scholarly journals 266 Deformation imaging by strain in chronic heart failure over sacubitril–valsartan: a multicentre echocardiographic registry (discover)—ARNI

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Elena Mandoli ◽  
Maria Concetta Pastore ◽  
Alberto Giannoni ◽  
Giovanni Benfari ◽  
Frank Lloyd Dini ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan have changed the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), due to the positive effects morbidity and mortality partly mediated by left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR). The aim of this multicentre study was to identify echocardiographic predictors of LVRR after sacubitril/valsartan administration. Methods and results Patients with HFrEF requiring therapy with sacubitril/valsartan from 13 Italian centres were included. Echocardiographic indexes including speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) indexes were used to predict LVRR [defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction and ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement > 10% at follow-up] at 6 months follow-up as the primary endpoint. Changes in symptoms (NYHA class) and neurohormonal activations [N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)] were also evaluated as secondary endpoints. The final population (excluding patients with poor acoustic windows and missing data) consists of 341 patients [mean age: 65 ± 10 years; 18% female, median LVEF 30% (interquartile range: 25–34)]. At 6 months follow-up, 82 (24%) patients showed early complete response (LVRR and LVEF ≥35%), 55 (16%) early incomplete response (LVRR and LVEF <35%), 204 (60%) no response (no LVRR and LVEF <35%). Non-ischaemic etiology, a lower left atrial volume index and a higher global longitudinal strain were all independent predictors of LVRR at multivariable logistic analysis (all P < 0.01). LA strain was the best predictor of positive changes in NYHA class and NT-proBNP (all P < 0.05) (Figure 1). Conclusions STE parameters at baseline could be useful to predict LVRR and clinical response to sacubitril-valsartan, and thus could be used as a guide for treatment in patients with HFrEF.

Author(s):  
Maria Concetta Pastore ◽  
Giulia Elena Mandoli ◽  
Alberto Giannoni ◽  
Giovanni Benfari ◽  
Frank Lloyd Dini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This sub-study deriving from a multicenter Italian register (DISCOVER-ARNI) investigated whether sacubitril/valsartan in adjunction of optimal medical therapy(OMT) could reduce the rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator(ICD) indications for primary prevention in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF) according to European guidelines indications, and its potential predictors. Methods In this observational study, consecutive patients with HFrEF eligible for sacubitril/valsartan from 13 Italian centers were included. Lack of follow-up or speckle tracking data represented exclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after 6 months from sacubitril/valsartan initiation. Results Of 351 patients, 225(64%) were ICD carriers and 126(36%) were not ICD carriers (of whom 13 had not indication) at baseline. After 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan, among 113 non-ICD carriers despite having baseline left ventricular (LV)EF≤35% and New York Heart Asscociation(NYHA) class=II-III, 69(60%) did not show ICD indications; 44(40%) still fulfilled ICD criteria. Age, atrial fibrillation, mitral regurgitation>moderate, left atrial volume index(LAVi), and LV global longitudinal strain(GLS) significantly varied between the groups. With ROC curves, age≥75 years, LAVi≥42ml/m2 and LV GLS≥-8.3% were associated with ICD indications persistence (AUC=0.65,=0.68,=0.68 respectively). With univariate and multivariate analysis, only LV GLS emerged as significant predictor of ICD indications at follow-up in different predictive models. Conclusions Sacubitril/valsartan may provide early improvement of NYHA class and LVEF, reducing the possible number of implanted ICD for primary prevention in HFrEF. Baseline reduced LV GLS was a strong marker of ICD indication despite OMT. Early therapy with sacubitril/valsartan may save infective/hemorrhagic risks and unnecessary costs deriving from ICDs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Concetta Pastore ◽  
Giulia Elena Mandoli ◽  
Alberto Giannoni ◽  
Giovanni Benfari ◽  
Frank Lloyd Dini ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims This sub-study deriving from a multicentre Italian register (DISCOVER-ARNI) investigated whether sacubitril/valsartan in adjunction of optimal medical therapy (OMT) could reduce the rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator(ICD) indications for primary prevention in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to European guidelines indications, and its potential predictors. Methods and results In this observational study, consecutive patients with HFrEF eligible for sacubitril/valsartan from 13 Italian centres were included. Lack of follow-up or speckle tracking data represented exclusion criteria. Demographic, clinical, biochemical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. Of 351 patients, 225 (64%) were ICD carriers and 126 (36%) were not ICD carriers (of whom 13 had not indication) at baseline. After 6 months of sacubitril/valsartan, among 113 non-ICD carriers despite having baseline left ventricular (LV)EF ≤ 35% and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class = II–III, 69(60%) did not show ICD indications; 44(40%) still fulfilled ICD criteria (Figure 1). Age, atrial fibrillation, mitral regurgitation>moderate, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) significantly varied between the groups. With ROC curves, age ≥ 75 years, LAVi ≥ 42 ml/m2 and LV GLS ≥ −8.3% were associated with ICD indications persistence (AUC = 0.65, 0.68, and 0.68, respectively). With univariate and multivariate analysis, age and LV GLS emerged as the only significant predictors of ICD indications at follow-up. Conclusions Sacubitril/valsartan provided early improvement of NYHA class and LVEF, reducing the possible number of implanted ICD for primary prevention in HFrEF. Baseline advanced age and reduced LV GLS were markers of ICD indication despite OMT. Early therapy with sacubitril/valsartan may save infective/haemorrhagic risks and unnecessary costs deriving from ICDs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-306
Author(s):  
Alexey S. Ryazanov ◽  
Evgenia V. Shikh ◽  
Konstantin I. Kapitonov ◽  
Mariya V. Makarovskaya ◽  
Alexey A. Kudryavtsev

