Epidemiology and risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonisation and infections: case-controlled study from an academic medical center in a southern area of China

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Fang ◽  
Xiaohui Lu ◽  
Heping Xu ◽  
Xiaobo Ma ◽  
Yilan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Pulmonary Diseases ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Global Public Health ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE While the emergence and spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and related infections pose serious threats to global public health, the epidemiology and associated risk factors remain poorly understood and vary by geography. METHODS In a case-controlled retrospective study, we examined the prevalence, patient background and risk factors for CRE colonisation and infections, and all patient-derived CRE from January 2015 to January 2017. Isolated carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (CSE) from 2875 enrolled patients were randomly selected during the study. RESULTS CRE colonisation and infections detection rates were 47/2875 (1.6%). Respiratory tract specimens were most frequently seen in 20/47 (42.6%) cases. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the main isolate in 35/47 (74.5%) CRE. As for carbapenemase, KPC-2-producing bacteria was most frequently detected in 38/47 (80.9%) Enterobacteriaceae. No underlying conditions (P = 0.004), pulmonary diseases (P = 0.018) and no antibiotics used prior to culture within 30 days (P < 0.001) were statistically significant between the CRE and CSE groups. CONCLUSION Klebsiellapneumoniae was the main isolate of CRE. The blaKPC-2 was the predominant CRE gene. Underlying conditions especially pulmonary diseases and antibiotics used prior to culture within 30 days represented key risk factors for acquisition of CRE.

scholarly journals Clinical and Mortality Risk Factors in Bloodstream Infections with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaopeng Li ◽  
Huan Ye
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Central Venous Catheterization ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Venous Catheterization ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Objective. To investigate the risk factors underlying the occurrence and mortality of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Methods. Medical information was retrospectively analyzed from 148 cases of patients with Enterobacteriaceae BSIs at a medical center in China, between 2013 and 2015. Results. The 30-day mortality rate in the CRE group was 65.4%. Indwelling urethral catheterization, admission to the ICU, use of antibiotics within 30 days, and BSIs from the respiratory system were associated with CRE BSIs. Lung infection, abdominal infection, central venous catheterization, and use of hormones within 30 days were associated with mortality. Conclusion. The 30-day mortality rate of CRE BSIs was high. Lung infections, abdominal infections, central venous catheterization, and use of hormones within 30 days increased the mortality rate of Enterobacteriaceae BSIs.

scholarly journals Difference in Susceptibility Between Carbapenemase- and Non–Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s70-s70
Author(s):  
Justin Clark ◽  
David Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Automated System ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Break Points ◽  
Susceptibility Profiles ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) remain among the most urgent infectious threats according to the CDC Threats Reports. Although focus has often been placed on carbapenemase-producing phenotypes, there is increasing interest in distinguishing the optimal treatment and outcomes of carbapenemase-producing (CP) and non–carbapenemase-producing (NCP) CRE. We compare antimicrobial susceptibility patterns between CP-CRE and NCP-CRE isolated from patients at our academic medical center. Methods: All CRE isolates of Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, K. oxytoca, and K. pneumoniae in adult inpatients from 2010 to 2019 were included in this study. Susceptibility testing was performed using the BD Phoenix Automated System (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD). CLSI susceptibility break points were utilized in the susceptibility analyses of all antimicrobials tested. To determine carbapenemase production, isolates resistant only to ertapenem were considered NCP-CRE, and those resistant to both ertapenem and meropenem were considered CP-CRE. Statistical comparisons of susceptibility profiles were performed using either the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test. All data preprocessing and statistical analyses were performed using Python software. Results: Over the decade, we identified 291 CRE isolates (216 isolates resistant only to ertapenem and 75 resistant to ertapenem and meropenem). The ertapenem-resistant–only phenotype comprises ~66% of the total CRE population and is largely composed of E. cloacae (67%). As expected, most β-lactam susceptibilities were negligibly low between the 2 groups; however, other clinically relevant antimicrobials (aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) exhibited starkly different susceptibility profiles (P value Conclusions: These findings suggest that the most predominant CRE phenotype at our institution is not carbapenemase production. Evaluation of outcomes between CP- and NCP-CRE should be pursued further. The large differences in the MIC distributions may lead to differing outcomes for the affected patients.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Imipenem/relebactam activity compared to other antimicrobials against non-MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from an academic medical center

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Kulengowski ◽  
David S Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Phenylboronic Acid ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

ABSTRACTBackgroundCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) cause significant mortality and are resistant to most antimicrobial agents. Imipenem/relebactam, a novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, and 16 other antimicrobials were evaluated against non-metallo-beta-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates from a United States tertiary academic medical center.ObjectivesTo evaluate imipenem/relebactam and other commonly utilised antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Methods: Clinical isolates (n  = 96) resistant to ertapenem or meropenem by BD Phoenix (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and negative for metallo-beta-lactamase-production by an EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA)/phenylboronic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) disk diffusion assay were identified and collected from January 2012 to January 2017. In vitro susceptibility by broth microdilution was performed according to CLSI guidelines using CLSI susceptibility breakpoints for 17 antimicrobials (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA).ResultsCRE primarily produced Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and consisted primarily of K. pneumoniae (55%) and Enterobacter spp. (25%), followed by Citrobacter spp. (10%), Escherichia coli (5%), and others (5%). CRE were most susceptible to imipenem/relebactam (100%), followed by amikacin (85%), tigecycline (82%), and polymyxin B/colistin (65%). The median reduction of imipenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of non-MBL-producing CRE was 16-fold but ranged from 0.5 to >512-fold. The MIC50, MIC90 and MIC range of imipenem/relebactam was 0.5/4, 1/4 and 0.06/4–1/4 mg/L, respectively.ConclusionsImipenem/relebactam exhibits excellent activity against CRE that produce KPC.

scholarly journals Risk factors associated with physician trainee concern over missed educational opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny S. Lou ◽  
Charles W. Goss ◽  
Bradley A. Evanoff ◽  
Jennifer G. Duncan ◽  
Thomas Kannampallil
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Physician Trainee ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a transformation of clinical care practices to protect both patients and providers. These changes led to a decrease in patient volume, impacting physician trainee education due to lost clinical and didactic opportunities. We measured the prevalence of trainee concern over missed educational opportunities and investigated the risk factors leading to such concerns. Methods All residents and fellows at a large academic medical center were invited to participate in a web-based survey in May of 2020. Participants responded to questions regarding demographic characteristics, specialty, primary assigned responsibility during the previous 2 weeks (clinical, education, or research), perceived concern over missed educational opportunities, and burnout. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between missed educational opportunities and the measured variables. Results 22% (301 of 1375) of the trainees completed the survey. 47% of the participants were concerned about missed educational opportunities. Trainees assigned to education at home had 2.85 [95%CI 1.33–6.45] greater odds of being concerned over missed educational opportunities as compared with trainees performing clinical work. Trainees performing research were not similarly affected [aOR = 0.96, 95%CI (0.47–1.93)]. Trainees in pathology or radiology had 2.51 [95%CI 1.16–5.68] greater odds of concern for missed educational opportunities as compared with medicine. Trainees with greater concern over missed opportunities were more likely to be experiencing burnout (p = 0.038). Conclusions Trainees in radiology or pathology and those assigned to education at home were more likely to be concerned about their missed educational opportunities. Residency programs should consider providing trainees with research or at home clinical opportunities as an alternative to self-study should future need for reduced clinical hours arise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document