Polyphenols as novel treatment options for dermatological diseases: A systematic review of clinical trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Tuong ◽  
Lauren Walker ◽  
Raja K. Sivamani
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Dermatological Diseases ◽  
Novel Treatment

scholarly journals INNV-20. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS THERAPY FOR PRIMARY FOR RECURRENT AND GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi134-vi135
Author(s):  
Pavan Shah ◽  
Taija White ◽  
Carrie Price ◽  
Debraj Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Electric Fields ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Tumor Treating Fields ◽  
Novel Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is an aggressive primary central nervous system malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Tumor treating fields (TTFs) are a novel treatment modality utilizing alternating electric fields that have demonstrated promise in randomized clinical trials for primary and recurrent glioblastomas. In addition to these studies, a multitude of smaller investigations have been performed examining their efficacy in a variety of combination therapies. This systematic review of available literature aims to summarize and evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFs for primary and recurrent glioblastoma patients. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines from database inception through 2/27/2019. Databases queried include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. 856 unique studies were initially identified in this search, 9 of which met final inclusion criteria. 2 authors independently performed the screening and data extraction of the studies. RESULTS Excluding historical controls, 1569 patients were identified in these studies, 1191 of which received TTFs therapy. TTFs were evaluated in single-arm clinical trials (n = 2), randomized clinical trials (n = 2), and retrospective studies (n = 5). These 9 studies are presented based on treatments provided, baseline patient characteristics, and patient outcomes. No adverse events appear to be associated with TTFs other than adverse skin reactions. Given the heterogeneity in the presented studies, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSIONS TTFs are a novel treatment modality that have demonstrated safety and efficacy in a number of settings and study designs. However, further investigation is needed to continue characterizing treatment outcomes and assessing TTFs interactions with various drug regimens.

scholarly journals Molecular Insights and Emerging Strategies for Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2761
Author(s):  
Fabiana Mallone ◽  
Marta Sacchetti ◽  
Alessandro Lambiase ◽  
Antonietta Moramarco
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Future Perspectives ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
Novel Treatment ◽  
Combinational Therapies

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular cancer. In recent decades, major advances have been achieved in the diagnosis and prognosis of UM allowing for tailored treatments. However, nearly 50% of patients still develop metastatic disease with survival rates of less than 1 year. There is currently no standard of adjuvant and metastatic treatment in UM, and available therapies are ineffective resulting from cutaneous melanoma protocols. Advances and novel treatment options including liver-directed therapies, immunotherapy, and targeted-therapy have been investigated in UM-dedicated clinical trials on single compounds or combinational therapies, with promising results. Therapies aimed at prolonging or targeting metastatic tumor dormancy provided encouraging results in other cancers, and need to be explored in UM. In this review, the latest progress in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of UM in adjuvant and metastatic settings are discussed. In addition, novel insights into tumor genetics, biology and immunology, and the mechanisms underlying metastatic dormancy are discussed. As evident from the numerous studies discussed in this review, the increasing knowledge of this disease and the promising results from testing of novel individualized therapies could offer future perspectives for translating in clinical use.

scholarly journals P10 Reporting of offspring data in diabetes, HIV infection and hypertension trials during pregnancy: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e21.1-e21
Author(s):  
B Aurich ◽  
T Martin-Montoya ◽  
D Zhang ◽  
E Jacqz-Aigrain
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chronic Medication ◽  
Neonatal Deaths

BackgroundAccording to international guidelines clinical trials are conducted during pregnancy to evaluate benefits and risks of medicines for both the mother and her offspring. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting criteria apply to these trials and should include safety data on the offspring. The safety of maternal treatments is a key issue for health care professionals and parents. Diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and hypertension are among the most frequent chronic diseases worldwide in women of child bearing potential. The objective of this systematic review was to analyse offspring data reported in clinical trials conducted in pregnant women receiving chronic drug treatment for one of these conditions.MethodsPubmed and Embase (01/01/1997–31/12/2017) were searched for drug trials in pregnant women with diabetes, HIV infection or hypertension. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by a full text review of eligible articles. Inclusion criteria were interventional clinical trials in pregnant women treated with chronic medication and full text in English. Trial characteristics, maternal and offspring data were extracted. Data was summarised by disease and study. Twelve key items were considered for the offspring. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017057024).ResultsOverall, 196 articles reporting 132 clinical trials (diabetes n=55; HIV n=59; hypertension n=18) were included. The number of births were frequently not reported (diabetes 40%; HIV 24%; hypertension 56%). Congenital malformations were infrequently reported with sufficient detail (diabetes 27%; HIV 34%; hypertension 6%). Similar observations were made for other key items (e.g. foetal losses, neonatal deaths, birth weight corrected for gestational age).ConclusionsUnderreporting of key data for the offspring was frequent in publications of clinical trials in pregnant women with diabetes, HIV infection or hypertension making the assessment of the benefit-risk ratio of treatment options during pregnancy difficult.Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose

