Chapter 3 Interpretation of recent clinical trials concerning tight glycaemic control and cardiovascular risk

Author(s):  
Cristina Bianchi ◽  
Stefano Del Prato
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1517-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Hill ◽  
Paul Baines ◽  
Paul Barton ◽  
Paul Newland ◽  
Dianne Terlouw ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P907-P908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolien Janssen ◽  
Esther van den Berg ◽  
Michaela Mattheus ◽  
Odd Erik Johansen ◽  
Geert Jan Biessels

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1224-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Pachler ◽  
Johannes Plank ◽  
Heinz Weinhandl ◽  
Ludovic J. Chassin ◽  
Malgorzata E. Wilinska ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Nobels ◽  
Patrick Lecomte ◽  
Natascha Deprez ◽  
Inge Van Pottelbergh ◽  
Paul Van Crombrugge ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariadelina Simeoni ◽  
Alessandra F. Perna ◽  
Giorgio Fuiano

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPTH) is a major complication in patients on maintenance hemodialysis burdened with high cardiovascular risk. Hypertension is also a high prevalence complication contributing to an increase in the mortality rate in hemodialysis patients. A possible association between SHPTH and hypertension has been widely reported in the literature and several pathogenetic mechanisms have been described. There is evidence that the decrease of plasma iPTH levels are correlated with hypertension correction in hemodialysis patients undergoing parathyroidectomy and oral calcimimetics administration. We have observed a similar behaviour also in a patient on chronic hemodialysis treated with Etelcalcetide. Even if this is an isolated observation, it could stimulate future investigation, possibly in dedicated clinical trials.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Dolores Mesa García ◽  
Cruz Erika García-Rodríguez ◽  
María de la Cruz Rico ◽  
Concepción María Aguilera ◽  
Milagros Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bente Lomholt Langdahl ◽  
Lorenz Christian Hofbauer ◽  
John Colin Forfar

Abstract Sclerostin is primarily produced by the osteocytes, inhibits the canonical Wnt pathway and thereby the osteoblasts, and stimulates RANKL release by the osteocytes and thereby osteoclast recruitment. Inhibition of sclerostin therefore causes stimulation of bone formation and inhibition of resorption. In clinical trials romosozumab, an antibody against sclerostin, increases BMD and reduces the risk of fractures compared to placebo and alendronate. The cardiovascular safety of romosozumab was adjudicated in 2 large clinical osteoporosis trials in postmenopausal women. Compared with placebo, the incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in the two treatment groups. Compared to alendronate, the incidence of serious cardiovascular events was higher in women treated with romosozumab. The incidence of serious cardiovascular adverse events was low and posthoc analyses should therefore be interpreted with caution, however, the relative risk seemed unaffected by preexisting cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Sclerostin is expressed in the vasculature, predominantly in vascular smooth muscle cells in the media. However, preclinical and genetic studies have not demonstrated any increased cardiovascular risk with continuously low sclerostin levels or inhibition of sclerostin. Furthermore, no potential mechanisms for such an effect have been identified. In conclusion, while there is no preclinical or genetic evidence of a harmful effect of sclerostin inhibition on cardiovascular safety, the evidence from the large clinical trials in postmenopausal women is conflicting. Romosozumab should therefore be used for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture after careful consideration of the cardiovascular risk and the balance between benefits and risks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document