A Genomics-Based Screen for Yeast Mutants With an Altered Recombination/End-Joining Repair Ratio

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 677-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Large Set ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Minimal Set ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Yeast Assay ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Yeast Mutants ◽  
Clear Increase

AbstractWe recently described a yeast assay suitable for genetic screening in which simple religation nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA) compete for repair of an I-SceI-created double-strand break. Here, the required allele has been introduced into an array of 4781 MATa deletion mutants and each strain screened individually. Two mutants (rad52 and srs2) showed a clear increase in the NHEJ/SSA ratio due to preferential impairment of SSA, but no mutant increased the absolute frequency of NHEJ significantly above the wild-type level. Seven mutants showed a decreased NHEJ/SSA ratio due to frank loss of NHEJ, which corresponded to all known structural/catalytic NHEJ components (yku70, yku80, dnl4, lif1, rad50, mre11, and xrs2); no new mutants in this category were identified. A clearly separable and surprisingly large set of 16 other mutants showed partial defects in NHEJ. Further examination of these revealed that NEJ1 can entirely account for the mating-type regulation of NHEJ, but that this regulatory role was distinct from the postdiauxic/stationary-phase induction of NHEJ that was deficient in other mutants (especially doa1, fyv6, and mck1). These results are discussed in the context of the minimal set of required proteins and regulatory inputs for NHEJ.

scholarly journals Rejoining of DNA Double-Strand Breaks as a Function of Overhang Length

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 896-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Daley ◽  
Thomas E. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Gc Content ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Overhang Length ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT The ends of spontaneously occurring double-strand breaks (DSBs) may contain various lengths of single-stranded DNA, blocking lesions, and gaps and flaps generated by end annealing. To investigate the processing of such structures, we developed an assay in which annealed oligonucleotides are ligated onto the ends of a linearized plasmid which is then transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Reconstitution of a marker occurs only when the oligonucleotides are incorporated and repair is in frame, permitting rapid analysis of complex DSB ends. Here, we created DSBs with compatible overhangs of various lengths and asked which pathways are required for their precise repair. Three mechanisms of rejoining were observed, regardless of overhang polarity: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing-like pathway, and a third mechanism independent of the first two mechanisms. DSBs with overhangs of less than 4 bases were mainly repaired by NHEJ. Repair became less dependent on NHEJ when the overhangs were longer or had a higher GC content. Repair of overhangs greater than 8 nucleotides was as much as 150-fold more efficient, impaired 10-fold by rad52 mutation, and highly accurate. Reducing the microhomology extent between long overhangs reduced their repair dramatically, to less than NHEJ of comparable short overhangs. These data support a model in which annealing energy is a primary determinant of the rejoining efficiency and mechanism.

scholarly journals RecF and RecR Play Critical Roles in the Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing Pathways of Mycobacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (19) ◽  
pp. 3121-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Gupta ◽  
Stewart Shuman ◽  
Michael S. Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Central Position ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTMycobacteria encode three DNA double-strand break repair pathways: (i) RecA-dependent homologous recombination (HR), (ii) Ku-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and (iii) RecBCD-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). Mycobacterial HR has two presynaptic pathway options that rely on the helicase-nuclease AdnAB and the strand annealing protein RecO, respectively. Ablation ofadnABorrecOindividually causes partial impairment of HR, but loss ofadnABandrecOin combination abolishes HR. RecO, which can accelerate annealing of single-stranded DNAin vitro, also participates in the SSA pathway. The functions of RecF and RecR, which, in other model bacteria, function in concert with RecO as mediators of RecA loading, have not been examined in mycobacteria. Here, we present a genetic analysis ofrecFandrecRin mycobacterial recombination. We find that RecF, like RecO, participates in the AdnAB-independent arm of the HR pathway and in SSA. In contrast, RecR is required for all HR in mycobacteria and for SSA. The essentiality of RecR as an agent of HR is yet another distinctive feature of mycobacterial DNA repair.IMPORTANCEThis study clarifies the molecular requirements for homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Specifically, we demonstrate that RecF and RecR play important roles in both the RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing pathways. Coupled with our previous findings (R. Gupta, M. Ryzhikov, O. Koroleva, M. Unciuleac, S. Shuman, S. Korolev, and M. S. Glickman, Nucleic Acids Res 41:2284–2295, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1298), these results revise our view of mycobacterial recombination and place the RecFOR system in a central position in homology-dependent DNA repair.

