scholarly journals Accuracy of upper endoscopies with random biopsies to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions who can safely be exempt from surveillance

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 680-690
Author(s):  
Michiel C. Mommersteeg ◽  
Stella A. V. Nieuwenburg ◽  
Wouter J. den Hollander ◽  
Lisanne Holster ◽  
Caroline M. den Hoed ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Guidelines recommend endoscopy with biopsies to stratify patients with gastric premalignant lesions (GPL) to high and low progression risk. High-risk patients are recommended to undergo surveillance. We aimed to assess the accuracy of guideline recommendations to identify low-risk patients, who can safely be discharged from surveillance. Methods This study includes patients with GPL. Patients underwent at least two endoscopies with an interval of 1–6 years. Patients were defined ‘low risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for discharge, and ‘high risk’ if they fulfilled requirements for surveillance, according to European guidelines (MAPS-2012, updated MAPS-2019, BSG). Patients defined ‘low risk’ with progression of disease during follow-up (FU) were considered ‘misclassified’ as low risk. Results 334 patients (median age 60 years IQR11; 48.7% male) were included and followed for a median of 48 months. At baseline, 181/334 (54%) patients were defined low risk. Of these, 32.6% were ‘misclassified’, showing progression of disease during FU. If MAPS-2019 were followed, 169/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.5% were ‘misclassified’. If BSG were followed, 174/334 (51%) patients were defined low risk, of which 32.2% were ‘misclassified’. Seven patients developed gastric cancer (GC) or dysplasia, four patients were ‘misclassified’ based on MAPS-2012 and three on MAPS-2019 and BSG. By performing one additional endoscopy 72.9% (95% CI 62.4–83.3) of high-risk patients and all patients who developed GC or dysplasia were identified. Conclusion One-third of patients that would have been discharged from GC surveillance, appeared to be ‘misclassified’ as low risk. One additional endoscopy will reduce this risk by 70%.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 378-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Christa Dreezen ◽  
Sun Tian ◽  
...  

378 Background: Although the benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and has been validated in public datasets, independent European patient cohorts and technical studies (Salazar 2011 JCO, Maak 2012 Ann Surg). Methods: In this study, the commercial ColoPrint test was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2003 to 2009. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. The 64-gene MSI-signature developed to identify patients with deficient mismatch repair system (Tian 2012 J Path) was evaluated for its accuracy to identify MSI patients and also for prognosis. Results: In this cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at low risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.6% for Low Risk and 78.4% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.33 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. The MSI-signature classified 47 patients (24.6%) as MSI-H and most MSI-H patients were ColoPrint low risk (81%). Patients who were ColoPrint low risk and MSI-H by signature had the best outcome with a 3-year RFS of 95% while patients with ColoPrint high risk had a worse outcome independently of the MSI-status. Low risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (90.1% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 91.4% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint high risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70.1% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.026). Conclusions: The combination of ColoPrint and MSI-Print improves the prognostic accuracy in stage II and stage III patients and may help the identification of patients at higher risk who are more likely to benefit from additional treatment


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Yue Wang

122 Background: The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial in stage IB gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to offer a reference for the rational indications of AT. Methods: We retrospectively included 1935 stage IB GC patients who experienced curative surgery from the SEER database between 2004 and 2015. These patients were allocated into two groups: Group AT and Group surgery alone (Group SA). Risk factors associated with AT were examined using univariate/multivariate analyses. A nomogram to project overall survival (OS) of AT was established and internally validated. Results: Five variables, which were significantly related with OS of AT, were incorporated in the nomogram. These variables were sex, age, examined lymph nodes, tumor site, and family income. The C-index of the model was 0.636 and the calibration curve showed that the anticipated values were in accordance with the actual values. The decision curve demonstrated that the optimal clinical impact was achieved when the threshold possibility was 0-47%. Then the entire cohort was separated into low-risk (≤107 points) as well as high-risk ( > 107 points) groups based on the projected 5-year OS. Group SA revealed a significantly poorer OS than Group AT for high-risk patients (P < 0.001); on the other hand, there was a comparable OS for low-risk patients (P = 0.067). Conclusions: We have developed an effective, intuitional and applied prognostic tool based on nomogram to clinical decision-making. For stage IB GC after surgical resection, AT was only recommended for high-risk patients. However, AT may be dispensable for low-risk patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2018-2018
Author(s):  
E. Franceschi ◽  
A. Tosoni ◽  
M. Ermani ◽  
V. Blatt ◽  
P. Amistà ◽  
...  

