A Clinical Activity Score That Discriminates Between Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Graves’ Ophthalmopathy

Author(s):  
Alan D. Penman ◽  
Kimberly W. Crowder ◽  
William M. Watkins

In this chapter the results of a retrospective analysis of pooled data from a randomized, double blind, clinical trial comparing oral prednisone to radiotherapy in patients with both inflammatory and noninflammatory Graves’ disease are described. The aim of the analysis was to determine whether a previously developed index (the Clinical Activity Score, CAS) could discriminate between inflammatory and noninflammatory Graves’ ophthalmopathy. The analysis showed that the CAS had a high predictive value for the outcome of immunosuppressive treatment in Graves’ ophthalmopathy. A high CAS helped to select patients who benefited from immunosuppressive treatment; a low CAS, however, did not exclude favorable therapeutic results. Disease activity (measured by the CAS), and not disease duration, is the prime determinant of therapeutic outcome in Graves’ ophthalmopathy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1008-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Eid ◽  
Valentine Coste-Verdier ◽  
Eric Longueville ◽  
Emmanuel Ribeiro ◽  
Bogdan Nicolescu-Catargi ◽  
...  

Purpose: Management of Graves’ ophthalmopathy remains challenging. Over the last decade, previous studies have shown promising results for Rituximab in the treatment of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. We present the response of 14 individuals with active moderate-to-severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy to Rituximab, representing one of the largest retrospective case series reported to date. Methods: Rituximab was administered intravenously, 1000 mg twice at a 2-week interval. The primary end point was a clinical activity score reduction (improvement by ⩾ 2 points or disease inactivation: clinical activity score < 3) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points included clinical activity score improved by ⩾ 2 points or inactivation of Graves’ ophthalmopathy at 12 weeks, improvement in each item of the clinical activity score, in proptosis, in severity disease by the total eye score and in diplopia according to the Gorman score. Results: A limited improvement in clinical activity score was observed (median improvement at 24 weeks by 1 point, p = 0.002, (5/14 patients, 35.7%). Disease inactivation occurred in 50% of patients (7/14 patients). At 12 weeks, clinical activity score improved by ⩾ 2 points in 2/14 patients (14.3%) and inactivation of Graves’ ophthalmopathy occurred in four patients (28.6%). Improvement in proptosis and total eye score was observed in 3/9 patients (33%) and in 4/14 patients (28.6%) at 24 weeks, respectively. Only one patient experienced moderate adverse event. Conclusion: Rituximab is a well-tolerated treatment with a good safety profile, but offered limited and partial improvement for active moderate-to-severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy with a long duration of disease.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Janicijevic-Petrovic ◽  
Tatjana Sarenac ◽  
Suncica Sreckovic ◽  
Marko Petrovic ◽  
Dejan Vulovic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Graves? ophthalmopthy is one of the most common causes of exophthalmos as well as the most common manifestation of Graves? disease. The treatment of Graves? ophthalmopathy includes ophthalmological and endocrinological therapy. The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the patients with Graves? ophthalmopathy treated with corticosteroids. Methods. Evaluation of 21 patients was performed in the Ophthalmology Clinic and Endocrinology Clinic, Clinical Centre Kragujevac, in the period from 2009 to 2010. They were treated with pulse doses of intravenous corticosteroids. They were referred to ophthalmologist by endocrinologist in euthyroid condition in the active phase of Graves? ophthalmopathy (ultrasonography of orbit findings and positive findings of antithyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody - anti-TSH R Ab). The clinical activity score (CAS) and NO SPECS classification for evaluation of disease severity were used. Ophthalmological examination includes: best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp exam, Hertels? test, direct ophthalmoscopy and ultrasonography of the orbit. Results. According to our results 76.19% of the patients were female; mean age of the patients was 35.2 ? 5.6 years. According to CAS classification after 6 months of the treatment recovery was shown in 23.81% of the patients, partial amelioration in 47.62% and no clinical amelioration in 28.57% of the patients. We achieved better results with male, young patients with high clinical activity score. Good results were observed after the first dose of corticosteroids, much better CAS after the third dose, which maintained until 6 months after the first treatment. Conclusion. Our results signify that intravenous pulse dose of corticosteroids treatment of the patients with Graves? ophthalmopthy is safe, comfortable, clinically justified and accessible for the clinicians and patients. Positive results are achieved after the first dose with increasing trend up to the third dose, which was maintained for the next three months.