Enhancement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae End-Joining Efficiency by Cell Growth Stage but Not by Impairment of Recombination

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 1015-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elissa Karathanasis ◽  
Thomas E Wilson
Keyword(s):  
High Efficiency ◽  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Glucose Depletion ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Recombination Pathway

Abstract Cells can repair DNA double-strand breaks by both homologous and nonhomologous mechanisms. To explore the basis of pathway utilization, we developed both plasmid and chromosomal yeast repair assays in which breaks are created with restriction endonucleases so that nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) competes with the single-strand annealing (SSA) recombination pathway, which we show acts with high efficiency via terminal direct repeats of only 28 bp and with reduced but measurable efficiency at 10 bp. The chromosomal assay utilizes a novel approach termed suicide deletion in which the endonuclease cleaves its own gene from the chromosome, thereby ending the futile cleavage cycle that otherwise prevents detection of simple-religation events. Eliminating SSA as a possibility in either assay, either by removal of the direct repeat or by mutation of RAD52, increased the relative but not the absolute efficiency of NHEJ. In contrast, the apparent efficiency of NHEJ was specifically increased in the G1 stage of the haploid cell cycle, as well as by the glucose depletion-signaled transition to stationary phase. The combined results argue against a model in which pathway utilization is determined by a passive competition. Instead, they demonstrate an active regulation designed to optimize the likelihood of genome restoration based on cell state.

scholarly journals Helicase Q promotes homology-driven DNA double-strand break repair and prevents tandem duplications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kamp ◽  
B. B. L. G. Lemmens ◽  
R. J. Romeijn ◽  
S. C. Changoer ◽  
R. van Schendel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Instability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Cellular Survival ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Tandem Duplications

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks are a major threat to cellular survival and genetic integrity. In addition to high fidelity repair, three intrinsically mutagenic DNA break repair routes have been described, i.e. single-strand annealing (SSA), polymerase theta-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) and residual ill-defined microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) activity. Here, we identify C. elegans Helicase Q (HELQ-1) as being essential for MMEJ as well as for SSA. We also find HELQ-1 to be crucial for the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) mode of homologous recombination (HR). Loss of HELQ-1 leads to increased genome instability: patchwork insertions arise at deletion junctions due to abortive rounds of polymerase theta activity, and tandem duplications spontaneously accumulate in genomes of helq-1 mutant animals as a result of TMEJ of abrogated HR intermediates. Our work thus implicates HELQ activity for all DSB repair modes guided by complementary base pairs and provides mechanistic insight into mutational signatures common in HR-defective cancers.

scholarly journals Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith L. Yanowitz ◽  
Nicolas Macaisne ◽  
Zebulin Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Strand Annealing

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious lesions DNA can endure. Yet, DSBs are programmed at the onset of meiosis and are required to facilitate appropriate reduction of ploidy in daughter cells. Repair of these break is tightly controlled to favor homologous recombination (HR), the only repair pathway that can form crossovers. However, little is known about how the activities of alternative repair pathways are regulated at these stages. We discovered an unexpected synthetic interaction between the DSB machinery and strand-exchange proteins. Depleting theC. elegansDSB-promoting factors HIM-5 and DSB-2 suppresses the formation of chromosome fusions that arise in the absence of RAD-51 or other strand-exchange mediators. Our investigations reveal that non-homologous and theta-mediated end joining (c-NHEJ and TMEJ, respectively) and single strand annealing (SSA) function redundantly to repair DSBs when HR is compromised and that HIM-5 influences the utilization of TMEJ and SSA.

