procedural or long-term complications when compared with pre-TAVI procedures, even in presence of high-risk lesions. 377 FigureAn example of post-TAVI high risk PCI. Pre-TAVI coronary angiography showed ostial left main critical lesion (A). After Symetis Aortic valve deployment, balloon angioplasty and stent implantation were performed (B and C) with good final angiographic result (D).