P–206 Does oocyte vitrifcation affect morphokinetics of subsequent embryo development?

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Montgomery ◽  
K Montgomery ◽  
D Nash ◽  
A Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Development ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Human Embryos ◽  
Early Cleavage ◽  
Oocyte Vitrification ◽  
Early Developmental

Abstract Study question Are the morphokinetic profiles, as assessed using time-lapse technology, of human embryos developed from vitrified oocytes different to those from fresh oocytes. Summary answer Vitrification of oocytes does have an effect on early developmental morphokinetic profiles, but this is normalized by the time the embryo has reached blastocyst. What is known already Vitrification of oocytes is now commonplace, but little is known about the effect this may have on subsequent embryo development. Study design, size, duration This was a retrospective data analysis, from 8 fertility clinics in the UK between 2012 and 2019. Embryos from patients in the vitrified group (n = 557) were matched to fresh patient controls (n = 539). The matching was performed based on the following criteria: type of treatment, patient age, cause of infertility and number of embryos. Participants/materials, setting, methods The embryos in each group were compared for mean morphokinetics of key developmental stages in hours post insemination (hpi). Parameters compared included early cleavage divisions (t2-t8), time to start of compaction (tSC), time to morula (tM), time to start blastulation (tSB), time to full blastocyst (tB) and duration of compaction (tB-tSC). Treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups, including percentage of blastocyst formation, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate. Main results and the role of chance The results showed a significant delay across all early cleavage divisions as follows for vitrified and fresh oocytes respectively: 2-cell (28.14 vs 26.10 (p < 0.001)), 3 cell (37.56 vs 35.37 (p < 0.001)), 4 cell (40.58 vs 37.54 (p < 0.001)), 5 cell (50.31 vs 47.14 (p < 0.001)), 6 cell (53.99 vs 50.87 (p < 0.001)), 7 cell (57.08 vs 54.48 (p < 0.001)) and 8 cell (61.26 vs 58.91 (p < 0.01)). In addition, tSC was also significantly delayed in the vitrified group (80.65 vs 76.36 (p < 0.001)). However, the compaction stage was significantly shorter in the vitrified oocytes (19.02 vs 22.45 (p < 0.001)). Therefore, there was no difference in the time that embryos derived from fresh and vitrified oocytes reached the blastocyst stage (108.03 vs 107.78 (p > 0.05)). No difference was found in clinical pregnancy, implantation or live birth rates but significantly fewer blastocyst developed from vitrified oocytes compared to fresh (36.09% vs 42.4% (p < 0.05)). Limitations, reasons for caution Although this was a matched analysis, it was a retrospective in nature therefore is subject to confounders. However, it would be problematic to perform a prospective randomized controlled trial to address this study question given the need to randomize patients to elective freezing of oocytes prior to embryo creation. Wider implications of the findings: Vitrification of oocytes may affect early developmental morphokinetic profiles, but any effect is normalized by the time the embryo has reached blastocyst. However, fewer blastocysts may develop following oocyte vitrification. This may have implications for oocyte donation banks and those patients choosing to cryopreserve oocytes. Trial registration number NA

scholarly journals Post-warming survival rates and clinical outcomes of human cleavage stage embryos vitrified/warmed using CryoTouch and Cryotop methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Somayeh Keshavarzi ◽  
Azadeh Dokht Eftekhari ◽  
Hajar Vahabzadeh ◽  
Marzieh Mehrafza ◽  
Robabeh Taheripanah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Human Embryos ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Embryo Survival

Abstract Background Vitrification has become the method of choice for cryopreservation of human embryos and gametes. There are multiple commercial media, containing different combinations and concentrations of cryoprotectants, available for vitrification and warming procedures. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare post-warming survival rate and clinical outcomes of cleavage stage embryos vitrified/warmed using two different commercial methods (CryoTouch and Cryotop) during intracytoplasmic sperm injection/frozen embryo transfer (ICSI/FET) cycles. This retrospective study evaluated a total of 173 FET cycles performed on 446 warmed cleavage stage embryos between January 2018 and December 2020. Post-warming embryo survival rate and clinical outcomes including clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates were calculated. Results The results showed no significant differences between two groups in terms of post-warming survival rate (p value = 0.5020), clinical pregnancy rate (p value = 0.7411), implantation rate (p value = 0.4694), and live birth rate (p value = 0.5737). Conclusions Collectively, high successful rates were observed in outcomes of vitrified/warmed cleavage stage embryos using both CryoTouch and Cryotop commercial methods.

