1103. Minocycline (MIN) Pharmacodynamics (PD) against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (STM) in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model

Abstract Background Antibiotic treatment options for serious STM infections are limited. MIN displays in vitro activity against STM; however, limited data supports optimal dosing for STM. Herein, we employed the murine neutropenic thigh infection model to assess MIN PD against STM. Methods Four clinical STM isolates with MIN MICs 0.25 – 1 mg/L were included. Both thighs of neutropenic ICR mice were inoculated with bacterial suspensions of 107 colony forming units (CFU)/mL. Mice received uranyl nitrate on Day -3 to provide predictable renal impairment. Two hours after inoculation, MIN or control was administered subcutaneously. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of 2.5, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg were conducted. Previously reported protein binding of 78.1% was used to define free exposure. Dose ranging studies were conducted on all STM to assess in vivo activity over a range of MIN exposures. MIN total daily doses (TDD) of 10, 20, and 50 mg/kg were fractionated q24h, q12h, and q6h against a single STM to determine the PD index best correlated with reductions in CFU/mL. Efficacy was measured in log10CFU/thigh at 24h compared with 0h controls. Composite CFU data were fitted to an Emax model to determine the fAUC/MIC exposure for stasis and 1 log10 reduction. Results MIN PK was linear up to 50 mg/kg and well described by a 1 compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. Mean PK parameters across the linear range were: Vd, 2.97 L/kg; K01, 10.62 1/h; and K10, 0.35 1/h. Mean ± SD bacterial burden at 0h across all isolates was 6.17±0.20 log10CFU/thigh. In 24h controls, bacterial growth was 7.90±0.85 log10CFU/thigh. A dose response was observed across all isolates using TDD of 2-300 mg/kg. PD indices correlated with CFU reductions as follows: fAUC/MIC (R2=0.613), fCmax/MIC (R2=0.590), and %fT >MIC (R2=0.504). The fAUC/MIC needed for stasis and 1 log10 reduction at 24h was 9.6 and 23.6, respectively. Conclusion These are the first data describing MIN PD against STM. Against these STM, MIN fAUC/MIC was the PD index best correlated with CFU reductions. The exposure thresholds defined in this study will be useful in designing optimal MIN dosing regimens for treating STM infections and re-assessment of the current susceptibility breakpoint. The study was funded under FDA Contract 75F40120C00171. Disclosures David P. Nicolau, PharmD, Abbvie, Cepheid, Merck, Paratek, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Tetraphase (Other Financial or Material Support, I have been a consultant, speakers bureau member, or have received research funding from the above listed companies.) Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, Allergan (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMérieux (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Contrafect (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK (Consultant)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Speaker’s Bureau)Roche Diagnostics (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Summit (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

1109. Pharmacokinetics and Exposure of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1303 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S646-S646

Author(s):

Abigail K Kois ◽

Jason A Gluck ◽

David P Nicolau ◽

Joseph L Kuti

Keyword(s):

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Compartment Model ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Population Pk ◽