2018 Background: Due to the rarity of medulloblastoma (MB) in adults, the few studies available on this condition are retrospective, and the follow-up tends to be short. Furthermore, the different therapeutic strategies used in these patients makes it difficult to assess survival rates and prognostic factors. Methods: Between January 1989 and February 2001, a prospective phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of treatment for adults with medulloblastoma. Patients were completely staged with a neuroradiological examination of the brain and neuraxis and by CSF cytology, according to Chang’s staging system. Low risk patients received radiotherapy alone, while high risk patients were given 2 cycles of upfront chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of the preliminary analysis of this study at a median follow-up of 3.7 years are reported elsewhere. The present papers reports on the long- term results of the same trial. Results: After a median follow up of 7.6 years, among a total of 36 enrolled adults with medulloblastoma, overall progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 72% (range 59% to 84%) and 75% (62% to 91%), respectively. No difference was found between low and high risk patients in terms of PFS and OS at 5 years: in low-risk patients the 5-year PFS was 80% (range, 59–100%) and the 5-year OS, 80% (range, 58 - 100%); in high-risk patients the 5-year PFS was 69% (range, 54 -89%) and the 5-year OS, 73% (range, 58 - 92%). Conclusions: A long-term follow-up is essential to evaluate the real impact of treatments in adult patients with MB. Since there is no significant difference between low-risk and high-risk patients for PFS and OS, the use of chemotherapy is also questionable in low-risk patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Ariel Han ◽  
Karin Chun Hayes ◽  
Tracy Woody ◽  
Frank Valone ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with an increased production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Most frequent treatment includes phlebotomy, hydroxyurea, interferon, and ruxolitinib. Current NCCN guideline recommends managing HCT levels to below 45%. The objective of this study was to determine real-world standards of care and patient characteristics, and to observe how treatment decisions vary by HCT level and thrombosis risk. METHODOLOGY We conducted a retrospective study using Symphony Health's longitudinal transactional healthcare claims database that includes prescription, medical and hospital claims across &gt; 4,900 US payers representing 86% of US lives. Eligible patients had at least one ICD-10 diagnosis code for PV and at least one of the treatments including phlebotomy, hydroxyurea, busulfan, interferon, and ruxolitinib between Jan 1, 2018 and Dec 31, 2019 (index period). For eligible patients, all prior treatment history initiated as far back as January 2010 was used to report therapy changes. Patients were also required to have at least one PV diagnosis within a year of treatment initiation and at least 2 HCT lab results during the index period. PV treatment changes and characteristics were studied. RESULTS Out of 28,306 patients with PV, 4,264 patients had HCT lab data for 2 years (index period). Median duration of follow-up was 854 days (range 98-3,373days). Patient therapy duration was from 1 to 9 years. Median patient age was 65 (range 11-94), with 1,451 (34%) patients aged less than 60, 2,813 (66%) 60 years or older, and a substantial male predominance (62% vs 38%). 1,247 (29%) patients were classified as Low Risk (age&lt; 60 with no TE history) and 3,017 (71%) patients as High Risk. Within the High-Risk group, 2,224 (52%) were age&gt;60 without prior TE, 204 (5%) were age&lt;60 with prior TE and 589 (14%) were age&gt;60 with prior TE. For Low Risk patients' initial treatment was phlebotomy alone (85%) and a total of 73% of all Low Risk patients remained on phlebotomy alone. For High Risk patients' initial treatment was phlebotomy alone (60%) and 43% all of High-Risk patients remained on phlebotomy alone (Figure 1). The median HCT prior to treatment initiation was 52.9% and 48% during treatment. 936 (22%) patients achieved NCCN treatment guidelines with HCT levels always remaining under 45%, and 1,226 (29%) patients had HCT levels controlled between 45% and 50%. However, 2,102 (49%) patients had some or all HCT levels&gt; 50% (Figure 2). With the most recent lab test, 2,180 (51%) of patients still had HCTs above 45% and 804 (19%) were still above 50%. In a sub-cohort of 653 High Risk patients with a prior TE and up to 5 years of follow up, 236 (36%) had at least one other TE; for the 1,774 High Risk patients who did not have the history of thrombosis, 161(9%) had at least one TE (Table 2). The most common TE since treatment began in patients with prior TE were deep vein thrombosis (n= 92 patients, 14%) and stroke (n= 95 patients, 15%). Among High Risk patients (n=397) who had another thrombotic event, 180 (45%) were treated by phlebotomy only and never switched to any other therapies. CONCLUSIONS Despite currently available treatments in US, patients' HCT level after treatment were higher than recommended as per guidelines. Failure to maintain HCT less than 45% increases the risk of future thrombotic events as shown by 36% of patients with prior TE experiencing another TE within the next 5 years. Disclosures Verstovsek: Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding. Han:Protagonist Therapeutics: Consultancy. Chun Hayes:Protagonist: Consultancy. Woody:Protagonist: Current Employment. Valone:Protagonist: Current Employment. Gupta:Protagonist: Current Employment.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 3469-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elihu Estey ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
...  