scholarly journals Live Birth Rate of Fresh Embryo Transfer with GnRH Agonist Long Protocol is Higher Than Frozen Embryo Transfer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Ding ◽  
Jingwei Yang ◽  
Lan Li ◽  
Na Yang ◽  
Ling Lan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Long Protocol

Abstract Background: Along with progress in embryo cryopreservation, especially in vitrification has made freeze all strategy more acceptable. Some studies found comparable or higher live birth rate with frozen embryo transfer (FET) than with fresh embryo transfer（ET）in gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol. But there were no reports about live birth rate differences between fresh ET and FET with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol. The aim of this study is to analyze whether patients benefit from freeze all strategy in GnRH-a protocol from real-world data.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, in which women undergoing fresh ET or FET with GnRH-a long protocol at Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute from January 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy rate.Results: A total of 7,814 patients met inclusion criteria, implementing 5,216 fresh ET cycles and 2,598 FET cycles, respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients were significantly different between two groups, except BMI. After controlling for a broad range of potential confounders (including age, infertility duration, BMI, AMH, no. of oocytes retrieved and no. of available embryos), multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate between two groups (all P>0.05). However, the implantation rate and live birth rate of fresh ET group were significantly higher than FET group (P<0.001 and P=0.012, respectively).Conclusion: Compared to FET, fresh ET following GnRH-a long protocol could lead to higher implantation rate and live birth rate in infertile patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). The freeze all strategy should be individualized and made with caution especially with GnRH-a long protocol.

scholarly journals Endometrial scratch vs no intervention in egg donation cycles: the ENDOSCRATCH trial protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Izquierdo ◽  
Laura de la Fuente ◽  
Katharina Spies ◽  
Jennifer Rayward ◽  
Lourdes López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Live Birth ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Embryo Quality ◽  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Egg Donation ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Endometrial Scratching ◽  
Donor Eggs

Abstract Background The effects of endometrial scratching (ES) on embryo implantation have been studied for many years. Several studies have shown better outcomes when performed on patients undergoing intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, but many other reports have not been able to find these differences. As far as cycles with donor eggs are concerned, reported evidence is scarce. Our aim in this trial is to determine if ES is useful for those patients undergoing IVF cycles with donor eggs, in order to assure a greater homogeneity in embryo quality and endometrial preparation. Methods This single centre randomized controlled trial will include patients undergoing an egg donation cycle, meeting the inclusion criteria and who accept to participate in the study. Once informed consent is signed, patients will be randomly allocated to the study arm (group A) and then receive ES in the luteal phase of the cycle prior to embryo transfer, or the control arm (group B) without any intervention. All cycle data will be collected and analyzed to obtain the clinical pregnancy and the live birth rates in the two groups. Discussion Several studies have tried to determine the effectiveness of an ES in IVF cycles, but it is still unclear due to the heterogeneity of these reports. The aim of this study is to determine if there are differences in clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in egg donor cycles, when comparing an ES performed in the preceding luteal phase versus no intervention, given that embryo quality and endometrial preparation protocols will be comparable. Trial registration Ethical approval of version 2.0 of this trial was obtained on the 13th January 2017. It was retrospectively registered on the 5th April 2017 as the ENDOSCRATCH Trial (NCT03108157) in ClinicalTrials.gov.