Background. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality from cardiovascular diseases and the number of hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These benefits may be related to effects on hemodynamics and cardiac remodeling. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on aortic stiffness and cardiac remodeling compared with enalapril in HFrEF. Materials and methods. In this long-term outpatient study, 100 patients with HFrEF received sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril. The primary endpoint was the change in arterial impedance (aortic stiffness characteristic) over a 12-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints included changes in N-terminal cerebral natriuretic propeptide (NT-proBNP), ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, E/e index, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes; left ventricular-arterial index (Ea/Ees). Results. During 12 months of follow-up, 100 patients showed significant differences between the groups with respect to changes in arterial impedance, which decreased from 224.0 to 207.9 dynes s/ cm5 in the sacubitrile/valsartan group and increased from 213.5 to 214.1 dyne s/cm5 in the enalapril group (difference between groups: 9.3 dynes s/ cm5; 95% CI: from 16.9 to 12.8 dynes s/cm5; p = 0.69). Also, there were intergroup differences in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and Ea/Ees index. NT-proBNP level, left ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volume index, left atrial volume index, E/e index were reduced in the sacubitril/valsartan group. Conclusions. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril resulted in a significant reduction in aortic stiffness in HFrEF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Sakaguchi ◽  
A Yamada ◽  
M Hoshino ◽  
K Takada ◽  
N Hoshino ◽  
...  

Abstract Purposes We examined how changes in left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) were associated with prognosis in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after congestive heart failure (HF) admission. Methods We studied 123 consecutive patients (age 70 ± 15 years, 55% male) who had been hospitalized due to congestive HF with preserved LVEF (> 50%). The exclusion criteria were atrial fibrillation and inadequate echo image quality for strain analyses. The patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography and measurement of plasma NT-ProBNP levels on the same day at the time of hospital admission as well as in the stable condition after discharge. Differences in GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP (delta GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP ; 2nd – 1st measurements) were calculated. The study end points were all-cause mortality and cardiac events. Results Mean periods of echo performance after hospitalization were 2 ±1days (1st echo) and 240 ± 289 days (2nd echo), respectively. During the follow-up (974 ± 626 days), 12 patients died and 25 patients were hospitalized because of HF worsening. In multivariate analysis, delta GLS and follow-up GLS were prognostic factors, whereas baseline and follow-up LVEF, NT-ProBNP, changes in LVEF and NT-ProBNP could not predict cardiac events. Delta GLS (p = 0.002) turned out to be the best independent prognosticator. Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that -0.6% of delta GLS was the optimal cut-off value to predict cardiac events and mortality (sensitivity 76%, specificity 67%, AUC 0.75). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with delta GLS more than -0.6% experienced significantly less cardiac events during the follow-up period (p < 0.0001, log-rank). Conclusion A change in LV GLS after congestive HF admission was a predictor of the prognosis in patients with preserved LVEF. It would be useful to check the changes in GLS in those with preserved LVEF after discharge.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R W J Van Grootel ◽  
A T Van Den Hoven ◽  
D Bowen ◽  
T Ris ◽  
J W Roos-Hesselink ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Congenital aortic stenosis (AoS) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity but predictors for clinical outcome are scarce. Strain analysis provides a robust and reproducible method for early detection of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, which might be of prognostic value. Therefore we aimed to assess the prognostic value of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global longitudinal early diastolic strain rate (GLSre) with regard to cardiovascular events. Methods This prospective study, included clinically stable patients with congenital AoS between 2011–2013. LV GLS and GLSre was performed in the apical 4, 3 and 2-chamber views using Tomtec software. The endpoint was a composite of death, heart failure, hospitalization, arrhythmia, thrombo-embolic events and re-intervention. Results In total 138 patients were included (33 [26–43] years, 86 (62%) male), NYHA class I: 134 (97%). Mean LV GLS was −15.3±3.2%, GLSre 0.66±0.18 s–1. Both correlated with NT-proBNP, LV volumes and ejection fraction (strongest LV GLS with LV EF: r −0.539, p<0.001, strongest LV GLSre with age: r −0.376 p<0.001). During median follow-up of 5.9 [5.5–6.2] years, the endpoint occurred in 53 (38%) patients: 4 patients died, 9 developed heart failure, 22 arrhythmias, 8 thrombo-embolic events and 35 re-interventions. Both LV GLS (standardized HR (sHR 0.62 (95% CI 0.47–0.81) and GLSre (sHR 0.62 (95% CI 0.47–0.83) were associated with the endpoint. Additional multivariable analysis showed that both GLS and GLSre were associated independent of left atrial volume, NT-proBNP and prior re-interventions. Figure 1 Conclusion Left ventricular GLS and GLSre are reduced in adult patients with congenital AoS. Both markers are associated with adverse cardiac events and have clear clinical relevance Acknowledgement/Funding Erasmus Thorax Foundation


