Mandatory Vaccination

Across the world, mass vaccination programs run by governments or third-sector organizations have saved countless lives; minimized human suffering; and maintained economic, social, and cultural functioning. Vaccination programs predominantly focus on diseases that once ravaged the infant and early childhood years. However, with significant global variation, vaccination programs also exist for adolescents, pregnant women, new parents, the elderly, and people with comorbidities as well as catch-up or booster programs for particular age groups or vaccines. Governments and organizations also run annual influenza vaccination programs for entire populations or key workers, and health-care and education workers may be subject to additional vaccination requirements. The commonality of all mass vaccination programs is that the state adopts a key role in planning, coordinating, and funding them, or implementing mechanisms to ensure vaccines’ receipt by populations. The state’s role makes mandatory vaccination a possibility. Numerous scholarship forms the evidence base for the safety, efficacy, and necessity of vaccines. However, vaccination as a practice has consistently been accompanied by a minority who doubt and refuse, either for some or all vaccines. Concern about refusal has grown in recent years. An extensive Oxford Bibliographies article, “Vaccine Hesitancy,” explains why doubt and refusal develop and persist, how scholars make sense of it, and how governments and health-care providers can address it. However, hesitancy is not the only determinant of suboptimal vaccine uptake. Vaccination programs can also fail to reach populations due to insufficient generation of demand, inefficient or inappropriate service provision, cost barriers, and access barriers. Understanding the determinants of undervaccination in any given region, country, or population group will be essential to determining what strategies, including mandatory vaccination, are appropriate. Mandatory vaccination is just one strategy among a suite of tools that governments and organizations can employ to increase uptake of vaccines by particular cohorts. Mandatory vaccination is receiving current attention due to governments in several high-income jurisdictions recently utilizing it to address parents’ vaccine hesitancy. However, as the scholarship in this article illuminates, many jurisdictions’ mandatory childhood vaccination policies predate current concerns around hesitancy. Mandates have long performed key roles in the governance of vaccination uptake, including in contexts where attention to other programmatic aspects or health promotion practices may be lacking. The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of Amy Morris in the writing of the Mandatory Vaccination of Health-Care Workers—Policies, Experiences, and Impact and the Mandatory Vaccination—Attitudinal Studies sections of this article.

Author(s):  
Khalida Naz Memon ◽  
Kanwal Naz Ariser ◽  
Rafaina Shah ◽  
Muhammad Ilyas Siddiqui ◽  
Shanti Chouhan ◽  
...  

Background: It is widely believed that vaccine hesitancy is prevalent. Achievement of COVID-19 vaccination depends upon public willingness towards immunization against this disease. This study aimed at revealing the underlying situation regarding community hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccine. This study was conducted to determine the level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among community and to seek association between socio-demographic factors and various perceptions about COVID-19 vaccine. Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 390 health-care providers and general Pakistani people of age 20 years and above through non probability snowball sampling. An online questionnaire was used to gather data. The socio-demographic variables along with various concepts regarding intentions to take vaccine as well as hesitancy for the same were tried to bring on the surface. The p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: This study reveals that 61.28% of participants desired to get vaccinated. There was significant association between the desire to get vaccination with participant’s age & occupation (p-value < 0.01).  The significant association between the positive views of the health-care providers and the other study subjects (p<0.00) is highly encouraging. The other socio-demographic variables have varied effect on vaccine uptake intentions and hesitancy and require further research on this subject. Conclusion: The study conducted on three hundred & ninety respondents consistently reveals the significant association between the positive views of the health care providers and the other study subjects with the p-values lesser than 0.001. The study concludes that other socio-demographic fabric of the community showed varied effect on COVID 19 vaccine uptake intentions and hesitancy. Recommendation: 1. The broad based qualitative research is strongly recommended in order to better seek the community insights & perceptions regarding this public health issue. The large number of Community people although want to get vaccinated against covid-19, still there is a widespread prevalent doubts about this vaccine as being not so safe for them. Such type of doubts among community necessitate that some counselling sessions be conducted in order to remove uncertainties among common people. Motivations of people need to be raised so as to increase the coverage of covid-19 vaccination.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes C. Fischer ◽  
Albrecht G. Schmidt ◽  
Edwin Bölke ◽  
Verena Keitel ◽  
Torsten Feldt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background COVID-19 infection is a major threat to patients and health care providers around the world. One solution is the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Methods We performed a comprehensive query of the latest publications on the prevention of viral infections including the recent vaccination program and its side effects. Results The situation is evolving rapidly and there is no reasonable alternative to population-scale vaccination programs as currently enrolled. Conclusion Therefore, regulatory authorities should consider supplementing their conventional mandate of post-approval pharmacovigilance, which is based on the collection, assessment, and regulatory response to emerging safety findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2131-2135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Jacobson ◽  
Jennifer L. St. Sauver ◽  
Joan M. Griffin ◽  
Kathy L. MacLaughlin ◽  
Lila J. Finney Rutten