Infusion Regimen ◽

Susceptibility Breakpoint ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background ECMO is a life-saving tool utilized in critically ill patients that require respiratory and/or cardiac support. ECMO may also affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of certain medications, including some antibiotics. Cefepime is a widely used antibiotic in this population due to its broad spectrum activity but limited data are available to guide dosing in patients requiring ECMO. Methods This was a prospective, single-center study of 6 critically ill adult patients requiring ECMO and receiving cefepime 2g q8h as a 3h infusion. After obtaining informed consent, 4-6 blood samples within the dosing interval were collected to determine cefepime concentrations. Population PK was conducted in Pmetrics using R. Final MAP Bayesian parameter estimates were used to simulate free time above MIC (%ƒT >MIC) for various cefepime dosing regimens. The target pharmacodynamic exposure was 70% fT >MIC. Results Patients were between 31-62 years old; 4/6 (66.7%) were on veno-venous (VV) ECMO and 2 veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. Two patients required continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) while the other 4 had a CrCL between 92-199 ml/min. A two compartment model fitted the data better than a one compartment model. Median (range) final population PK parameters were: clearance (CL), 9.8 L/h (7.6-33.1); volume of central compartment (VC ), 6.9 L (4.7-49.8); and intercompartment transfer constants (k12), 2.04 h-1 (1.48-2.29); and k21, 1.49 h-1 (0.75-1.71). The 2g q8h (3h infusion) regimen resulted in target exposure in all patients up to an MIC of 8 mg/L (the susceptibility breakpoint for Pseudomonas), with 5/6 patients achieving this at 16 mg/L. A standard 2g q12h (0.5h infusion) regimen would have resulted in 5/6 patients achieving 70% ƒT >MIC at 8 mg/L and 1/6 at 16 mg/L. Conclusion These are the first data describing cefepime PK and exposure attainment in critically ill patients receiving ECMO. Cefepime 2g q8h (3h infusion) achieved target pharmacodynamic exposure up to the susceptibility breakpoint of 8 mg/L in all 6 patients, including 2 with concomitant CVVHDF. Additional studies are warranted to define cefepime PK in patients on ECMO across a robust range of CrCL to guide dosing. Disclosures David P. Nicolau, PharmD, Abbvie, Cepheid, Merck, Paratek, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Tetraphase (Other Financial or Material Support, I have been a consultant, speakers bureau member, or have received research funding from the above listed companies.) Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, Allergan (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMérieux (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Contrafect (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK (Consultant)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Speaker’s Bureau)Roche Diagnostics (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Summit (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

123. Oral Ibrexafungerp Outcomes by Fungal Disease in Patients from an Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Open-label Study (FURI)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.123 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S73-S74

Author(s):

Peter G Pappas ◽

Oliver Cornely ◽

Philipp Koehler ◽

Todd P McCarty ◽

Barbara D Alexander ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Fungal Disease ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Candida species are a major cause of invasive and mucocutaneouls infections. There are limited oral treatment options available for patients with Candida infections who are unresponsive to or who are intolerant of currently available antifungals. Oral ibrexafungerp is an investigational broad-spectrum glucan synthase inhibitor antifungal with activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, including azole- and echinocandin-resistant strains. A Phase 3 open-label, single-arm study of ibrexafungerp (FURI; NCT03059992) is ongoing for the treatment of patients intolerant of or with fungal disease refractory to standard antifungal therapy. We present an analysis of patient outcomes from the FURI study by fungal disease type. Table 1: FURI Outcomes by Fungal Disease Methods FURI patients were eligible for enrollment if they have proven or probable, severe mucocutaneous candidiasis, invasive candidiasis or invasive aspergillosis,other fungal diseases and evidence of failure to, intolerance to, or toxicity related to a currently approved standard-of-care antifungal treatment or can not receive approved oral antifungal options (e.g., susceptibility of the organism) and a continued IV antifungal therapy is clinically undesirable or unfeasible. Results An independent Data Review Committee (DRC) provided an assessment of treatment response for 74 patients enrolled in the FURI study from 22 centers in US, UK and EU treated with ibrexafungerp for mucocutaneous or invasive fungal infections from 2016- 2020. A total of 39 (52.7%) patients had invasive candidiasis, 32 (43.2%) had mucocutaneous candidiasis and 3 (4.5%) patients had invasive aspergillosis. The percent of patients who were determined to have a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), clinical improvement (CI) was 63.5%, stable disease (SD) was 23.0%, patients with progression of disease 6.8% and 4 patients were indeterminate. Additionally, there was 1 death in the FURI study that was not related to fungal disease. Table 1 shows outcomes by fungal disease type as determined by the DRC. Conclusion Analysis of 74 patients from the FURI study indicates that oral ibrexafungerp provides a favorable therapeutic response in patients with challenging fungal disease and limited treatment options. Disclosures Peter G. Pappas, MD, Astellas (Research Grant or Support)Cidara (Research Grant or Support)F2G (Consultant)Matinas (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Mayne Pharma (Research Grant or Support)Scynexis (Research Grant or Support) Oliver Cornely, Prof., Actelion (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Allecra Therapeutics (Consultant)Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Basilea (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Biocon (Consultant)Biosys (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)CoRe Consulting (Consultant)Da Volterra (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)DFG (German Research Foundation) (Grant/Research Support)Entasis (Consultant)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Grupo Biotoscana (Consultant)Immunic (Grant/Research Support)IQVIA (Consultant)Janssen (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Consultant)Medicines Company (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini (Consultant)Merck/MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Molecular Partners (Consultant)MSG-ERC (Consultant)Mylan (Consultant)Nabriva (Consultant)Noxxon (Consultant)Octapharma (Consultant)Paratek (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)PSI (Consultant)Roche Diagnostics (Consultant)Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Wiley (Blackwell) (Other Financial or Material Support) Philipp Koehler, MD, Ambu GmbH (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau)Astellas Pharma (Speaker's Bureau)Euopean Confederation of Medical Mycology (Speaker's Bureau)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau)MSD (Speaker's Bureau)Noxxon N.V. (Consultant)Pfizer (Speaker's Bureau)State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (Grant/Research Support) Todd P. McCarty, MD, Cidara (Grant/Research Support)GenMark (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for Research Presentation)T2 Biosystems (Consultant) Barbara D. Alexander, MD, MHS, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant) Rachel Miller, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Caryn Morse, MD, Chimerix (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Covis Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Ridgeback Biotherapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Roche (Scientific Research Study Investigator)SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Theratechnologies (Advisor or Review Panel member)Viiv (Advisor or Review Panel member) Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, MD, Amplyx (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)F2G (Consultant)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Speaker's Bureau)Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Viracor (Consultant) Jürgen Prattes, Dr, AbbVie Inc. (Shareholder)Gilead (Speaker's Bureau)MSD (Grant/Research Support)Novo Nordisk (Shareholder)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)Stryker (Shareholder) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, DDS, PhD, FRCPath, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Thomas J. Walsh, MD, PhD (hon), Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Shionogi (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Francisco M. Marty, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Marisa Miceli, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Martin Hoenigl, MD, Astellas (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support) Martin Hoenigl, MD, Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; F2G (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Pfiyer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Scýnexis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Thomas F. Patterson, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Nkechi Azie, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) David A. Angulo, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

