scholarly journals Reducing the variance of redshift space distortion measurements from mock galaxy catalogues with different lines of sight

2020 ◽  
Vol 500 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-271
Author(s):  
Alex Smith ◽  
Arnaud de Mattia ◽  
Etienne Burtin ◽  
Chia-Hsun Chuang ◽  
Cheng Zhao

ABSTRACT Accurate mock catalogues are essential for assessing systematics in the cosmological analysis of large galaxy surveys. Anisotropic two-point clustering measurements from the same simulation show some scatter for different lines of sight (LOS), but are on average equal, due to cosmic variance. This results in scatter in the measured cosmological parameters. We use the OuterRim N-body simulation halo catalogue to investigate this, considering the three simulation axes as LOS. The quadrupole of the two-point statistics is particularly sensitive to changes in the LOS, with subper cent level differences in the velocity distributions resulting in ∼1.5 σ shifts on large scales. Averaging over multiple LOS can reduce the impact of cosmic variance. We derive an expression for the Gaussian cross-correlation between the power spectrum multipole measurements, for any two LOS, including shot noise, and the corresponding reduction in variance in the average measurement. Quadrupole measurements are anticorrelated, and for three orthogonal LOS, the variance on the average measurement is reduced by more than 1/3. We perform a Fisher analysis to predict the corresponding gain in precision on the cosmological parameter measurements, which we compare against a set of 300 extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey emission-line galaxy EZmocks. The gain in fσ8, which measures the growth of structure, is also better than 1/3. Averaging over multiple LOS in future mock challenges will allow the redshift space distortion models to be constrained with the same systematic error, with less than three times the CPU time.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (12) ◽  
pp. 054
Author(s):  
Samuel Brieden ◽  
Héctor Gil-Marín ◽  
Licia Verde

Abstract In the standard (classic) approach, galaxy clustering measurements from spectroscopic surveys are compressed into baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift space distortions measurements, which in turn can be compared to cosmological models. Recent works have shown that avoiding this intermediate step and fitting directly the full power spectrum signal (full modelling) leads to much tighter constraints on cosmological parameters. Here we show where this extra information is coming from and extend the classic approach with one additional effective parameter, such that it captures, effectively, the same amount of information as the full modelling approach, but in a model-independent way. We validate this new method (ShapeFit) on mock catalogs, and compare its performance to the full modelling approach finding both to deliver equivalent results. The ShapeFit extension of the classic approach promotes the standard analyses at the level of full modelling ones in terms of information content, with the advantages of i) being more model independent; ii) offering an understanding of the origin of the extra cosmological information; iii) allowing a robust control on the impact of observational systematics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 499 (4) ◽  
pp. 4905-4917
Author(s):  
S Contreras ◽  
R E Angulo ◽  
M Zennaro ◽  
G Aricò ◽  
M Pellejero-Ibañez

ABSTRACT Predicting the spatial distribution of objects as a function of cosmology is an essential ingredient for the exploitation of future galaxy surveys. In this paper, we show that a specially designed suite of gravity-only simulations together with cosmology-rescaling algorithms can provide the clustering of dark matter, haloes, and subhaloes with high precision. Specifically, with only three N-body simulations, we obtain the power spectrum of dark matter at z = 0 and 1 to better than 3 per cent precision for essentially all currently viable values of eight cosmological parameters, including massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy, and over the whole range of scales explored, 0.03 < $k/{h}^{-1}\, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ < 5. This precision holds at the same level for mass-selected haloes and for subhaloes selected according to their peak maximum circular velocity. As an initial application of these predictions, we successfully constrain Ωm, σ8, and the scatter in subhalo-abundance-matching employing the projected correlation function of mock SDSS galaxies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 485 (4) ◽  
pp. 5059-5072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Upton Sanderbeck ◽  
Vid Iršič ◽  
Matthew McQuinn ◽  
Avery Meiksin

ABSTRACT Spatial fluctuations in ultraviolet backgrounds can subtly modulate the distribution of extragalactic sources, a potential signal and systematic for large-scale structure surveys. While this modulation has been shown to be significant for 3D Ly α forest surveys, its relevance for other large-scale structure probes has been hardly explored, despite being the only astrophysical process that likely can affect clustering measurements on the scales of ≳Mpc. We estimate that the background fluctuations, modulating the amount of H i, have a fractional effect of (0.03–0.3) × (k/[10−2 Mpc−1])−1 on the power spectrum of 21 cm intensity maps at z = 1–3. We find a smaller effect for H α and Ly α intensity mapping surveys of (0.001–0.1) × (k/[10−2 Mpc−1])−1 and even smaller effect for more traditional surveys that correlate the positions of individual H α or Ly α emitters. We also estimate the effect of backgrounds on low-redshift galaxy surveys in general based on a simple model in which background fluctuations modulate the rate halo gas cools, modulating star formation: We estimate a maximum fractional effect on the power of ∼0.01 (k/[10−2 Mpc−1])−1 at z = 1. We compare sizes of these imprints to cosmological parameter benchmarks for the next generation of redshift surveys: We find that ionizing backgrounds could result in a bias on the squeezed triangle non-Gaussianity parameter fNL that can be larger than unity for power spectrum measurements with a SPHEREx-like galaxy survey, and typical values of intensity bias. Marginalizing over a shape of the form k−1PL, where PL is the linear matter power spectrum, removes much of this bias at the cost of ${\approx } 40{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ larger statistical errors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 490 (3) ◽  
pp. 4237-4253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Leclercq ◽  
Wolfgang Enzi ◽  
Jens Jasche ◽  
Alan Heavens

