35 Wound Improvement Project: Improving Skill Sustainment and Confidence

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S24-S25
Author(s):  
Sarah K Shingleton ◽  
Alexandra J Helms ◽  
Leopoldo C Cancio ◽  
Monica L Abbott ◽  
Corey A Miner

Abstract Introduction New burn intensive care unit (BICU) nurses in the Burn Center complete an evidence-based preceptorship to include standardized wound care education that is reinforced throughout preceptorship. A gap in skill sustainment was identified; factors include lack of a formal sustainment program, inconsistent reinforcement of wound care skills and a perceived decrease in pride in wound care. The purposes of this project are to 1) develop and implement a wound care skill sustainment program 2) re-establish confidence in wound care and 3) improve the quality of wound care delivered in the BICU. Methods A Wound Improvement Project (WIP) committee was formed FEB 2018 consisting 8 BICU nurses; the BICU Nurse Manager and Wound Clinical Nurse Specialist serve as consultants. WIP developed several learning modules and is now developing a wound skill sustainment program and evaluation tool based on the Burn Nurse Competency Initiative (BNCI) standards. BICU staff complete an anonymous survey about wound care confidence every 6 months. WIP mentors and evaluates competency through direct observation during 3 assigned shifts with each BICU nurse. Wound care documentation is audited monthly and a wound care quality audit tool is being developed. Descriptive statistics, student’s T-test, and ANOVA were used. Results The confidence survey was given in Spring 2018 (n=52), Winter 2019 (n=33) and Summer 2019 (n=64); each question showed significant improvement. Notably “how confident would you be doing a full body wound care by yourself with some help turning” improved from 4.12 (±1.17) to 4.64 (±0.65, p=.01). 24 BICU staff have been evaluated with 40 pending completion. No significant difference was found in skill competency between the 3 WIP assigned shifts; however self-evaluation for “how comfortable/confident do you feel advocating for a different type of wound care treatment for your patient” improved from 6.1 (±2.2) to 7.5 (±1.9, p< .0001). Average wound documentation scores improved from 85% in FEB 2018 to 99% in FEB 2019. Conclusions Wound care confidence and documentation have improved since initiation of WIP. Targeted education, bedside tools and workshops have all contributed. There is a positive trend (not significant) towards improved skill competency this is likely due to tool modifications and the small number of staff evaluated to date. Staff feedback has been positive with most staff finding WIP helpful. The long-term goal is to expand WIP to all areas of the Burn Center. Applicability of Research to Practice BNCI standards are a framework for skill sustainment and progression of staff from competent towards proficient and expert. Development and evaluation of nurse-led sustainment programs are needed across the burn community.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S132-S132
Author(s):  
Carolyn B Blayney ◽  
Nicole S Gibran