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Study of the Effects of DHEA on the Outcome of IVF in Endometriosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yanxia Zhang ◽  
Meiqing Li ◽  
Lian Li ◽  
Jianghua Xiao ◽  
Zhe Chen
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Synthesis Process ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group

Objective. To investigate the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in patients with endometriosis (EMT). Methods. Female patients diagnosed with EMT in our hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were selected. The patients were divided into the control group (n = 22) and the DHEA group (n = 22) according to the random number table. Patients in the control group received placebo and patients in the DHEA group received DHEA. Patients in both groups received either DHEA (25 mg) or placebo orally 3 times a day for 90 days from the first day of menstruation. Patients were subsequently treated with an IVF cycle. In the control group, 22 patients completed the first cycle and 13 patients completed the second cycle. In the DHEA group, 22 patients completed the first cycle and 11 patients completed the second cycle. Serum sex hormone levels including serum E2 on hCG day, mean progesterone on hCG day, FSH on day 2, AMH on day 2, and gonadotropin dose were determined using a chemiluminescent immunoassay kit. The number of antral follicles of the bilateral ovaries was counted by transvaginal B-ultrasound, and the maximum length and transverse diameter of the ovaries were measured at the same time, to calculate the average diameter of the ovaries, observe the morphology of endometrium, and measure the thickness of the endometrium. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, persistent pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were compared between the two groups. Results. There were no significant differences in serum E2, progesterone, endometrial thickness, recovered oocytes, mean number of transferred embryos, and mean score of leading embryo transfer between the DHEA group and the women who completed the first and second cycles ( P > 0.05 ). The AMH, antral follicle count, serum E2 on hCG day, the number of recovered oocytes, fertilized oocytes, and the fertilization rate in the DHEA group were higher than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The doses of FSH on day 2, COH on day 3, and gonadotropin were lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the total number of embryos, the number of high-quality embryos, and the number of transplanted embryos between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, persistent pregnancy rate, and live birth rate in the DHEA group were higher than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. DHEA can significantly increase serum E2 level and improve IVF outcome by regulating the hormone synthesis process, thus improving oocyte and embryo quality.

scholarly journals Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: an age-stratification analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pattraporn Chera-aree ◽  
Isarin Thanaboonyawat ◽  
Benjawan Thokha ◽  
Pitak Laokirkkiat
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer between embryos cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) and those cultured in a conventional incubator (CI).Methods: The medical records of 250 fertilized embryos from 141 patients undergoing infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technology at a tertiary hospital from June 2018 to May 2020 were reviewed. The study population was divided into TLS and CI groups at a 1 to 1 ratio (125 embryos per group). The primary outcome was the live birth rate. Results: The TLS group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (46.4% vs. 27.2%, p=0.002), implantation rate (27.1% vs. 12.0%, p=0.004), and live birth rate (32% vs. 18.4%, p=0.013) than the CI group. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the different age groups favored the TLS group. However, this difference only reached statistical significance in the live birth rate in women aged over 40 years and the clinical pregnancy rate in women aged 35–40 years (p=0.048 and p=0.031, respectively). The miscarriage rate, cleavage rate, and blastocyst rate were comparable.Conclusion: TLS application improved the live birth rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, particularly in the advanced age group in this study, while the other reproductive outcomes were comparable. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to further explore the ramifications of these findings, especially in different age groups.

scholarly journals Estimating the causal effect of embryo transfer day on clinical in vitro fertilization outcomes using propensity score matching

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Chih Hsieh ◽  
Chun-I Lee ◽  
En-Yu Lai ◽  
Jia-Ying Su ◽  
Yi-Ting Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Day 5 Transfer

Abstract Background For women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the clinical benefit of embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage (Day 5) versus cleavage stage (Day 3) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and odds of live birth of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo transfer, and more importantly, to address the issue that patients were chosen to receive either transfer protocol due to their underlying clinical characteristics, i.e., confounding by indication. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,090 IVF cycles collected by Lee Women’s Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan from 1998 to 2014. We utilized the method of propensity score matching to mimic a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where each patient with Day 5 transfer was matched by another patient with Day 3 transfer with respect to other clinical characteristics. Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and odds of live birth were compared for women underwent Day 5 transfer and Day 3 transfer to estimate the causal effects. We further investigated the causal effects in subgroups by stratifying age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results Our analyses uncovered an evidence of a significant difference in implantation rate (p=0.04) favoring Day 5 transfer, and showed that Day 3 and Day 5 transfers made no difference in both odds of live birth (p=0.27) and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.11). With the increase of gestational age, the trend toward non-significance of embryo transfer day in our result appeared to be consistent for subgroups stratified by age and AMH, while all analyses stratified by age and AMH were not statistically significant. Conclusions We conclude that for women without strong indications for Day 3 or Day 5 transfer, there is a small significant difference in implantation rate in favor of Day 5 transfer. However, the two protocols have indistinguishable outcomes on odds of live birth and clinical pregnancy rate.