ABSTRACT We propose a new, likelihood-free approach to inferring the primordial matter power spectrum and cosmological parameters from arbitrarily complex forward models of galaxy surveys where all relevant statistics can be determined from numerical simulations, i.e. black boxes. Our approach, which we call simulator expansion for likelihood-free inference (selfi), builds upon approximate Bayesian computation using a novel effective likelihood, and upon the linearization of black-box models around an expansion point. Consequently, we obtain simple ‘filter equations’ for an effective posterior of the primordial power spectrum, and a straightforward scheme for cosmological parameter inference. We demonstrate that the workload is computationally tractable, fixed a priori, and perfectly parallel. As a proof of concept, we apply our framework to a realistic synthetic galaxy survey, with a data model accounting for physical structure formation and incomplete and noisy galaxy observations. In doing so, we show that the use of non-linear numerical models allows the galaxy power spectrum to be safely fitted up to at least kmax = 0.5 h Mpc−1, outperforming state-of-the-art backward-modelling techniques by a factor of ∼5 in the number of modes used. The result is an unbiased inference of the primordial matter power spectrum across the entire range of scales considered, including a high-fidelity reconstruction of baryon acoustic oscillations. It translates into an unbiased and robust inference of cosmological parameters. Our results pave the path towards easy applications of likelihood-free simulation-based inference in cosmology. We have made our code pyselfi and our data products publicly available at http://pyselfi.florent-leclercq.eu.


2019 ◽  
Vol 491 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhdeep Singh ◽  
Rachel Mandelbaum ◽  
Uroš Seljak ◽  
Sergio Rodríguez-Torres ◽  
Anže Slosar

ABSTRACT We present cosmological parameter constraints based on a joint modelling of galaxy–lensing cross-correlations and galaxy clustering measurements in the SDSS, marginalizing over small-scale modelling uncertainties using mock galaxy catalogues, without explicit modelling of galaxy bias. We show that our modelling method is robust to the impact of different choices for how galaxies occupy dark matter haloes and to the impact of baryonic physics (at the $\sim 2{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ level in cosmological parameters) and test for the impact of covariance on the likelihood analysis and of the survey window function on the theory computations. Applying our results to the measurements using galaxy samples from BOSS and lensing measurements using shear from SDSS galaxies and CMB lensing from Planck, with conservative scale cuts, we obtain $S_8\equiv \left(\frac{\sigma _8}{0.8228}\right)^{0.8}\left(\frac{\Omega _\mathrm{ m}}{0.307}\right)^{0.6}=0.85\pm 0.05$ (stat.) using LOWZ × SDSS galaxy lensing, and S8 = 0.91 ± 0.1 (stat.) using combination of LOWZ and CMASS × Planck CMB lensing. We estimate the systematic uncertainty in the galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements to be $\sim 6{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ (dominated by photometric redshift uncertainties) and in the galaxy–CMB lensing measurements to be $\sim 3{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$, from small-scale modelling uncertainties including baryonic physics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (12) ◽  
pp. 044
Author(s):  
G. Parimbelli ◽  
G. Scelfo ◽  
S.K. Giri ◽  
A. Schneider ◽  
M. Archidiacono ◽  
...  

