scholarly journals Long-term effectiveness of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Samuel ◽  
Michal Abrahamowicz ◽  
Jacqueline Joza ◽  
Marie-Eve Beauchamp ◽  
Vidal Essebag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
World Population ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aims Randomized trials suggest reductions in all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalizations with catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and HF. Whether these results can be replicated in a real-world population with long-term follow-up or varies over time is unknown. We sought to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of CA in reducing the incidence of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, stroke, and major bleeding in AF–HF patients. Methods and results In a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with AF–HF in Quebec, Canada (2000–2017), CA patients were matched 1:2 to controls on time and frequency of hospitalizations. Confounders were controlled for using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for the presence of cardiac electronic implantable devices and medication use during follow-up, and the effect of time since CA was modelled with B-splines. For non-fatal outcomes, the Lunn–McNeil approach was used to account for the competing risk of death. Among 101 933 AF–HF patients, 451 underwent CA and were matched to 899 controls. Over a median follow-up of 3.8 years, CA was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.2–0.7)], but no difference in stroke or major bleeding. The hazard of HF rehospitalization for CA patients, relative to non-CA patients, varied with time since CA (P = 0.01), with a reduction in HF rehospitalizations until approximately 3 years post-CA. Conclusion Compared with matched non-CA patients, CA was associated with a long-term reduction in all-cause mortality and a reduction in HF rehospitalizations until 3 years post-CA.

P1024Catheter ablation is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in a real-world cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Samuel ◽  
M Abrahamowicz ◽  
J Joza ◽  
V Essebag ◽  
L Pilote
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Population Based ◽  
World Population ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common co-existing conditions. Randomized trial data suggests a reduction in all-cause mortality with catheter ablation (CA) in selected patients, however, whether these results are replicable in a real-world population and persist in the long-term remains to be shown. Purpose To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of CA in AF-HF patients in reducing the incidence of: a) all-cause mortality b) HF hospitalizations, and c) major morbidities (stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and major bleeding). Methods A population-based administrative cohort was created of AF-HF patients with government prescription coverage in Quebec, Canada (1999–2015). Patients who underwent CA (cases) were matched 1:2 to controls using risk-set sampling. Cases were matched on time in the cohort and frequency of hospitalizations. Measured time-invariant confounders were controlled for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and included age, sex, clinical characteristics, presence of cardiac implantable electronic devices, and medication use. Multivariable Cox models adjusted the association of CA with the outcomes for the time varying confounders of the presence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), anticoagulation use (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulation), and any antiarrhythmic (AAD) use during follow-up. For non-fatal outcomes, the competing risk of death was accounted for using the Lunn-McNeil approach. Results Of the 87,676 AF-HF patients, 298 underwent CA and were matched to 591 controls. After IPTW, the distribution of covariates was balanced between cases and controls [age 65.6±11.0 vs 61.6±11.6; women 24% vs 20%; CHA2DS2-Vasc score 3.2±2.3 vs 2.9±2.1; CA vs non-CA, respectively; standardized mean differences <0.1 for all]. Over a median follow-up of 3.3 (IQR 1.1–6.4) years, 19 (7.3%) of CA patients died compared to 144 (24.6%) non-CA patients. After weighting and adjustment, CA was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality [adjusted HR 0.5 (95% CI 0.3–0.9)]. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of HF hospitalizations over the follow-up [CA: 22.5% vs non-CA: 27.1%; adjusted HR 0.9 (95% CI 0.6–1.2)]. The incidences of stroke/TIA (1.7% vs 6.8%) and major bleeding (1.7% vs 4.9%) for CA vs non-CA were not statistically different. Conclusion In a matched population-based AF-HF cohort, CA was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients who did not undergo CA. Although no difference in the risk of HF hospitalizations, stroke/TIA, and major bleeding was detected between CA and non-CA patients, larger studies are warranted. Acknowledgement/Funding Canadian Institute of Health Research; Fonds de recherché du Quebec-Santé, Clinical Research Scholar Award (V. Essebag) and Doctoral Award (M. Samuel)

P985The long-term impact of maintaining sinus rhythm on the risk for death or heart failure after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a real world clinical practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Yoshizawa ◽  
H Shiomi ◽  
M Tanaka ◽  
T Aizawa ◽  
S Yamagami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Af Recurrence