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 3562-3567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Marcocci ◽  
Luigi Bartalena ◽  
Maria Laura Tanda ◽  
Luca Manetti ◽  
Enrica Dell’Unto ◽  
...  

Eighty-two consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe and active Graves’ ophthalmopathy were randomly treated with orbital radiotherapy combined with either oral (prednisone; starting dose, 100 mg/d; withdrawal after 5 months) or iv (methylprednisolone; 15 mg/kg for four cycles and then 7.5 mg/kg for four cycles; each cycle consisted of two infusions on alternate days at 2-wk intervals) glucocorticoids. The two groups did not differ for age, gender, duration of hyperthyroidism and ophthalmopathy, prevalence of smokers, thyroid volume, and pretreatment ocular conditions. Both groups of patients received radioiodine therapy shortly before treatment for Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Follow-up lasted for 12 months. A significant reduction in proptosis (from 23.2 ± 3.0 to 21.6 ± 1.2 mm in the iv glucocorticoid group, P &lt; 0.0001; and from 23 ± 1.8 to 21.7± 1.8 mm in oral glucocorticoid group, P &lt; 0.0001) and in lid width (from 13.3 ± 2.5 to 11.8 ± 2.2 mm, and from 13.6 ± 2.0 to 11.5 ± 1.9 mm, respectively; P &lt; 0.001 in both cases) occurred, with no difference between the two groups. Diplopia significantly improved in both groups: it disappeared in 13 of 27 (48.1%) iv glucocorticoid patients (P &lt; 0.005) and in 12 of 33 (36.4%) oral glucocorticoid patients (P &lt; 0.03). The degree of amelioration of diplopia did not significantly differ between the two groups (P = 0.82). Optic neuropathy improved in 11 of 14 iv glucocorticoid (P &lt; 0.01) and only in 3 of 9 oral glucocorticoid (P = 0.57) patients, with no significant difference in these outcomes. The Clinical Activity Score decreased from 4.5 ± 1.2 to 1.7 ± 1.0 (P &lt; 0.0001) in the iv glucocorticoid group and from 4.2 ± 1.1 to 2.2 ± 1.2 (P &lt; 0.0001) in the oral glucocorticoid group; final Clinical Activity Score was significantly lower in iv glucocorticoid than in oral glucocorticoid patients (P &lt; 0.01). By self-assessment evaluation, 35 (85.3%) iv glucocorticoid and 30 (73.2%) oral glucocorticoid patients reported an improvement of ocular conditions (P = 0.27). Overall, both treatments produced favorable effects in most patients, but responders in the iv glucocorticoid group (36 of 41, 87.8%) were more than in the oral glucocorticoid group (26 of 41, 63.4%) (P &lt; 0.02). Moreover, iv glucocorticoid treatment was better tolerated than oral glucocorticoid treatment. Side effects occurred in 23 (56.1%) iv glucocorticoid and 35 (85.4%) oral glucocorticoid patients (P &lt; 0.01); in particular, cushingoid features developed in 5 of the former and 35 of the latter patients. One iv glucocorticoid patient had severe hepatitis of undetermined origin at the end of glucocorticoid treatment, followed by spontaneous recovery. In conclusion, high-dose iv glucocorticoid and oral glucocorticoid (associated with orbital radiotherapy) are effective in the management of severe Graves’ ophthalmopathy, but the iv route seems to be more effective and better tolerated than the oral route and associated with a lower rate of side effects.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahar Yanik ◽  
Işik Conkbayir ◽  
Golge Acaroglu ◽  
Baki Hekimoglu

