Epidemiology

Author(s):  
Guilherme V. Polanczyk

This chapter initially reviews the main methodological aspects of ADHD prevalence studies, specifically study design, case definition, and ascertainment to subsequently address meta-analyses summarizing the prevalence of the disorder on children, adolescents, and adults. Results of meta-regression in the context of meta-analysis have investigated the effect of year of publication, sample location, and methodological characteristics of studies on heterogeneity of results. Studies on the course of the disorder, following up clinical and community samples, are discussed, as well as cultural influences on epidemiological findings. Large-scale cross-national studies and longitudinal studies following non-referred samples are necessary to further advance the knowledge on the epidemiology of ADHD.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Kvarven ◽  
Eirik Strømland ◽  
Magnus Johannesson

Andrews & Kasy (2019) propose an approach for adjusting effect sizes in meta-analysis for publication bias. We use the Andrews-Kasy estimator to adjust the result of 15 meta-analyses and compare the adjusted results to 15 large-scale multiple labs replication studies estimating the same effects. The pre-registered replications provide precisely estimated effect sizes, which do not suffer from publication bias. The Andrews-Kasy approach leads to a moderate reduction of the inflated effect sizes in the meta-analyses. However, the approach still overestimates effect sizes by a factor of about two or more and has an estimated false positive rate of between 57% and 100%.


Author(s):  
Colin Baigent ◽  
Richard Peto ◽  
Richard Gray ◽  
Natalie Staplin ◽  
Sarah Parish ◽  
...  

Clinical trials generally need to be able to detect or to refute realistically moderate (but still worthwhile) differences between treatments in long-term disease outcome. Large-scale randomized evidence should be able to detect such effects, but medium-sized trials or medium-sized meta-analyses can, and often do, yield false-negative or exaggeratedly positive results. Hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year could be avoided by seeking appropriately large-scale randomized evidence about various widely practicable treatments for the common causes of death, and by disseminating this evidence appropriately. This chapter takes a look at the use of large-scale randomized evidence—produced from trials and meta-analysis of trials—and how this data should be handled in order to produce accurate result.


Author(s):  
Tianye Jia ◽  
Congying Chu ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Jenny van Dongen ◽  
Evangelos Papastergios ◽  
...  

AbstractDNA methylation, which is modulated by both genetic factors and environmental exposures, may offer a unique opportunity to discover novel biomarkers of disease-related brain phenotypes, even when measured in other tissues than brain, such as blood. A few studies of small sample sizes have revealed associations between blood DNA methylation and neuropsychopathology, however, large-scale epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) are needed to investigate the utility of DNA methylation profiling as a peripheral marker for the brain. Here, in an analysis of eleven international cohorts, totalling 3337 individuals, we report epigenome-wide meta-analyses of blood DNA methylation with volumes of the hippocampus, thalamus and nucleus accumbens (NAcc)—three subcortical regions selected for their associations with disease and heritability and volumetric variability. Analyses of individual CpGs revealed genome-wide significant associations with hippocampal volume at two loci. No significant associations were found for analyses of thalamus and nucleus accumbens volumes. Cluster-based analyses revealed additional differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with hippocampal volume. DNA methylation at these loci affected expression of proximal genes involved in learning and memory, stem cell maintenance and differentiation, fatty acid metabolism and type-2 diabetes. These DNA methylation marks, their interaction with genetic variants and their impact on gene expression offer new insights into the relationship between epigenetic variation and brain structure and may provide the basis for biomarker discovery in neurodegeneration and neuropsychiatric conditions.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Alan Dahlke ◽  
Brenton M. Wiernik

Range restriction is a common problem in organizational research and is an important statistical artifact to correct for in meta-analysis. Historically, researchers have had to rely on range-restriction correc-tions that only make use of range-restriction information for one variable, but it is not uncommon for researchers to have such information for both variables in a correlation (e.g., when studying the cor-relation between two predictor variables). However, existing meta-analytic methods incorporating these corrections overlook their unique implications for estimating the sampling variance of corrected correlations and for accurately assigning weights to studies in individual-correction meta-analyses. We introduce new methods for computing individual-correction and artifact-distribution meta-analyses us-ing the bivariate indirect range-restriction (BVIRR; “Case V”) correction and describe improved meth-ods for applying BVIRR corrections that substantially reduce bias in parameter estimation. We illustrate the effectiveness of these methods in a large-scale simulation and in meta-analyses of expatriate data. We provide R code to implement the methods described in this article; more comprehensive and robust functions for applying these methods are available in the psychmeta package for R (Dahlke & Wiernik, 2018, 2017/2019).


