scholarly journals CTCF binding sites promote transcription initiation and prevent DNA methylation on the maternal allele at the imprinted H19/Igf2 locus

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (19) ◽  
pp. 2945-2954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Engel ◽  
Joanne L. Thorvaldsen ◽  
Marisa S. Bartolomei
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximei Luo ◽  
Tianjiao Zhang ◽  
Yixiao Zhai ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Shumei Zhang ◽  
...  

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism for gene regulation. The conventional view of DNA methylation is that DNA methylation could disrupt protein-DNA interactions and repress gene expression. Several recent studies reported that DNA methylation could alter transcription factors (TFs) binding sequence specificity in vitro. Here, we took advantage of the large sets of ChIP-seq data for TFs and whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data in many cell types to perform a systematic analysis of the protein-DNA methylation in vivo. We observed that many TFs could bind methylated DNA regions, especially in H1-hESC cells. By locating binding sites, we confirmed that some TFs could bind to methylated CpGs directly. The different proportion of CpGs at TF binding specificity motifs in different methylation statuses shows that some TFs are sensitive to methylation and some could bind to the methylated DNA with different motifs, such as CEBPB and CTCF. At the same time, TF binding could interactively alter local DNA methylation. The TF hypermethylation binding sites extensively overlap with enhancers. And we also found that some DNase I hypersensitive sites were specifically hypermethylated in H1-hESC cells. At last, compared with TFs’ binding regions in multiple cell types, we observed that CTCF binding to high methylated regions in H1-hESC were not conservative. These pieces of evidence indicate that TFs that bind to hypermethylation DNA in H1-hESC cells may associate with enhancers to regulate special biological functions.


PLoS Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1009189
Author(s):  
Alejandro Martin-Trujillo ◽  
Nihir Patel ◽  
Felix Richter ◽  
Bharati Jadhav ◽  
Paras Garg ◽  
...  