1997 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Ph. Mourits ◽  
Mark F. Prummel ◽  
Wilmar M. Wiersinga ◽  
L. Koornneef

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Loiudice ◽  
Marco Pellegrini ◽  
Michele Marinò ◽  
Barbara Mazzi ◽  
Ilaria Ionni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hemodynamic changes have been observed in patients with Graves’ disease. The aim of our study was to evaluate choroidal vascular change using the choroidal vascularity index (CVI) in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO). Methods In this cross-sectional observational study, 40 patients affected by TAO were recruited. Forty healthy individuals, matched for age and sex, served as controls. Foveal enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography scans were obtained from all participants. Images were binarized using the ImageJ software and luminal area (LA) and total choroidal area (TCA) were measured. CVI was calculated as the proportion of LA to TCA. The relation between CVI or subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and clinical activity score, exophthalmometric value, diplopia status, gender, and age was evaluated. Results CVI was significantly higher in patients with TAO (P = 0.004). No significant difference was observed in SFCT (P = 0.200) and TCA (P = 0.153) comparing TAO patients and healthy controls. LA was significantly higher in TAO group (P = 0.045). On multiple regression analysis, CVI was associated with TCA (P = 0.043). No association was found between SFCT or CVI and TCA, clinical activity score, exophthalmometric value, Inami value, diplopia status, gender or age (P > 0.05). Conclusions This is the first study that has demonstrated an increase in CVI in eyes with TAO compared with healthy controls and has assessed its association with clinical features.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosario Le Moli ◽  
Alessandro Pluchino ◽  
Vincenzo Muscia ◽  
Concetto Regalbuto ◽  
Bruno Luciani ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 765-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Rebelo Pinto ◽  
F. Lopes ◽  
S. de Souza ◽  
L. da Fonseca ◽  
M. Vaisman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scheila Fritsch ◽  
Rafaela Martinez Copes ◽  
Bruna Savioli ◽  
Mariana Freitas de Aguiar ◽  
Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010) was developed in 2010 as an assessment tool for disease activity in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TA). It has since been widely used in different studies and in clinical practice for the management of patients with TA. The present study aims to translate the ITAS2010 into Brazilian Portuguese language and to validate it for use in clinical practice in Brazil. Methods For this cross-sectional study, the ITAS2010 was translated in accordance with the guidelines described by Beaton et al. and then applied with 27 patients with TA on three assessments by two rheumatologists working independently. To measure interrater agreement, the assessments were performed on the same day within approximately 1 hour. One of the rheumatologists performed a second evaluation of patients with TA within 7 to 14 days to measure intrarater agreement. Results The correlation coefficient for the ITAS2010 score between the two raters was high (r = 0.916; p < 0.0001), as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [0.918 with a 95% confidence interval (95CI): 0.828–0.962]. The correlation coefficient and the ICC for intrarater agreement were moderate for ITAS2010 (r = 0.633; p < 0.0001 and ICC = 0.594; 95CI: 0.292–0.790). The ITAS2010 at baseline was compared with the physician’s global assessment (PGA) and with Kerr’s criteria for detecting disease activity in TA. Higher ITAS2010 scores were observed in patients with active and grumbling/persistent disease than in those presenting inactive disease according to the PGA [1.5 (0.0–3.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0–0.0); p = 0.0025]. Patients with active disease according to the Kerr’s criteria had also higher ITAS2010 scores than those considered in remission [3.0 (3.0–7.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0–0.0); p = 0.0068]. Conclusions The Brazilian Portuguese version of the ITAS2010 is a valid and reproducible tool for the assessment of disease activity in TA and it is an additional tool for the routine evaluation of Brazilian patients with TA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document