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1138-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Przewlocka-Kosmala ◽  
Thomas H Marwick ◽  
Andrzej Mysiak ◽  
Wojciech Kosowski ◽  
Wojciech Kosmala

Abstract Aims Improvement in left ventricular (LV) systolic reserve, including exertional increase in global longitudinal strain (GLS), may contribute to the clinical benefit from therapeutic interventions in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, GLS is an afterload-dependent parameter, and its measurements may not adequately reflect myocardial contractility recruitment with exercise. The estimation of myocardial work (MW) allows correction of GLS for changing afterload. We sought to investigate the associations of GLS and MW parameters with the response of exercise capacity to spironolactone in HFpEF. Methods and results We analysed 114 patients (67 ± 8 years) participating in the STRUCTURE study (57 randomized to spironolactone and 57 to placebo). Resting and immediately post-exercise echocardiograms were performed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. The following indices of MW were assessed: global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, and global work efficiency. The amelioration of exercise intolerance at follow-up in the spironolactone group was accompanied by a significant improvement in exertional increase in GCW (P = 0.002) but not in GLS and other MW parameters. Increase in exercise capacity at 6 months was independently correlated with change in exertional increase in GCW from baseline to follow-up (β = 0.24; P = 0.009) but not with GLS (P = 0.14); however, no significant interaction with the use of spironolactone on peak VO2 was found (P = 0.97). Conclusion GCW as a measure of LV contractile response to exertion is a better determinant of exercise capacity in HFpEF than GLS. Improvement in functional capacity during follow-up is associated with improvement in exertional increment of GCW.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman Lamaida ◽  
Antonio Cerciello

Abstract Aims The PARADIGM-HF trial proved the superiority of sacubitril/valsartan (Sa/Va) vs. enalapril in reducing mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Sacubitril/valsartan, new drug used in treatment of heart failure with reduced systolic function (HFrEF) has recently been shown to improve tolerance to exercise and cardiovascular performance. Methods and results We prospectively enrolled 40 outpatient patients with HFrEF with indication for therapy with sacubitril/valsartan and subjected to serial controls with blood tests, echocardiogram before and during gradual optimization of therapy, with the aim of evaluating the effects of the drug on left ventricular remodelling. We studied 40 patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan for at least 3 months. After a mean follow-up of 120 ± 40 days, 95% of patients reached the maximum dose of the drug without major side effects. The ejection fraction increased while end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes of the left ventricle decreased. We also observed a significant reduction in NT-proBNP values without significant worsening of renal function or hyperkalaemia. There NYHA functional class has improved with a positive impact on the prognosis of heart failure at 2 years (P = 0.006). Conclusions In our population, medium-term treatment with sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated a favourable effect on left ventricular remodelling and functional status, confirming the data of previous clinical trials in real life. One more follow-up long and a larger population will help confirm these to confirm these positive effects of the drug on patients with HfrEF.