Although DNA methylation is the best characterized epigenetic mark, the mechanism by which it is targeted to specific regions in the genome remains unclear. Recent studies have revealed that local DNA methylation profiles might be dictated by cis-regulatory DNA sequences that mainly operate via DNA-binding factors. Consistent with this finding, we have recently shown that disruption of CTCF-binding sites by rare single nucleotide variants (SNVs) can underlie cis-linked DNA methylation changes in patients with congenital anomalies. These data raise the hypothesis that rare genetic variation at transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) might contribute to local DNA methylation patterning. In this work, by combining blood genome-wide DNA methylation profiles, whole genome sequencing-derived SNVs from 247 unrelated individuals along with 133 predicted TFBS motifs derived from ENCODE ChIP-Seq data, we observed an association between the disruption of binding sites for multiple TFs by rare SNVs and extreme DNA methylation values at both local and, to a lesser extent, distant CpGs. While the majority of these changes affected only single CpGs, 24% were associated with multiple outlier CpGs within ±1kb of the disrupted TFBS. Interestingly, disruption of functionally constrained sites within TF motifs lead to larger DNA methylation changes at nearby CpG sites. Altogether, these findings suggest that rare SNVs at TFBS negatively influence TF-DNA binding, which can lead to an altered local DNA methylation profile. Furthermore, subsequent integration of DNA methylation and RNA-Seq profiles from cardiac tissues enabled us to observe an association between rare SNV-directed DNA methylation and outlier expression of nearby genes. In conclusion, our findings not only provide insights into the effect of rare genetic variation at TFBS on shaping local DNA methylation and its consequences on genome regulation, but also provide a rationale to incorporate DNA methylation data to interpret the functional role of rare variants.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2494-2494
Author(s):  
Floriana Manodoro ◽  
Jacek Marzec ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Tracy Chaplin ◽  
Jelena V Jovanovic ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(15;17) which results in the expression of the chimeric protein PML- RARα. Compared to the wild type retinoic acid receptor α (RARα), the fusion protein acquires dominant oncogenic properties and the chromosomal rearrangement is identified as the trigger of APL. However the pathogenesis of APL cannot be explained by the sole failure of RARα regulation and additional genetic and epigenetic alterations are required. We and others have shown that the microRNAs (miRNAs) clustered in the chromosome 14q32 imprinted domain and epigenetically regulated by the upstream differentially methylated regions (DMRs) are overexpressed only in APL (Dixon-McIver et al., 2008; Li et al., 2008; Valleron et al., 2012). Here, using high-throughput amplicon bisulfite sequencing (Roche 454), we characterized the DNA methylation profile of the DMRs in bone marrow/peripheral blood samples from patients with APL, other subclasses of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and from healthy donors. Sequence reads were quality filtered and a total of 923,981 used to determine the methylation status of 202 CpGs. We identified an APL-specific hypermethylation signature (Fig. 1) at the DMR that spans the promoter of the MEG3 gene (MEG3-DMR) and partially overlaps the miRNA cluster. Hypermethylation encompassed the binding site motifs for the enhancer blocking protein CTCF. Consistent with the CTCF insulating activity, CpG methylation at the CTCF binding sites positively correlated with the expression of miRNAs (Fig. 2). Notably, no significant DNA methylation changes were detected at the intergenic imprinting control region (IG-DMR). Indeed, consistent with a scenario whereby only the genes regulated by the MEG3-DMR would be affected by the aberrant methylation, the gene expression profile performed on a cohort of 97 AML patients showed that among the imprinted genes of the domain only MEG3 was distinctively up-regulated in APL. Taking advantage of the long sequence reads obtained, we performed the haplotype analysis of the DNA methylation changes in diagnostic/remission sample pairs and demonstrated that hypermethylation arises in a mono-allelic manner in APL (Fig. 3). As the expression of the 14q32 miRNAs in the adult is normally restricted to the brain, we propose a model in which loss of imprinting (LOI) at 14q32 leads to aberrant expression of the miRNAs in APL cells. This study provides novel insights into the epigenetic characterization of APL and the mechanism underlying the deregulation of a specific cluster of miRNAs in this subtype of leukemia. The 14q32 miRNAs include species with oncogene and tumor-suppressor activity and their up-regulation may play a role in the APL pathogenesis. Further investigations are required to determine whether LOI is involved in the cancer initiation or it occurs at a later stage, possibly in association with the expression of the chimeric protein PML-RARα.Figure 1Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of the CpG methylation levels. Each row represents a CpG site and each column a sample. The percentage of CpG methylation is depicted using color scales of red (CpG methylation > 50%) and green (CpG methylation < 50%). Sample group labels are indicated (APL; Control; Remission; AMLs).Figure 1. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of the CpG methylation levels. Each row represents a CpG site and each column a sample. The percentage of CpG methylation is depicted using color scales of red (CpG methylation > 50%) and green (CpG methylation < 50%). Sample group labels are indicated (APL; Control; Remission; AMLs).Figure 2Correlation between DNA methylation levels and miRNAs expression. The expression of 14q32 miRNAs was correlated with the DNA methylation level at the DMRs. The position of CpG islands, CTCF binding sites (A-B-C-D-E-F-G) and amplicons is labeled with green, red and blue horizontal bars, respectively. Amplicons 1-9 reside in the MEG3-DMR. The correlation is represented with red and green vertical bars indicating positive and negative values, respectively.Figure 2. Correlation between DNA methylation levels and miRNAs expression. The expression of 14q32 miRNAs was correlated with the DNA methylation level at the DMRs. The position of CpG islands, CTCF binding sites (A-B-C-D-E-F-G) and amplicons is labeled with green, red and blue horizontal bars, respectively. Amplicons 1-9 reside in the MEG3-DMR. The correlation is represented with red and green vertical bars indicating positive and negative values, respectively.Figure 3Haplotype analysis. The sequenced amplicons were interrogated using the available SNPs (UCSC database). When a heterozygous SNP was observed, sequence reads were separated accordingly to the SNP genotype and unsupervised cluster analysis performed on the allelic CpG methylation pattern. Allelic DNA methylation profiles at the MEG3-DMR: the diagnostic (A) and complete remission (B) stages of a patient with APL; (C) healthy donor. D) Allelic DNA-methylation profile at the IG-DMR, healthy donor. Each column represents a CpG site and each row the methylation pattern of a single sequence read. Blue, methylated; yellow not methylated.Figure 3. Haplotype analysis. The sequenced amplicons were interrogated using the available SNPs (UCSC database). When a heterozygous SNP was observed, sequence reads were separated accordingly to the SNP genotype and unsupervised cluster analysis performed on the allelic CpG methylation pattern. Allelic DNA methylation profiles at the MEG3-DMR: the diagnostic (A) and complete remission (B) stages of a patient with APL; (C) healthy donor. D) Allelic DNA-methylation profile at the IG-DMR, healthy donor. Each column represents a CpG site and each row the methylation pattern of a single sequence read. Blue, methylated; yellow not methylated. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Llères ◽  
Benoît Moindrot ◽  
Rakesh Pathak ◽  
Vincent Piras ◽  
Mélody Matelot ◽  
...  

