scholarly journals INNV-20. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY FOR PRIMARY FOR RECURRENT AND GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi134-vi135
Author(s):  
Pavan Shah ◽  
Taija White ◽  
Carrie Price ◽  
Debraj Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Novel Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary central nervous system malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Tumor treating fields (TTFs) are a novel treatment modality utilizing alternating electric fields that have demonstrated promise in randomized clinical trials for primary and recurrent glioblastomas. In addition to these studies, a multitude of smaller investigations have been performed examining their efficacy in a variety of combination therapies. This systematic review of available literature aims to summarize and evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFs for primary and recurrent glioblastoma patients. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines from database inception through 2/27/2019. Databases queried include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. 856 unique studies were initially identified in this search, 9 of which met final inclusion criteria. 2 authors independently performed the screening and data extraction of the studies. RESULTS Excluding historical controls, 1569 patients were identified in these studies, 1191 of which received TTFs therapy. TTFs were evaluated in single-arm clinical trials (n = 2), randomized clinical trials (n = 2), and retrospective studies (n = 5). These 9 studies are presented based on treatments provided, baseline patient characteristics, and patient outcomes. No adverse events appear to be associated with TTFs other than adverse skin reactions. Given the heterogeneity in the presented studies, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSIONS TTFs are a novel treatment modality that have demonstrated safety and efficacy in a number of settings and study designs. However, further investigation is needed to continue characterizing treatment outcomes and assessing TTFs interactions with various drug regimens.

scholarly journals Tumor treating fields in the management of Glioblastoma: opportunities for advanced imaging

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram S. Soni ◽  
Ted K. Yanagihara
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Imaging Biomarkers ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Alternating Electric Fields ◽  
Promising Line

AbstractAlternating electric fields have been successfully applied to cancer cells in-vitro to disrupt malignant progression and this antimitotic therapy has now been proven to be efficacious in Phase II and Phase III randomized clinical trials of patients with glioblastoma. With additional clinical trials ongoing in a number of other malignancies, there is a crucial need for a better understanding of the radiographic predictors of response and standardization of surveillance imaging interpretation. However, many radiologists have yet to become familiarized with this emerging cancer therapy and there is little active investigation to develop prognostic or predictive imaging biomarkers. This article provides an overview of the pre-clinical data that elucidate the biologic mechanisms of alternating electric fields as a cancer therapy. Results from clinical trials in patients with glioblastoma are then reviewed while elaborating on the several limitations to adoption of this promising line of treatment. Finally, a proposal for the development of imaging markers as a means of overcoming some of these limitations is made, which may improve treatment utilization by augmenting patient selection not only in glioblastoma, but also other malignant conditions for which this therapy is currently being evaluated.

scholarly journals Noninvasive Application of Alternating Electric Fields in Glioblastoma: A Fourth Cancer Treatment Modality

2012 ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Gutin ◽  
Eric T. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Radiation Treatments

Overview: Tumor treating fields (TTF) therapy is a novel antimitotic, electric field–based treatment for cancer. This nonchemical, nonablative treatment is unlike any of the established cancer treatment modalities, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Recently, it has entered clinical use after a decade of intensive translational research. TTF therapy is delivered to patients by a portable, battery-operated, medical device using noninvasive transducer arrays placed on the skin surface surrounding the treated tumor. TTF therapy is now a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) who have exhausted surgical and radiation treatments. This article will introduce the basic science behind TTF therapy, its mechanism of action, the preclinical findings that led to its clinical testing, and the clinical safety and efficacy data available to date, as well as offer future research directions on this novel treatment modality for cancer.

L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Reza Mirhafez ◽  
Mitra Hariri
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Inflammatory Mediators ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Human Adults ◽  
Factor Α

Abstract. L-arginine is an important factor in several physiological and biochemical processes. Recently, scientists studied L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). We conducted a systematic review on randomized controlled trials assessing L-arginine effect on inflammatory mediators. We searched data bases including Google scholar, ISI web of science, SCOPUS, and PubMed/Medline up to April 2019. Randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of L-arginine on inflammatory mediators in human adults were included. Our search retrieved eleven articles with 387 participants. Five articles were on patients with cancer and 6 articles were on adults without cancer. L-arginine was applied in enteral form in 5 articles and in oral form in 6 articles. Eight articles were on both genders, two articles were on women, and one article was on men. L-arginine could not reduce inflammatory mediators among patients with and without cancer except one article which indicated that taking L-arginine for 6 months decreased IL-6 among cardiopathic nondiabetic patients. Our results indicated that L-arginine might not be able to reduce selected inflammatory mediators, but for making a firm decision more studies are needed to be conducted with longer intervention duration, separately on male and female and with different doses of L-arginine.

Maternal and Neonatal Effect of Fentanyl as a Premedication before Induction of General Anesthesia in Cesarean Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-237
Author(s):  
Mir Hadi Musavi ◽  
Behzad Jodeiri ◽  
Keyvan Mirnia ◽  
Morteza Ghojazadeh ◽  
Zeinab Nikniaz
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Fentanyl ◽  
Neonatal Effect ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Background: Although, some clinical trials investigated the maternal and neonatal effect of fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia in cesarean section, to the best of our knowledge, there is no systematic review to summarize these results. Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the maternal and neonatal effect of intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia in cesarean section. Methods: The databases of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane library were searched till July 2017 to identify randomized clinical trials which evaluated the effects of intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia compared with placebo on neonate first and fifth minute Apgar score and maternal heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in cesarean section. Standard Mean difference (SMD) was calculated and I-square statistic test was used for heterogeneity analysis. Results: The present systematic review and meta-analysis consisted of three clinical trials including 180 women in labor. Considering the results of meta-analysis, there is no significant differences between fentanyl and placebo in the case of Apgar score at 1 minute; however, the Apgar score of 5 minutes was significantly lower in fentanyl group compared with placebo (SMD -0.68, 95%CI: - 0.98, -0.38, p<0.001). In the term of maternal hemodynamics, the heart rate (SMD -0.43, 95%CI: - 0.72, -0.13, p=0.004) and MAP (SMD -0.78, 95% CI: -1.09, -0.48, p<0.001) in fentanyl group were significantly lower compared with placebo group. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis showed that using intravenous fentanyl as a premedication before induction of general anesthesia had adverse effects on neonate Apgar score. However, it had positive effects on preventing adverse consequences of intubation on maternal hemodynamics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document