543. Molnupiravir Maintains Antiviral Activity Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants In Vitro and in Early Clinical Studies

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.742 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S373-S373

Author(s):

Jay Grobler ◽

Julie Strizki ◽

Nicholas Murgolo ◽

Wei Gao ◽

Youfang Cao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Antiviral Activity ◽

Viral Genome ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Spike Protein ◽

Research Support ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Molnupiravir (MOV, MK-4482, EIDD-2801) is an orally administered prodrug of N-hydroxycytidine (NHC, EIDD-1931), a nucleoside with broad antiviral activity against a range of RNA viruses. MOV acts by driving viral error catastrophe following its incorporation by the viral RdRp into the viral genome. Given its mechanism of action, MOV activity should not be affected by substitutions in the spike protein present in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern which impact efficacy of therapeutic neutralizing antibodies and vaccine induced immunity. We characterized MOV activity against variants by assessing antiviral activity in vitro and virologic response from the Phase 2/3 clinical trials (MOVe-In, MOVe-Out) for treatment of COVID-19. Methods MOV activity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants, was evaluated in an in vitro infection assay. Antiviral potency of NHC (IC50) was determined in Vero E6 cells infected with virus at MOI ~0.1 by monitoring CPE. Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load measures in participants enrolled in MOVe-In and MOVe-Out were analyzed based on SARS-CoV-2 genotype. Sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from study participants were amplified from nasal swabs by PCR and NGS was performed on samples with viral genome RNA of >22,000 copies/ml amplified by primers covering full length genome with Ion Torrent sequencing to identify clades represented in trial participants. SARS-CoV-2 clades were assigned using clade.nextstrain.org. Results In vitro, NHC was equally effective against SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 (20I), B.1351 (20H), and P1 (20J), compared with the original WA1 (19B) isolate. In clinical trials, no discernable difference was observed in magnitude of viral response measured by change from baseline in RNA titer over time across all clades represented including 20A through 20E and 20G to 20I. No participants at the time of the study presented with 20F, 20J, or 21A. Conclusion Distribution of clades in participants in MOVe-In and MOVe-Out was representative of those circulating globally at the time of collection (Oct 2020 – Jan 2021). Both in vitro and clinical data suggest that spike protein substitutions do not impact antiviral activity of MOV and suggest its potential use for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Disclosures Jay Grobler, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Julie Strizki, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Nicholas Murgolo, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Wei Gao, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Youfang Cao, PhD, Merck & Co. (Employee) Ying Zhang, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jiejun Du, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Manoj Nair, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Yaoxing Huang, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Yang Luo, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Daria Hazuda, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) David D. Ho, MD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) David D. Ho, MD, Brii Biosciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; RenBio (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Founder, Other Financial or Material Support, Shareholder; WuXi Biologics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant

