scholarly journals THER-02. TARGETING DNA DAMAGE REPAIR IN MYC-DRIVEN PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii114-ii114
Author(s):  
Sonja Krausert ◽  
Sander Lambo ◽  
Sebastian Brabetz ◽  
Norman Mack ◽  
Benjamin Schwalm ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii412-iii412
Author(s):  
Sonja Krausert ◽  
Sander Lambo ◽  
Norman Mack ◽  
Benjamin Schwalm ◽  
Stefan Pfister ◽  
...  

Abstract Pediatric brain tumors harboring amplifications or high overexpression of MYC-/MYCN are often associated with poor outcome. High MYC(N) expression in these tumors leads to increased transcription, which can be in conflict with DNA replication and subsequently can cause replication stress, R-loops and DNA damage. We hypothesize that high MYC(N) expression makes them vulnerable to DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRi) and even more vulnerable to combinations of DDRi and chemotherapeutics. To test this hypothesis we performed in vitro drug experiments using Group 3 medulloblastoma (MB) and ETMR cell lines. IC50-values were evaluated of topoisomerase inhibitor Irinotecan (SN-38) and Pamiparib (BGB-290), a brain-penetrant PARP-inhibitor, in monotherapy. All cell lines were sensitive for SN-38 and showed IC50-values in the low nM-range but PARP-inhibitors were ineffective. However, a significant decrease in IC50 can be observed when SN-38 and Pamiparib are used in combination. For in vivo treatments, we injected NSG mice with luciferase labelled patient-derived xenograft- (PDX-) cells of various models (MB Group 3, MB SHH, ETMR, RELA EPN), monitored tumor growth via IVIS and randomized the mice into four groups (vehicle, BGB-290, Irinotecan and Irinotecan+Pamiparib) when a predefined threshold of tumor growth was reached. Mice were treated with Irinotecan (or vehicle) once per day i.p. and Pamiparib (or vehicle) twice per day per oral gavage. Treatment with Pamiparib did not show any survival benefit, but mice treated with Irinotecan or the combination showed a clear survival benefit. Treatments are ongoing and more results will be presented at the conference.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihong Zhao ◽  
Boya Xu ◽  
Wenbin Ma ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Chuanlu Jiang ◽  
...  

With the gradual understanding of tumor development, many tumor therapies have been invented and applied in clinical work, and immunotherapy has been widely concerned as an emerging hot topic in the last decade. It is worth noting that immunotherapy is nowadays applied under too harsh conditions, and many tumors are defined as “cold tumors” that are not sensitive to immunotherapy, and brain tumors are typical of them. However, there is much evidence that suggests a link between DNA damage repair mechanisms and immunotherapy. This may be a breakthrough for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors. Therefore, in this review, first, we will describe the common pathways of DNA damage repair. Second, we will focus on immunotherapy and analyze the mechanisms of DNA damage repair involved in the immune process. Third, we will review biomarkers that have been or may be used to evaluate immunotherapy for brain tumors, such as TAMs, RPA, and other molecules that may provide a precursor assessment for the rational implementation of immunotherapy for brain tumors. Finally, we will discuss the rational combination of immunotherapy with other therapeutic approaches that have an impact on the DNA damage repair process in order to open new pathways for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors, to maximize the effect of immunotherapy on DNA damage repair mechanisms, and to provide ideas and guidance for immunotherapy in brain tumors.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 366-OR
Author(s):  
GRACE H. YANG ◽  
JEE YOUNG HAN ◽  
SUKANYA LODH ◽  
JOSEPH T. BLUMER ◽  
DANIELLE FONTAINE ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document