scholarly journals Structural basis of the XPB–Bax1 complex as a dynamic helicase–nuclease machinery for DNA repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 6326-6339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin DuPrez ◽  
Feng He ◽  
Zhenhang Chen ◽  
Eduardo Hilario ◽  
Li Fan

Abstract Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair pathway for a variety of DNA lesions. XPB plays a key role in DNA opening at damage sites and coordinating damage incision by nucleases. XPB is conserved from archaea to human. In archaea, XPB is associated with a nuclease Bax1. Here we report crystal structures of XPB in complex with Bax1 from Archaeoglobus fulgidus (Af) and Sulfolobus tokodaii (St). These structures reveal for the first time four domains in Bax1, which interacts with XPB mainly through its N-terminal domain. A Cas2-like domain likely helps to position Bax1 at the forked DNA allowing the nuclease domain to incise one arm of the fork. Bax1 exists in monomer or homodimer but forms a heterodimer exclusively with XPB. StBax1 keeps StXPB in a closed conformation and stimulates ATP hydrolysis by XPB while AfBax1 maintains AfXPB in the open conformation and reduces its ATPase activity. Bax1 contains two distinguished nuclease active sites to presumably incise DNA damage. Our results demonstrate that protein-protein interactions regulate the activities of XPB ATPase and Bax1 nuclease. These structures provide a platform to understand the XPB-nuclease interactions important for the coordination of DNA unwinding and damage incision in eukaryotic NER.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Kokic ◽  
Aleksandar Chernev ◽  
Dimitry Tegunov ◽  
Christian Dienemann ◽  
Henning Urlaub ◽  
...  

AbstractGenomes are constantly threatened by DNA damage, but cells can remove a large variety of DNA lesions by nucleotide excision repair (NER)1. Mutations in NER factors compromise cellular fitness and cause human diseases such as Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy2,3. The NER machinery is built around the multisubunit transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), which opens the DNA repair bubble, scans for the lesion, and coordinates excision of the damaged DNA single strand fragment1,4. TFIIH consists of a kinase module and a core module that contains the ATPases XPB and XPD5. Here we prepare recombinant human TFIIH and show that XPB and XPD are stimulated by the additional NER factors XPA and XPG, respectively. We then determine the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the human core TFIIH-XPA-DNA complex at 3.6 Å resolution. The structure represents the lesion-scanning intermediate on the NER pathway and rationalizes the distinct phenotypes of disease mutations. It reveals that XPB and XPD bind double- and single-stranded DNA, respectively, consistent with their translocase and helicase activities. XPA forms a bridge between XPB and XPD, and retains the DNA at the 5’-edge of the repair bubble. Biochemical data and comparisons with prior structures6,7 explain how XPA and XPG can switch TFIIH from a transcription factor to a DNA repair factor. During transcription, the kinase module inhibits the repair helicase XPD8. For DNA repair, XPA dramatically rearranges the core TFIIH structure, which reorients the ATPases, releases the kinase module and displaces a ‘plug’ element from the DNA-binding pore in XPD. This enables XPD to move by ~80 Å, engage with DNA, and scan for the lesion in a XPG-stimulated manner. Our results provide the basis for a detailed mechanistic analysis of the NER mechanism.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (48) ◽  
pp. 14817-14822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa T. Zhang ◽  
Yuan He ◽  
Patricia Grob ◽  
Yick W. Fong ◽  
Eva Nogales ◽  
...  

The Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) complex is a versatile factor involved in both nucleotide excision repair and transcriptional coactivation as a critical component of the NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 pluripotency gene regulatory network. Here we present the structure of the human holo-XPC complex determined by single-particle electron microscopy to reveal a flexible, ear-shaped structure that undergoes localized loss of order upon DNA binding. We also determined the structure of the complete yeast homolog Rad4 holo-complex to find a similar overall architecture to the human complex, consistent with their shared DNA repair functions. Localized differences between these structures reflect an intriguing phylogenetic divergence in transcriptional capabilities that we present here. Having positioned the constituent subunits by tagging and deletion, we propose a model of key interaction interfaces that reveals the structural basis for this difference in functional conservation. Together, our findings establish a framework for understanding the structure-function relationships of the XPC complex in the interplay between transcription and DNA repair.


2007 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Maddukuri ◽  
Dominika Dudzińska ◽  
Barbara Tudek

The eukaryotic cell encounters more than one million various kinds of DNA lesions per day. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is one of the most important repair mechanisms that removes a wide spectrum of different DNA lesions. NER operates through two sub pathways: global genome repair (GGR) and transcription-coupled repair (TCR). GGR repairs the DNA damage throughout the entire genome and is initiated by the HR23B/XPC complex, while the CSB protein-governed TCR process removes DNA lesions from the actively transcribed strand. The sequence of events and the role of particular NER proteins are currently being extensively discussed. NER proteins also participate in other cellular processes like replication, transcription, chromatin maintenance and protein turnover. Defects in NER underlay severe genetic disorders: xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne syndrome (CS) and trichothiodystrophy (TTD).