Download Full-text

65. In Vivo Efficacy of Human Simulated Minocycline (MIN) against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (STM)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.065 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S44-S44

Author(s):

Andrew J Fratoni ◽

David P Nicolau ◽

Joseph L Kuti

Keyword(s):

Critically Ill ◽

Bacterial Growth ◽

Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

In Vivo Efficacy ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Susceptibility Breakpoint ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background The current susceptibility breakpoint for MIN against STM is 4mg/L, yielding >99% of isolates susceptible. Unfortunately, there are limited pre-clinical and clinical data to support this breakpoint for STM. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a MIN human simulated regimen (HSR) against STM across a wide range of MICs in the murine neutropenic thigh model. Methods Clinical STM with modal MIN MICS of 0.25-8mg/L were included. Confirmatory pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were performed in infected neutropenic mice to develop a MIN HSR providing an area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) exposure similar to MIN 100mg intravenous (IV) q12h at steady-state based on PK parameters from critically ill adult patients. The murine neutropenic thigh infection model was utilized to examine the antibacterial effects of the confirmed MIN HSR against 17 STM. Both thighs of neutropenic ICR mice were inoculated with bacterial suspensions of 107 colony forming units (CFU)/mL. Two hours after inoculation, the MIN HSR was administered subcutaneously (SC) over 24h. Control mice received normal saline. Efficacy was measured as the change in log10CFU/thigh at 24h compared with 0h controls. Results MIN 22, 10, 14, and 10mg/kg dosed SC at 0, 6, 12, and 18h best recapitulated the human Cmax and AUC profile. Mean ± standard deviation bacterial burden at 0h across all isolates was 6.03±0.32 log10CFU/thigh. Bacterial growth was 1.35±0.68 log10CFU/thigh in 24h controls. Six of 7 isolates (86%) with MIC ≤ 0.5mg/L achieved 1-log kill with MIN HSR (-1.44±1.37 log10CFU/thigh). All STM with MIC ≥ 1mg/L experienced bacterial growth (1.18±0.79 log10CFU/thigh) (Figure). Figure. Efficacy of a minocycline human simulated exposure of 100mg intravenous Q12h in the murine neutropenic thigh model against 17 clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates Conclusion These data describe the in vivo efficacy of a MIN HSR with exposures similar to MIN 100mg IV q12h in critically ill adults. Lack of antibacterial activity against STM with MICs ≥ 1mg/L justifies a reassessment of the current susceptibility breakpoint. The study was funded under FDA Contract 75F40120C00171. Disclosures David P. Nicolau, PharmD, Abbvie, Cepheid, Merck, Paratek, Pfizer, Wockhardt, Shionogi, Tetraphase (Other Financial or Material Support, I have been a consultant, speakers bureau member, or have received research funding from the above listed companies.) Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, Allergan (Speaker’s Bureau)BioMérieux (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Contrafect (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK (Consultant)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Speaker’s Bureau)Roche Diagnostics (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Research Grant or Support)Summit (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

1510. Infant Pneumonia and Subsequent Risk of Chronic Respiratory Disorders

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S758-S759

Author(s):

