Three or More Courses of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Multiply Recurrent Brain Metastases

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 871-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Nicholas Damico ◽  
Jacob A. Miller ◽  
John H. Suh ◽  
Erin S. Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Intracranial Recurrence

Abstract BACKGROUND: Although patients with brain metastasis are treated with primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), the use of salvage therapies and their consequence remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: To study the intracranial recurrence patterns and salvage therapies for patients who underwent multiple SRS courses. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 59 patients with brain metastases who underwent ≥3 SRS courses for new lesions. Cox regression analyzed factors predictive for overall survival. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 52 years. Over time, patients underwent a median of 3 courses of SRS (range: 3-8) to a total of 765 different brain metastases. The 6-month risk of distant intracranial recurrence after the first SRS treatment was 64% (95% confidence interval: 52%-77%). Overall survival was 40% (95% confidence interval: 28%-53%) at 24 months. Only 24 patients (41%) had a decline in their Karnofsky Performance Status ≤70 at last office visit. Quality of life was preserved among 77% of patients at 12 months, with 45% experiencing clinically significant improvement during clinical follow-up. Radiation necrosis developed in 10 patients (17%). On multivariate analysis, gender (males, Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.0, P < .05), Karnofsky Performance Status ≤80 (HR 3.2, P < .001), extracranial metastases (HR: 3.6, P < .001), and a distant intracranial recurrence ≤3 months from initial to repeat SRS (HR: 3.8, P < .001) were associated with a poorer survival. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, performing ≥3 SRS courses controls intracranial disease. Patients may need salvage SRS for distant intracranial relapse, but focal retreatments are associated with modest toxicity, do not appear to negatively affect a patient's performance status, and help preserve quality of life.

scholarly journals Long Survival in a Patient with Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMO.S317
Author(s):  
G Sanna ◽  
G Petralia ◽  
M Cossu Rocca ◽  
C Marenghi ◽  
F Nolè
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Good Control ◽  
Short Report ◽  
Whole Brain Irradiation ◽  
Her Family

The incidence of brain metastases (BMs) is apparently rising in patients with advanced breast cancer, possibly due to better therapeutic approaches for control of metastatic growth in other organs. Occurrence of BMs severely affects quality of life and is associated with dire prognosis. In this short report we describe the clinical case of a 47 year old woman, with BMs from breast cancer diagnosed in May 2001. The patient was treated with whole brain irradiation and radiosurgery, with initial control of BMs. Due to previous radiotherapy fields and doses, further local treatments are not feasible anymore. Since September 2006, the patient has been receiving systemic therapy with Lapatinib at the dose of 1500 mg/die continuously, with a good control of cerebral, liver and nodal metastasis after one year of treatment (September 2007). Her quality of life is acceptable, her Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is more than 70%, and she takes care of her family, and has not experienced neuro-cognitive dysfunction.

Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme

Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel C. Nwokedi ◽  
Steven J. DiBiase ◽  
Salma Jabbour ◽  
Joseph Herman ◽  
Pradip Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This retrospective review evaluates the impact of SRS delivered on a gamma knife (GK) unit as an adjuvant therapy in the management of patients with GBM. METHODS Between August 1993 and December 1998, 82 patients with pathologically confirmed GBM received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Of these 82 patients, 64 with a minimum follow-up duration of at least 1 month are the focus of this analysis. Of the 64 assessable patients, 33 patients were treated with EBRT alone (Group 1), and 31 patients received both EBRT plus a GK-SRS boost (Group 2). GK-SRS was administered to most patients within 6 weeks of the completion of EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 59.7 Gy (range, 28–70.2 Gy), and the median GK-SRS dose to the prescription volume was 17.1 Gy (range, 10–28 Gy). The median age of the study population was 50.4 years, and the median pretreatment Karnofsky performance status was 80. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, and survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit. RESULTS Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 16 months, and the actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years were 67, 40, and 26%, respectively. When comparing age, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, and tumor volume, no statistical differences where discovered between Group 1 versus Group 2. When comparing the overall survival of Group 1 versus Group 2, the median survival was 13 months versus 25 months, respectively (P = 0.034). Age, Karnofsky performance status, and the addition of GK-SRS were all found to be significant predictors of overall survival via Cox regression analysis. No acute Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity was encountered. CONCLUSION The addition of a GK-SRS boost in conjunction with surgery and EBRT significantly improved the overall survival time in this retrospective series of patients with GBM. A prospective, randomized validation of the benefit of SRS awaits the results of the recently completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's trial RTOG 93-05.

