Bundle branch reentry tachycardia

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2270-2275
Author(s):  
Akihiko Nogami
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Purkinje System ◽  
Bundle Branch Reentry ◽  
Reentry Tachycardia

Bundle branch reentry ventricular tachycardia, a unique form of reentrant ventricular tachycardia involving the His–Purkinje system, occurs in patients with cardiomyopathy and His–Purkinje conduction disease. It responds poorly to pharmacological therapy and can be cured effectively with catheter ablation. However, even after ablation, patients may remain at risk for total mortality and sudden cardiac death and may require further therapies including cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.

Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: the role of catheter ablation

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2279-2288
Author(s):  
Tilman Maurer ◽  
William G. Stevenson ◽  
Karl-Heinz Kuck
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Premature Ventricular Contractions ◽  
Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Premature Beats

Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) may occur in the presence or absence of structural heart disease. The standard therapy for patients with structural heart disease at high risk of sudden cardiac death due to VT is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). While ICDs effectively terminate VT and prevent sudden cardiac death, they do not prevent recurrent episodes of VT, since the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate remains unchanged. However, shocks from an ICD increase mortality and impair quality of life. These limitations as well as continuous advancements in technology have made catheter ablation an important treatment strategy for patients with structural heart disease presenting with VT. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias include premature ventricular contractions and VT occurring in the absence of overt structural heart disease. In this setting, catheter ablation has evolved as the primary therapeutic option for symptomatic ventricular premature beats and sustained VTs and is curative in most cases. This chapter presents an overview of the principles of invasive diagnosis and treatment of monomorphic VTs in patients with and without structural heart disease and delineates the clinical outcome of catheter ablation. Finally, the chapter provides an outlook to the future, discussing potential directions and upcoming developments in the field of catheter ablation of monomorphic VT.

scholarly journals Efficacy of epicardial and endocardial ablation in the prevention of ventricular tachycardia in arrythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy- a meta analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sattar ◽  
W Ullah ◽  
S Mamtani ◽  
C Alraies
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Mapping Techniques ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Introduction Ventricular tachycardia is a major complication associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death in arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recurrence of VT status post catheter endocardial ablation with conventional mapping is a evolving discussion in management of VT prevention in ARVC. With the evolution of new mapping techniques to locate ectopic foci of VT, a combination of endo- and epicardial catheter ablation have proven to be efficacious in the prevention of frequency of VT recurrence and its duration. Methods Using PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE) and Cochrane database we searched using the MeSH terms including: “arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy”, “arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia”, “monomorphic ventricular tachycardia”, “polymorphic ventricular Tachycardia”, “endocardial catheter ablation”, “epicardial catheter ablation”. The primary outcomes were to assess VT frequency and duration status post endocardial or epicardial or a combination of both types of ablation. The secondary outcome includes sudden cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death after procedure. ANOVA with post HOC analysis was performed using SPSS v.26 (IBM Corp, NY, USA) Results A total of 33 studies included 1437 patients with a mean male=67%. The data analysis showed a mean VT prevention for endocardial ablation was 65%, epicardial 78%, and for combined epi-endocardial was 89% (figure-1). The mean procedural mortality rate was 2%. In order to test the hypothesis that combined epi-endocardial ablation was more successful in the prevention of VT recurrence, we performed a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis was statistically significant F(2,14)=5.879, 95% CI, p=0.014. Post Hoc test (Tukey HSD test) with multiple comparisons indicated that patients who underwent combined epi-endocardial ablation experienced a statistically significant difference in VT prevention of 89% (95% CI p=0.01) compared to only endocardial ablation, mean VT prevention of 65% (95% CI, p=0.189) or only epicardial, mean VT prevention of 78% (95% CI, p=0.353). Conclusion With new mapping techniques, use of endocardial, and epicardial ablation is linked to decrease VT frequency, duration, ICD shocks, and sudden cardiac death in patients with ARVC in cohorts with prior failure of antiarrhythmics. Total VT Prevention across target sites Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Classification and treatment of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2259-2265
Author(s):  
Alfred E. Buxton
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Death Risk ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death Risk

Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is classified in a variety of ways, depending on the clinical situation. The two primary distinctions are whether the arrhythmia occurs in the presence or absence of structural heart disease, and whether or not the arrhythmia causes symptoms. The prevalence of NSVT is highest in patients with structural heart disease. NSVT in patients with heart disease rarely causes symptoms, but may be associated with increased total mortality and sudden cardiac death risk. However, sudden cardiac death risk is usually not elevated out of proportion to the increased total mortality risk, suggesting that NSVT is merely a marker of sicker patients, rather than having a mechanistic relation to arrhythmias causing cardiac arrest. Furthermore, no trial has demonstrated that suppression of NSVT reduces mortality. In contrast, patients with symptoms due to NSVT usually do not have underlying structural heart disease. In these patients, treatment may be necessary to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. Appropriate treatment of NSVT in this setting also does not improve mortality, because NSVT in the absence of structural heart disease is not associated with increased mortality or sudden death risk (excepting patients with ion channelopathies, such as long QT syndrome). The exception to this rule is the recognition that ventricular dysfunction may be caused by frequent or incessant episodes of NSVT. In this case, treatment of the arrhythmia may not only improve symptoms, but presumably also improve survival.

