scholarly journals Indication and prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 972-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saori Asada ◽  
Hiroshi Morita ◽  
Atsuyuki Watanabe ◽  
Koji Nakagawa ◽  
Satoshi Nagase ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims To establish the indication for programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS), we evaluated the prognostic significance of PVS based on abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) markers. Methods and results One hundred and twenty-five asymptomatic patients with BrS were included. We performed PVS at two sites of the right ventricle with up to three extrastimuli [two pacing cycle lengths and minimum coupling interval (MCI) of 180 ms]. We followed the patients for 133 months and evaluated ventricular fibrillation (VF) events. Fragmented QRS (fQRS) and Tpeak-Tend (Tpe) interval were evaluated as ECG markers for identifying high-risk patients. Fragmented QRS and long Tpe interval (≥100 ms) were observed in 66 and 37 patients, respectively. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by PVS in 60 patients. During follow-up, 10 patients experienced VF events. Fragmented QRS, long Tpe interval, and PVS-induced VF with an MCI of 180 ms or up to two extrastimuli were associated with future VF events (fQRS: P = 0.015, Tpe ≥ 100 ms: P = 0.038, VF induction: P < 0.001). However, PVS-induced VF with an MCI of 200 ms was less specific (P = 0.049). The frequencies of ventricular tachyarrhythmia events during follow-up were 0%/year with no ECG markers and 0.1%/year with no VF induction. The existence of two ECG factors with induced VF was strongly associated with future VF events (event rate: 4.4%/year, P < 0.001), and the existence of one ECG factor with induced VF was also associated (event rate: 1.3%/year, P = 0.011). Conclusion We propose PVS with a strict protocol for asymptomatic patients with fQRS and/or long Tpe interval to identify high-risk patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Licciardello ◽  
Jacopo Marazzato ◽  
Michele Golino ◽  
Francesca Seganfreddo ◽  
Federica Matteo ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims According to European guidelines, aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is regarded as a I class recommendation for secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, the risk stratification of BrS patients for primary prevention ICD still represents a clinical conundrum. Although intracardiac electrophysiology (EP) study proved useful for the selection of high-risk patients in this setting. Therefore, aim of this study was to assess all clinical and EP variables associated with the induction of VA at EP study and the rate of appropriate/inappropriate ICD interventions and/or clinical SCD events in these patients occurring at follow-up. Methods and results From 2001 to 2021, all EP studies performed in symptomatic/asymptomatic patients (46 ± 14 years, M 88%) with/without family history of SCD spontaneous/drug-induced type I pattern (TIP) on ECG and no spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias were retrospectively considered at our study centre. Clinical variables, BrS pattern, EP study data (including right ventricular site and type of stimulation protocol), and ICD interventions (DC-shocks or Anti-Tachycardia Pacing events, ATP) and/or SCD events occurring at follow-up were all evaluated. EP study was deemed positive for any polymorphic VA induced during programmed ventricular stimulation; non-sustained episodes included. ICD was routinely implanted in all patients with a positive EP study. Follow-up data were detected by the collection of medical and home-monitoring recordings at study-site level. Follow-up data were available in 50 patients (9 ± 6 years on average). Patients were generally young with few cardiovascular comorbidities. SCD history was known in 21 (42%) with a significant number of asymptomatic patients (48%). Br patterns were equally distributed in the investigated population (spontaneous and drug-induced TIP in 52% and 48%, respectively) and AF history was fairly common (16%). In the study population, EP study tested positive in 30 patients (60%): spontaneous TIP (P = 0.0518), few extrastimuli during programmed ventricular stimulation (P = 0.0015), and right ventricular stimulation at the apical site (P ≤ 0.0001) were the only variables to be clearly associated with a positive EP study in the appraised patients. At follow-up, appropriate ICD shocks were documented in 4 out of 30 implanted patients (13%) at generally 5 ± 7 years from EP study evaluation. Although three ICD interventions (75%) occurred in patients with spontaneous TIP, one patient with drug-induced TIP pattern and positive EP study referred to Emergency Department for unrelenting VT storm after roughly 13 years from ICD implantation. Inappropriate ICD interventions for fast rate AF were detected in 10% of cases. Finally, no SCD events were documented at follow up in patients with a negative EP study. Conclusions In a retrospective analysis, EP study proved useful in the risk stratification of SCD in BrS patients. A few ventricular extrastimuli delivered at the right ventricular apex seem sufficient to prompt the induction of life-threatening VA in high-risk BrS patients during EP study. Moreover, in this setting, a negative EP study seems protective against the development of VA/SCD events at follow-up. However, not only is spontaneous TIP associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic death, but a drug-induced TIP, generally regarded as a low-risk condition, might also be associated with a long-term hazard of SCD in these patients.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Takagi ◽  
Yasuhiro Yokoyama ◽  
Kazutaka Aonuma ◽  
Naohiko Aihara ◽  
Masayasu Hiraoka