scholarly journals Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Anussara Prayongrat ◽  
Randa Tao ◽  
Pamela K Allen ◽  
Nandita Guha ◽  
Ganesh Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Cell Lung Carcinoma

Abstract Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for brain metastases, yet little is known about SRS for neuroendocrine tumors given their unique natural history. Objective To determine outcomes and toxicity from SRS in patients with brain metastases arising from neuroendocrine tumors. Methods Thirty-three patients with brain metastases from neuroendocrine tumors who underwent SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Median age was 61 years and median Karnofsky performance status was 80. Primary sites were lung (87.9%), cervix (6.1%), esophagus (3%), and prostate (3%). Ten patients (30.3%) received upfront SRS, 7 of whom had neuroendocrine tumors other than small cell lung carcinoma. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors for survival. Results With median follow-up after SRS of 5.3 months, local and distant brain recurrence developed in 5 patients (16.7%) and 20 patients (66.7%), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) after SRS was 6.9 months. Patients with progressive disease per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria at 4 to 6 weeks after SRS had shorter median time to developing recurrence at a distant site in the brain and shorter OS than patients without progressive disease: 1.4 months and 3.3 months vs 11.4 months and 12 months, respectively (both P < .001). Toxicity was more likely in lesions of small cell histology than in lesions of other neuroendocrine tumor histology, 15.7% vs 3.3% (P = .021). No cases of grade 3 to 5 necrosis occurred. Conclusions SRS is an effective treatment option for patients with brain metastases from neuroendocrine tumors with excellent local control despite slightly higher toxicity rates than expected. Progressive disease at 4 to 6 weeks after SRS portends a poor prognosis.

scholarly journals Cyberknife® hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-hSRS) as salvage treatment for brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with five or more brain metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hamel-Perreault ◽  
D. Mathieu ◽  
L. Masson-Cote
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Extracranial Disease

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (bmets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome.Methods In the 103 patients who underwent srs for the treatment of 5 or more bmets, primary histology was nonsmall- cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (rpa) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 bmets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated bmets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative bmets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3).Results Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and rpa (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (os). Moreover, a cumulative treated bmets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better os. The total number of bmets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The rpa was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence.Conclusions Our study suggests that srs is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more bmets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.

scholarly journals Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life Scores under Treatment Predicts Longer Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maike Jörling ◽  
Sandra Rutzner ◽  
Markus Hecht ◽  
Rainer Fietkau ◽  
Luitpold V. Distel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Objectives. Baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores predict survival, which has already been demonstrated in various studies. However, we were interested in whether changes in baseline scores during treatment are also significant predictors of survival. Methods and Materials. We analysed the data of 400 consecutive cancer patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Leading diagnoses were head and neck cancer (34.5%), rectal cancer (24.5%), and lung cancer (13%). HRQoL was studied at baseline, six weeks after therapy and after each completed year after the start of therapy until drop out of the study using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The change score was calculated as the baseline score subtracted from the score after therapy. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Results. High global health status (p=0.005) and low pain scores (p=0.040) at baseline were related to favourable overall survival. Change scores of role functioning (p=0.027), global health status (p<0.018), and pain (p<0.001) were predictive of overall survival. Pain was the superior predictor of survival (p=0.001) among all variables and QoL scores studied by multivariate analysis. A deterioration in pain was associated with a 2.8 times higher chance of survival (HR 0.36). Conclusions. Deterioration of HRQoL baseline pain score by cancer treatment is a favourable and superior prognostic factor for survival.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Early Mortality After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: a Single Institutional Retrospective Review

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Emily Bennett ◽  
Michael A Vogelbaum ◽  
Gene H Barnett ◽  
Lilyana Angelov ◽  
Samuel Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Prior Surgery

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival. OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS. METHODS A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable. CONCLUSION Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.