We examined whether combining all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) might be an alternative to ATRA plus chemotherapy in untreated acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Twenty-five low-risk patients (white blood cell [WBC] count less than 10 × 109/L [10 000/μL]) received ATRA (45 mg/m2 daily) and ATO (0.15 mg/kg daily, beginning day 10 of ATRA), and in complete remission (CR) received ATO plus ATRA, without chemotherapy, unless they were reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–positive 3 months from CR date or had molecular relapse. Nineteen high-risk patients were treated identically, but received chemotherapy, generally 9 mg/m2 gemtuzumab ozogamycin (GO) on day 1 of induction. The CR rate was 39 of 44 (24 of 25 in low-risk, 15 of 19 in high-risk). Disease recurred at 9, 9, and 15 months, respectively, in 3 high-risk patients. The median follow-up time from CR date in the 36 patients alive in first CR is 16 months (15 months in low-risk, 20 months in high-risk), with 9 patients followed for at least 24 months. Each of the 36 patients was PCR-negative at last follow-up. Thus, none of the low-risk patients has received chemotherapy, and only 3 high-risk patients (the 3 with relapsed disease) have received chemotherapy past induction. ATRA plus ATO may serve as an alternative to chemotherapy in low-risk untreated APL (eg, in older patients) and, when combined with GO, may improve outcome in high-risk patients.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Ferdows Atiq ◽  
Esmee Wuijster ◽  
Moniek P.M. de Maat ◽  
Marieke J.H.A. Kruip ◽  
Marjon H. Cnossen ◽  
...  

Introduction Although large studies have recently provided valuable insights on the diagnosis, bleeding phenotype, and treatment outcomes of VWD patients, these aspects remain poorly understood in individuals with low VWF. Firstly, there is no clear evidence which cut-off value should be used to diagnose low VWF. Although 0.50 IU/mL is the most recommended cut-off value, some centers use the lower limit of normal (0.60 IU/mL). Secondly, the incidence of post-surgical bleeding, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and traumatic- or spontaneous bleeding after diagnosis of low VWF are still unknown. Lastly, it is hard to predict which individuals with low VWF have an increased bleeding risk. Therefore, we investigated the bleeding phenotype of individuals with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31-0.50 IU/mL and 0.51-0.60 IU/mL, and the incidence of post-surgical bleeding, PPH and traumatic- and spontaneous bleeding after their initial diagnosis of "low VWF". Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 2007 to November 2019 at the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam. All patients evaluated for the presence of a bleeding disorder with VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and/or VWF activity (VWF:Act) and/or VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB) levels between 0.31-0.60 IU/mL, were included. Patients with VWF:Ag and/or VWF:Act and/or VWF:CB ≤0.30 IU/mL, acquired VWD and those with a concomitant bleeding disorder were excluded. For each individual we collected data from electronic patient files on baseline characteristics, reason for referral, family history of bleeding disorders, ISTH-BAT and laboratory measurements at diagnosis. Retrospective follow-up started from initial date of low VWF diagnosis through November 2019, during which we collected data on surgical procedures, pregnancies, and incidence of spontaneous- and traumatic bleeding. Results We included 439 patients; 269 patients with historically lowest VWF levels 0.31-0.50 IU/mL and 170 patients 0.51-0.60 IU/mL. Mean age at diagnosis was 28.8 ±17.7 years. Most patients were female (74.3%) and had blood group O (76.4%, Table 1). The bleeding score (BS) was similar in patients with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31-0.50 IU/mL (3.7 ±3.0) and 0.51-0.60 IU/mL (4.0 ±2.9, p=0.209, Table 1). During the mean follow-up period of 6.3 ±3.7 years, 259 surgical procedures were performed in 146 patients, 81 deliveries in 56 women, and 109 spontaneous- or traumatic bleedings in 71 patients. The incidence of post-surgical bleeding was 7 (2.7%) during follow-up, whereas 8 deliveries (10%) were complicated by PPH. Overall, 65 out of 439 patients (14.8%) had a bleeding episode requiring treatment during follow-up, resulting in an incidence of bleeding requiring treatment of 0.5 ±1.9 per patient per decade. No difference was found in the incidence of bleeding requiring treatment between patients with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31-0.50 IU/mL and 0.51-0.60 IU/mL (Figure 2A, p=0.154). We found that referral for a personal bleeding diathesis, a younger age at diagnosis and