Author(s):  
Jae‐Hyeong Park ◽  
In‐Chang Hwang ◽  
Jin Joo Park ◽  
Jun‐Bean Park ◽  
Goo‐Yeong Cho

Background Stroke is a major comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), especially in those with decreased left atrial (LA) function, and thus, identifying patients highly at risk of stroke can prevent its occurrence. We evaluated the predictive value of global longitudinal strain of LA (LAGLS) in patients with acute HF and sinus rhythm. Methods and Results In this retrospective study, 2461 patients (53.3% men, 69.7±14.4 years old) with sinus rhythm and LAGLS among 4312 consecutive patients with acute HF from 3 tertiary hospitals were included. HF phenotypes were defined as HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (left ventricular EF ≤40%), HF with midrange EF (40% <left ventricular EF <50%), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular EF ≥50%). Primary outcome was new‐onset stroke. The mean left ventricular EF was 39.4%±15.6%. Moreover, 1388 (57.5%), 342 (14.2%), and 682 (28.3%) were classified with HF with reduced EF, HF with midrange EF, and HF with preserved EF, retrospectively. LAGLS was 17.2%±10.4%. During the follow‐up duration (mean: 30.3±25.4 months), 100 patients experienced stroke. Patients with stroke had higher LA diameter ( P =0.031) and lower LAGLS ( P =0.010) than those without stroke. In the univariate analysis, age, diabetes mellitus, LA diameter, LA volume index, and LAGLS were significant risk factors for stroke. In the multivariate analysis, each 1% decrease in LAGLS was associated with a 3.8% increased risk for stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.038; 95% CI, 1.013–1.065; P =0.003). When applying a LAGLS cutoff point of 14.5%, patients with LAGLS <14.5% had approximately twice the risk for stroke after adjusting other significant variables (HR, 1.940; 95% CI, 1.269–2.965; P =0.002). Conclusions In patients with acute HF and sinus rhythm, decreased LAGLS (<14.5%) was associated with an increased risk for stroke, with an annual incidence of 2.38%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Monzo ◽  
Ilaria Ferrari ◽  
Carlo Gaudio ◽  
Francesco Cicogna ◽  
Claudia Tota ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%] despite ≥3 months of optimal medical therapy. Recent observations demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan induces beneficial reverse cardiac remodelling in eligible HFrEF patients. Given the pivotal role of LVEF in the selection of ICD candidates, we sought to assess the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on ICD eligibility and its predictors in HFrEF patients. Methods and results We retrospectively evaluated 48 chronic HFrEF patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan and previously implanted with an ICD in primary prevention. We assumed that ICD was no longer necessary if LVEF improved &gt;35% (or &gt; 30% in asymptomatics) at follow-up. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, sacubitril/valsartan induced a significant drop in LV end-systolic volume (−16.7 ml/m2, P = 0.023) and diameter (−6.8 mm, P = 0.022), resulting in a significant increase in LVEF (+3.9%, P &lt; 0.001). As a consequence, 40% of previously implanted patients resulted no more eligible for ICD at follow-up. NYHA class improved in the 50% of population. A dose-dependent effect was noted, with higher doses associated to more reverse remodelling. Among patients deemed no more eligible for ICD, lower NYHA class [odds ratio (OR): 3.73 (95% CI: 1.05–13.24), P = 0.041], better LVEF [OR: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.01–1.48), P = 0.032], and the treatment with the intermediate or high dose of sacubitril/valsartan [OR: 5.60 (1.15–27.1), P = 0.032] were the most important predictors of status change. Conclusions In symptomatic HFrEF patients, sacubitril/valsartan induced beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and improved NYHA class. These effects resulted in a significant reduction of patients deemed eligible for ICD in primary prevention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Castrichini ◽  
Paolo Manca ◽  
Vincenzo Nuzzi ◽  
Giulia Barbati ◽  
Antonio De Luca ◽  
...  

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, partially due to cardiac reverse remodeling (RR). Little is known about the RR rate in long-lasting HFrEF and the evolution of advanced echocardiographic parameters, despite their known prognostic impact in this setting. We sought to evaluate the rates of left ventricle (LV) and left atrial (LA) RR through standard and advanced echocardiographic imaging in a cohort of HFrEF patients, after the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan. A multi-parametric standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluation was performed at the moment of introduction of sacubitril/valsartan and at 3 to 18 months subsequent follow-up. LVRR was defined as an increase in the LV ejection fraction ≥10 points associated with a decrease ≥10% in indexed LV end-diastolic diameter; LARR was defined as a decrease >15% in the left atrium end-systolic volume. We analyzed 77 patients (65 ± 11 years old, 78% males, 40% ischemic etiology) with 76 (28–165) months since HFrEF diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 9 (interquartile range 6–14) months from the beginning of sacubitril/valsartan, LVRR occurred in 20 patients (26%) and LARR in 33 patients (43%). Moreover, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) improved from −8.3 ± 4% to −12 ± 4.7% (p < 0.001), total left atrial emptying fraction (TLAEF) from 28.2 ± 14.4% to 32.6 ± 13.7% (p = 0.01) and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) from 10.3 ± 6.9% to 13.7 ± 7.6% (p < 0.001). In HFrEF patients, despite a long history of the disease, the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan provides a rapid global (i.e., LV and LA) RR in >25% of cases, both at standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document