Vaccines ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rola Khamisy-Farah ◽  
Mohammad Adawi ◽  
Haneen Jeries-Ghantous ◽  
Jacob Bornstein ◽  
Raymond Farah ◽  
...  

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a highly widespread virus which is responsible for one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. Two main preventative strategies exist: anti-HPV vaccination and cervical screening. Health-care workers play a key role in promoting public health campaigns; however, vaccine hesitancy is an often under-recognized challenge. To investigate the overall knowledge of HPV and HPV-related issues, as well as the attitudes and practices of health professionals towards recommending the anti-HPV vaccine, an ad hoc knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) questionnaire was developed and validated in a sample of 139 Israeli pediatricians, gynecologists, and internal medicine doctors. The KAP questionnaire was found to be psychometrically valid and sound (with an rKR-20 coefficient of 0.74 for the second part and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85 for the third part). Furthermore, the present study confirmed the importance of health-care providers in recommending the immunization practice. Parents that had been strongly advised by health-care providers to vaccinate their children accepted immunization for their girls (odds ratio (OR) 1.09 (95% CI 1.04–1.14)) and boys (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02–1.10)), had a lower probability of deciding to postpone the immunization appointment (OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.66–0.98)), had fewer doubts and concerns about the vaccine (OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54–0.89)), and had a lower probability of refusing the vaccination (OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86–0.99)). Interestingly, the use of new, emerging tools such as ad hoc websites, applications, and other interactive devices reduced vaccine hesitancy (OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.82–0.99)) and concerns about the side-effects of the vaccine (OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86–0.99)). However, among Israeli health-care workers, knowledge was generally moderate, with updated information lacking in about 30% of surveyed health-care providers and approximately 20% of them not recommending the anti-HPV vaccine among boys. This study has practical implications for policy- and decision-makers in that they should be aware of the overall level of knowledge among health-care workers and should implement ad hoc educational interventions to address gaps in knowledge and help medical providers routinely recommend the anti-HPV vaccine both to male and female children and adolescents.


Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1418
Author(s):  
Rachel S. Purvis ◽  
Emily Hallgren ◽  
Ramey A. Moore ◽  
Don E. Willis ◽  
Spencer Hall ◽  
...  

The World Health Organization has identified vaccine hesitancy as a top health concern. Emerging research shows that those who are hesitant may still get vaccinated; however, little is known about those who say they are hesitant but still get vaccinated. Most people have high trust in several sources of COVID-19 information, and trust in certain information sources such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and health care providers was associated with being vaccinated. This study explored trusted information sources among hesitant adopters in the United States with a survey respondents completed while waiting after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine dose. The study included (n = 867) respondents. The majority of respondents were female (60.21%); were between the ages of 18 and 44 years old (71.97%); and were diverse, with most identifying as White (44.54%) or Hispanic/Latinx (32.55%). Hesitant adopters reported multiple trusted sources of COVID-19 vaccine information, which can be grouped into four emergent subthemes: (1) Health care/Medical science, (2) Personal relationships, (3) News and social media, and (4) Individual/Myself. Some respondents expressed a distrust of all sources of COVID-19 vaccine information, despite receiving the vaccine, describing a lack of trust in traditional sources of information such as the mainstream media or government. This study contributes to the literature by documenting trusted sources of COVID-19 vaccine information among hesitant adopters in the United States. Findings provide important insights about respondents’ trusted sources of COVID-19 vaccine information that can inform future public health messaging campaigns intended to increase vaccine uptake among hesitant adopters.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 062-067
Author(s):  
Obidile Valentine Chidi ◽  
Ekwebene Onyeka Chukwudalu ◽  
Azubuike Precious Chidozie ◽  
Nnamani Chioma Phyllis ◽  
Nehemiah Emono Dankano ◽  
...  