an abnormal BS at diagnosis were strong and independent risk factors for bleeding requiring treatment during follow-up, respectively HR=2.32 (95%CI: 1.16-4.63), HR=1.18 (95%CI: 1.01-1.38) and HR=1.77 (95%CI: 1.04-3.01). These risk factors were combined to develop a risk score to identify low VWF patients with an increased risk for bleeding requiring treatment (Figure 2B). The risk score performed excellent to differentiate in bleeding requiring treatment between low risk, intermediate risk and high risk patients (p&lt;0.001, Figure 2C). The number of patients with bleeding requiring treatment was 8/126 (6.3%) in patients with low risk, 18/143 (12.6%) in intermediate risk and 39/170 (22.9%) in high risk patients (p&lt;0.001). Likewise, the incidence of bleeding requiring treatment per patient per decade was 0.22 ±1.08 in low risk, 0.28 ±1.25 in intermediate risk and 0.87 ±2.61 in high risk patients (p=0.004, Figure 2D). Conclusion To conclude, there is no difference in the bleeding phenotype of individuals with historically lowest VWF levels of 0.31-0.50 IU/mL and 0.51-0.60 IU/mL. Therefore, the cut-off value to diagnose low VWF should be set at 0.60 IU/mL. Furthermore, the risk score developed in the current study may assist to identify low VWF patients with low, intermediate and high risk for future bleeding. Disclosures Atiq: SOBI: Other: travel grant; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Kruip:Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; SOBI: Research Funding; Bayer: Speakers Bureau. Cnossen:Takeda: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; CSL behring: Research Funding; Nordic Pharma: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Leebeek:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Uniqure: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Other: Travel grant; Roche: Other: DSMB member for a study.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5563-5563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Visentin ◽  
Federica Frezzato ◽  
Silvia Imbergamo ◽  
Valentina Trimarco ◽  
Veronica Martini ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common hematological malignancies in Western countries. The disease is characterized by heterogeneous clinical course and outcome. During the last 15 years several clinical, biological and molecular prognostic factors have been identified, validated and some of them are currently used in patients' and treatment management. To improve the predictive accuracy of these markers, they have been combined into prognostic indexes (W. Wierda, JCO 2011, D. Rossi, Blood 2012, J. Bahlo, Haematologica 2015). Werecently proposed the Integrated CLL Scoring System (ICSS) based on cytogenetic abnormalities by FISH, IGHV mutational status and CD38 expression from 212 patients (A. Visentin et al, Clin Lymph Myeloma & Leuk 2015). The aim of this study was to validate the prognostic power of our index into a larger series of 420 CLL patients. METHODS 420 CLL patients referred to the Hematology Unit of Padua University Hospital from 1989 to 2015 were recruited in this study. According to ICSS, patients were classified as: low-risk, those patients with 13q deletion or normal FISH, IGVH mutated and CD38<30%; high-risk, subjects with 17p or 11q deletion and/or IGVH unmutated and CD38>30%; intermediate-risk, all remaining patients. Treatment free survival (TFS) was calculated as time from diagnosis to treatment (event), death or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to death for any cause (event) or last known follow-up (censored). TFS and OS were compared with log-rank test and plotted using Kaplan-Meier method. The predictive accuracy of ICSS was evaluated by the Harrel's concordance index (c-index); a value >0.5 implies a good predictive ability. RESULTS The median age of our cohort was 62 years; 64% were male and 85% were Binet stage A at diagnosis. Cytogenetic analysis by FISH showed that 41 patients harbored 17p deletion, 50 11q deletion, 236 13q deletion, 44 trisomy 12 and 49 had normal FISH. 236 (56%) patients had IGHV gene homology >98% (i.e. mutated IGHV) and 103 (25%) expressed more then 30% of CD38. According to ICSS 202 (48%) subjects were classified as low-risk, 83 (20%) intermediate-risk and 135 (32%) high-risk. After a median follow-up of 81 months, the median TFS for ICSS classes of risk were 211, 70 and 27 months (log-rank test, p<0.0001, Figure 1A). The estimated 10-year TFS were 61%, 37% and 10% for low, intermediate and high-risk patients. The median OS were 213 and 136 months for intermediate and high-risk, while it was not reached for low-risk patients (Log-rank test, p<0.0001, Figure 1B). After 10 years from diagnosis the estimated OS were 88%, 79% and 57%, respectively. These data were confirmed by a multivariate analyses. In fact, high-risk