scholarly journals Catheter ablation can improve survival with the reduction of heart failure in frail patients with atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Joung ◽  
P.S Yang ◽  
J.H Sung ◽  
E Jang ◽  
H.T Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Background Characteristics ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance

Abstract Background It is unclear whether catheter ablation is beneficial in frail patients with AF. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate whether catheter ablation reduces death and other outcomes in real-world frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Out of 801,710 patients with AF in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from 2006 to 2015, 1,411 frail patients underwent AF ablations. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score were calculated retrospectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to categorize ablation and non-ablation frail groups. Results After IPTW, the two cohorts had similar background characteristics. During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (interquartile range: 2.2–7.8), the risk of death in frail patients with ablations was reduced by 65% compared to frail patients without ablations (2.0 and 6.4 per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.50; P<0.001). Ablations were related with a lower incidence and risk of heart failure admission (1.8 and 3.1 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44–0.98; P=0.042) and acute myocardial infarction (0.2 and 0.6 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.62; P=0.001). However, the risk of stroke did not change after ablation. Conclussion Ablation may be associated with lower incidences of death, heart failure, and acute myocardial infarction in real-world frail patients with AF, supporting the role of AF ablation in these patients. The effect of frailty risk on the outcome of ablation should be evaluated in further studies. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Reduction of mortality by catheter ablation in real-world atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pil-Sung Yang ◽  
Daehoon Kim ◽  
Jung-Hoon Sung ◽  
Eunsun Jang ◽  
Hee Tae Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Real World ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance ◽  
Reduction Of Mortality

AbstractWhether catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves survival and affects other outcomes in real-world heart failure (HF) patients is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether ablation reduces death, and other outcomes in real-world AF patients with HF. Among 834,735 patients with AF from 2006 to 2015 in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, 3173 HF patients underwent AF ablation. Propensity score weighting was used to correct for differences between the groups. During median 54 months follow-up, the risk of all-cause death in ablated patients was less than half of that in patients with medical therapy (2.8 vs. 6.2 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.65, p < 0.001). Ablation was related with lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32–0.62, p < 0.001), HF admission (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.33–0.46, p < 0.001) and stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.37–0.53, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the risk of all-cause death was reduced in most subgroups except in the elderly (≥ 75 years) and strictly anticoagulated patients. Ablation may be associated with reduced risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular death in real-world AF patients with HF, supporting the role of AF ablation in patients with HF.

scholarly journals Trends in mortality, co-morbidity and treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis 1998–2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 931-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattias Skielta ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist ◽  
Solveig W Jonsson ◽  
Thomas Mooe
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Congestive Heart Failure ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
One Year ◽  
Over Time

Aims: Rheumatoid arthritis may influence the outcome after an acute myocardial infarction. We aimed to compare trends in one-year mortality, co-morbidities and treatments after a first acute myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus non-rheumatoid arthritis patients during 1998–2013. Furthermore, we wanted to identify characteristics associated with mortality. Methods and results: Data for 245,377 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction were drawn from the Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions for 1998–2013. In total, 4268 patients were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to study mortality trends over time and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with mortality. The one-year mortality in rheumatoid arthritis patients was initially lower compared to non-rheumatoid arthritis patients (14.7% versus 19.7%) but thereafter increased above that in non-rheumatoid arthritis patients (17.1% versus 13.5%). In rheumatoid arthritis patients the mean age at admission and the prevalence of atrial fibrillation increased over time. Congestive heart failure decreased more in non-rheumatoid arthritis than in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, prior diabetes mellitus and hypertension were associated with significantly higher one-year mortality during the study period 1998–2013. Conclusions: The decrease in one-year mortality after acute myocardial infarction in non-rheumatoid arthritis patients was not applicable to rheumatoid arthritis patients. This could partly be explained by an increased age at acute myocardial infarction onset and unfavourable trends with increased atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis per se was associated with a significantly worse prognosis.

Long-term impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction on heart failure: insights from the NOAFCAMI-SH registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.L Xu ◽  
J Luo ◽  
H.Q Li ◽  
Z.Q Li ◽  
B.X Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with poor survival, but the clinical implication of NOAF on subsequent heart failure (HF) is still not well studied. We aimed to investigate the relationship between NOAF following AMI and HF hospitalization. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between February 2014 and March 2018, using data from the New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in ShangHai registry, where all participants did not have a documented AF history. Patients with AMI who discharged alive and had complete echocardiography and follow-up data were analyzed. The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, which was defined as a minimum of an overnight hospital stay of a participant who presented with symptoms and signs of HF or received intravenous diuretics. Results A total of 2075 patients were included, of whom 228 developed NOAF during the index AMI hospitalization. During up to 5 years of follow-up (median: 2.7 years), 205 patients (9.9%) experienced HF hospitalization and 220 patients (10.6%) died. The incidence rate of HF hospitalization among patients with NOAF was 18.4% per year compared with 2.8% per year for those with sinus rhythm. After adjustment for confounders, NOAF was significantly associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.30–4.28; p&lt;0.001). Consistent result was observed after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause death (subdistribution HR: 3.06, 95% CI: 2.18–4.30; p&lt;0.001) or performing a propensity score adjusted multivariable model (HR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.39–4.50; p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, the risk of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in patients with persistent NOAF (HR: 5.81; 95% CI: 3.59–9.41) compared with that in those with transient NOAF (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.84–3.70; p interaction = 0.008). Conclusion NOAF complicating AMI is strongly associated with an increased long-term risk of heart. Cumulative incidence of outcome Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): 1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