P–612 Transdermal testosterone vs. Placebo (lubricant gel) pre-treatment in improving IVF outcomes in diminished ovarian reserve patients (POSEIDON group 3 and 4): a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K D Nayar ◽  
S Gupta ◽  
R Bhattacharya ◽  
P Mehra ◽  
J Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Testosterone Gel ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract Study question To compare the efficacy of transdermal testosterone with placebo (lubricant gel) in improving IVF outcomes using GnRH antagonist protocol in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients. Summary answer Patients receiving pre-treatment with testosterone gel had higher mean number of oocytes retrieved and grade A embryos as compared to the patients receiving lubricant gel. What is known already Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is associated with suboptimal ovarian response, higher cycle cancellation rate and lower clinical pregnancy rate following IVF cycles. Various treatment regimens have been devised for management of such patients and use of adjuvants in the form of oral or transdermal androgen is one of them. Androgens improves follicular response to gonadotropin stimulation as well as increase FSH receptor expression in granulosa cells, in turn leading to better oocyte yield and pregnancy rate. Aim was to compare the effect of transdermal testosterone gel with placebo gel on ART outcome in DOR patients (POSEIDON Group 3 and 4). Study design, size, duration A prospective, randomised controlled trial was carried out from 1st September 2019 to 31st October 2020 at a tertiary infertility centre in India. 50 patients fulfilling the criteria of Group 3 and Group 4 of POSEIDON classification were included in the study. Patients with endocrine disorders (thyroid, prolactin), endometrioma, history of surgery on the ovaries, sensitivity to testosterone gel, male factor infertility and deranged liver and renal function tests were excluded. Participants/materials, setting, methods Enrolled patients were randomised into two groups of 25 patients each, one group was pretreated (TTG group) with transdermal testosterone gel, 12.5 mg/day from day 6th of previous cycle to day 2nd of stimulation cycle while patients in other group took lubricant gel for the same duration before stimulation with GnRH antagonist fixed protocol followed by fresh Day 3 transfer. Main results and the role of chance The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The primary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved and number of grade A embryos formed (according to Istanbul consensus). The secondary outcome measures were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. The mean number of oocytes retrieved in TTG group was 5±1.02 which was significantly higher than placebo group–3.5±1.2, (p &lt; 0.001). The mean number of Grade A embryos were also significantly higher (4.78±0.54 vs 3.00±0.23, p &lt; 0.001) in TTG group. The TTG group had higher implantation rate (28% vs 20%, p = 0.49), clinical pregnancy rate (32% vs 18%, p = 0.41), ongoing pregnancy rate (32% vs 16%, p = 0.38) and lower miscarriage rate (0% vs 20%, p = 0.38), however, these differences were not statistically significant. Limitations, reasons for caution The study was done at a single centre with small sample size, replication with more subjects and in different centers is needed. Wider implications of the findings: Pre-treatment with testosterone gel in DOR patients improves ovarian response to stimulation and results in higher number of oocytes retrieved and good quality embryos resulting in improved clinical pregnancy rates. Transdermal testosterone is advantageous because of better bioavailability, easy application, patient friendly and less adverse effects. Trial registration number MCDH/2019/54

Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2488-2496
Author(s):  
Anick De Vos ◽  
Lisbet Van Landuyt ◽  
Martine De Rycke ◽  
Pieter Verdyck ◽  
Greta Verheyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Human Embryos ◽  
Trophectoderm Biopsy ◽  
Developmental Potential