patients had 5.3 and 4.0 times risk of start treatment and death than low-risk subjects, respectively (p<0.0001). This model was statistically internally validated, showing c-indexed of 0.712 and 0.693 for TFS and OS, respectively. In multivariate analyses, variables confirmed to predict adverse prognosis were male gender (p=0.0183), age>65years (p<0.0001), Rai III-IV (p=0.0025), Binet C (p=0.0002), 17p deletion (p=0.0002), TP53 abnormalities (p=0.0051), unmutated IGVH (p<0.0001), CD38>30% (p=0.0044) and high-risk ICSS (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS We herein provide evidence of the prognostic power and feasibility of ICSS into a large population of CLL patients. The use of this prognostic index could help physician into follow-up schedule, since high-risk patients should be monitored more often given the estimated increased risk of progression. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3612-3612
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Robert Rosenberg ◽  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
...  

3612 Background: Although benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and validated in independent validation studies (JCO 2011, Ann Surg 2013). Methods: In this study, ColoPrint was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. Stage II patients from this study were pooled with patients from previous studies (n=416) and ColoPrint performance was compared to clinical risk factors described in the NCCN Guidelines 2013. Results: In the MDACC patient cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at Low Risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.5% for Low Risk and 78.1% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.42 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis, ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. Low Risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (91% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 90% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint High Risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.037). In the pooled stage II dataset, ColoPrint identified 63% of patients as Low Risk with a 3-year RFS of 93% while High Risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 82.3% with a HR of 2.7 (p=0.001). In the univariate analysis, no clinical factor reached statistical significance. Using clinical high risk factors as described in the NCCN guidelines as classification, 56% of patients were classified as low risk with a 3-year RFS of 90.3% while high risk patients had a 3-year RFS of 87.7% with a HR of 0.6 (p=0.63). Conclusions: ColoPrint significantly improves prognostic accuracy, thereby facilitating the identification of patients at higher risk who might be considered for additional treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Wolter ◽  
S Kriechbaum ◽  
C Troidl ◽  
M Weferling ◽  
K Diouf ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are several tools for primary prevention (e.g. Framingham, ESC) that can be used to predict mortality risk in healthy individuals. However, only a few scores have been validated to predict outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease. One of these instruments is the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) score. The ESC guideline for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) places a clear emphasis on carrying out risk stratification before using invasive treatment. Recent studies have revealed a prognostic value of serum hs-cTnI in patients with stable CAD. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic information provided by hs-cTnI in stable high-risk CAD patients. Methods Between 2011 and 2014, consecutive stable patients with suspected CAD undergoing coronary angiography were included in the study. Data from a 4-year follow-up was obtained; the study endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality. Serum hs-cTnI was measured before angiography using a high-sensitivity assay. Results A total of 3,742 patients were included, of whom 2,274 (60.1%) had confirmed CAD. Patients with an estimated annual mortality rate above 3% using the REACH score were defined as having high risk (n=996 in the low-risk group, n=1,278 in the high-risk cohort). Patients with higher risk were more often male (81.5% vs. 69.2%, p<0.001), were older (mean age 73.2±8.1 y vs. 63±9.4 y), and had more cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes mellitus (DM) 43.5% vs. 13.7%, p<0.001; arterial hypertension 90.8% vs. 86%, p<0.001). Median hs-cTnI was elevated in high-risk patients (6.9 ng/L [IQR 1–3: 3.8–14.8 ng/L] vs. 3 ng/L [IQR 1–3: 1.7–5.9 ng/L]; p<0.001). A total of 298 patients (23.3%) died in the high-risk group compared with 74 patients (7.4%) in the low-risk group. Log(hs-cTnI) was