SUMMARYMammalian genomic imprinting is essential for development and provides a unique paradigm to explore intra-cellular differences in chromatin configuration. Here, we compared chromatin structure of the two conserved imprinted domains controlled by paternal DNA methylation imprints—the Igf2-H19 and the Dlk1-Dio3 domains—and assessed the involvement of the insulator protein CTCF. At both domains, CTCF binds the maternal allele of a differentially-methylated region (DMR), in addition to multiple instances of bi-allelic CTCF binding in their surrounding TAD (Topologically Associating Domain). On the paternal chromosome, bi-allelic CTCF binding alone is sufficient to structure a first level of sub-TAD organization. Maternal-specific CTCF binding at the DMRs adds a further layer of sub-TAD organization, which essentially hijacks the existing paternal sub-TAD organisation. Genome-editing experiments at the Dlk1-Dio3 locus confirm that the maternal sub-TADs are essential during development to maintain the imprinted Dlk1 gene in an inactive state on the maternal chromosome.


2011 ◽  
Vol 223 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Zitzmann ◽  
D von Schweinitz ◽  
J Müller-Höcker ◽  
R Kappler ◽  
J Hubertus

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3848-3848
Author(s):  
Martina Kapalova ◽  
Pavel Burda ◽  
Karin Vargova ◽  
Filipp Savvulidi ◽  
Tomas Zikmund ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3848 Introduction: 5-azacitidine (AZA) represents very promising albeit not fully efficient therapy for int-2 and high risk MDS patients. Molecules that interfere with AZA therapy are not known. In significant proportion of MDS patients, PU.1 gene is methylated at −17-kb-located upstream regulatory element (URE) where several key transcription factors regulate PU.1 expression. PU.1 represents major factor that controls normal myeloid differentiation. Methylated URE in MDS progenitors can be efficiently demethylated by AZA leading to restoration of cell differentiation capacity (Curik et al 2012). PU.1 gene contains several binding sites for transcription factor CTCF. CTCF represents very important modulator of gene expression, whose binding to DNA can be prevented by DNA methylation. We herein asked if CTCF regulates PU.1 and if so, whether its association with PU.1 gene coincides with DNA methylation status of MDS blasts. Methods: Human high risk MDS patient CD34+ progenitors and MDS-derived erytroleukaemia OCI-M2 and murine erythroleukaemia cell (MEL) lines were studied by RT-PCR, immunoblotting, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. Manipulation of gene expression was done by transfection of cDNA or siRNA. Results: We herein show that CTCF binding sites at PU.1 gene similarly to URE are severely methylated in CD34+ progenitors from high risk MDS patients and MDS-derived erytroleukaemia cell line, and as expected, AZA induced their rapid demethylation. Methylated CTCF binding sites are not occupied by CTCF. However upon AZA-mediated demethylation, CTCF is recruited to the binding sites at PU.1 gene as determined by ChIP. Our other data provided evidence that CTCF interacts with the ISWI ATPse SNF2H (SMARCA5). Indeed, the recruitment of CTCF at PU.1 gene in MDS/AML cells was coincident with recruitment of its interacting partner SMARCA5. In addition, SMARCA5 facilitates CTCF binding to the DNA as demonstrated at ICR locus (near H19 and Igf2 genes) upon siRNA-mediated downregulation of SMARCA5. To understand role of CTCF-SMARCA5 recruitment to the PU.1 gene and its effects on PU.1 expression we upregulated CTCF expression by transfecting an expression plasmid encoding CTCF cDNA and observed that upon increasing CTCF levels the PU.1 protein level was downregulated. Conversely, downregulation of SMARCA5 by siRNA caused upregulation of PU.1 levels. These data indicated that PU.1 is negatively regulated by CTCF and SMARCA5. Furthermore, inhibitory effects of CTCF and SMARCA5 on PU.1 expression were also demonstrated in presence of AZA in MDS cells following DNA demethylation of PU.1 gene. Conclusion: Our results indicate that CTCF and SMARCA5 are cooperating inhibitory factors to downregulate PU.1 and that AZA-mediated demethylation facilitates the CTCF-SMARCA5 binding to PU.1 gene in MDS patients. CTCF and SMARCA5 are novel factors that interfere with positive prodifferentiation effects of AZA. (Grant support: P305/12/1033, UNCE 204021, PRVOUK-P24/LF1/3, SVV-2012–264507, P301/12/P380, GAUK 251070 45410 and 251135 82210). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (13) ◽  
pp. 2066-2074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Floriana Manodoro ◽  
Jacek Marzec ◽  
Tracy Chaplin ◽  
Farideh Miraki-Moud ◽  
Eva Moravcsik ◽  
...  

