scholarly journals 1133. Opportunities for Antibiotic Discontinuation and De-escalation after Discharge from the Emergency Department in Pediatric Patients with UTI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S657-S658
Author(s):  
Stephanie Hawkins ◽  
Patrick Gavigan ◽  
Jessica E Ericson ◽  
George McSherry
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In children, urinary tract infection (UTI) represents one of the most common indications for antibiotics. While previous data has demonstrated high rates of misdiagnosis and inconsistencies with empiric antibiotics, the impact and opportunities for antibiotic reduction once final culture and susceptibility data are available, particularly in pediatric patients seen in the emergency department (ED), is unknown. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted over a period of 18-months, which included subjects less than 18 years of age who were discharged from the ED with a diagnosis of UTI. Episodes in which urine cultures were negative or grew only mixed urogenital flora were considered possible for discontinuation. De-escalation was considered possible in episodes in which identified bacteria were susceptible to more narrow spectrum agents than the prescribed empiric antibiotic. Rates of discontinuation and de-escalation were calculated as proportions, and excess days of therapy were described. Subjects whose empiric antibiotics were active against isolated bacteria were compared to those with bacteria resistant to empiric therapy. Results A total of 87 episodes of UTI were identified. Pathogenic bacteria were isolated in 51 (59%) of the 78 episodes in which urine cultures were sent, most commonly Escherichia coli (84%). Empiric antibiotic therapy and duration varied and were active against isolated bacteria in 39 (76%) of the episodes. Subjects whose antibiotics were inactive were more likely to be Hispanic and receive cephalexin [Table 3]. Antibiotics were discontinued in 3 of the 27 possible episodes (11%), resulting in 127 extra antibiotic days, median of 6 (IQR=10 days) days per episode. In 20 episodes there was an opportunity for de-escalation, but it was never attempted, leading to 131 extra days of broad-spectrum antibiotics (median 7.5 days, IQR=3). Table 1. Microbiology and resistance profile of bacteria isolated from urine cultures Table 2. Empiric antibiotic regimens, including type of antibiotic and duration Table 3. Comparison of episodes in which empiric antibiotics were active against isolated bacteria versus those in which empiric antibiotics were inactive Conclusion Antibiotics are rarely adjusted after discharge from the ED. Lack of adjustment results in unnecessary total and broad-spectrum antibiotic exposures. Initiatives designed to improve antibiotic use post-discharge could result in significant decreases in unnecessary antibiotics, and ultimately reduced rates of antibiotic resistance. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in COVID-19 on hospital admission

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison K. Lew ◽  
Palak H. Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics > 48 h following admission or if another source of infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Results A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n = 76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n = 170), p < 0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p < 0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and antibiotics directed at atypical bacteria DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p < 0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p = 0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes. Conclusion Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison Lew ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background: Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics >48hours following admission or if another infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Results: A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n=76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n=170), p<0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p<0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and atypical antibiotic DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p<0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p=0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison Lew ◽  
Palak B. Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background: Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19.Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics >48hours following admission or if another infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics.Results: A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n=76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n=170), p<0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p<0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and atypical antibiotic DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p<0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p=0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes.Conclusion: Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals 1346. Implementation of a Multidisciplinary 48 Hour Antibiotic Timeout in a Pediatric Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S684-S684
Author(s):  
Victoria Konold ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Jennifer Pisano ◽  
Natasha N Pettit ◽  
Anish Choksi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