Abstract Background Catheter ablation has been rapidly spread as a first line therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). A recent randomized trial have shown that AF ablation reduces the risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF). However, the impact of maintained sinus rhythm (SR) on long-term risk of death or HF hospitalization has not been adequately evaluated. Purpose To investigate the impact of maintaining SR by AF ablation on long-term risk of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Methods The long-term clinical outcomes were compared between patients with maintained SR and those with recurrent AF using a landmark analysis in which the landmark point was set at 1.5-year after the 1st ablation. Results Among consecutive 1467 patients who underwent AF ablation in our institution between February 2004 and December 2017, the study population consisted of 1311 patients after excluding 150 patients because of death or lost to follow-up. Mean age was 67.9±0.3 and paroxysmal AF was 67%. Among 460 patients who had AF recurrence within 1.5 years after the 1st ablation, 328 underwent 2nd ablation. Therefore, at 1.5-year after the 1st AF ablation, 1145 patients had maintained SR rhythm (SR-group), and 166 patients had recurrent AF episodes (AF-group). During 4.7±2.4 years of follow-up, the cumulative 5-year incidence of death or HF beyond 1.5 years after the 1st ablation was 5.1% in SR-group and 15.6% in AF-group (log rank P<0.001). After adjusting for baseline confounders, the lower risk of SR-group relative to AF-group for death or HF was still statistically significant (HR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.11–3.58, P=0.02). Risks for a Composite of Death or HF Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Crude HR P value Adjusted HR P value AF recurrence 2.59 (1.43–4.43) 0.002 2.05 (1.11–3.58) 0.02 Age>75 years old 2.55 (1.56–4.10) <0.001 2.32 (1.39–3.81) 0.002 Female 0.85 (0.49–1.43) 0.56 0.73 (0.40–1.25) 0.26 PeAF 1.25 (0.68–2.16) 0.45 0.98 (0.52–1.75) 0.94 LSAF 1.10 (0.46–2.23) 0.82 0.70 (0.28–1.53) 0.39 LVEF>50% 0.27 (0.16–0.48) <0.001 0.57 (0.31–1.09) 0.09 Past history of HF 7.06 (4.18–11.6) <0.001 4.67 (2.51–8.41) <0.001 CKD 4.74 (2.08–9.39) <0.001 2.23 (0.94–4.69) 0.07 AF, Atrial fibrillation; PeAF, Persistent AF; LSAF; Long standing AF; HF, Heart failure; CKD, Chronic kidney disease. Figure 1 Conclusions Successfully maintained SR was associated with reduced long-term risk for death or HF hospitalization in real world patients undergoing AF ablation.

P1885Cha2ds-2vasc score lacks of ability to predict mortality in patients attending the emergency department with atrial fibrillation in the presence of troponin i

