scholarly journals DNA Damage Repair in Brain Tumor Immunotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shihong Zhao ◽  
Boya Xu ◽  
Wenbin Ma ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Chuanlu Jiang ◽  
...  

With the gradual understanding of tumor development, many tumor therapies have been invented and applied in clinical work, and immunotherapy has been widely concerned as an emerging hot topic in the last decade. It is worth noting that immunotherapy is nowadays applied under too harsh conditions, and many tumors are defined as “cold tumors” that are not sensitive to immunotherapy, and brain tumors are typical of them. However, there is much evidence that suggests a link between DNA damage repair mechanisms and immunotherapy. This may be a breakthrough for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors. Therefore, in this review, first, we will describe the common pathways of DNA damage repair. Second, we will focus on immunotherapy and analyze the mechanisms of DNA damage repair involved in the immune process. Third, we will review biomarkers that have been or may be used to evaluate immunotherapy for brain tumors, such as TAMs, RPA, and other molecules that may provide a precursor assessment for the rational implementation of immunotherapy for brain tumors. Finally, we will discuss the rational combination of immunotherapy with other therapeutic approaches that have an impact on the DNA damage repair process in order to open new pathways for the application of immunotherapy in brain tumors, to maximize the effect of immunotherapy on DNA damage repair mechanisms, and to provide ideas and guidance for immunotherapy in brain tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 580-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben R Hawley ◽  
Wei-Ting Lu ◽  
Ania Wilczynska ◽  
Martin Bushell

Abstract Many surveillance and repair mechanisms exist to maintain the integrity of our genome. All of the pathways described to date are controlled exclusively by proteins, which through their enzymatic activities identify breaks, propagate the damage signal, recruit further protein factors and ultimately resolve the break with little to no loss of genetic information. RNA is known to have an integral role in many cellular pathways, but, until very recently, was not considered to take part in the DNA repair process. Several reports demonstrated a conserved critical role for RNA-processing enzymes and RNA molecules in DNA repair, but the biogenesis of these damage-related RNAs and their mechanisms of action remain unknown. We will explore how these new findings challenge the idea of proteins being the sole participants in the response to DNA damage and reveal a new and exciting aspect of both DNA repair and RNA biology.


DNA Repair ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 103192
Author(s):  
Nan Jia ◽  
Chaowan Guo ◽  
Yuka Nakazawa ◽  
Diana van den Heuvel ◽  
Martijn S. Luijsterburg ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 13-14
Author(s):  
Yang Han ◽  
Ya Zhang ◽  
Xinting Hu ◽  
Xiang Sun ◽  
Xin Wang

