P1020Persistent AF patients with limited areas of low voltage have a similar benefit from pulmonary vein isolation as compared to paroxysmal AF patients: insight from the SMOP study

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Frigerio ◽  
A Sanzo ◽  
S Cornara ◽  
E Chieffo ◽  
C La Greca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Low Voltage ◽  
High Density ◽  
P Value ◽  
Atrial Fibrosis ◽  
Density Mapping

Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed with radio-frequency catheter ablation (CA) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). However previous data have suggested that PVI is less effective in persistent (PER) vs. paroxysmal (PAR) AF. Atrial fibrosis and scar, indeed, are an important substrate involved in persistent AF, and some author correlate them to an increased rate of recurrences after CA. For this reason several adjunctive ablation strategies have been suggested for invasive treatment in PER AF pts. However, there is a lack of evidence on their effectivness in current literature. Objective the aim of our study was to assess the rate of AF recurrences in PAR and PER AF patients after a first pulmonary vein isolation (IVP) procedure, and their relationship with low voltage areas of the left atrium assessed by means of high density mapping performed before CA. Methods we analyzed 214 patients of the SMOP-AF study (Substrate Mapping as Outcome Predictor in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation), a prospective multi-centric registry enrolling patients with both PAR and PER AF undergoing a first radio-frequency CA procedure aimed to obtain permanent PVI . High-density mapping was performed in sinus rhythm using the CARTO system before PVI. Areas with less than 0,5 mV on mapping were defined as low voltage zone (LVZ); LVZ was indexed on the atrial area. Comparisons were made by cross-tables and Chi-square test or Student T test. Results Patients with PER AF (n = 44, 21%) were older (63 ± 9 vs 58 ± 10 yrs, p = 0.01), but notably with no difference in LVEF and atrial dimensions as compared to pts with PAR AF. In addition no statistical difference was observed in procedural variables, except for a greater LVZ area on atrial mapping (8 ± 18 % vs. 5 ± 15 %, p = 0.04) and a longer p wave duration (115 ± 21 msec vs. 103 ± 18 msec, p = 0.01) in pts with PER AF. The incidence of recurrence in the overall population was 15.3% at 3 months and 13.7% from 3 to 12 months: there was no statistical difference in success-rate between PER and PAR pts (respectively 79,5% vs 86% p value = 0.315 in blanking period and 85,3% vs 86,5% p value = 0.8 at 3-12 months follow-up). No statistical difference was observed for ablation variables (number of lesion, contact force, force time integral) in pts with vs. without recurrences. Conclusion Our study showed that pulmonary vein isolation alone seems to be as effective in paroxismal and persistent AF patients with low degree of left atrial fibrosis. Our data call into question the idea that PVI alone is not effective in PER AF. High density mapping of the LA could help to identify a subset of PER AF patients with a limited extension of low voltage areas (i.e around 10% of the overall LA surface) that could benefit from PVI without adjunctive ablation strategies. Our data needs to be confirmed in a longer follow-up.

scholarly journals B-PO02-073 ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AFTER WIDE-AREA PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION USING THE VISUALLY GUIDED LASER BALLOON FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S125-S126
Author(s):  
Takashi Yamasaki ◽  
Tetsuhisa Hattori Keisuke Ohta ◽  
Nobuyuki Miyai, Reo Nakamura ◽  
Takayoshi Sawanishi Noriyuki Kinosita ◽  
Ken Kakita
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Wide Area ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
One Year ◽  
Laser Balloon

scholarly journals Up to 6-year follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation: Importance of sinus node function

2011 ◽  
Vol 141 (6) ◽  
pp. 1455-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Soga ◽  
Hitoshi Okabayashi ◽  
Yoshio Arai ◽  
Takuya Nomoto ◽  
Jota Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

scholarly journals Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in a Patient with an Atrial Septal Defect Closure Device

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meisam Mokhtari ◽  
Zahra Khajali ◽  
Mona Heidarali ◽  
Majid Haghjoo
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Closure Device ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect Closure ◽  
Occluder Device ◽  
Asd Closure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly treated arrhythmia in clinical practice and is often found in association with an atrial septal defect (ASD). However, ASD closure rarely confers complete arrhythmia control. A 23-year-old man presented to our center with frequent episodes of palpitations. AF was documented in 12-lead electrocardiography, and echocardiography showed a secundum-type ASD, 14 mm in size, with a significant left-to-right shunt. ASD closure was performed successfully with an ASD occluder device with no residual shunting. During follow-up, the patient experienced several episodes of AF. Thirteen months after the ASD closure, cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation was done successfully with no complications. During a 12-month follow-up, he had no symptoms or AF recurrences, and echocardiography showed no residual shunting. This study showed that cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation could be performed successfully without residual shunts in patients with ASD closure devices.

scholarly journals Clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4S) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
T. Y. Chichkova ◽  
S. E. Mamchur ◽  
E. A. Khomenko
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Rf Ablation