Pathways and assays for DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 879-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinbao Li ◽  
Huize Sun ◽  
Yulin Huang ◽  
Yali Wang ◽  
Yuyan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Homology Search ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
D Loop ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Strand Annealing

AbstractDouble strand breaks (DSBs) are the most detrimental type of DNA damage that must be repaired to ensure genome integrity and cell survival. Unrepaired or improperly repaired DSBs can potentially cause tumorigenesis or cell death. DSBs are primarily repaired by non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination (HR). The HR pathway is initiated by processing of the 5′-end of DSBs to generate 3′-end single-strand DNA (ssDNA). Furthermore, the intermediate is channeled to one of the HR sub-pathways, including: (i) double Holliday junction (dHJ) pathway, (ii) synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA), (iii) break-induced replication (BIR), and (iv) single-strand annealing (SSA). In the dHJ sub-pathway, the 3′-ssDNA coated with Rad51 recombinase performs homology search and strand invasion, forming a displacement loop (D-loop). Capture of the second end by the D-loop generates a dHJ intermediate that is subsequently dissolved by DNA helicase or resolved by nucleases, producing non-crossover or crossover products. In SDSA, the newly synthesized strand is displaced from the D-loop and anneals to the end on the other side of the DSBs, producing non-crossovers. In contrast, BIR repairs one-end DSBs by copying the sequence up to the end of the template chromosome, resulting in translocation or loss of heterozygosity. SSA takes place when resection reveals flanking homologous repeats that can anneal, leading to deletion of the intervening sequences. A variety of reporter assays have been developed to monitor distinct HR sub-pathways in both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals. Here, we summarize the principles and representative assays for different HR sub-pathways with an emphasis on the studies in the budding yeast.

scholarly journals Behavior of dicentric chromosomes in budding yeast

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. e1009442
Author(s):  
Diana Cook ◽  
Sarah Long ◽  
John Stanton ◽  
Patrick Cusick ◽  
Colleen Lawrimore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phenotypic Diversity ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dicentric Chromosomes ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

DNA double-strand breaks arisein vivowhen a dicentric chromosome (two centromeres on one chromosome) goes through mitosis with the two centromeres attached to opposite spindle pole bodies. Repair of the DSBs generates phenotypic diversity due to the range of monocentric derivative chromosomes that arise. To explore whether DSBs may be differentially repaired as a function of their spatial position in the chromosome, we have examined the structure of monocentric derivative chromosomes from cells containing a suite of dicentric chromosomes in which the distance between the two centromeres ranges from 6.5 kb to 57.7 kb. Two major classes of repair products, homology-based (homologous recombination (HR) and single-strand annealing (SSA)) and end-joining (non-homologous (NHEJ) and micro-homology mediated (MMEJ)) were identified. The distribution of repair products varies as a function of distance between the two centromeres. Genetic dependencies on double strand break repair (Rad52), DNA ligase (Lif1), and S phase checkpoint (Mrc1) are indicative of distinct repair pathway choices for DNA breaks in the pericentromeric chromatin versus the arms.

scholarly journals Multiple Pathways for Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Mammalian Chromosomes

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8353-8360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfu Lin ◽  
Tamas Lukacsovich ◽  
Alan S. Waldman
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT To study repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian chromosomes, we designed DNA substrates containing a thymidine kinase (TK) gene disrupted by the 18-bp recognition site for yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Some substrates also contained a second defective TK gene sequence to serve as a genetic donor in recombinational repair. A genomic DSB was induced by introducing endonuclease I-SceI into cells containing a stably integrated DNA substrate. DSB repair was monitored by selection for TK-positive segregants. We observed that intrachromosomal DSB repair is accomplished with nearly equal efficiencies in either the presence or absence of a homologous donor sequence. DSB repair is achieved by nonhomologous end-joining or homologous recombination, but rarely by nonconservative single-strand annealing. Repair of a chromosomal DSB by homologous recombination occurs mainly by gene conversion and appears to require a donor sequence greater than a few hundred base pairs in length. Nonhomologous end-joining events typically involve loss of very few nucleotides, and some events are associated with gene amplification at the repaired locus. Additional studies revealed that precise religation of DNA ends with no other concomitant sequence alteration is a viable mode for repair of DSBs in a mammalian genome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document