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7147
Author(s):  
Olga A. Kladova ◽  
Irina V. Alekseeva ◽  
Murat Saparbaev ◽  
Olga S. Fedorova ◽  
Nikita A. Kuznetsov

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is known to be a critical player of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that these proteins interact with APE1 either at upstream or downstream steps of BER. Therefore, we may propose that even a minor disturbance of protein–protein interactions on the DNA template reduces coordination and repair efficiency. Here, the ability of various human DNA repair enzymes (such as DNA glycosylases OGG1, UNG2, and AAG; DNA polymerase Polβ; or accessory proteins XRCC1 and PCNA) to influence the activity of wild-type (WT) APE1 and its seven natural polymorphic variants (R221C, N222H, R237A, G241R, M270T, R274Q, and P311S) was tested. Förster resonance energy transfer–based kinetic analysis of abasic site cleavage in a model DNA substrate was conducted to detect the effects of interacting proteins on the activity of WT APE1 and its single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants. The results revealed that WT APE1 activity was stimulated by almost all tested DNA repair proteins. For the SNP variants, the matters were more complicated. Analysis of two SNP variants, R237A and G241R, suggested that a positive charge in this area of the APE1 surface impairs the protein–protein interactions. In contrast, variant R221C (where the affected residue is located near the DNA-binding site) showed permanently lower activation relative to WT APE1, whereas neighboring SNP N222H did not cause a noticeable difference as compared to WT APE1. Buried substitution P311S had an inconsistent effect, whereas each substitution at the DNA-binding site, M270T and R274Q, resulted in the lowest stimulation by BER proteins. Protein–protein molecular docking was performed between repair proteins to identify amino acid residues involved in their interactions. The data uncovered differences in the effects of BER proteins on APE1, indicating an important role of protein–protein interactions in the coordination of the repair pathway.


Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Joo Lee ◽  
Rou-Jia Sung ◽  
Gregory L. Verdine

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an essential DNA repair system distinguished from other such systems by its extraordinary versatility. NER removes a wide variety of structurally dissimilar lesions having only their bulkiness in common. NER can also repair several less bulky nucleobase lesions, such as 8-oxoguanine. Thus, how a single DNA repair system distinguishes such a diverse array of structurally divergent lesions from undamaged DNA has been one of the great unsolved mysteries in the field of genome maintenance. Here we employ a synthetic crystallography approach to obtain crystal structures of the pivotal NER enzyme UvrB in complex with duplex DNA, trapped at the stage of lesion-recognition. These structures coupled with biochemical studies suggest that UvrB integrates the ATPase-dependent helicase/translocase and lesion-recognition activities. Our work also conclusively establishes the identity of the lesion-containing strand and provides a compelling insight to how UvrB recognizes a diverse array of DNA lesions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-68
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ragab Abdel Gawwad ◽  
Ali Taha Ozdemir

The UV irradiation is a major DNA damaging factor in plants. Arabidopsis thaliana uses various repair pathways for these kinds of DNA lesions. One of them is the nucleotide excision repair pathway. The AtCUL4, ERCC1/UVR7 and CHR8 are vital proteins for nucleotide excision pathway and mutations in these proteins cause flaws in the repair mechanism. Two of these proteins play crucial role during DNA damage recognition and the other is involved in the excision of damaged bases. During NER processes, Arabidopsis uses different sets of proteins during the DNA damage recognition for transcriptionally active and genomic DNA. In order to get better insight into these proteins, we used bioinformatics tools to predict, analyze, and validate 3D structures of ERCC1/UVR7, AtCUL4 and CHR8. We also predicted the subcellular and sub-nuclear localization of proteins. Subsequently, we predicted the docking sites for each individual proteins and searched for interacting residues which mediate the protein-protein interactions. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C453-C453
Author(s):  
David Jeruzalmi