Management of carcinoid syndrome (CS): A systematic review of systemic treatment options.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Edward M. Wolin ◽  
Al Bowen Benson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Carcinoid Heart Disease ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Symptom Response

516 Background: CS is a major cause of symptom burden (diarrhea/flushing) in patients (pts) with neuroendocrine tumors and is associated with shortened survival and severe complications such as carcinoid heart disease. We performed a systematic review of clinical evidence for CS systemic treatments. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Large ( > 60 pt) prospective clinical trials investigating the efficacy/safety of systemic treatment options for pts with CS were eligible for inclusion. Data extracted included study design, pt population, interventions, prior treatments, permitted concomitant medications, study endpoints/statistical analyses, and efficacy/safety outcomes. Results: Six large prospective clinical trials (total 953 pts) were identified from 144 search results. Significant heterogeneity existed in pt populations, control groups (placebo vs active comparator), duration of therapy, study endpoints, and efficacy/safety data reporting. Interventions assessed were long-acting and subcutaneous octreotide (OCT & OCT SC), lanreotide (LAN), telotristat ethyl (TE)+somatostatin analogues (SSA), pasireotide (PAS), and everolimus (EVE)+OCT. Symptom response was variably assessed by the frequency of diarrhea/flushing and/or receipt of rescue short-acting SSA in 5/6 studies; a significant improvement in at least one of these measures occurred in 4 studies (OCT and OCT SC; LAN; TE+SSA). Failure to meet symptom response criteria ranged from 29-82% in the studies. Reported reductions in CgA and/or 5-HIAA reached statistical significance in 3 studies (LAN; EVE+OCT; TE+SSA). Interventions were generally well tolerated. Two phase 3 trials focused specifically on management of CS symptoms refractory to SSA; strategies included switching to PAS or an increased dose of OCT (40 mg q28d) for refractory diarrhea/flushing, or receipt of TE with continued SSA for refractory diarrhea. Conclusions: SSA provide substantial symptom relief for pts with CS. For refractory symptoms, TE can be added, SSA dose increased, and metastasis debulking can be used (with surgery, hepatic artery embolization, ablation, and PRRT). The addition of biologic agents to SSA can further improve CS management.

scholarly journals The efficacy of topical, oral and surgical interventions for the treatment of tungiasis: A systematic review of the literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e0009722
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Tardin Martins ◽  
Amanda Ramos de Brito ◽  
Patrícia Shu Kurizky ◽  
Rodrigo Gurgel Gonçalves ◽  
Yago Ranniere Teixeira Santana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Tissue Destruction ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Surgical Extraction ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

Background Tungiasis is a neglected disease caused by Tunga penetrans that can be complicated by secondary infections and local tissue destruction. Adequate treatment is important, especially in vulnerable populations; potential treatment options proposed range from surgical extraction to the use of oral and topical medications. We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the efficacy of topical, oral and surgical interventions for the treatment of tungiasis. Methodology/Principal findings The present review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021234741). On September 1, 2020, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scielo and LILACS BVS. We included clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies that evaluated any topical, systemic or mechanical treatment for tungiasis. We used the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool for Randomized Trials for clinical trial analysis. Qualitative and quantitative descriptive syntheses were performed. Our search strategy resulted in 3376 references. Subsequently, 2568 titles/abstracts and 114 full texts were screened. We finally included 19 articles; 9 were classified as clinical trials. Two and 3 articles presented low and some RoB, respectively, according to the tool. Only two articles tested the efficacy of oral medications (niridazole, ivermectin), with discouraging results. Six clinical trials evaluated topical products for the treatment of tungiasis; 2 evaluated dimeticone-based compounds and reported positive results in lesion reduction and cure. None reported significant adverse reactions. Surgical extraction was evaluated only in observational studies. Conclusions/Significance We conclude that, although surgical extraction is the most commonly used treatment, there is sufficient evidence supporting the use of occlusive agents, especially manufactured dimeticone-based products.

scholarly journals Deficiency in the Treatment Description of mTOR Inhibitor Resistance in Medulloblastoma, a Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 464
Author(s):  
Hajar Alammar ◽  
Rayan Nassani ◽  
Mana M. Alshehri ◽  
Alaa A. Aljohani ◽  
Bahauddeen M. Alrfaei
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Malignant Cell ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trials ◽  
Inhibitor Resistance ◽  
Pediatric Brain

