Ependymomas: surgeon case volume and patient outcomes
Abstract Aims Ependymomas (tumours arising from ependymal cells) are rare in the adult population and therefore there is limited class 1 evidence on the treatment and management of these patients. We present our experience from a large single center. We address whether management should be undertaken by sub-specialised surgeons with high volume experience. Method Retrospective comparative study. Results High volume surgeons operated on larger volume (16.14 mm3, 8.31mm3, p=0.10) and more complex tumours (multi-centric cases p=0.10). We find a non-significant improvement in complication rate (p=0.77), extent of gross total resection (70.8% against 65.7%) and a positive change in performance status for high volume surgeons (p=0.84). Length of hospital stay is significantly prolonged when complications occur (14.2 and 48.4 days, p<0.05). Conclusion Surgeons who have higher case load of ependymomas operate on more complex tumours. In addition, our results indicate there is a technical advantage of high volume surgeons compared to low volume surgeons, which translates into improved clinical outcomes for patients. We show that this has a significant impact on length of hospital stay, as well as the associated economical implications. For rare tumours such as ependymomas, super-specialisation and referral to surgeons with higher case volume will likely improve patient outcomes. We call for a multi-centre, prospective studies to combine data in demonstrating statistical significance (power calculation for complication rate, N=150, p=0.05).