Introduction: Enhanced DNA damage repair effect is an important mechanism for drug-resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Moreover, the ability of cancer cells to repair under radiation or chemotherapy drug induced DNA damage also serves as one of the mechanisms for therapy resistance. It is reported that nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1 (NUSAP1), a microtubule binding protein, has been involved in DNA damage repair process and plays important roles in the development, progression, and metastasis in several types of cancer. However, its role and mechanism in the development of CLL are still unclear. Methods: Expression levels of NUSAP1 mRNA and protein in CLL cell lines and patient specimens were detected by qRT-PCR and Western blot, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve and overall survival were analyzed by log-rank test. Peripheral blood samples from de novo CLL patients and healthy volunteers were collected with informed consents at the Department of Hematology in Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University (SPHASU). Microarray datasets GSE22762 were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus. With altering NUSAP1 expression by lentivirus-transfected cells in vitro, the effects of NUSAP1 on cell proliferation, apoptosis and cycle were detected by CCK8, Annexin V-PE /7AAD staining and PI/RNase staining respectively. Bioinformatics analysis, luciferase reporter analysis, immunoprecipitation and were applied to discern and examine the relationship between NUSAP1 and its potential targets. Results: According to clinical specimens and bioinformatics analysis, the expression level of NUSAP1 gene in samples of CLL patients was significantly increased than that of healthy donors (P<0.05) (Figure A). Besides, the results indicated that the OS of patients with highly expressed NUSAP1 was significantly worse than in patients with low expression with the statistical analysis database GSE22762. mRNA and protein expression levels of NUSAP1 were significantly higher in CLL cell lines than in PBMCs from healthy donors (Figure C). Our findings indicated that NUSAP1 knockdown notably inhibited cell proliferation when compared with the Scramble group (Figure D). Moreover, the amounts of DNA fragmentation of the apoptotic cells were remarkably increased by NUSAP1 shRNA in MEC-1 and EHEB cells when compared with the Scramble group (Figure E). In addition, after knocking down NUSAP1, MEC-1 and EHEB cells were blocked in G0/G1 phase (Figure F). Moreover, addition to fludarabine or ibrutinib with shNUSAP1 group showed enhanced cytotoxicity in CLL cells (Figure G). The differential genes were analyzed via RNA-seq between Scramble and ShNUSAP1 group. Intriguingly, annotations of gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated that NUSAP1 was closely related to biological processes including cell cycle and response to drug. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis showed that NUSAP1 were enriched in pathways in cancer, DNA replication and cell cycle. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) implicated that NUSAP1 was functionally enriched in DNA replication, cell cycle and proteasome (Figure H). Immunofluorescence showed that NUSAP1 was mainly distributed in the cell nucleus, and the expression level of RAD51 was positively correlated with the change of NUSAP1 expression (Figure I). Surppression of NUSAP1 inhibited the action of proteins in DNA damage repair pathway (Figure J). Through COIP, NUSAP1 was identified to bind with RAD51 and play an important role in DNA damage repair pathway (Figure K). Hence, NUSAP1 participates in the DNA damage repair process and enhances the drug resistance in CLL. Conclusions: This study first demonstrated that the high expression of NUSAP1 in CLL patients is associated with poor prognosis through database analysis and experiments in vitro. Interference of NUSAP1 expression led to a slower CLL cell proliferation and a higher apoptosis rate, meanwhile induced the G1 phase arrest. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that NUSAP1 contributes to DNA damage repairing by binding to RAD51 and enhances drug resistance in CLL. Therefore, NUSAP1 is expected to be a potential target for the treatment of CLL with drug-resistance. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jehad F. Alhmoud ◽  
John F. Woolley ◽  
Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa ◽  
Mohammed Imad Malki

DNA damage is well recognized as a critical factor in cancer development and progression. DNA lesions create an abnormal nucleotide or nucleotide fragment, causing a break in one or both chains of the DNA strand. When DNA damage occurs, the possibility of generated mutations increases. Genomic instability is one of the most important factors that lead to cancer development. DNA repair pathways perform the essential role of correcting the DNA lesions that occur from DNA damaging agents or carcinogens, thus maintaining genomic stability. Inefficient DNA repair is a critical driving force behind cancer establishment, progression and evolution. A thorough understanding of DNA repair mechanisms in cancer will allow for better therapeutic intervention. In this review we will discuss the relationship between DNA damage/repair mechanisms and cancer, and how we can target these pathways.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongli An ◽  
Lu Yang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Zhixue Gan ◽  
Haihui Gu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT RAD6, an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, is a key node for determining different DNA damage repair pathways, controlling both the error-prone and the error-free DNA damage repair pathways through differential regulation of the ubiquitination of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) protein. However, whether other pathways are involved in the RAD6-mediated regulation of DNA damage repair is still unclear. To deeply understand the molecular mechanisms of RAD6 in DNA damage repair, we performed a proteomic analysis and identified the changes of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks of RAD6 before and after X-ray irradiation. Furthermore, our study indicated that a proteasome-related event is likely involved in the DNA damage repair process. Moreover, we found that RAD6 promotes proteasome activity and nuclear translocation by enhancing the degradation of PSMF1 and the lamin B receptor (LBR). Therefore, we provide a novel pathway that is employed by RAD6 in response to DNA damage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii114-ii114
Author(s):  
Sonja Krausert ◽  
Sander Lambo ◽  
Sebastian Brabetz ◽  
Norman Mack ◽  
Benjamin Schwalm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document