scholarly journals Evaluation of Durability of a Single Dose of the Bivalent HPV Vaccine: The CVT Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (10) ◽  
pp. 1038-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimée R Kreimer ◽  
Joshua N Sampson ◽  
Carolina Porras ◽  
John T Schiller ◽  
Troy Kemp ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The authors investigated the durability of vaccine efficacy (VE) against human papillomavirus (HPV)16 or 18 infections and antibody response among nonrandomly assigned women who received a single dose of the bivalent HPV vaccine compared with women who received multiple doses and unvaccinated women. Methods HPV infections were compared between HPV16 or 18-vaccinated women aged 18 to 25 years who received one (N = 112), two (N = 62), or three (N = 1365) doses, and age- and geography-matched unvaccinated women (N = 1783) in the long-term follow-up of the Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial. Cervical HPV infections were measured at two study visits, approximately 9 and 11 years after initial HPV vaccination, using National Cancer Institute next-generation sequencing TypeSeq1 assay. VE and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. HPV16 or 18 antibody levels were measured in all one- and two-dose women, and a subset of three-dose women, using a virus-like particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 448). Results Median follow-up for the HPV-vaccinated group was 11.3 years (interquartile range = 10.9–11.7 years) and did not vary by dose group. VE against prevalent HPV16 or 18 infection was 80.2% (95% CI = 70.7% to 87.0%) among three-dose, 83.8% (95% CI = 19.5% to 99.2%) among two-dose, and 82.1% (95% CI = 40.2% to 97.0%) among single-dose women. HPV16 or 18 antibody levels did not qualitatively decline between years four and 11 regardless of the number of doses given, although one-dose titers continue to be statistically significantly lower compared with two- and three-dose titers. Conclusion More than a decade after HPV vaccination, single-dose VE against HPV16 or 18 infection remained high and HPV16 or 18 antibodies remained stable. A single dose of bivalent HPV vaccine may induce sufficiently durable protection that obviates the need for more doses.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 871-873
Author(s):  
Soma Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Manidip Pal

HPV vaccination of the 9-14 years girl children is the answer to eradicate carcinoma cervix. Nonavalent vaccine provides wider coverage than the quadrivalent vaccine. On long-term follow-up, even after single dose HPV vaccination, antibody titre remains good. Herd immunity also achieved by HPV vaccine. Hence single dose nonavalent HPV vaccination of mass people (sexually naive 9-14 years girl children) can provide almost 100% protections and this will be cost-effective also for developing country.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1643-1652
Author(s):  
Carolina Porras ◽  
Sabrina H Tsang ◽  
Rolando Herrero ◽  
Diego Guillén ◽  
Teresa M Darragh ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (37) ◽  
pp. 5630-5636 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Raina MacIntyre ◽  
Peter J. Shaw ◽  
Fiona E. Mackie ◽  
Christina Boros ◽  
Helen Marshall ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Clements ◽  
S.P. Dhir ◽  
J.T. Grayston ◽  
S.P. Wang

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1008-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. F. Schwarz

1008 Background: Genital HPV infections can be acquired shortly after sexual debut, and the risk remains throughout a sexually active woman’s lifetime. In women 15–25 years of age, the AS04-containing HPV vaccine was highly immunogenic and conferred 100% protection against HPV-16/18 persistent infection and associated cervical lesions up to 27 months. In the long-term follow-up of this study, sustained vaccine efficacy has been observed up to 48 months. The present phase III study (580299/014) assessed immune responses to the AS04-containing HPV-16/18 vaccine in women 26–55 years old compared with women 15–25 years old. Methods: Healthy women in Germany and Poland between 15 and 55 years of age received 3 doses of HPV-16/18 AS04-containing vaccine at months 0, 1, and 6. The groups were age stratified: 15–25 (n=229), 26–45 (n=226), and 46–55 (n=211). Anti-HPV-16/18 antibody titers were assessed at months 0, 2, 7, and 12 by ELISA (EU/mL). Seropositivity rates and geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs) were calculated for all groups. Safety was assessed after each dose in all participants. Results: All initially seronegative women became seropositive for both HPV 16 and 18 at Month 2. At Month 7, HPV-16 GMTs (95% CI) were 7908.4 (6874.0–9098.5) in 15–25 year olds, 4029.2 (3402.7–4771.0) in 26–45 year olds, and 2566.8 (2181.2–3020.6) in 46–55 year olds. For HPV-18, GMTs were 3499.3 (3098.7–3951.6) in 15–25 year olds, 1837.3 (1602.1–2107.0) in 26–45 year olds, and 1313.0 (1145.6–1504.9) in 46–55 year olds. Overall the vaccine was well-tolerated, and the incidence of local symptoms (within 30 days) tended to be lower in the 46–55 year-old group (69.2% versus 81.6% [26–45] and 85.7% [15–25]). Conclusions: An AS04-containing HPV-16/18 vaccine was immunogenic and generally safe in 15–55 year-old females. As observed with other vaccines, GMTs decreased with age, however, the Month 7 postvaccination antibody levels in the oldest age group (46–55) were still 3–4 times higher than those observed during a separate long-term follow-up study where sustained efficacy has been observed up to 48 months. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Ming Lv ◽  
Chun Yuan ◽  
Lan Zhang ◽  
Yu-Na Wang ◽  
Zi-Niu Dai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS), an emerging tickborne infectious disease caused by a novel banyangvirus (SFTS virus, SFTSV), was endemic in several Asian countries with a high mortality up to 30%. Until recently, SFTSV-associated re-infection have not been reported and investigated. Case presentation A 42-year-old female patient was identified as a case of SFTS with re-infection, with two episodes of SFTSV infection on June 2018 and May 2020. The diagnosis of SFTS was confirmed by detection of SFTSV RNA in the blood samples using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and antibodies specific for SFTSV using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The changes of viremia and antibody response differed between the two episodes. Phylogenetic analysis showed the two viral genome sequences were in the same clade, but showing 0.6% dissimilarity of the nearly whole nucleotide sequence. Analysis of clinical data revealed that the second episode showed milder illness than that of the first episode. Conclusions Epidemiological and clinical findings, viral whole genomic sequences, and serological evidence, provided evidence for the re-infection of SFTSV rather than prolonged viral shedding or relapse of the original infection. The patients with re-infection of SFTSV may be at high odds of clinically inapparent or mildly symptomatic. More attention should be directed towards the long-term follow up of the recovered patients in the future, to explicitly acquire the decay profile of their immunity response. Graphic abstract


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document