Background Neither the clinical characteristics nor risk stratification of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome have been clearly determined. We compared clinical and ECG characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome to identify new markers for distinguishing high- from low-risk patients. Methods A total of 216 consecutive individuals with Brugada syndrome (mean age 52±14 years, 197 males) were enrolled in the Japan Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation Study (J-IVFS). Clinical and ECG characteristics were compared among 3 groups of patients: VF group; patients with aborted sudden death and documented VF (N=34), Syncope (Sy) group; patients with syncope without documented VF (N=70), and Asymptomatic (As) group; subjects without symptoms (N=112). Comparisons were made among the 3 groups as well as between the symptomatic (VF/Sy) and asymptomatic (As) groups. Short-term prognosis was also compared among the 3 groups, and between the VF/Sy and As groups. Results 1) Clinical characteristics: incidence of past history of AF was significantly higher in the VF and Sy groups than in the AS group (26, 26, and 12 %, respectively; [p=0.04]), though no other clinical parameters differed among the groups. 2) On resting 12-lead ECG, r-J interval (interval from QRS onset to J point) in lead V2 and QRS duration in lead V6 were highest in the VF group (104, 98, and 92 msec in V2 [p<0.001]; 106, 103, and 94 msec in V6 [p<0.0001], respectively, VF vs. Sy vs. As). 3) Positive late potential and inducibility of VF by EPS did not differ in incidence among the 3 groups. 4) Clinical follow-up: during a mean follow-up of 36±16 months, incidence of cardiac events (sudden death and/or VF) was higher in the VF/Sy groups than in the As group (29, 8, and 0 %, respectively [p<0.001]). Multivariate analysis showed that the frequencies of r-J interval ≥ 90 msec in lead V2 and QRS duration ≥ 90 msec in lead V6 were significantly higher in patients with cardiac events (p=0.02, 0.02, respectively). Conclusions In symptomatic patients, prolonged ventricular depolarization in precordial leads of the ECG was prominent in the VF group, and this sign can be used to distinguish high- from low-risk patients with Brugada syndrome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 680-690
Author(s):  
Michiel C. Mommersteeg ◽  
Stella A. V. Nieuwenburg ◽  
Wouter J. den Hollander ◽  
Lisanne Holster ◽  
Caroline M. den Hoed ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. Methods This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. Results 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. Conclusion One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%.


Author(s):  
Laura C. Blomaard ◽  
Bas de Groot ◽  
Jacinta A. Lucke ◽  
Jelle de Gelder ◽  
Anja M. Booijen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementation of the acutely presenting older patient (APOP) screening program for older patients in routine emergency department (ED) care shortly after implementation. Methods We conducted an implementation study with before-after design, using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model for quality improvement, in the ED of a Dutch academic hospital. All consecutive patients ≥ 70 years during 2 months before and after implementation were included. The APOP program comprises screening for risk of functional decline, mortality and cognitive impairment, targeted interventions for high-risk patients and education of professionals. Outcome measures were compliance with interventions and impact on ED process, length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission rate. Results Two comparable groups of patients (median age 77 years) were included before (n = 920) and after (n = 953) implementation. After implementation 560 (59%) patients were screened of which 190 (34%) were high-risk patients. Some of the program interventions for high-risk patients in the ED were adhered to, some were not. More hospitalized patients received comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) after implementation (21% before vs. 31% after; p = 0.002). In 89% of high-risk patients who were discharged to home, telephone follow-up was initiated. Implementation did not influence median ED LOS (202 min before vs. 196 min after; p = 0.152) or hospital admission rate (40% before vs. 39% after; p = 0.410). Conclusion Implementation of the APOP screening program in routine ED care did not negatively impact the ED process and resulted in an increase of CGA and telephone follow-up in older patients. Future studies should investigate whether sustainable changes in management and patient outcomes occur after more PDSA cycles.


Author(s):  
Grischa Hoffmann ◽  
Christine Friedrich ◽  
Katharina Huenges ◽  
Rainer Petzina ◽  
Astrid-Mareike Vogt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background High-risk patients with multivessel disease (MVD) including a complex stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary may not be ideal candidates for guideline compliant therapy by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) regarding invasiveness and perioperative complications. However, they may benefit from minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting and hybrid revascularization (HCR). Methods A logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation score (logES) >10% defined high risk. In high-risk patients with MVD undergoing MIDCAB or HCR, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) after 30 days and during midterm follow-up was evaluated. Results Out of 1,250 patients undergoing MIDCAB at our institution between 1998 and 2015, 78 patients (logES: 18.5%; age, 76.7 ± 8.6 years) met the inclusion criteria. During the first 30 days, mortality and rate of MACCE were 9.0%; early mortality was two-fold overestimated by logES. Complete revascularization as scheduled was finally achieved in 64 patients (82.1%). Median follow-up time reached 3.4 (1.2–6.5) years with a median survival time of 4.7 years. Survival after 1, 3, and 5 years was 77, 62, and 48%. Conclusion In high-risk patients with MVD, MIDCAB is associated with acceptable early outcome which is better than predicted by logES. Taking the high-risk profile into consideration, midterm follow-up showed satisfying results, although scheduled HCR was not realized in a relevant proportion. In selected cases of MVD, MIDCAB presents an acceptable alternative for high-risk patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document