Abstract Introduction Standardizing care has shown in the literature to be a means to improving the culture of safety in any field. Aligning burn surgeons, staff and ancillary services in the Burn ICU, Burn Acute Care floor, Burn Clinic who all have varying ideas, and plans of care creates toxic variation and communication challenges for bedside staff. While attending a medical center leadership development session, Burn Center Leadership collaborated on a project regarding burn center standardization. Methods A multidisciplinary Burn Center retreat in September 2017, launched the effort with a special emphasis on patient and family participation.We elicited feedback on what we did well and areas we could improve on. Using crowdsourcing methodology, the group selected 5 core QI/PI areas: resuscitation, wound care, pain/anxiety/delirium, physical mobility and psychosocial needs.Each multidisciplinary group, led by a non-physician chair and a Physician liaison established assigned tasks, rules of engagement and time frames. Work groups met weekly and reported progress to the Burn center QI committee.The project concluded with dissemination of the work products to staff. Patients and families were updated on the progress made to ensure we were still in alignment with our original goals. Results Burn Center orientation materials, standard operating practice documents and a Burn Center Standard of Care packet was developed. Documents were uploaded to a commonly accessible Burn Center Sharepoint website so there was one central source of information. The final BasECamP output was a daily checklist packet started on all BICU admits, that addressed key QI indicators and directives for care goals; 24 hr resuscitation guidelines, time to TF vs PO within 4 hrs of admit, daily weights, IV vs PO medication for wound care, time to first active mobility and a review of ICU and Hospital LOS per %TBSA. 71 adult burn patients >18 years admitted to the BICU between November 2018 and May 2019 were started on the pathway. Of the 71, 58 were admitted with a burn injury, 4 with TEN, 6 were burn post-ops and there were 3 deaths. The 58 new burn admits are reviewed below. Conclusions The BaSeCamP packet is turned in and reviewed with the team. Data shows significant improvement in knowledge of standard operating procedures, expectations and resource availability. With improved communication across the burn team, staff more clearly understand patient-specific expectations in burn care and are more easily able to educate patients and families about the plan. Applicability of Research to Practice This Process improvement project responds to patient and family feedback that burn teams must coordinate communication and eliminate variability in delivery of care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S241-S242
Author(s):  
Sydney Mullins ◽  
Sarah Bernardy ◽  
Marianne MacLachlan ◽  
Maureen Evans ◽  
Anna Olszewski ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) rates in burn patients exceeds the national average. The purpose of this study was to determine if implementation of an evidence-based process for wound care and central line management reduce infections. Methods A protocol for central line and wound care was developed in conjunction with another burn center with lower CLABSI rates and a care bundle, based on colorectal surgical literature. The new protocol required hand to elbow washing prior to wound care, separating the dirty and clean steps of the wound care process, changing protective gear when going from dirty to clean and performing the Hospital Acquired Infection (HAI) bundle elements separate from wound care. CLABSI and Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) rates were then compared with the previous year. Results Following implementation of the new wound care guidelines, the number of CLABSIs declined from 10 in 2017 to 2 in 2018 and 1 so far in 2019 (through August 2019). The median number of CLABSIs per 1000 days was 0 (range of 0 to 11) before the bundle and 0 (range of 0 to 4.2) after implementation of the bundle. Using the Wilcox rank sum test, there was no significant difference (p=0.09) between the CLABSI rate per 1000 device days between the time period before the bundle implementation and after the bundle implementation, however this may be due to the small sample size. Although the CLABSI rate did not show a statistically significant decrease, the proportion of positive blood cultures decreased by 50% after implementation of the bundle. The number of VAPs declined from 8 in 2017 to 6 in 2018 and so far in 2019 no VAPs have been reported (through August 2019). There was no difference in device days between groups. Conclusions Creating a wound care process that clearly defines and separates clean and dirty steps, similar to colorectal surgical bundles in the reduction of Surgical Site Infection, reduced CLABSI and HAI rates in a clinically significant, if not statistically significant way in the Burn Intensive Care Unit. Further study is needed to increase the power of this study to possibly detect statistically significant differences. Applicability of Research to Practice Implementation of an evidence-based, standardized practice for wound care improved infection rates at one regional burn center. It would be beneficial for this process to be replicated at other centers to further test correlation with infection reduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s109-s109
Author(s):  
Richard Salway ◽  
Trenika Williams ◽  
Camilo Londono ◽  
Bonnie Arquilla

Introduction:Currently, there are no universally accepted personal protective equipment (PPE) training guidelines for Emergency Medicine physicians, though many hospitals offer training through a brief didactic presentation. Physicians’ response to hazmat events requires PPE utilization to ensure the safety of victims, facilities, and providers; providing effective and accessible training is crucial. In the event of a real disaster, time constraints may not allow a brief in-person presentation and an accessible video training may be the only resource available.Aim:To assess the effectiveness of video versus in-person training of 20 Emergency Medicine Residents in Level C PPE donning and doffing (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, boots, and an air-purifying respirator).Methods:A prospective observational study was performed with 20 Emergency Medicine residents as part of Emergency Preparedness training. Residents were divided into two groups, with Group A viewing a demonstration video developed by the emergency preparedness team, and Group B receiving in-person training by a Hazmat Team Member. Evaluators assessed critical tasks of donning and doffing PPE utilizing a prepared evaluation tool. At the drill’s conclusion, all participants completed a self-evaluation to determine their confidence in their respective trainings.Results:Both video and in-person training modalities showed significant improvement in participants’ confidence in doffing and donning a PPE suit (p>0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was seen between training modalities in the performance of donning or doffing (p>0.05).Discussion:Video and in-person training are equally effective in preparing residents for donning and doffing Level C PPE, with similar error rates in both modalities. Future trainings should focus on decreasing the overall rate of breaches across all training modalities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S51-S52
Author(s):  
Michael G Barba