Medulloblastoma is a common fatal pediatric brain tumor. More treatment options are required to prolong survival and decrease disability. mTOR proteins play an essential role in the disease pathogenesis, and are an essential target for therapy. Three generations of mTOR inhibitors have been developed and are clinically used for immunosuppression and chemotherapy for multiple cancers. Only a few mTOR inhibitors have been investigated for the treatment of medulloblastoma and other pediatric tumors. The first-generation mTOR, sirolimus, temsirolimus, and everolimus, went through phase I clinical trials. The second-generation mTOR, AZD8055 and sapanisertib, suppressed medulloblastoma cell growth; however, limited studies have investigated possible resistance pathways. No clinical trials have been found to treat medulloblastoma using third-generation mTOR inhibitors. This systematic review highlights the mechanisms of resistance of mTOR inhibitors in medulloblastoma and includes IDO1, T cells, Mnk2, and eIF4E, as they prolong malignant cell survival. The findings promote the importance of combination therapy in medulloblastoma due to its highly resistant nature.

scholarly journals Aztreonam for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1685-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindley A Barbee ◽  
Matthew R Golden
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Neisseria Gonorrhoeae ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Near Term

Abstract Background Ceftriaxone is the only consistently active antimicrobial agent recommended for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Although some new antimicrobials are in development, the necessity to expand treatment options in the near term may require using older drugs that have not been widely used to treat gonorrhoea. Methods We conducted a literature review of clinical trials and case series, published from 1983 to 2017, reporting treatment efficacy results following administration of 1 g aztreonam intramuscularly or IV for uncomplicated gonococcal infections. We summed trial data, stratified by anatomical site of infection, and calculated summary efficacy estimates and 95% CI for each site of infection. Results The 10 identified clinical trials enrolled 678, 38 and 16 individuals with urogenital, rectal and pharyngeal gonorrhoea, respectively. Aztreonam had an efficacy of 98.6% (95% CI: 97.5%–99.4%) for urogenital, 94.7% (95% CI: 82.3%–99.4%) for rectal and 81.3% (95% CI: 54.4%–96.0%) for pharyngeal gonococcal infections. Conclusions Although most clinical trials included in this meta-analysis were conducted >30 years ago, aztreonam appears to have excellent efficacy for urogenital gonorrhoea; its efficacy at extragenital sites remains uncertain.

scholarly journals Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (675) ◽  
pp. e694-e702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Speich ◽  
Anja Thomer ◽  
Soheila Aghlmandi ◽  
Hannah Ewald ◽  
Andreas Zeller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Central Register ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Drug Treatments ◽  
Meta Analyses

BackgroundSubacute cough following a non-specific viral infection lasting 3–8 weeks is common. However, despite many treatment options there are no systematic reviews evaluating these.AimTo provide a systematic overview of treatment options and outcomes evaluated in randomised clinical trials (RCTs).Design and settingSystematic review and meta-analyses assessing the overall effects of any treatment for subacute cough.MethodThe authors systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (last search March 2017) for RCTs in adult patients with subacute cough. The authors considered trials evaluating any outcome of any drug or non-drug treatments, apart from traditional Chinese and Asian medicines. They combined treatment effects on cough-related outcomes in random effects meta-analyses.ResultsSix eligible RCTs including 724 patients were identified. These assessed montelukast, salbutamol plus ipratropium bromide, gelatine, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and nociception opioid 1 receptor agonist and codeine. Five studies reported effects on various cough severity scores at various timepoints. No treatment option was associated with a clear benefit on cough recovery or other patient-relevant outcomes in any of the studies or in meta-analyses for cough outcomes at 14 days and 28 days. Reported adverse events were rather mild and reported for 14% of patients across all treatments.ConclusionEvidence on treatment options for subacute cough is weak. There is no treatment showing clear patient-relevant benefits in clinical trials.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in Pediatric Solid Tumors—A Systematic Review

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoud Marayati ◽  
Colin H. Quinn ◽  
Elizabeth A. Beierle
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Intensified Chemotherapy

Despite advances in the treatment of many pediatric solid tumors, children with aggressive and high-risk disease continue to have a dismal prognosis. For those presenting with metastatic or recurrent disease, multiple rounds of intensified chemotherapy and radiation are the typical course of action, but more often than not, this fails to control the progression of the disease. Thus, new therapeutics are desperately needed to improve the outcomes for these children. Recent advances in our understanding of both the immune system’s biology and its interaction with tumors have led to the development of novel immunotherapeutics as alternative treatment options for these aggressive malignancies. Immunotherapeutic approaches have shown promising results for pediatric solid tumors in early clinical trials, but challenges remain concerning safety and anti-tumor efficacy. In this review, we aim to discuss and summarize the main classes of immunotherapeutics used to treat pediatric solid tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document