Stephen I Pelton ◽

Rotem Lapidot ◽

Matthew Wasserman ◽

Melody Shaff ◽

Ahuva Hanau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Airway Disease ◽

Research Support ◽

Recurrent Wheezing ◽

Recurrent Pneumonia ◽

Respiratory Disorders ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Study Population ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in infancy (i.e., among children aged < 2 years) may have long-term consequences for the rapidly developing lung. We examined the impact of pneumonia in infancy on subsequent respiratory health. Methods A retrospective matched-cohort design and data from Optum’s de-identified Integrated Claims-Clinical dataset (2009-2018) were employed. Study population comprised children who were hospitalized for CAP before age 2 years (“CAP patients”) as well as matched comparators without evidence of pneumonia before age 2 years (“comparison patients”). CAP patients and comparison patients were matched (fixed 1:5 ratio, without replacement) using estimated propensity scores and a nearest-neighbor approach; those with evidence of selected medical conditions (e.g., extreme prematurity, congenital diseases, respiratory diseases) before age 2 years were excluded. Study outcomes included recurrent pneumonia and a composite of asthma, recurrent wheezing, and hyperactive airway disease. Rates of study outcomes from age 2 to 5 years were estimated for all CAP and comparison patients as well as subgroups of CAP patients (and corresponding comparison patients) stratified by etiology (bacterial, viral, unspecified). Results Study population totaled 1,343 CAP patients and 6,715 comparison patients. CAP patients and comparison patients were well-balanced on their baseline characteristics and mean duration of follow-up was 757 and 729 days, respectively. Rates of chronic respiratory disorders from age 2 to 5 years were significantly higher among CAP patients versus comparison patients. Analyses of subgroups stratified by etiology demonstrated higher rates of study outcomes among CAP patients across all strata. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and a composite of asthma, recurrent wheezing, and hyperactive airway disease from age 2 to 5 years among CAP patients and matched comparison patients Conclusion Infant CAP foreshadows an increase in subsequent risk of chronic respiratory disorders. Further studies are needed to determine whether this elevated risk is due to infant pneumonia or whether infant pneumonia is a marker of at-risk children. Disclosures Stephen I. Pelton, MD, Merck vaccine (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, DSMB)Seqirus Vaccine Ltd. (Consultant) Rotem Lapidot, MD, MSCI, Pfizer (Consultant) Matthew Wasserman, MSc., Pfizer Inc. (Employee) Melody Shaff, BA, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Ahuva Hanau, BS, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Alexander Lonshteyn, PhD, Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Derek Weycker, PhD, Pfizer Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)

Download Full-text

Reversal of Azole Resistance inCandida albicansby Sulfa Antibacterial Drugs

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.00701-17 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 62 (3) ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Hassan E. Eldesouky ◽

Abdelrahman Mayhoub ◽

Tony R. Hazbun ◽

Mohamed N. Seleem

Keyword(s):

Treatment Options ◽

Antifungal Drugs ◽

Infection Model ◽

Azole Resistance ◽

Global Public Health ◽

Sulfa Drugs ◽

Antibacterial Drugs ◽

Content Type

ABSTRACTInvasive candidiasis presents an emerging global public health challenge due to the emergence of resistance to the frontline treatment options, such as fluconazole. Hence, the identification of other compounds capable of pairing with fluconazole and averting azole resistance would potentially prolong the clinical utility of this important group. In an effort to repurpose drugs in the field of antifungal drug discovery, we explored sulfa antibacterial drugs for the purpose of reversing azole resistance inCandida. In this study, we assembled and investigated a library of 21 sulfa antibacterial drugs for their ability to restore fluconazole sensitivity inCandida albicans. Surprisingly, the majority of assayed sulfa drugs (15 of 21) were found to exhibit synergistic relationships with fluconazole by checkerboard assay with fractional inhibitory concentration index (ΣFIC) values ranging from <0.0312 to 0.25. Remarkably, five sulfa drugs were able to reverse azole resistance in a clinically achievable range. The structure-activity relationships (SARs) of the amino benzene sulfonamide scaffold as antifungal agents were studied. We also identified the possible mechanism of the synergistic interaction of sulfa antibacterial drugs with azole antifungal drugs. Furthermore, the ability of sulfa antibacterial drugs to inhibitCandidabiofilm by 40%in vitrowas confirmed. In addition, the effects of sulfa-fluconazole combinations onCandidagrowth kinetics and efflux machinery were explored. Finally, using aCaenorhabditis elegansinfection model, we demonstrated that the sulfa-fluconazole combination does possess potent antifungal activityin vivo, reducingCandidain infected worms by ∼50% compared to the control.