Abstract Introduction Timely rehabilitation is vital to the functional outcomes of burn patients. The rehabilitation department at our ABA certified Burn Center determined there was a need for a more effective method to coordinate daily care in the Burn Progressive Care Unit (BPCU). The purpose of this performance improvement project was to evaluate whether our Burn Center had a problem with delays in rehabilitation and if so, develop a plan to reduce disruptions. Methods Lean Six Sigma Process Improvement Methodology guided the team in this project. A 5-question needs assessment Pre-Rehabilitation Worksheet (Pre-RW) was used to evaluate the problem. The Pre-RW asked if there was a delay; reason for delay; length of delay; communication between services; body region, and the number of cutaneous functional units (CFUs) involved. The team then analyzed data from the Pre-RWs using descriptive statistics and a Pareto chart. Results from the Pre-RWs were used to prioritize changes that would mitigate delays. Rehabilitation staff then completed Post-RWs. Pre- and Post-RW results were compared to determine if the changes decreased delays in rehabilitative care. Results From April 24 to August 5, 2018, 140 Pre-RWs were completed in the BPCU; 24 were incomplete/omitted. Rehabilitation encounters that were delayed or canceled were 37.9% (n=53). Of these, 64% were delayed but eventually completed. The top 3 reasons for delay were: dressings down for morning rounds (DFR, 26%); wound care in progress (19%); patient refusal (16%). In 47% of the encounter delays the patients had over 15 CFUs involved. Improvements were made as follows: DFR assessment became part of the bedside rounds process; wound care orders were placed prior to 9 a.m.; patients were offered evening wound care. Communication improved through the use of a whiteboard, hands-free voice-call badges, and a time frame for coordinating the plan of the day. Following the improvements, Post-RWs (n=131) were collected from May 1 to July 30, 2019. 23.8% of all encounters were delayed or canceled. Of these, 51% were delayed but performed. The 3 chief reasons for delay were patient refusal, 38%; untimely dressing changes, 19%; and medical issues, 13%. In 84% of the deficit encounters 0–15 CFUs were involved. Conclusions Our burn center was able to define a problem with delays in rehabilitation and mitigate delays. This project demonstrates that deliberate changes decrease delays in rehabilitation. Applicability of Research to Practice Care of the burn patient requires a structured interdisciplinary, systems approach. Burn centers can improve outcomes by adopting a plan to improve coordination of services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e234-e238
Author(s):  
Isdin Oke ◽  
Steven D. Ness ◽  
Jean E. Ramsey ◽  
Nicole H. Siegel ◽  
Crandall E. Peeler

Abstract Introduction Residency programs receive an institutional keyword report following the annual Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP) examination containing the raw number of incorrectly answered questions. Programs would benefit from a method to compare relative performance between subspecialty sections. We propose a technique of normalizing the keyword report to determine relative subspecialty strengths and weaknesses in trainee performance. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our institutional keyword reports from 2017 to 2019. We normalized the percentage of correctly answered questions for each postgraduate year (PGY) level by dividing the percent of correctly answered questions for each subspecialty by the percent correct across all subsections for that PGY level. We repeated this calculation for each PGY level in each subsection for each calendar year of analysis. Results There was a statistically significant difference in mean performance between the subspecialty sections (p = 0.038). We found above average performance in the Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation section (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.18) and high variability of performance in the Clinical Optics section (95% CI: 0.76–1.34). Discussion The OKAP institutional keyword reports are extremely valuable for residency program self-evaluation. Performance normalized for PGY level and test year can reveal insightful trends into the relative strengths and weaknesses of trainee knowledge and guide data-driven curriculum improvement.