Vaccines found to be highly effective will enable uptake than those with low effectiveness. Health care providers in Nigeria aged 18 years and above participated in this study. The study was conducted to assess the enablers and perceived risks of Covid-19 vaccination among healthcare providers in Nigeria. A snowball sampling technique was relied upon in the distribution of the online questionnaires sent in the form of a link through social media outlets such as Whatsapp, Face book and emails within four weeks interval. The analysis was performed using the Statistical Software Package SPSS version 22.0.Four Hundred and forty-five respondents filled the questionnaire from the six geopolitical zones of the country. It was observed that safety of the vaccine, proven efficacy and good knowledge of the vaccine were enablers to the Covid-19 vaccine uptake. This finding shows that a higher proportion of health care providers was in support of the covid-19 vaccine under the presumption that the vaccine was proven effective. 243(54.6%) perceived that a clinical sequalae may result later after they take the Covid-19 vaccine, 207(46.5%) perceived that the clinical trial of the Covid-19 vaccine was inadequate and 187(42.0%) perceived that a new virus strain may emerge and therefore, bring about another vaccine. In addition, 180(40.4%) respondents perceived that the Covid-19 vaccine might worsen their co-morbidities and 61(13.7%) showed concerns as they think the Covid-19 vaccine may affect their immune systems and make them more susceptible to new viral strains. Proven vaccine safety, proven efficacy and good knowledge were identified as enablers of the covid-19 vaccine while clinical sequalae and inadequate trials were noted as the perceived risks of covid-19 vaccine uptake among health care providers.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein ◽  
Islam Galal ◽  
Nahed A Makhlouf ◽  
Hoda A Makhlouf ◽  
Howaida K Abd-Elaal ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundSince the start of COVID-19 outbreak investigators are competing to develop and exam vaccines against COVID-19. It would be valuable to protect the population especially health care employees from COVID-19 infection. The success of COVID-19 vaccination programs will rely heavily on public willingness to accept the vaccine.AimsThis study aimed to describe the existing COVID-19 vaccine approval landscape among the health care providers and to identify the most probable cause of agreement or disagreement of COVID-19 vaccine.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was done.ResultsThe present study included 496 health care employees, 55% were at age group from 18-45 years old. History of chronic diseases was recorded in 40.4%, and definite history of drug/food allergy in 10.1%. Only 13.5% totally agree to receive the vaccine, 32.4% somewhat agree and 40.9% disagreed to take the vaccine. Causes of disagreement were none safety, fear of genetic mutation and recent techniques and believe that the vaccine is not effective (57%, 20.2%, 17.7% and 16.6% respectively). The most trusted vaccine was the mRNA based vaccine. The age of health care employees and the presence of comorbidities or chronic diseases were the main factors related to COVID-19 acceptance (P<0.001 and 0.02 respectively).ConclusionVaccine hesitancy is not uncommon in healthcare employees in Egypt and this may be an alarming barrier of vaccine acceptance in the rest of population. There is an urgent need to start campaigns to increase the awareness of the vaccine importance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18273-e18273
Author(s):  
Stefan Varga ◽  
Suepattra Grace May ◽  
Edith Morais ◽  
Anshu Shrestha ◽  
Caroline Huber ◽  
...  

e18273 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) has a well-established link to cervical cancer and anogenital and oropharyngeal malignancies. Recognition of the HPV-caused cancer burden in males has led to expansions of female-only HPV vaccination programs to all genders. This study explored drivers of and barriers to gender-neutral HPV vaccination (GNV) program adoption, implementation, and potential impacts on the HPV-caused cancer burden. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with academic oncologists as well as advocacy, public health, infectious disease, and policy experts in six countries (Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada and Italy) from April-August 2018. Using a semi-structured discussion guide, we sought to elicit expert perceptions on factors affecting uptake of HPV vaccination in males and subsequent effects on the incidence of HPV-associated cancer. Data were analyzed for key themes. Results: Eighteen experts participated in the study, including three academic oncologists and two doctoral level oncology researchers. A key theme from the analysis was the critical need to promote education and awareness about GNV across all healthcare providers to facilitate vaccine uptake and high GNV coverage rates. Participants reported a lack of awareness among segments of practitioners about the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine in preventing HPV infection and associated cancers in all genders. They also described strategies to overcome knowledge gaps, such as partnerships with oncologists, cancer advocacy organizations, and professional medical societies, emphasizing the key role that all health care providers can play in raising awareness of the importance of HPV vaccination for all genders. Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest the need to enhance healthcare provider education about GNV, and the importance of a multi-specialty approach to promoting HPV vaccination to prevent infection and HPV associated morbidity and mortality in all genders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document