Download Full-text

Preclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of the Fully Human Monoclonal IgM Antibody KBPA101 Specific for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Serotype IATS-O11

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy ◽

10.1128/aac.01142-09 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 54 (6) ◽

pp. 2338-2344 ◽

Cited By ~ 35

Author(s):

Michael P. Horn ◽

Adrian W. Zuercher ◽

Martin A. Imboden ◽

Michael P. Rudolf ◽

Hedvika Lazar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Human Monocyte ◽

Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes ◽

Infection Model ◽

High Avidity ◽

Burn Wound

ABSTRACT Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in ventilator-associated pneumonia is a serious and often life-threatening complication in intensive care unit patients, and new treatment options are needed. We used B-cell-enriched peripheral blood lymphocytes from a volunteer immunized with a P. aeruginosa O-polysaccharide-toxin A conjugate vaccine to generate human hybridoma cell lines producing monoclonal antibodies specific for individual P. aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide serotypes. The fully human monoclonal antibody secreted by one of these lines, KBPA101, is an IgM/κ antibody that binds P. aeruginosa of International Antigenic Typing System (IATS) serotype O11 with high avidity (5.81 × 107 M−1 ± 2.8 × 107 M−1) without cross-reacting with other serotypes. KBPA101 specifically opsonized the P. aeruginosa of IATS O11 serotype and mediated complement-dependent phagocytosis in vitro by the human monocyte-like cell line HL-60 at a very low concentration (half-maximal phagocytosis at 0.16 ng/ml). In vivo evaluation of KBPA101 demonstrated a dose-response relationship for protection against systemic infections in a murine burn wound sepsis model, where 70 to 100% of animals were protected against lethal challenges with P. aeruginosa at doses as low as 5 μg/animal. Furthermore, a high efficacy of KBPA101 in protection from local respiratory infections in an acute lung infection model in mice was demonstrated. Preclinical toxicology evaluation on human tissue, in rabbits, and in mice did not indicate any toxicity of KBPA101. Based on these preclinical findings, the first human clinical trials have been initiated.

Download Full-text

120. An open-label comparative trial of SUBA-itraconazole (SUBA) versus conventional itraconazole (c-itra) for treatment of proven and probable endemic mycoses (MSG-15): a pharmacokinetic (PK) and adverse Event (AE) analysis

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.120 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S72-S72

Author(s):

Peter G Pappas ◽

Andrej Spec ◽

Marisa Miceli ◽

Gerald McGwin ◽

Rachel McMullen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Serum Levels ◽