2021 ◽  
pp. 030573562098729
Author(s):  
Rebecca R Johnston ◽  
Gina M Childers

The purpose of this research was to examine the effects of musical pantophagy, classical music consumption, and initial receptivity to select musical examples on changes in preference rating resulting from a program of repeated exposure. Participants included undergraduate students enrolled in a section of music appreciation at a large Southeastern university ( n = 67). Data were collected using a research designed preference rating measure (PRM) administered during a 5-week period within which there were eight test measures. Participants were divided into quartiles. Pre- to post-test measures resulted in a general positive trend for all participants. Comparisons of Q1 (lowest pantophagy) and Q3 (highest pantophagy) on PRMs 1–8 yielded no differences between groups, and PRM 8 was significantly different from PRM 1 for both groups. The same comparisons for Q1 (non-Classical music consumption) indicated significant difference with large effect size and for Q1 (lowest initial receptivity) indicated significant difference. Results suggest that regardless of musical pantophagy, repetition is an effective means by which to increase affective response to music, and that students who do not currently consume formal art music and who have low initial receptivity may report greater increases in affective response to music over time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S140-S140
Author(s):  
Ekta Vohra

Abstract Introduction Certified wound care nurses perform a vital role in skin health and management in the hospital setting. During the certification process, minimal time is spent on burn wound education, despite the fact that wound care nurses are consulted for various wound etiologies; one of those being burns. This construct created a need for collaboration between the burn team and wound care nurses. Although all burns are essentially wounds, the reality is that all wounds are not burns. The management of the burn wound is often different from the management of pressure injuries or surgical wounds. In speaking with the wound care nurses at this large urban academic medical center, a knowledge gap was identified in burn wound care education as well as appropriate and timely consultation of the burn team. Methods This knowledge improvement project focused on educating the wound care nurses in assessment and treatment of burns, and the process for burn service consultation. Burn education was provided through in-person didactic presentations. The lecture included burn wound photos with opportunities to classify the potential depth of burn wounds as well as typical complications. Additionally, it discussed when a burn consult is needed. A basic knowledge retrospective pre-posttest method was utilized. Results An educational plan was tailored to meet the learning needs of the wound care nurses to address the knowledge gap. Post test data results were tracked. Post scores were increased, indicating a successful educational intervention. Also, while providing the education, the burn outreach coordinator identified an opportunity to expand the burn center’s presence among colleagues through collaboration with the wound care nurses. The wound nurses made excellent ambassadors for the mission of the burn service. Conclusions Provision of burn education across disciplines may improve recognition of burn wounds and facilitate definitive treatment.


Author(s):  
TJ Ó Ceallaigh ◽  
Aoife Ní Shéaghdha

While research on Irish-medium immersion education (IME) has heralded benefits such as cognitive skills, academic achievement and language and literacy development, many studies have also identified challenges to its successful implementation. Immersion-specific research-validated tools can help school leaders navigate the school self-evaluation journey, critically review and evaluate the quality of aspects of their school’s provision and plan for improvement. This paper reports on one theme, leadership, from a larger study, Quality indicators of best practice in Irish-medium immersion (Ó Ceallaigh and Ní Shéaghdha, 2017). Qualitative in nature, the study was guided by the following research question: What are IME educators’ perceptions of best practices in IME?. The study explored 120 IME educators’ perceptions of best practice in IME to inform the development of IME quality indicators. Individual interviews and focus group interviews were utilised to collect data. Data analysis revealed particular themes related to best IME leadership practices. Findings in turn informed the design of an evidence-informed school self-evaluation tool for IME settings. The various functions of the tool will be explored with a particular emphasis on building teaching and leadership capacity in IME through the school self-evaluation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document