D-dimer and the incidence of heart failure and mortality after acute myocardial infarction

Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-316880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyuan Zhang ◽  
Shanjie Wang ◽  
Jinxin Liu ◽  
Yini Wang ◽  
Hengxuan Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Plaque Rupture ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Clinical Covariates ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
D Dimer

ObjectiveD-dimer might serve as a marker of thrombogenesis and a hypercoagulable state following plaque rupture. Few studies explore the association between baseline D-dimer levels and the incidence of heart failure (HF), all-cause mortality in an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) population. We aimed to explore this association.MethodsWe enrolled 4504 consecutive patients with AMI with complete data in a prospective cohort study and explored the association of plasma D-dimer levels on admission and the incidence of HF, all-cause mortality.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 1 year, 1112 (24.7%) patients developed in-hospital HF, 542 (16.7%) patients developed HF after hospitalisation and 233 (7.1%) patients died. After full adjustments for other relevant clinical covariates, patients with D-dimer values in quartile 3 (Q3) had 1.51 times (95% CI 1.12 to 2.04) and in Q4 had 1.49 times (95% CI 1.09 to 2.04) as high as the risk of HF after hospitalisation compared with patients in Q1. Patients with D-dimer values in Q4 had more than a twofold (HR 2.34; 95% CI 1.33 to 4.13) increased risk of death compared with patients in Q1 (p<0.001). But there was no association between D-dimer levels and in-hospital HF in the adjusted models.ConclusionsD-dimer was found to be associated with the incidence of HF after hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in patients with AMI.

486Are the results of the CASTLE-AF trial reproducible in the real life? Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure in a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bisson ◽  
F Mondout ◽  
J Herbert ◽  
N Clementy ◽  
B Pierre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Systèmes D’Information ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a validated therapy for patients with symptomatic AF to prevent recurrences. The CASTLE AF trial indicated that ablation for AF in patients with heart failure (HF) was associated with a lower rate of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF than was medical therapy. The purpose of our study was to compare the incidence of these events in AF patients with HF after AF catheter ablation versus those not treated with AF ablation at a nationwide level in centers possibly less well experienced. Methods This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national hospitalization PMSI (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information) database covering hospital care from the entire population. We included all patients, over 18 years old, with AF and HF from January 2010 to December 2015. Crude event rates were ascertained and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards risk model. Propensity-matched Cox regression was also used to compare event rates according to AF ablation usage status. Results Among the 261,449 patients identified with AF and HF, 1,270 patients were treated with AF ablation (24% female, mean age 63±10 yo) and 260,179 did not have AF ablation (45% female, mean age 79±11 yo). During follow-up (417±502 days), there were 56,981 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of HF and 81,393 deaths were recorded. Incidence of hospitalization for HF was significantly lower in patients with AF ablation than in those with no ablation (13.74% vs 51.11% person per year respectively, p<0.0001). Incidence of death was also significantly lower in patients with AF ablation than in those with no ablation (6.07% vs 27.42% person per year respectively, p<0.0001). These associations were confirmed in a multivariable analysis after adjustment on age and other comorbidities (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.28–0.39, p<0.0001 for HF and HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31–0.48, p<0.0001 for all-cause death). After 1:1 propensity score matching, AF ablation was also associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for HF (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31–0.47, p<0.0001) and a lower risk of death (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0.70, p<0.0001). Conclusion In the nationwide analysis of unselected AF patients with HF seen in hospitals, AF ablation was independently associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for HF and death. This provides “real world” data consistent with those observed in recent trials with lower numbers of highly selected patients

scholarly journals 175: Association between silent Atrial Fibrillation and heart failure after Acute Myocardial infarction

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Karim Stamboul ◽  
A. Gudjoncik ◽  
Luc Lorgis ◽  
Claude Touzery ◽  
Jean Claude Beer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction

scholarly journals Association between silent atrial fibrillation and heart failure after acute myocardial infarction

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P4070-P4070
Author(s):  
K. Stamboul ◽  
A. Gudjoncik ◽  
L. Lorgis ◽  
J. C. Beer ◽  
C. Touzery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction

scholarly journals Does sacubitril/valsartan work in acute myocardial infarction? The PARADISE-AMI study

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_E) ◽  
pp. E87-E90
Author(s):  
Laura Gatto
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Laboratory Animals ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by left ventricular dysfunction have an increased risk of death and heart failure. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the ability of ACE inhibitors in optimizing the outcome in this particular clinical setting. In recent years, the sacubitril/valsartan association has drastically improved the prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a significant decrease in mortality from cardiovascular causes and hospitalizations due to acute heart failure. However, it has not yet been fully clarified whether this pharmacological association may play a role in patients with AMI. Pre-clinical studies have suggested the possibility that sacubitril/valsartan can reduce the size of the infarct scar and prevent the onset of ventricular arrhythmias in laboratory animals in which myocardial infarction was induced. On the other hand, small clinical experiences with patients after myocardial infarction have provided conflicting data. The results of the PARADISE-MI study were recently presented, which enrolled 5661 patients with AMI complicated by pulmonary congestion and left ventricular dysfunction randomized to therapy with ramipril or sacubitril/valsartan and followed up for ∼2 years. Although combination therapy was associated with an ∼10% reduction in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes or an episode of heart failure, this was not enough to achieve statistical significance. However, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was shown to be more effective than ramipril in preventing recurrence of heart failure after the first one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document