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M I Gonzalez Del Hoyo ◽  
G Cediel ◽  
A Carrasquer ◽  
G Bonet ◽  
K Vasquez-Nunez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background CHA2DS2-VASc score has been used as a surrogate marker for predicting outcomes beyond thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Likewise, cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a predictor of mortality in AF. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the association of cTnI and CHA2DS2-VASc score with long-term prognosis in patients admitted to the emergency department with AF. Methods A retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2012 and December 2013, enrolling patients admitted to the emergency department with AF and having documented cTnI measurements. CHA2DS2-VASc score was estimated. Primary endpoint was 5-year all-cause mortality, readmission for heart failure (HF), readmission for myocardial infarction (MI) and the composite end point of major adverse cardiac events defined as death, readmission for HF or readmission for MI (MACE). Results A total of 578 patients with AF were studied, of whom 252 patients had elevated levels of cTnI (43.6%) and 334 patients had CHA2DS2-VASc score >3 (57.8%). Patients with elevated cTnI tended to be oldercompared with those who did not have cTnI elevation and were more frequently comorbid and of higher ischemic risk, including hypertension, prior MI, prior HF, chronic renal failure and peripheral artery disease. The overall median CHA2DS2-VASc score was higher in those with cTnI elevation compared to those patients elevated cTnI levels (4.2 vs 3.3 points, p<0.001). Main diagnoses at hospital discharge were tachyarrhythmia 30.3%, followed by heart failure 17.7%, respiratory infections 9.5% and acute coronary syndrome 7.3%. At 5-year follow-up, all-cause death was significantly higher for patients with cTnI elevation compared with those who did not have cTnI elevation (56.4% vs. 27%; logrank test p<0.001). Specifically, for readmissions for HF and readmissions for MI there were no differences in between patients with or without cTnI elevation. In addition, MACE was reached in 165 patients (65.5%) with cTnI elevation, compare to 126 patients (38.7%) without cTnI elevation (p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, cTnI elevation was an independent predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–2.26, p=0.001) and of MACE (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.15–1.88; P=0.002), but it did not reach statistical significance for readmissions for MI and readmissions for HF. CHA2DS2-VASc score was a predictor on univariate Cox regression analysis for each endpoint, but it did not reach significance on multivariable Cox regression analysis for any endpoint. Conclusions cTnI is independently associated with long-term all-cause mortality in patients attending the emergency department with AF. cTnI compared to CHA2DS2-VASc score is thus a biomarker with predictive capacity for mortality in late follow-up, conferring utility in the risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Long-term clinical outcomes after major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Fushimi AF registry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Ogawa ◽  
Yoshimori An ◽  
Kenjiro Ishigami ◽  
Syuhei Ikeda ◽  
Kosuke Doi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aims Oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of ischaemic stroke but may increase the risk of major bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients after a major bleeding event. This study assessed the outcomes of AF patients after major bleeding. Methods and results The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of the AF patients in Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, Japan. Analyses were performed on 4304 AF patients registered by 81 institutions participating in the Fushimi AF Registry. We investigated the demographics and outcomes of AF patients who experienced major bleeding during follow-up period. During the median follow-up of 1307 days, major bleeding occurred in 297 patients (6.9%). Patients with major bleeding were older than those without (75.6 vs. 73.4 years; P &lt; 0.01). They were more likely to have pre-existing heart failure (33.7% vs. 26.7%; P &lt; 0.01), history of major bleeding (7.7% vs. 4.0%; P &lt; 0.01), and higher mean HAS-BLED score (2.05 vs.1.73; P &lt; 0.01). On landmark analysis, ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 17 patients (3.6/100 person-years) after major bleeding and 227 patients (1.7/100 person-years) without major bleeding, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.93 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–3.23; P = 0.03]. All-cause mortality occurred in 97 patients with major bleeding (20.0/100 person-years) and 709 (5.1/100 person-years) patients without major bleeding [HR 2.73 (95% CI, 2.16–3.41; P &lt; 0.01)]. Conclusion In this community-based cohort, major bleeding is associated with increased risk of subsequent all-cause mortality and thromboembolism in the long-term amongst AF patients. Trial registration https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000005834. (last accessed 22 October 2020)

Abstract 14884: Patients with Renal Impairment Derive Long-Term Benefit from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results from the MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Usama Daimee ◽  
Arthur Moss ◽  
Ilan Goldenberg ◽  
Scott Solomon ◽  
Scott McNitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Mild Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Term Benefit

Background: Whether patients with renal impairment experience benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy plus an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-ICD) during long-term follow-up is unknown. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that baseline renal function affects long-term risk of all-cause mortality and heart-failure events (HFEs) as well as benefit derived from CRT-ICD. Methods: We evaluated the impact of renal function in 1274 patients with mild heart failure and left-bundle branch block enrolled in MADIT-CRT. Patients with BUN>70 mg/dl or creatinine>3.0 mg/dl were excluded from the trial. Two subgroups were created based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR): GFR<60 and GFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients were studied over a follow-up period of 7 years for the end points of all-cause mortality and HFEs. Results: There were 413 patients with baseline GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (mean 48.1±8.3). Relative to those with GFR≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (mean 79.6±16.0), the low-GFR patients experienced greater risk of death (HR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.57-2.91, p<0.0001) and HFEs (HR= 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.69, p=0.03). In both GFR groups, CRT-ICD relative to ICD alone was associated with significantly lower risk of death (GFR<60: HR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.42-0.94, p=0.024, absolute risk reduction [ARR]=12%; GFR≥60: HR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, p=0.049, ARR=8%) [Figure]. Similarly, there was significant reduction in the risk of HFEs (GFR<60: HR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.25-0.53, p<0.0001, ARR=27%; GFR≥60: HR= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.31-0.57, p<0.0001, ARR=17%). Conclusion: In conclusion, in mild heart failure patients, moderate renal dysfunction is associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and HFEs relative to mildly impaired-to-normal renal function. While patients in both groups derive long-term benefit from CRT-ICD with similar relative reductions in all-cause mortality and HFEs, the greater absolute benefit occurs in patients with moderate renal disease.