Short Term Variability of Repolarization Predicts Ventricular Tachycardia and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Structural Heart Disease

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1720-1721
Author(s):  
Peter Oosterhoff ◽  
Larisa G. Tereshchenko ◽  
Marcel A.G. van der Heyden ◽  
Raja N. Ghanem ◽  
Paul J. De Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Variability

Beyond ejection fraction: Novel clinical approaches towards sudden cardiac death risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa Pour-Ghaz ◽  
Mark Heckle ◽  
Ikechukwu Ifedili ◽  
Sharif Kayali ◽  
Christopher Nance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Icd Therapy

: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is indicated for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The most commonly used risk stratification algorithms use left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to determine which patients qualify for ICD therapy, even though LVEF is a better marker of total mortality than ventricular tachyarrhythmias mortality. This review evaluates imaging tools and novel biomarkers proposed for better risk stratifying arrhythmic substrate, thereby identifying optimal ICD therapy candidates.

Diabetes and arrhythmias

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 941-944
Author(s):  
Heikki Huikuri ◽  
Lars Rydén
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Diagnostic Work

Cardiac arrhythmias are more common in subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) than in their counterparts without diabetes. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is present in 10–20% of the DM patients, but the association between DM and AF is mostly due to co-morbidities of DM patients increasing the vulnerability to AF. When type 2 DM and AF coexist, there is a substantially higher risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and heart failure, which indicates screening of AF in selected patients with DM. Anticoagulant therapy either with vitamin K antagonists or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is recommended for DM patients with either paroxysmal or permanent AF, if not contraindicated. Palpitations, premature ventricular beats, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia are common in patients with DM. The diagnostic work-up and treatment of these arrhythmias does not differ between the patients with or without DM. The diagnosis and treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia, either monomorphic or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, or resuscitated ventricular fibrillation is also similar between the patients with or without DM. The risk of sudden cardiac death is higher in DM patients with or without a diagnosed structural heart disease. Patients with diabetes and a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30–35% should be treated with a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator according to current guidelines. Beta-blocking therapy is recommended for DM patients with left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure to prevent sudden cardiac death due to arrhythmia.

Ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death might complicate the long-term outcome by patients after tetralogy of Fallot repair

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (23) ◽  
pp. 1067-1069
Author(s):  
Attila Mihálcz ◽  
Csaba Földesi ◽  
Tamás Szili-Török
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Tachycardia ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Tetralogy Of Fallot ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Tetralogy Of Fallot Repair

A Fallot-tetralógia miatti műtétet követően a hosszú távú túlélést befolyásoló tényezők közé tartozik a kamrai tachycardia és a hirtelen szívhalál. E betegek gondozásában érdemi segítséget jelent az implantálható cardioverter defibrillátor rendszer. A végleges pacemaker és/vagy implantálható cardioverter defibrillátor implantációját követően ritka, ám potenciálisan letális kimenetelű fertőzéses szövődmény az endocarditis. Ez esetben a leghatékonyabb kezelési mód a kombinált terápia, amely a beültetett készülék + elektródák teljes körű eltávolításából és agresszív antibiotikus kezelésből áll. Célkitűzés: Ilyen esetekben a tervezett reimplantáció különös óvatosságot igényel a nagyobb recidívaarány miatt, amelynek rizikója fokozottabb pacemakerdependencia esetén. Célunk olyan módszer alkalmazása volt, amelynek segítségével a recidíva kockázata minimálisra csökkenthető. Módszer: Esetünkben a korábban Fallot-tetralógia miatt többször műtött, pacemaker-, majd implantálható cardioverter defibrillátor beültetéseken átesett betegnél recidív endocarditis miatt készülék- és elektródaeltávolítást végeztünk, standard antibiotikus terápia alkalmazásával. A reimplantációt minithoracotomián keresztül végeztük. Az így elhelyezett sokkelektróda elégtelen működése miatt egy másik sokkelektródát szubkután vezettünk a hátsó mellkasfali régióba; rendszerünk az indukált kamrafibrillációt sikerrel szüntette meg. Megbeszélés: Esetismertetésünk demonstrálja a szubkután defibrillátorrendszer alkalmazhatóságát és előnyeit speciális körülmények fennállásakor. Felhívjuk a figyelmet arra a tényre, hogy ezt a technikát gyakrabban is lehetne alkalmazni olyan esetekben, amelyekben a transzvénás implantáció nem optimális.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document