Abstract We investigate and quantify the impact of mixed (cold and warm) dark matter models on large-scale structure observables. In this scenario, dark matter comes in two phases, a cold one (CDM) and a warm one (WDM): the presence of the latter causes a suppression in the matter power spectrum which is allowed by current constraints and may be detected in present-day and upcoming surveys. We run a large set of N-body simulations in order to build an efficient and accurate emulator to predict the aforementioned suppression with percent precision over a wide range of values for the WDM mass, Mwdm, and its fraction with respect to the totality of dark matter, fwdm. The suppression in the matter power spectrum is found to be independent of changes in the cosmological parameters at the 2% level for k≲ 10 h/Mpc and z≤ 3.5. In the same ranges, by applying a baryonification procedure on both ΛCDM and CWDM simulations to account for the effect of feedback, we find a similar level of agreement between the two scenarios. We examine the impact that such suppression has on weak lensing and angular galaxy clustering power spectra. Finally, we discuss the impact of mixed dark matter on the shape of the halo mass function and which analytical prescription yields the best agreement with simulations. We provide the reader with an application to galaxy cluster number counts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 498 (3) ◽  
pp. 3470-3483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Wang ◽  
Gong-Bo Zhao ◽  
Cheng Zhao ◽  
Oliver H E Philcox ◽  
Shadab Alam ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We perform a multitracer analysis using the complete Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) DR16 luminous red galaxy (LRG) and the DR16 emission-line galaxy (ELG) samples in the configuration space, and successfully detect a cross-correlation between the two samples, and find the growth rate to be fσ8=0.342 ± 0.085 (∼25 per cent accuracy) from the cross-sample alone. We perform a joint measurement of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) and redshift space distortion (RSD) parameters at a single effective redshift of zeff = 0.77, using the autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions of the LRG and ELG samples, and find that the comoving angular diameter distance DM(zeff)/rd = 18.85 ± 0.38, the Hubble distance DH(zeff)/rd = 19.64 ± 0.57, and fσ8(zeff) = 0.432 ± 0.038, which is consistent with a ΛCDM model at $68{\ \rm per\ cent}$ CL. Compared to the single-tracer analysis on the LRG sample, the Figure of Merit of α⊥, α∥, andfσ8 is improved by a factor of 1.11 in our multitracer analysis, and in particular, the statistical uncertainty of fσ8 is reduced by $11.6{\ \rm per\ cent}$.


2020 ◽  
Vol 634 ◽  
pp. A74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Lacasa

As galaxy surveys improve their precision thanks to lower levels of noise and the push toward small, non-linear scales, the need for accurate covariances beyond the classical Gaussian formula becomes more acute. Here I investigate the analytical implementation and impact of non-Gaussian covariance terms that I had previously derived for the galaxy angular power spectrum. Braiding covariance is such an interesting class of such terms and it gets contributions both from in-survey and super-survey modes, the latter proving difficult to calibrate through simulations. I present an approximation for braiding covariance which speeds up the process of numerical computation. I show that including braiding covariance is a necessary condition for including other non-Gaussian terms, namely the in-survey 2-, 3-, and 4-halo covariance. Indeed these terms yield incorrect covariance matrices with negative eigenvalues if considered on their own. I then move to quantify the impact on parameter constraints, with forecasts for a survey with Euclid-like galaxy density and angular scales. Compared with the Gaussian case, braiding and in-survey covariances significantly increase the error bars on cosmological parameters, in particular by 50% for the dark energy equation of state w. The error bars on the halo occupation distribution (HOD) parameters are also affected between 12% and 39%. Accounting for super-sample covariance (SSC) also increases parameter errors, by 90% for w and between 7% and 64% for HOD. In total, non-Gaussianity increases the error bar on w by 120% (between 15% and 80% for other cosmological parameters) and the error bars on HOD parameters between 17% and 85%. Accounting for the 1-halo trispectrum term on top of SSC, as has been done in some current analyses, is not sufficient for capturing the full non-Gaussian impact: braiding and the rest of in-survey covariance have to be accounted for. Finally, I discuss why the inclusion of non-Gaussianity generally eases up parameter degeneracies, making cosmological constraints more robust for astrophysical uncertainties. I released publicly the data and a Python notebook reproducing the results and plots of the article.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (S333) ◽  
pp. 292-295
Author(s):  
Shintaro Yoshiura ◽  
Jack L. B. Line ◽  
Kenji Kubota ◽  
Kenji Hasegawa ◽  
Keitaro Takahashi

AbstractThe cross power spectrum of the 21 cm signal and Lyman-α emitters (LAEs) is a probe of the Epoch of Reionization. Astrophysical foregrounds do not correlate with the LAE distribution, though the foregrounds contribute to the error. To study the impact of foregrounds on the measurement, we assume realistic observation by the Murchison Widefield Array using a catalogue of radio galaxies, a LAE survey by the Subaru Hyper Supreme-Cam and the redshift of LAEs is determined by the Prime Focus Spectrograph. The HI distribution is estimated from a radiative transfer simulation with models based on results of radiation hydrodynamics simulation. Using these models, we found that the error of cross power spectrum is dominated by foreground terms. Furthermore, we estimate the effects of foreground removal, and find 99% of the foreground removal is required to detect the 21 cm-LAE signal at k ∼ 0.4 h Mpc−1.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (S306) ◽  
pp. 347-350
Author(s):  
Alejandro Guarnizo ◽  
Luca Amendola ◽  
Martin Kunz ◽  
Adrian Vollmer

AbstractFrom the galaxy power spectrum in redshift space, we derive semi-analytical results on the generic degeneracy of galaxy clustering measurements. Defining the observables A = Gbσ8 and R = Gfσ8, (being G the growth function, b the bias, f the growth rate, and σ8 the amplitude of the power spectrum), we perform a Fisher matrix formalism to forecast the expected precision of these quantities for a Euclid-like survey. Among the results we found that galaxy surveys have generically a slightly negative correlation between A and R, and they can always measure R about 3.7 to 4.7 times better than A.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document