Long-term systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huang ◽  
C Liu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission or discharge was associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the optimal long-term SBP for HFpEF was less clear. Purpose To examine the association of long-term SBP and all-cause mortality among patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study. Participants had at least two SBP measurements of different times during the follow-up were included. Long-term SBP was defined as the average of all SBP measurements during the follow-up. We stratified participants into four groups according to long-term SBP: &lt;120mmHg, ≥120mmHg and &lt;130mmHg, ≥130mmHg and &lt;140mmHg, ≥140mmHg. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with SBP level. To assess for nonlinearity, we fitted restricted cubic spline models of long-term SBP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by confining participants with history of hypertension or those with left ventricular ejection fraction≥50%. Results The 3338 participants had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.6) years; 51.4% were women, and 89.3% were White. The median long-term SBP was 127.3 mmHg (IQR 121–134.2, range 77–180.7). Patients in the SBP of &lt;120mmHg group were older age, less often female, less often current smoker, had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, less often had history of hypertension, and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, long-term SBP of 120–130mmHg and 130–140mmHg was associated with a lower risk of mortality during a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85, P=0.001; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, P=0.004, respectively); long-term SBP of &lt;120mmHg had similar risk of mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.78–1.36, P=0.836), compared with long-term SBP of ≥140mmHg. Findings from restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrate that there was J-shaped association between long-term SBP and all-cause mortality (P=0.02). These association was essentially unchanged in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among patients with HFpEF, long-term SBP showed a J-shaped pattern with all-cause mortality and a range of 120–140 mmHg was significantly associated with better outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials need to evaluate optimal long-term SBP goal in patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M660229 and 2019TQ0380)

scholarly journals Catheter ablation can improve survival with the reduction of heart failure in frail patients with atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Joung ◽  
P.S Yang ◽  
J.H Sung ◽  
E Jang ◽  
H.T Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Background Characteristics ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance

Abstract Background It is unclear whether catheter ablation is beneficial in frail patients with AF. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate whether catheter ablation reduces death and other outcomes in real-world frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Out of 801,710 patients with AF in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from 2006 to 2015, 1,411 frail patients underwent AF ablations. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score were calculated retrospectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to categorize ablation and non-ablation frail groups. Results After IPTW, the two cohorts had similar background characteristics. During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (interquartile range: 2.2–7.8), the risk of death in frail patients with ablations was reduced by 65% compared to frail patients without ablations (2.0 and 6.4 per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.50; P&lt;0.001). Ablations were related with a lower incidence and risk of heart failure admission (1.8 and 3.1 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44–0.98; P=0.042) and acute myocardial infarction (0.2 and 0.6 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.62; P=0.001). However, the risk of stroke did not change after ablation. Conclussion Ablation may be associated with lower incidences of death, heart failure, and acute myocardial infarction in real-world frail patients with AF, supporting the role of AF ablation in these patients. The effect of frailty risk on the outcome of ablation should be evaluated in further studies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Long-term impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction on heart failure: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Xu ◽  
J Luo ◽  
H.Q Li ◽  
Z.Q Li ◽  
B.X Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with poor survival, but the clinical implication of NOAF on subsequent heart failure (HF) is still not well studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NOAF following AMI and HF hospitalization. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2014 and March 2018, using data from the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in ShangHai registry, where all participants did not have a documented AF history. Patients with AMI who discharged alive and had complete echocardiography and follow-up data were analyzed. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, which was defined as a minimum of an overnight hospital stay of a participant who presented with symptoms and signs of HF or received intravenous diuretics. Results A total of 2075 patients were included, of whom 228 developed NOAF during the index AMI hospitalization. During up to 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.7 years), 205 patients (9.9%) experienced HF hospitalization and 220 patients (10.6%) died. The incidence rate of HF hospitalization among patients with NOAF was 18.4% per year compared with 2.8% per year for those with sinus rhythm. After adjustment for confounders, NOAF was significantly associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30–4.28; p&lt;0.001). Consistent result was observed after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.18–4.30; p&lt;0.001) or performing a propensity score adjusted multivariable model (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.39–4.50; p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, the risk of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with persistent NOAF (HR: 5.81; 95% CI: 3.59–9.41) compared with that in those with transient NOAF (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.84–3.70; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusion NOAF complicating AMI is strongly associated with an increased long-term risk of heart. Cumulative incidence of outcome Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document