Key Points Loss of imprinting occurs at the 14q32 domain in APL. DNA methylation at the CTCF binding sites correlates with the overexpression of 14q32 miRNAs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1124-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Han ◽  
Dong-Hoon Lee ◽  
Piroska E. Szabó

ABSTRACT A paternally methylated imprinting control region (ICR) directs allele-specific expression of the imprinted H19 and Igf2 genes. CTCF protein binding in the ICR is required in the maternal chromosome for insulating Igf2 from the shared enhancers, initiation of the H19 promoter transcription, maintaining DNA hypomethylation, and chromosome loop formation. Using novel quantitative allele-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation-single-nucleotide primer extension assays, we measured the chromatin composition along the H19/Igf2 imprinted domain in cells with engineered mutations at the four ICR-CTCF binding sites. Abolishing CTCF binding in the ICR reduced normally maternal allele-specific H3K9 acetylation and H3K4 methylation at the H19 ICR and promoter/gene body and maternal allele-specific H3K27 trimethylation at the Igf2 P2 promoter and Igf2 differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Paternal H3K27 trimethylation and macroH2A1 became biallelic in the mutant cells at the H19 promoter while paternal H3K9 acetylation and H3K4 methylation became biallelic at the Igf2 DMRs. We provide evidence that CTCF is the single major organizer of allele-specific chromatin composition in this domain. This finding has important implications: (i) for mechanisms of insulation since CTCF regulates chromatin at a distance, involving repression by H3K27 trimethylation at the Igf2 locus independently of repression by DNA hypermethylation; and (ii) for mechanisms of genomic imprinting since point mutations of CTCF binding sites cause domain-wide “paternalization” of the maternal allele's chromatin composition.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 11184-11190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bongjune Yoon ◽  
Herry Herman ◽  
Benjamin Hu ◽  
Yoon Jung Park ◽  
Anders Lindroth ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Imprinted methylation of the paternal Rasgrf1 allele in mice occurs at a differentially methylated domain (DMD) 30 kbp 5′ of the promoter. A repeated sequence 3′ of the DMD regulates imprinted methylation, which is required for imprinted expression. Here we identify the mechanism by which methylation controls imprinting. The DMD is an enhancer blocker that binds CTCF in a methylation-sensitive manner. CTCF bound to the unmethylated maternal allele silences expression. CTCF binding to the paternal allele is prevented by repeat-mediated methylation, allowing expression. Optimal in vitro enhancer-blocking activity requires CTCF binding sites. The enhancer blocker can be bypassed in vivo and imprinting abolished by placing an extra enhancer proximal to the promoter. Together, the repeats and the DMD constitute a binary switch that regulates Rasgrf1 imprinting.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin P. Berman ◽  
Yaping Liu ◽  
Theresa K. Kelly

Nucleosome organization and DNA methylation are two epigenetic mechanisms that are important for proper control of mammalian transcription. Numerous lines of evidence suggest an interaction between these two mechanisms, but the nature of this interaction in vivo remains elusive. Whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing studies have shown that human methylation levels are periodic at intervals of approximately 190 bp, suggesting a genome-wide relationship between the two marks. A recent report (Chodavarapu et al., 2010) attributed this to higher methylation levels of DNA within nucleosomes. Here, we propose an alternate explanation for these nucleosomal periodicities. By examining methylation patterns in published datasets, we find that genome-wide methylation levels are highest within the linker regions that occur between nucleosomes in multi-nucleosome arrays. This effect is most prominent within long-range Partially Methylated Domains (PMDs) and the strongly positioned nucleosomes that flank CTCF binding sites. The CTCF-flanking nucleosomes retain positioning even in regions completely devoid of CpG dinucleotides, suggesting that DNA methylation is not required for proper positioning. We propose that DNA methylation is inhibited by histone proteins at CTCF and other unknown classes of nucleosomes within PMDs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document