scholarly journals Intestinal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Prevents Recurrence of C. difficile Infections but Not Recurrence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1421-1422
Author(s):  
Lea Ann Chen

Intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT) is an effective therapy for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, further research is needed to understand the safety of this procedure, particularly given the frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms and of IBD treatment escalation after IMT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Yoshimatsu ◽  
Yohei Mikami ◽  
Takanori Kanai

AbstractThe number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease is rapidly increasing in developed countries. The main cause of this increase is thought not to be genetic, but secondary to rapidly modernized environmental change. Changes in the environment have been detrimental to enteric probiotics useful for fermentation, inducing an increase in pathobionts that survive by means other than fermentation. This dysregulated microbiota composition, the so-called dysbiosis, is believed to have increased the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease. Bacteriotherapy, a treatment that prophylactically and therapeutically corrects the composition of disturbed intestinal microbiota, is a promising recent development. In fact, fecal microbiome transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in 2013 was a significant contribution for bacteriotherapy. In this paper, we comprehensively review bacteriotherapy in an easy-to-understand format.



2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 171-173
Author(s):  
B Balram ◽  
n winczura ◽  
D H Kao ◽  
L A Dieleman ◽  
B Halloran ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and have worse outcomes including higher rates of colectomy and death, and experience higher rates of recurrent CDI (rCDI). However, it is still not clear whether rCDI is a cause of refractory IBD or a consequence of the inflammatory state in the colon. Aims We aimed to assess the outcomes of rCDI in patients with active IBD compared to inactive IBD in the era of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) Methods This is a retrospective cohort of adult IBD patients with rCDI at the IBD centre at the University of Alberta hospital between 2014–2017. rCDI was defined as a recurrent episode occurring within 60 days of the prior after successful treatment with antibiotics. We collected demographic and clinical characteristics, along with the rCDI-related and FMT outcomes in patients with active and inactive IBD. Active IBD was based on clinical assessment using a combination of disease severity scores (Harvey Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo scores), presence of active disease on colonoscopy, clinical symptoms and/or treatment escalation or change in the month leading up to rCDI diagnosis. Results Over the study period, 56 IBD patients (50% ulcerative colitis, 28/56) had a total of 85 rCDI episodes. Thirty-four percent (19/56) of patients had two or more rCDI episodes. Forty-one percent (35/85) of rCDI episodes were toxin positive while the remainder were only PCR positive. Thirty-nine percent (33/85) had active IBD at the time of CDI diagnosis. Patients with active IBD were more likely to have rCDI (1.7 rCDI episodes vs. 1.5, p=0.018). IBD treatment escalation was also more likely in the active IBD cases (79% vs. 44%, p = 0.002) with the use of steroids (27% vs 2%, p = 0.001) and addition of biologics (18% vs. 2%, p = 0.013). Active IBD cases were also more likely to be hospitalized (30% vs. 10%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive FMT (27% vs. 4%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the time between rCDI episodes, antibiotic exposure or colectomy rates between the two groups. Conclusions Compared to IBD patients in remission, patients with active IBD are more likely to experience rCDI, IBD treatment escalation and FMT. It is interesting to note that only 27% of patients with recurrent CDI required FMT suggesting CDI may be a marker of active or refractory disease rather than a cause. Larger, prospective studies are needed to help clarify this association. Funding Agencies None



2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110202
Author(s):  
Kanika Sehgal ◽  
Devvrat Yadav ◽  
Sahil Khanna

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease of the intestinal tract that commonly presents with diarrhea. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common complications associated with IBD that lead to flare-ups of underlying IBD. The pathophysiology of CDI includes perturbations of the gut microbiota, which makes IBD a risk factor due to the gut microbial alterations that occur in IBD, predisposing patients CDI even in the absence of antibiotics. Superimposed CDI not only worsens IBD symptoms but also leads to adverse outcomes, including treatment failure and an increased risk of hospitalization, surgery, and mortality. Due to the overlapping symptoms and concerns with false-positive molecular tests for CDI, diagnosing CDI in patients with IBD remains a clinical challenge. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion for CDI in patients who seem to be experiencing an exacerbation of IBD symptoms. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line treatments for the management of CDI in IBD. Microbiota restoration therapies effectively prevent recurrent CDI in IBD patients. Immunosuppression for IBD in IBD patients with CDI should be managed individually, based on a thorough clinical assessment and after weighing the pros and cons of escalation of therapy. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD, and outlines the principles of management of both CDI and IBD in IBD patients with CDI.



Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 643
Author(s):  
Angela Saviano ◽  
Mattia Brigida ◽  
Alessio Migneco ◽  
Gayani Gunawardena ◽  
Christian Zanza ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 (L. reuteri) is a probiotic that can colonize different human body sites, including primarily the gastrointestinal tract, but also the urinary tract, the skin, and breast milk. Literature data showed that the administration of L. reuteri can be beneficial to human health. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge on the role of L. reuteri in the management of gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal pain, diarrhea and constipation, both in adults and children, which are frequent reasons for admission to the emergency department (ED), in order to promote the best selection of probiotic type in the treatment of these uncomfortable and common symptoms. Materials and Methods: We searched articles on PubMed® from January 2011 to January 2021. Results: Numerous clinical studies suggested that L. reuteri may be helpful in modulating gut microbiota, eliminating infections, and attenuating the gastrointestinal symptoms of enteric colitis, antibiotic-associated diarrhea (also related to the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection), irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic constipation. In both children and in adults, L. reuteri shortens the duration of acute infectious diarrhea and improves abdominal pain in patients with colitis or inflammatory bowel disease. It can ameliorate dyspepsia and symptoms of gastritis in patients with HP infection. Moreover, it improves gut motility and chronic constipation. Conclusion: Currently, probiotics are widely used to prevent and treat numerous gastrointestinal disorders. In our opinion, L. reuteri meets all the requirements to be considered a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious probiotic that is able to contribute to the beneficial effects on gut-human health, preventing and treating many gastrointestinal symptoms, and speeding up the recovery and discharge of patients accessing the emergency department.



2017 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nissilä ◽  
K. Korpela ◽  
A. I. Lokki ◽  
R. Paakkanen ◽  
S. Jokiranta ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Shubhakar ◽  
Bas C Jansen ◽  
Alex T. Adams ◽  
Karli R. Reiding ◽  
Nicholas T. Ventham ◽  
...  

Abstract A blood-based prognostic biomarker to guide clinical decision-making at diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) would be immensely helpful. We investigated a composite serum N-glycomic biomarker to predict future disease course in 244 newly diagnosed IBD patients. Forty-seven individual glycan peaks were analysed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography identifying 105 glycoforms from which 24 derived glycan traits were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations of derived glycan traits with disease. Cox proportional hazard models were used to predict treatment escalation from first-line treatment to biologics or surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 25.9, p = 1.1×10− 12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.52–78.78). Application to an independent replication cohort of 54 IBD patients yielded a HR of 5.1 (p = 1.1×10− 5; 95% CI, 2.54–10.1). These data demonstrate the predictive capacity of serum N-glycan biomarkers and represent a step towards personalized medicine in IBD.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiufang Cui ◽  
Haiyang Wang ◽  
Ziping Ye ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Xinyun Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota is thought to be involved in the occurrence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in remission (IBDR) with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-type symptoms, but the specific distinct profile of these bacteria remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate this issue by conducting a cross-sectional study.METHODS: IBS patients were diagnosed according to Rome Ⅳ criteria, IBD diagnosed according to the criteria of European Crohn & Colitis Organization (ECCO), IBDR patients with IBS-type symptoms were defined according to related IBS-type symptoms meeting the Rome IV criteria in IBDR patients, and were included Crohn’s disease in remission (CDR) and ulcerative colitis in remission (UCR) based on Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (DAI) and Mayo Scoring System respectively. Healthy controls come from the physical examination center and exclude people with underlying diseases. All enrolled subjects were divided into six groups, as followed: Health Control, IBS, CDR with IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS+), CDR without IBS-type symptoms (CDR-IBS-), UCR-IBS+ and UCR-IBS-. We collected fresh fecal samples from all subjects and applied 16S rRNA sequencing analysis to detect the structure and diversity of the microbiota among different groups. RESULTS: A total of 97 subjects were included in this study, of which 18 were health controls, 34 IBS patients, 25 CDR and 20 UCR. The richness of intestinal microbiota in CDR-IBS-was significantly lower than that in the control and IBS groups based on the analysis of observed species and Chao index (P<0.05). The observed species index in CDR-IBS+ was significantly higher than CDR-IBS- group (median index: 254.8 vs 203, P=0.036). No difference was found in Alpha diversity between UCR-IBS+ and UCR-IBS-. At phylum level, there was no significant difference between UC or CD with IBS-type symptoms and those without related symptoms. At genus level, the number of Faecalibacterium in CDR-IBS+ increased significantly while Fusobacterium decreased compared with CDR-IBS-(mean relative abundance of Faecalibacterium: 20.35% vs 5.18%, P<0.05; Fusobacterium: 1.51% vs 5.2%, P<0.05). However, compared with UCR-IBS - group, the number of Faecalibacterium in UCR-IBS+ group decreased, while the number of Streptococcus increased, but there was no statistical difference in the genus structure. Regardless of the phylum or genus level, the abundance and composition of the microbiota of IBS patients were not distinct from those of healthy people.CONCLUSIONS: CD patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms may be related to the increase of Faecalibacterium and decrease of Fusobacterium. UC patients in remission with IBS-type symptoms cannot be explained by changes in the abundance and structure of intestinal microbiota from our across-sectional study.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document