Aim. To estimate the clinical success of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods.230 patients (males: 49.6%, mean age 57 (53; 62) with symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy were included in a single-center prospective study. The patients were randomized into 2 groups to undergo either cryoballoon ablation (n = 122) or radiofrequency (RF) (n = 108) ablation. Both groups were comparable in baseline parameters. The follow-up period was 12 months. Clinical outcomes were estimated with the use of a three-stage scale. The rates of cardiovascular rehospitalizations, direct-current cardioversions and repeated ablations during were estimated within the follow-up. The quality of life (QoL) in the cryoablation group was measured using the AFEQT scale.Results.77% (n = 94) of patients in the cryoballoon ablation group and 71.3% (n = 77) of patients in the RF group (р = 0.71) demonstrated reported the optimal clinical effects. Both groups, cryo ablation and RF ablation, had similar rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (23.8 vs 28.7%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.4; р = 0.39), direct-current cardioversions (12.3 vs 17.6%, OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3–1.4; р = 0.26) and repeated ablations (9.8–11.1%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4–2.0; р = 0.75). The patients treated with cryoballoon as opposed to RF ablation had significantly more successful usage of “pill-in-pocket” strategy – 14.8 vs 6.5% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.01–6.2; р = 0.04). Significant improvements of the QoL parameters with strong size effect have been found in the cryoablation group, i.e. global score (GS) increased by 8.9±6.9 (95% CI 6.6–10.1; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001), symptoms (S) – by 8.3±7.9 (95% CI 4.2–8.8; dCohen 1.5; р<0.001), daily activities (DA) – by 10.0±6.9 (95% CI = 6.4–10.6; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001), treatment concerns (TC) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 6.3–9.2; dCohen 1.2; р<0.001) and treatment satisfaction (TS) – by 5.5±6.0 (95% CI 5.4–9.8; dCohen 0.9; р<0.001).Conclusion.The both catheter-based technologies had comparable clinical success. Cryoablation was characterized by improvement in all QoL parameters based on the AFEQT score.

P3778Long-term outcome of non-pharmacologial treatment of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a large single-centre experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Dinshaw ◽  
M Lemoine ◽  
J Hartmann ◽  
B Schaeffer ◽  
N Klatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
High Density ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Density Mapping ◽  
Ablation Success

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is generally associated with a significant deterioration of clinical status. Non-pharmacological treatment such as surgical and catheter ablation has become an established therapy for symptomatic AF but in patients with HCM often having a chronically increased left atrial pressure and extensive atrial cardiomyopathy the long-term outcome is uncertain. Purpose The present study aimed to analyse the long-term outcome of AF ablation in HCM and the mechanism of recurrent atrial arrhythmias using high-density mapping systems. Methods A total of 65 patients (age 64.5±9.9 years, 42 (64.6%) male) with HCM undergoing AF ablation for symptomatic AF were included in our study. The ablation strategy for catheter ablation included pulmonary vein isolation in all patients and biatrial ablation of complex fractionated electrograms with additional ablation lines if appropriate. In patients with suspected atrial tachycardia (AT) high-density activation and substrate mapping were performed. A surgical ablation at the time of an operative myectomy for left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was performed in 8 (12.3%) patients. The outcome was analysed using clinical assessment, Holter ECG and continuous rhythm monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices. Results Paroxysmal AF was present in 27 (41.6%), persistent AF in 37 (56.9%) and primary AT in 1 (1.5%) patients. The mean left atrial diameter was 54.1±12.5 ml. In 11 (16.9%) patients with AT high-density mapping was used to characterize the mechanism of the ongoing tachycardia. After 1.9±1.2 ablation procedures and a follow-up of 48.5±37.2 months, ablation success was demonstrated in 58.9% of patients. The success rate for paroxysmal and persistent AF was 70.0% and 55.8%, respectively (p=0.023). Of those patients with AT high-density mapping guided ablation was successful in 44.4% of patients. The LA diameter of patients with a successful ablation was smaller (52.2 vs. 58.1 mm; p=0.003). Conclusion Non-pharmacological treatment of AF in HCM is effective during long-term follow-up. Paroxysmal AF and a smaller LA diameter are favourable for successful ablation. In patients with complex AT the use of high-density mapping can guide ablation resulting in further ablation success in a reasonable number of patients.

P2846Focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FIRMAP AF study)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Tilz ◽  
C L Lenz ◽  
P S Sommer ◽  
N Sawan ◽  
R Meyer-Saraei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Rf Ablation ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Based on the assumption of trigger elimination, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) currently presents the gold standard of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, rapidly spinning rotors or focal impulse formation has been raised as a crucial sustaining mechanism of AF. Ablation of these rotors may potentially obviate the need for trigger elimination with PVI. Purpose This study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) guided catheter ablation only with the gold standard of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF. Methods This was a post-market, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, multi-center trial. Patients were enrolled at three centers and equally (1:1) randomized between those undergoing conventional RF ablation with PVI (PVI group) vs. those treated with FIRM-guided RF ablation without PVI (FIRM group). Data was collected at enrollment, procedure, and at 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits. The study was closed early by the sponsor. At the time of study closure, any pending follow-up visits were waived. Results From February 2016 until February 2018, a total of 51 (out of a planned 170) patients (mean age 63±10.6 years, 57% male) were enrolled and randomized. Four patients withdrew from the study prior to treatment, resulting in 23 patients allocated to the FIRM group and 24 in the PVI group. Only 13 patients in the FIRM group and 11 patients in the PVI group completed the 12-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was not completed given the small number of patients. Single-procedure effectiveness (freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after blanking period) was 52.9% (9/17) in the FIRM group and 85.7% (12/14) in the PVI group at 6 months; and 31.3% (5/16) in the FIRM group and 80% (8/10) in the PVI group at 12 months. Repeat procedures were performed in 45.8% (11/24) patients in the FIRM group and 7.4% (2/27) in the PVI group. The acute safety endpoint [freedom from procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE)] was achieved in 87% (20/23) of FIRM group patients and 100% (24/24) of PVI group patients. Procedure related SAEs occurred in three patients in the FIRM group: 1 femoral artery aneurysm and 2 injection site hematomas. No additional procedure-related SAEs were reported >7 days post-procedure. Conclusions These partial study effectiveness results reinforce the importance of PVI in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients and suggest that FIRM-guided ablation alone (without PVI) is not an effective strategy for treatment of paroxysmal AF in most patients. Further study is needed to understand the effectiveness of adding FIRM-guided ablation as an adjunct to PVI in this patient group. Acknowledgement/Funding Abbot

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document