Research Support ◽

Open Label ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Endemic Mycoses ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background C-itra is the drug of choice for treatment of most non-CNS, non-life-threatening forms of endemic mycoses (EM), including histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis and talaromycosis. SUBA represents a new formulation of itraconazole that utilizes nanotechnology to improve bioavailability when administered orally. SUBA is formulated as nanoparticles allowing for absorption in the small bowel while not relying on gastric acidity for optimal absorption. MSG-15 is an open-label, comparative clinical trial comparing SUBA to c-itra for the treatment of EM. Herein we report the final PK and AE profiles of these two compounds. Methods Subjects with proven and probable EM were eligible this open-label comparative study. The protocol allowed up to 14 d of prior therapy with any antifungal for this episode of EM. Subjects were randomized to receive either SUBA 130 mg po bid or c-itra 200 mg po bid for up to 6 months. Follow up occurred at 7, 14, 28, 42, 84 and 180 d post-enrollment. PK samples were obtained at 7, 14, and 42 d. Clinical assessment, including symptom assessment, AEs, overall drug tolerance, and quality of life were assessed at each visit. We used descriptive statistics for this analysis. Results 89 subjects with EM entered the trial, including 43 on SUBA and 46 on c-itra. We measured PK serum levels of itra and hydroxyl-itra at days 7, 14, and 42 and these data are depicted in Figures 1-3. There were no significant differences in these levels, including combined itra/hydroxyl-itra levels, among the two study arms. AUC for itra and hydroxyl-itra were similar for both arms. AEs as assessed at each study evaluation were also quite similar among the two study arms. Overall, any AE occurred in 74% vs 85% of SUBA and c-itra recipients, respectively (NS). Drug-related AEs occurred in 35% vs 41% of SUBA and itra recipients, respectively (NS). Most common drug-related AEs included cardiovascular (edema and hypertension), nausea and loss of appetite. Combined Itraconazole and Hydroxy-itraconazole Concentration Over Time Conclusion Compared to c-itra, SUBA demonstrates almost identical serum levels despite being dosed at roughly 60% standard dosing for c-itra (130 mg po bid vs 200 mg po bid). SUBA is slightly better tolerated than c-itra, although the specific AEs are similar. Disclosures Peter G. Pappas, MD, Astellas (Research Grant or Support)Cidara (Research Grant or Support)F2G (Consultant)Matinas (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Mayne Pharma (Research Grant or Support)Scynexis (Research Grant or Support) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Marisa Miceli, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) George R. R. Thompson III, III, MD, Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Appili (Consultant)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Avir (Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Mayne (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

548. Baseline characteristics associated with clinical improvement and mortality in hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.742 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S340-S340

Author(s):

Antonella Castagna ◽

David Shu Cheong Hui ◽

Kathleen M Mullane ◽

Mamta Jain ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Improvement ◽

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Hospitalized Patients ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Remdesivir (RDV) has been shown to shorten recovery time and was well tolerated in patients with severe COVID-19. Here we report baseline characteristics associated with clinical improvement at day (d) 14. Methods We enrolled hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, oxygen saturation >94% on room air, and radiological evidence of pneumonia. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 5d or 10d of intravenous RDV once daily plus standard of care (SoC), or SoC only. For this analysis, patients were followed through discharge, d14, or death. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics associated with clinical improvement in oxygen support (≥2-point improvement on a 7-category ordinal scale ranging from discharge to death) were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression methods. Results 584 patients were randomized and treated (5/10d RDV, n=384; SoC: n=200). 159 (27%) were ≥65y, 227 (39%) female, 328 (61%) white, 102 (19%) Asian, and 99 (19%) Black. 252 participants (43%) were enrolled in Europe, 260 (45%) North America (NA), and 72 (12%) in Asia. Most patients (483 [83%]) were not on supplemental oxygen but required medical care at baseline. In a multivariable model, 5/10d RDV was significantly positively associated with clinical improvement (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.69, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.65; p=0.0226). Significant covariables positively associated with clinical improvement included age < 65y (p< 0.0001) and region of treatment (Europe and NA vs Asia, p< 0.0001 each; Table); other examined factors were not significantly associated with clinical improvement, including gender, race, ethnicity, baseline oxygen support, duration of symptoms and hospitalization, obesity, and baseline transaminase levels. Table 1. Conclusion In moderate COVID-19 patients, after adjusting for treatment arm, age < 65y and region (NA vs Asia; Europe vs Asia) were associated with higher rates of clinical improvement. These observations recapitulate younger age as positive prognostic factor, and highlight the differences in the impact of the pandemic globally. Disclosures Antonella Castagna, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) David Shu Cheong Hui, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Kathleen M. Mullane, DO, PharmD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Mamta Jain, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Advisor or Review Panel member)Janssen (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support) Massimo Galli, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Personal fees) Shan-Chwen Chang, MD, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Robert H. Hyland, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Devi SenGupta, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Huyen Cao, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Hailin Huang, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Anand Chokkalingam, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Anu Osinusi, MD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Diana M. Brainard, MD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Christoph Lübbert, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) David Chien Boon Lye, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) David Chien Boon Lye, MD, NO DISCLOSURE DATA Judith A. Aberg, MD, Theratechnology (Consultant) Enrique Navas Elorza, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Karen T. Tashima, MD, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Research Grant or Support)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Tibotec (Research Grant or Support)Viiv Healthcare (Research Grant or Support) Mark McPhail, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text