Efficient elimination of DNA lesions by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is critical for all organisms. In bacteria, the NER pathway is implemented by the successive action of three proteins, UvrA, UvrB and UvrC via a series of large and dynamic multi-protein complexes. A large number of studies have defined three major stages associated with the early steps of the NER pathway. In stage 1, a large (300-400 kDa) complex of the UvrA and UvrB proteins (AB) scans the genome to identify lesion-containing DNA. This process requires rapid binding and release of DNA; moreover, damage must be specifically recognized, and distinguished from native DNA, despite the fact that the relevant lesions induce widely different DNA structures. Once lesion-containing DNA has been located, it is stably bound by a dimeric form of UvrA within the AB complex (Stage 2). A major reorganization then occurs in which UvrA is lost from the ensemble, and concomitantly, UvrB becomes localized at the site of damage (Stage 3). Following these early stages, additional events lead to excision of the damage on one strand, and repair of the resulting single-stranded gap. Over the past few years, we have determined three structures of UvrA and the UvrA·UvrB complex. Our first structure of isolated UvrA revealed its overall architecture, its DNA binding surface, and the arrangement of its four-nucleotide binding sites. In the structure of the complete UvrA·UvrB damage sensor, a central UvrA dimer is flanked by two UvrB molecules, all linearly arrayed along a DNA path predicted by biochemical studies. DNA is predicted to bind to UvrA in the complex within a narrow and deep groove that is compatible with native duplex DNA only. In contrast, the shape of the corresponding surface in our prior structure of UvrA is wide and shallow, and appears compatible with various types of lesion-deformed DNA. These differences point to conformation switching between the two forms as a component of the genome-scanning phase of damage sensing. We also show that the highly conserved signature domain II of UvrA, which is adjacent to the proximal nucleotide-binding site, mediates a critical nexus of contacts to UvrB and to DNA. Moreover, in the novel UvrA conformer, the disposition of this domain is altered such that association with either UvrB or DNA is precluded. Concomitantly, nucleotide is uniquely absent from the proximal binding site. Thus, the signature domain II is implicated in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent conformational change that detaches UvrA from both UvrB and DNA after initial damage recognition. The disposition and number of UvrB molecules in the AB complex, both unanticipated, suggest that once UvrA departs, UvrB localizes to the site of damage by helicase-mediated tracking along the DNA. Together these results permit a high-resolution model for the dynamics of early stages in NER.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
JT Barnett ◽  
J Kuper ◽  
W Koelmel ◽  
C Kisker ◽  
NM Kad

AbstractNucleotide excision repair (NER) protects the genome following exposure to diverse types of DNA damage, including UV light and chemotherapeutics. Mutations in mammalian NER genes lead to diseases such as xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. In eukaryotes, the major transcription factor TFIIH is the central hub of NER. The core components of TFIIH include the helicases XPB, XPD, and five ‘structural’ subunits. Two of these structural TFIIH proteins, p44 and p62 remain relatively unstudied; p44 is known to regulate the helicase activity of XPD during NER whereas p62’s role is thought to be structural. However, a recent cryo-EM structure shows that p44, p62, and XPD make extensive contacts within TFIIH, with part of p62 occupying XPD’s DNA binding site. This observation implies a more extensive role in DNA repair beyond the structural integrity of TFIIH. Here, we show that p44 stimulates XPD’s ATPase but upon encountering DNA damage, further stimulation is only observed when p62 is part of the ternary complex; suggesting a role for the p44/p62 heterodimer in TFIIH’s mechanism of damage detection. Using single molecule imaging, we demonstrate that p44/p62 independently interacts with DNA; it is seen to diffuse, however, in the presence of UV-induced DNA lesions the complex stalls. Combined with the analysis of a recent cryo-EM structure we suggest that p44/p62 acts as a novel DNA-binding entity within TFIIH that is capable of recognizing DNA damage. This revises our understanding of TFIIH and prompts more extensive investigation into the core subunits for an active role during both DNA repair and transcription.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Kobaisi ◽  
N. Fayyad ◽  
H. R. Rezvani ◽  
M. Fayyad-Kazan ◽  
E. Sulpice ◽  
...  

The continuous exposure of the human body’s cells to radiation and genotoxic stresses leads to the accumulation of DNA lesions. Fortunately, our body has several effective repair mechanisms, among which is nucleotide excision repair (NER), to counteract these lesions. NER includes both global genome repair (GG-NER) and transcription-coupled repair (TC-NER). Deficiencies in the NER pathway underlie the development of several DNA repair diseases, such as xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne syndrome (CS), and trichothiodystrophy (TTD). Deficiencies in GG-NER and TC-NER render individuals to become prone to cancer and neurological disorders, respectively. Therefore, NER regulation is of interest in fine-tuning these risks. Distinct signaling cascades including the NFE2L2 (NRF2), AHR, PI3K/AKT1, MAPK, and CSNK2A1 pathways can modulate NER function. In addition, several chemical and biological compounds have proven success in regulating NER’s activity. These modulators, particularly the positive ones, could therefore provide potential treatments for genetic DNA repair-based diseases. Negative modulators, nonetheless, can help sensitize cells to killing by genotoxic chemicals. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the major upstream signaling pathways and molecules that could modulate the NER’s activity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shalaka Chitale ◽  
Holger Richly

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation triggers the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the lesion sites and the deposition of histone marks as part of the DNA damage response. The major DNA repair pathway removing DNA lesions caused by exposure to UV light is nucleotide excision repair (NER). We have previously demonstrated that the endoribonuclease DICER facilitates chromatin decondensation during lesion recognition in the global-genomic branch of NER. Here, we report that DICER mediates the recruitment of the methyltransferase MMSET to the DNA damage site. We show that MMSET is required for efficient NER and that it catalyzes the dimethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 (H4K20me2). H4K20me2 at DNA damage sites facilitates the recruitment of the NER factor XPA. Our work thus provides evidence for an H4K20me2-dependent mechanism of XPA recruitment during lesion recognition in the global-genomic branch of NER.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document