found to be a risk factor based on regression analysis including age, gender, DM, arterial hypertension and the REACH score (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.61–2.54]). The area under the ROC of hs-cTnI for predicting all-cause mortality was 0.69 (95% CI 0.66–0.72) for hs-cTnI and 0.72 (95% CI 0.69–0.72) for the REACH score. There was a correlation between hs-cTnI and the REACH score (Spearman correlation 0.458; p<0.001). In patients at low risk, the best cut-off for hs-cTnI was 3 ng/L, and for high-risk patients 8.25 ng/L was the best threshold value. Using low REACH score and low hs-cTnI levels, it was possible to identify patients at very low risk with a mortality rate below 3.4% in a follow-up of 48 months. It was also feasible to determine patients at very high risk in the group of patients who were already at high risk using the hs-cTnI cut-off (mortality 15.2% vs. 33.7%). Conclusion Hs-cTnI was found to be an independent risk factor in low- as well as high-risk patients. Hs-cTnI levels correlate with the REACH risk score. Moreover, it was possible to separate patients at very high and very low risk by combining REACH score and hs-cTnI.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1834-1834
Author(s):  
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Charles Koller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although ATRA and anthracyclines provide durable remissions in patients with untreated APL, we have reported that ATRA plus As2O3 may do the same while avoiding “chemotherapy.” However, follow-up of patients treated with ATRA plus As2O3 has been relatively limited, prompting this report. Methods: From 2/02 to 4/07, 67 patients with untreated APL were given ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily followed by As2O3 0.15 mg/kg IV 1-hr infusion daily starting on D10. Patients with leukocyte counts (WBC) > 10×109/L (low-risk) also received gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) 9 mg/m2 on D1 and/or idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on D1-4. Patients in complete remission (CR) received As2O3 0.15 mg/kg IV on D1-5 weekly for 4 weeks on and 4 weeks off and ATRA 45 mg/m2 daily for 2 weeks on and 2 weeks off (for 28 weeks). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for PML-RARα (sensitivity level, 10−4) was performed every 3 months from CR for at least 2 yrs. Patients with molecular relapse, defined by two sequential positive PCR tests for PML-RARα within 2 wks, received GO 9 mg/m2 once monthly for 3 months in addition to ATRA and As2O3 as in post-remission therapy. If the PCR results subsequently became negative, low-risk patients received no chemotherapy and high-risk patients received a single dose of GO. Results: The median patient age was 46 yrs (range, 14–81), and 30% were >60 yrs. Thirty-six percent of patients had WBC ≥10×109/L, 54% had coagulopathy, and 27% had Zubrod performance status (PS) > 1. The overall response rate was 91% (CR 90%, CRp 1%). The median time to response was 29 days (range, 19–70). Response rates were higher in patients with PS 0–1 (98% vs. 72%, p=.001), no coagulopathy (100% vs. 83%, p=.02), and LDH <1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN)(97% vs. 83%, p=.046). The median follow-up in surviving patients is 25 months. Six patients died during induction; 1 died with central nervous system relapse; and 3 died in remission from other metastatic cancers (malignant melanoma, 1; breast, 1; and prostate, 1). The 2-yr survival rate was 84%. Survival rates were higher in patients with PS<1 (p=.0004), no coagulopathy (p=.01), and LDH <1.5×ULN (p=.02). The 2-yr failure-free survival (FFS) rate in responding patients was 92% (Sanz risk: low and intermediate 100%; high, 78%). Four patients relapsed (at 9, 9, 13, and 16 months); molecular relapse preceded hematologic relapse by 21, 23, 38, and 128 days, respectively. None of the remaining patients had evidence of molecular relapse. WBC ≥10×109/L (p=.006), LDH ≥1.5×ULN (p=.02), and high Sanz risk (p=.02) predicted relapse. Molecular remission rates are shown in Table. Time from CR (months) No. of pts in CR tested PCR negative Negative, % 0 52 2 4 3 45 44 98 6 40 40 100 9 37 35 95 12 33 31 94 15 11 11 100 18 22 22 100 24 20 20 100 30 9 9 100 36 8 8 100 48 3 3 100 Grade 3–4 nonhematologic toxicities were infections (n=18), neurologic (n=5), cardiac arrhythmias (n=4), APL differentiation syndrome (n=4), headache (n=3), renal failure (n=3); mucositis (n=1), rash (n=1), and transaminitis (n=1). Conclusions: ATRA plus As2O3 results in high rates of CR, molecular remission, FFS, and survival. PCR testing for PML-RARα accurately predicted relapse and should be performed in high-risk patients during the first year after CR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document