1340. The Burden of Influenza and Rhinovirus Among Hospitalized Adults Post the COVID-19 Pandemic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1532 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S757-S758

Author(s):

Olivia D Reese ◽

Ashley Tippett ◽

Laila Hussaini ◽

Luis Salazar ◽

Megan Taylor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Tract Infections ◽

The Impact ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) are a significant cause of morbidity in adults. Influenza is associated with about 490,600 hospitalizations and 34,200 deaths in the US in the 2018-2019 season. The burden of rhinovirus among adults hospitalized with ARI is less well known. We compared the burden of influenza and rhinovirus from 2 consecutive winter respiratory viral seasons in hospitalized adults and healthy controls pre-COVID-19 and one season mid-COVID-19 to determine the impact of rhinovirus as a pathogen. Methods From Oct 2018 to Apr 2021, prospective surveillance of adults ≥50 years old admitted with ARI or COPD/CHF exacerbations at any age was conducted at two Atlanta hospitals. Adults were eligible if they lived within an eight-county region around Atlanta and if their symptom duration was < 14 days. In the seasons from Oct 2018 to Mar 2020, asymptomatic adults ≥50 years old were enrolled as controls. Standard of care test results were included and those enrolled contributed nasopharyngeal swabs that were tested for respiratory pathogens using BioFire® FilmArray® Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP). Results During the first two seasons, 1566 hospitalized adults were enrolled. Rhinovirus was detected in 7.5% (118) and influenza was detected in 7.7% (121). Rhinovirus was also detected in 2.2% of 466 healthy adult controls while influenza was detected in 0%. During Season 3, the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, influenza declined to 0% of ARI hospitalizations. Rhinovirus also declined (p=0.01) but still accounted for 5.1% of all ARIs screened (Figure 1). Rhinovirus was detected at a greater rate in Season 3 than in asymptomatic controls in the first 2 seasons (p=0.008). In the first two seasons, Influenza was detected in 8.6% (24/276) of those admitted to the ICU. Rhinovirus was detected in 6.1% (17/276) of those admitted to the ICU but declined to 3.1% (8/258) in Season 3. Figure 1. Percent Positive Cases of Influenza and Rhinovirus between Season 1&2 (hospitalized and healthy controls) vs Season 3 (hospitalized) Conclusion Dramatic declines occurred in influenza in adults hospitalized with ARI, CHF, or COPD in Atlanta during the COVID-19 pandemic and with enhanced public health measures. Although rhinovirus declined during the COVID-19 pandemic, it continued to be identified at a rate higher than in historical controls. Additional data are needed to understand the role of rhinovirus in adult ARI, CHF, and COPD exacerbations. Disclosures David L. Swerdlow, MD, Pfizer Vaccines (Employee) Robin Hubler, MS, Pfizer Inc. (Employee) Christina A. Rostad, MD, BioFire Inc, GSK, MedImmune, Micron, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Pasteur. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Meissa Vaccines (Other Financial or Material Support, Co-inventor of patented RSV vaccine technology unrelated to this manuscript, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc.) Larry Anderson, MD, ADVI (Consultant)Bavarian Nordic (Consultant)Novavax (Consultant)Phizer (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sciogen (Research Grant or Support) Nadine Rouphael, MD, pfizer, sanofi, lily, quidel, merck (Grant/Research Support) Nadine Rouphael, MD, Lilly (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Emory Study PI, Grant/Research Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Emory study PI, Grant/Research Support; Pfizer: I conduct as co-PI the RSV PFIZER study at Emory, Research Grant; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, I conduct as co-PI the RSV PFIZER study at Emory; Quidel (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Emory Study PI, Grant/Research Support; Sanofi Pasteur (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Chair phase 3 COVID vaccine, Grant/Research Support Evan J. Anderson, MD, GSK (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)Kentucky Bioprocessing, Inc (Advisor or Review Panel member)MedImmune (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Medscape (Consultant)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Micron (Scientific Research Study Investigator)PaxVax (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Regeneron (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Download Full-text