Quality of life in patients with advanced gastroesophageal (GE) adenocarcinoma treated with modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (mDCF).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 92-92
Author(s):  
E. C. Smyth ◽  
Y. Y. Janjigian ◽  
E. Robinson ◽  
E. C. Sheehy ◽  
I. Karpenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Score Change ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Significant Toxicity

92 Background: Although DCF is a standard first line chemotherapy option for advanced GE adenocarcinoma, the regimen is associated with significant toxicity. Even so, time to detriment in quality of life (QoL) was significantly better with parent DCF than CF (Ajani, JCO 2007). Modified DCF (mDCF) has demonstrated less toxicity than parent DCF without compromising efficacy in two phase II studies (Shah, GI ASCO 2010; Kelsen, ASCO 2009). We report the quality of life (QoL) over time of patients receiving mDCF on these two clinical trials. Methods: Patients (pts) treated on two protocols utilizing the mDCF regimen, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab, were administered standard EORTC QoL questionnaires (QLC –C30 version 3), at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (m). Chemotherapy and QoL assessment continued until disease progression. Mean score change from baseline was assessed using Wilcoxon test. Results: 94 eligible pts have been enrolled on both studies; QoL questionnaires are available on 87 pts. 74% are male, median age 58 years (range 28-78), with baseline Karnofsky performance status of 80% (range 70-100). Patient compliance with QoL assessment was high at baseline but diminished with time; 89% of pts completed the questionnaire at baseline and 41% at 12m. There was no significant detriment in EORTC QOL scores (including global health, physical and social functioning and fatigue) during treatment with mDCF (Table). Conclusions: In patients with advanced GE cancer, we observed no detriment in QoL scores in patients receiving mDCF therapy. Specifically, physical and social functioning, fatigue, appetite, and global heath QoL scores were maintained at baseline levels during the first 6 months of therapy, and appear to improve in patients who remained on protocol therapy during the next 6 months of treatment. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Brain metastases in patients treated with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 326-326
Author(s):  
H. Alharbi ◽  
T. K. Choueiri ◽  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
S. North ◽  
M. J. MacKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Brain

326 Background: Patients with brain metastases from advanced RCC treated in the targeted therapy era are not well characterized. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 6 centers. Results: One hundred six out of 705 (15%) patients with mRCC had brain metastases. Forty-seven patients had brain metastases at the start of first-line anti-VEGF therapy and the rest developed metastases during follow-up. Of the patients with brain metastases, 6%, 68%, and 26% were in the favorable, intermediate and poor prognosis groups, respectively, per the Heng et al JCO 2009 criteria. Ninety percent had cerebral metastases, 17% had cerebellar metastases, 40% had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, and 81% had symptoms of brain metastases. The median largest size and number of brain metastases was 1.8 cm (range 0.2–6.6) and 1 (range 1–20), respectively. Patients were treated with first-line sunitinib (n=77), sorafenib (n=23), bevacizumab (n=5), and temsirolimus (n=1). Local disease treatment included whole brain radiotherapy (81%), stereotactic radiosurgery (25%), and neurosurgery (25%). The brain metastases of 59 patients were evaluable and based on the local treatment and/or targeted therapy achieved 7 (12%) complete responses, 23 (39%) partial responses, 14 (24%) patients with stable disease, and 15 (25%) patients with progressive disease in the brain metastases. Patients with more than 4 brain metastases vs. those with no more than 4 have an overall survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis of 3.9 vs. 15.4 months (p=0.0051). Previous nephrectomy, sarcomatoid, and non-clear cell histology are not associated with development of brain metastases. On multivariable analysis, KPS<80% (p=0.0139), diagnosis to treatment with targeted therapy <1 year (p=0.0012), and higher number of brain metastases (p=0.0311) were associated with worse survival from diagnosis of brain metastases. Conclusions: In patients with brain metastases from RCC, KPS at start of therapy, diagnosis to treatment time and number of brain metastases may be prognostic factors for overall survival. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document