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does double vitrification and warming of human blastocysts having undergone biopsy once or twice have an impact on the clinical outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER The clinical pregnancy rate obtained with double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts was comparable to that obtained with single vitrification single biopsy blastocysts in our center in the same time period (46%; 2016–2018), whereas that obtained with double-vitrified double-biopsied blastocysts seemed lower and will need further study. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Genetic testing on cryopreserved unbiopsied embryos involves two cryopreservation procedures. Retesting of failed/inconclusive-diagnosed blastocysts inevitably involves a second round of biopsy and a second round of vitrification as well. To what extent this practice impacts on the developmental potential of blastocysts has been studied to a limited extent so far and holds controversy. Additionally, the obstetrical/perinatal outcome after the transfer of double-vitrified/single or double-biopsied blastocysts is poorly documented. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective observational study included 97 cycles of trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) on vitrified-warmed embryos followed by a second round of vitrification between March 2015 and December 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In 36 warming cycles, no biopsy was performed on the embryos before the first vitrification (single biopsy group). In 61 warming cycles, the embryos had been biopsied on Day 3 (n = 4) or on Day 5/6 (n = 57) before the first vitrification (double biopsy group). A second biopsy was mostly indicated in cycles of failed or inconclusive diagnosis at the first biopsy. Two cycles involved a more specific mutation test for X-linked diseases on male embryos and one cycle involved testing for a second monogenic indication supplementary to a previously tested reciprocal translocation. Post-warming suitability for biopsy, availability of genetically transferable embryos and clinical outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were reported. Neonatal follow-up of the children was included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 91 cleavage-stage embryos and 154 blastocysts were warmed, of which 34 (37.4%) and 126 (81.8%), respectively, were of sufficient quality to undergo trophectoderm biopsy and were subsequently vitrified for a second time. Out of these, 92 underwent biopsy for the first time (single biopsy), whereas 68 underwent a second biopsy (double biopsy). After diagnosis, 77 blastocysts (48.1%) were revealed to be genetically transferable (44 in the single biopsy group and 33 in the double biopsy group). In 46 warming cycles, 51 blastocysts were warmed and 49 survived this second warming procedure (96.0%). Subsequently, there were 45 FET cycles resulting in 27 biochemical pregnancies and 18 clinical pregnancies with fetal heartbeat (40.0% per FET cycle: 44.0% in the single biopsy group and 35.0% in the double biopsy group, P = 0.54). Thirteen singletons were born (eight in the single biopsy group and five in the double biopsy group), while three pregnancies were ongoing. A total of 26 embryos (13 in each group) remain vitrified and have the potential to increase the final clinical pregnancy rate. The neonatal follow-up of the children born so far is reassuring. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a small retrospective cohort, thus, the implantation potential of double vitrification double biopsy blastocysts, as compared to double vitrification single biopsy blastocysts and standard PGT (single vitrification, single biopsy), certainly needs further investigation. Although one could speculate on birthweight being affected by the number of biopsies performed, the numbers in this study are too small to compare birthweight standard deviation scores in singletons born after single or double biopsy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS PGT on vitrified-warmed embryos, including a second vitrification-warming step, results in healthy live birth deliveries, for both single- and double-biopsied embryos. The neonatal follow-up of the 13 children born so far did not indicate any adverse effect. The present study is important in order to provide proper counseling to couples on their chance of a live birth per initial warming cycle planned and concerning the safety issue of rebiopsy and double vitrification. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Effects of fifth day (D5) or sixth day (D6) frozen–thawed blastocysts on neonatal outcomes

Zygote ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Wang ◽  
Jingran Zhen ◽  
Zhengyi Sun ◽  
Qi Yu ◽  
Chengyan Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Sex Ratio ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
The Difference

SummaryThis study aimed to compare the neonatal outcomes of transplanted fifth day (D5) or sixth day (D6) frozen–thawed blastocysts, aiming to provide guidance when choosing blastocyst recovery methods. The clinical data of 1109 patients that were performed for recovered blastocyst transplantation, as well as the data of 515 patients who had already delivered were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into single- or twins-birth groups according to blastocyst formation time (D5 or D6) and the number of fetus(es). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the D5 group were all significantly higher than those in the D6 group (P < 0.05), and the biochemical pregnancy rate in the D5 group was significantly lower than that in the D6 group (P = 0.049). Other factors, including birth weight, birth length, incidence of low birth weight and sex ratio, differed between the D5 and D6 groups, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the D5 group were all significantly higher than that in the D6 group. The birth weight at D6 was prone to be heavier no matter the birth group, and the sex ratio in the D5 group was higher than that at D6, the difference in neonatal outcomes between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document