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Taghipour ◽  
Saeed Bahadory ◽  
Ehsan Javanmard

Abstract Background Microsporidia is a zoonotic pathogen with health consequences in immunocompromised patients. Small ruminants are a potential reservoir of microsporidia for humans in their vicinity. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the molecular prevalence of microsporidian infections with emphasis on Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes among sheep and goats at a global scale through systematic review and meta-analysis approach. Methods The standard protocol of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Eligible prevalence studies on small ruminant microsporidiosis, published from 1 January 2000 until 15 April 2021 were gathered using systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The point estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model. The variance between studies (heterogeneity) was quantified by I2 index. Results In total, 25 articles (including 34 datasets) were included for final meta-analysis. The pooled molecular prevalence of microsporidia in sheep and goats was estimated to be 17.4% (95% CI: 11.8–25%) and 16% (95% CI: 11.2–22.4%), respectively. Likewise, the overall prevalence of E. bieneusi was estimated to be 17.4% (95% CI: 11.8–25%) for sheep and 16.3% (95% CI: 11.3–22.8%) for goats. According to internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene analysis, E. bieneusi with genotypes BEB6 (15 studies) and COS-1 (nine studies) in sheep, and CHG3 (six studies) and BEB6 (five studies) in goats were the highest reported genotypes. Conclusion The present results highlight the role of sheep and goats as reservoir hosts for human-infecting microsporidia. Therefore, this global estimate could be beneficial on preventive and control measures.


Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda K Cornes ◽  
Jennifer Brody ◽  
Alanna C Morrison ◽  
David Siscovick ◽  
James B Meigs ◽  
...  

Introduction: Common variants in the gene encoding insulin receptor substrate 1 ( IRS1 ) and nearby on 2q36.3 have been associated with levels of fasting insulin (FI). We hypothesized that a greater burden of rare variants in these regions is associated with higher FI. Methods: CHARGE-S sequenced (average coverage >60x) the IRS1 and 2q36.6 regions (totaling 185 kb) in 3,539 individuals on the SOLiD platform. FI information among non-diabetics was available in 3 studies: Framingham Heart Study ( N =811), Cardiovascular Heart Study ( N =967) and Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study ( N =1761). We analyzed rare variants (MAF < 1%) using a weighted sum test, similar to Madsen-Browning (powerful to detect an association if effects of casual rare variants are in the same direction), and the SKAT test (preferred method if variant effects are in opposite directions). Meta-analyses of weighted rare variants results used the inverse-variance method while SKAT results used a similar approach. For multi-variant tests, the threshold for significance was considered to be α = 0.05. Coding annotation predictions were obtained from the dbNSFP database which includes functional predictions from SIFT, MutationTaster, Polyphen-2, Phylo-P and LRT. Non-coding annotation information (protein binding regions, transcription factor binding sites, DNase hypersensitivity sites, conservation scores) was obtained from ENCODE and ORegAnno databases. From these annotations, we grouped different types of variants together (possible loss of function; possibly regulatory) in order to determine specific variants contributing most to the effect. Results: Sequencing found 4,534 variants in two regions, 86.7% of which were rare and novel, not seen in 1000 genomes or dbSNP. Approximately 20% of variants had annotation information available; of these, 34 variants were possibly damaging. We found suggestive association with FI ( p =0.03) for all rare variants in the meta-analysis of weighted-sum tests at 2q36.3 but not at IRS1 . At IRS1 (but not at 2q36.3), SKAT meta-analysis tests showed evidence for all rare variants associated with FI ( p =0.03). SKAT tests restricted to N =365 possibly damaging variants at IRS1 suggested an association with FI in coding ( p =0.06) and in non-coding ( p =0.02) variants. Conclusion: Large scale deep sequencing in the IRS1 and 2q36.3 regions found very large numbers of new, rare variants. Multi-variant tests suggest that rare variation in these regions influence FI levels, with individuals with more and rarer variants having higher FI. Further investigation is warranted to address why weighted sum and SKAT tests provide different levels of evidence for association in the two regions. Also, conditional analyses will test whether new rare variants at IRS1 or 2q36 explain observed GWAS associations.


Author(s):  
Robert M Bernard

This paper examines sources of potential bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses which can distort their findings, leading to problems with interpretation and application by practitioners and policymakers. It follows from an article that was published in the Canadian Journal of Communication in 1990, “Integrating Research into Instructional Practice: The Use and Abuse of Meta-analysis,” which introduced meta-analysis as a means for estimating population parameters and summarizing quantitative research around instructional research questions. This paper begins by examining two cases where multiple meta-analyses disagree. It then goes on to describe substantive and methodological aspects of meta-analysis where various kinds of bias can influence the outcomes and suggests measures that can be taken to avoid them. The intention is to improve the reliability and accuracy of reviews so that practitioners can trust the results and use them more effectively. Cet article examine les sources des partis pris potentiels dans les synthèses systématiques et les méta-analyses qui peuvent déformer les conclusions, ce qui peut causer des problèmes d’interprétation et d’application par les praticiens et les responsables des politiques. Il fait suite à un article publié dans le Canadian Journal of Communication en 1990, intitulé « Integrating Research into Instructional Practice: The Use and Abuse of Meta-analysis », qui présentait la méta-analyse comme moyen d’estimer les paramètres relatifs à la population et de résumer la recherche quantitative sur les questions de recherche pédagogique. L’article commence avec l’examen de deux cas dans lesquels de nombreuses méta-analyses sont en désaccord. Il décrit ensuite les aspects substantifs et méthodologiques des méta-analyses dans lesquels divers types de partis pris peuvent influencer les résultats et suggère des mesures qui peuvent être adoptées pour éviter ces partis pris. L’intention est d’améliorer la fiabilité et l’exactitude des synthèses afin que les praticiens puissent compter sur les résultats et les utiliser plus efficacement.


