Secondary Production

Ecology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wyatt F. Cross ◽  
Kate A. Henderson ◽  
James R. Junker ◽  
Eric A. Scholl

Secondary production is the generation of new heterotrophic biomass and is analogous to net primary production of autotrophs. For an individual, secondary production is equivalent to the growth of new somatic or reproductive biomass over time. For a population, secondary production comprises the total formation of biomass, regardless of its fate, by all individuals within the population over a defined time interval. Some consider secondary production the ultimate measure of population ‘success’ because it incorporates aspects of survivorship, individual growth rate, biomass, development time, and reproduction. Secondary production is often associated with the subfield of ecosystem ecology because it is a flux with dimensions of mass or energy area-2 time-1. This flux is typically estimated with an ecological currency (e.g., joules, carbon, organic matter) that can be compared with other ecosystem processes such as primary production or decomposition. Secondary production estimates are thus useful for placing species, populations, and communities within a broader ecosystem context, and for facilitating the study of energy flows and ecological efficiencies in trophic interactions. The vast majority of secondary production estimates have come from freshwater and marine ecosystems, while there are very few studies in terrestrial ecosystems. In the aquatic studies, although early work was largely focused on fishes, most estimates are for benthic invertebrates; some studies have quantified production of zooplankton, bacteria, and fungi. Early studies of secondary production were focused on methodology and basic comparisons among populations or communities. More recent literature has expanded the application of secondary production toward broader ecological questions related to, for example, energy and chemical flows in food webs, species interaction strengths, and responses to anthropogenic stressors. This bibliography focuses on primary literature that highlights key historic, conceptual, theoretical, and applied papers related to secondary production. Papers highlighted herein are biased toward freshwaters and invertebrates because of their dominance in the literature, but key references that extend to other habitats and taxa are included.

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (31) ◽  
pp. 12942-12947 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Haberl ◽  
K. H. Erb ◽  
F. Krausmann ◽  
V. Gaube ◽  
A. Bondeau ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 3085
Author(s):  
Edward Laws ◽  
Kanchan Maiti

Knowledge of the relationship between net primary production (NPP) and export production (EP) in the ocean is required to estimate how the ocean’s biological pump is likely to respond to climate change effects. Here, we show with a theoretical food web model that the relationship between NPP and EP is obscured by the following phenomena: (1) food web dynamics, which cause EP to be a weighted average of new production (NP) over a previous temperature-dependent time interval that can vary between several weeks at 25 °C to several months at 0 °C and, hence, to be much less temporally variable than NP and (2) the temperature dependence of the resiliency of the food web to perturbations, which causes the return to equilibrium to vary from roughly 50 days at 0 °C to 5–10 days at 25 °C. The implication is that the relationship between NPP and EP can be discerned at tropical and subtropical latitudes if measurements of NPP and EP are averages or climatologies over a timeframe of roughly one month. At high latitudes, however, measurements may need to be averaged over a timeframe of roughly one year because the food webs at high latitudes are very likely far from equilibrium with respect to NPP and EP much of the time, and the model can describe only the average behavior of such physically dynamic systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (16) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Liao ◽  
Qianlai Zhuang

Abstract Droughts dramatically affect plant production of global terrestrial ecosystems. To date, quantification of this impact remains a challenge because of the complex plant physiological and biochemical processes associated with drought. Here, this study incorporates a drought index into an existing process-based terrestrial ecosystem model to estimate the drought impact on global plant production for the period 2001–10. Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) gross primary production (GPP) data products are used to constrain model parameters and verify the model algorithms. The verified model is then applied to evaluate the drought impact. The study indicates that droughts will reduce GPP by 9.8 g C m−2 month−1 during the study period. On average, drought reduces GPP by 10% globally. As a result, the global GPP decreased from 106.4 to 95.9 Pg C yr−1 while the global net primary production (NPP) decreased from 54.9 to 49.9 Pg C yr−1. This study revises the estimation of the global NPP and suggests that the future quantification of the global carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems should take the drought impact into account.


2012 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Potter ◽  
Steven Klooster ◽  
Vanessa Genovese

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (23) ◽  
pp. 5441-5454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaner Yan ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Lifeng Jiang ◽  
Yiqi Luo

Abstract. Carbon (C) turnover time is a key factor in determining C storage capacity in various plant and soil pools as well as terrestrial C sink in a changing climate. However, the effects of C turnover time on ecosystem C storage have not been well explored. In this study, we compared mean C turnover times (MTTs) of ecosystem and soil, examined their variability to climate, and then quantified the spatial variation in ecosystem C storage over time from changes in C turnover time and/or net primary production (NPP). Our results showed that mean ecosystem MTT based on gross primary production (GPP; MTTEC_GPP =  Cpool/GPP, 25.0 ± 2.7 years) was shorter than soil MTT (MTTsoil =  Csoil/NPP, 35.5 ± 1.2 years) and NPP-based ecosystem MTT (MTTEC_NPP =  Cpool/NPP, 50.8 ± 3 years; Cpool and Csoil referred to ecosystem or soil C storage, respectively). On the biome scale, temperature is the best predictor for MTTEC (R2 =  0.77, p < 0.001) and MTTsoil (R2 =  0.68, p < 0.001), while the inclusion of precipitation in the model did not improve the performance of MTTEC (R2 =  0.76, p < 0.001). Ecosystem MTT decreased by approximately 4 years from 1901 to 2011 when only temperature was considered, resulting in a large C release from terrestrial ecosystems. The resultant terrestrial C release caused by the decrease in MTT only accounted for about 13.5 % of that due to the change in NPP uptake (159.3 ± 1.45 vs. 1215.4 ± 11.0 Pg C). However, the larger uncertainties in the spatial variation of MTT than temporal changes could lead to a greater impact on ecosystem C storage, which deserves further study in the future.


2015 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 921-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xia ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Xingmin Mu ◽  
Kai Jin ◽  
Wenyi Sun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document