2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry K. Ngugi ◽  
Paul D. Esker ◽  
Harald Scherm

The continuing exponential increase in scientific knowledge, the growing availability of large databases containing raw or partially annotated information, and the increased need to document impacts of large-scale research and funding programs provide a great incentive for integrating and adding value to previously published (or unpublished) research through quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis has become the standard for quantitative evidence synthesis in many disciplines, offering a broadly accepted and statistically powerful framework for estimating the magnitude, consistency, and homogeneity of the effect of interest across studies. Here, we review previous and current uses of meta-analysis in plant pathology with a focus on applications in epidemiology and disease management. About a dozen formal meta-analyses have been published in the plant pathological literature in the past decade, and several more are currently in progress. Three broad research questions have been addressed, the most common being the comparative efficacy of chemical treatments for managing disease and reducing yield loss across environments. The second most common application has been the quantification of relationships between disease intensity and yield, or between different measures of disease, across studies. Lastly, meta-analysis has been applied to assess factors affecting pathogen–biocontrol agent interactions or the effectiveness of biological control of plant disease or weeds. In recent years, fixed-effects meta-analysis has been largely replaced by random- (or mixed-) effects analysis owing to the statistical benefits associated with the latter and the wider availability of computer software to conduct these analyses. Another recent trend has been the more common use of multivariate meta-analysis or meta-regression to analyze the impacts of study-level independent variables (moderator variables) on the response of interest. The application of meta-analysis to practical problems in epidemiology and disease management is illustrated with case studies from our work on Phakopsora pachyrhizi on soybean and Erwinia amylovora on apple. We show that although meta-analyses are often used to corroborate and validate general conclusions drawn from more traditional, qualitative reviews, they can also reveal new patterns and interpretations not obvious from individual studies.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252533
Author(s):  
Jordi Munoz-Muriedas

Recent technological advances in the field of big data have increased our capabilities to query large databases and combine information from different domains and disciplines. In the area of preclinical studies, initiatives like SEND (Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data) will also contribute to collect and present nonclinical data in a consistent manner and increase analytical possibilities. With facilitated access to preclinical data and improvements in analytical algorithms there will surely be an expectation for organisations to ensure all the historical data available to them is leveraged to build new hypotheses. These kinds of analyses may soon become as important as the animal studies themselves, in addition to being critical components to achieve objectives aligned with 3Rs. This article proposes the application of meta-analyses at large scale in corporate databases as a tool to exploit data from both preclinical studies and in vitro pharmacological activity assays to identify associations between targets and tissues that can be used as seeds for the development of causal hypotheses to characterise of targets. A total of 833 in-house preclinical toxicity studies relating to 416 compounds reported to be active (pXC50 ≥ 5.5) against a panel of 96 selected targets of interest for potential off-target non desired effects were meta-analysed, aggregating the data in tissue–target pairs. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of the number of animals with observed events (any morphology, any severity) in treated and control groups in the tissue analysed. This led to a total of 2139 meta-analyses producing a total of 364 statistically significant associations (random effects model), 121 after adjusting by multiple comparison bias. The results show the utility of the proposed approach to leverage historical corporate data and may offer a vehicle for researchers to share, aggregate and analyse their preclinical toxicological data in precompetitive environments.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.V. Roshchupkin ◽  
H.H.H. Adams ◽  
M.W. Vernooij ◽  
A. Hofman ◽  
C.M. Van Duijn ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTLarge-scale data collection and processing have facilitated scientific discoveries in fields such as genomics and imaging, but cross-investigations between multiple big datasets remain impractical. Computational requirements of high-dimensional association studies are often too demanding for individual sites. Additionally, the sheer size of intermediate results is unfit for collaborative settings where summary statistics are exchanged for meta-analyses. Here we introduce the HASE framework to perform high-dimensional association studies with dramatic reduction in both computational burden and storage requirements of intermediate results. We implemented a novel meta-analytical method that yields identical power as pooled analyses without the need of sharing individual participant data. The efficiency of the framework is illustrated by associating 9 million genetic variants with 1.5 million brain imaging voxels in three cohorts (total N=4,034) followed by meta-analysis, on a standard computational infrastructure. These experiments indicate that HASE facilitates high-dimensional association studies enabling large multicenter association studies for future discoveries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document