New Antibiotics ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Empirical Antibiotics ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background To meet the core elements required for antimicrobial stewardship programs, our institution implemented a pharmacy-led antibiotic timeout (ATO) process in 2017 and a multidisciplinary ATO process in 2019. An antibiotic timeout is a discussion and review of the need for ongoing empirical antibiotics 2-4 days after initiation. This study sought to evaluate both the multidisciplinary ATO and the pharmacy-led ATO in a pediatric population, compare the impact of each intervention on antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) to a pre-intervention group without an ATO, and to then compare the impact of the pharmacy-led ATO versus multidisciplinary ATO on antibiotic days of therapy (DOT). Methods This was a retrospective, pre-post, quasi-experimental study of pediatric patients comparing antibiotic DOT prior to ATO implementation (pre-ATO), during the pharmacy-led ATO (pharm-ATO), and during the multidisciplinary ATO (multi-ATO). The pre-ATO group was a patient sample from February-September 2016, prior to the initiation of a formal ATO. The pharmacy-led ATO was implemented from February-September 2018. This was followed by a multidisciplinary ATO led by pediatric residents and nurses from February-September 2019. Both the pharm-ATO and the multi-ATO were implemented as an active non-interruptive alert added to the electronic health record patient list. This alert triggered when new antibiotics had been administered to the patient for 48 hours, at which time, the responsible clinician would discuss the antibiotic and document their decision via the alert workspace. Pediatric patients receiving IV or PO antibiotics administered for at least 48 hours were included. The primary outcome was DOT. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Results 1284 unique antibiotic orders (n= 572 patients) were reviewed in the pre-ATO group, 868 (n= 323 patients) in the pharm-ATO and 949 (n= 305 patients) in the multi-ATO groups. Average DOT was not significantly different pre vs post intervention for either methodology (Table 1). Mortality was similar between groups, but LOS was longer for both intervention groups (Table 1). Impact of an ATO on DOT, Mortality and LOS Conclusion An ATO had no impact on average antibiotic DOT in a pediatric population, regardless of the ATO methodology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1033. Effectiveness of a Physician-Driven Automated Antibiotic Time Out in the Setting of Gram-negative Bacteremia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S363-S364
Author(s):  
Sana Mohayya ◽  
Navaneeth Narayanan ◽  
Daniel Cimilluca ◽  
Parth Vaidya ◽  
Alexander Malanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In an effort to minimize complications associated with over-utilization of antibiotics, many antimicrobial stewardship programs have incorporated an antibiotic time out (ATO). Despite the increasing adoption of the ATO, limited data are available to support its effectiveness. This study was designed to assess the impact of an automated ATO integrated into the electronic medical record (EMR) on the rate of antibiotic modification in patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic(s) for Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB). Methods This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatients from January 2017 to June 2018 conducted at a large academic medical center. ATO was implemented on October 31, 2017. Adult patients with GNB who received at least 72 hours of a systemic antibiotic were included. Patients with neutropenia or polymicrobial infections were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a modification of therapy within 24 hours of final culture results. Secondary outcomes included modification at any point in therapy, time to modification of therapy, time to de-escalation, and days of therapy of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results There was a total of 88 patients who met inclusion criteria, 37 patients pre-ATO and 51 patients post-ATO. The primary outcome of modification of therapy within 24 hours of final culture results was not significantly different for patients in the pre-ATO and post-ATO groups (19% vs. 20%, P = 0.94, respectively). The secondary outcome of modification of therapy at any point in therapy was not significantly different between the two groups (62% vs. 66%, P = 0.67). Of the 47 patients who received a modification of therapy, the mean time to modification was significantly shorter in the post-ATO group (52.8 hours vs. 45.26 hours, P < 0.05,). All other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between study groups. Conclusion The ATO alert was not associated with a higher rate of antibiotic modification within 24 hours of culture results in patients with GNB, although there was a significant reduction in the time to antibiotic modification. Further efforts are needed to improve the time to modification and optimize antibiotic prescribing practices. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Retrospective evaluation of healthcare utilisation and mortality of two post-discharge care programmes in Singapore

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Yi Han Ang ◽  
Chuen Seng Tan ◽  
Milawaty Nurjono ◽  
Xin Quan Tan ◽  
Gerald Choon-Huat Koh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Health System ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Healthcare Utilisation ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Discharge Care ◽  
High Acuity ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact on healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges, and mortality of a programme for frequent hospital utilisers and a programme for patients requiring high acuity post-discharge care as part of an integrated healthcare model.DesignA retrospective quasi-experimental study without randomisation where patients who received post-discharge care interventions were matched 1:1 with unenrolled patients as controls.SettingThe National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), which was one of six RHS in Singapore, implemented the NUHS RHS Integrated Interventions and Care Extension (NICE) programme for frequent hospital utilisers and the NUHS Transitional Care Programme (NUHS TCP) for high acuity post-discharge care. The programmes were supported by the Ministry of Health in Singapore, which is a city-state nation located in Southeast Asia with a 5.6 million population.ParticipantsLinked healthcare administrative data, for the time period of January 2013 to December 2016, were extracted for patients enrolled in NICE (n=554) or NUHS TCP (n=270) from June 2014 to December 2015, and control patients.InterventionsFor both programmes, teams conducted follow-up home visits and phone calls to monitor and manage patients’ post-discharge.Primary outcome measuresOne-year pre- and post-enrolment healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges of all-cause inpatient admissions, emergency admissions, emergency department attendances, specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) attendances, total inpatient length of stay and mortality rates were compared.ResultsPatients in NICE had lower mortality rate, but higher all-cause inpatient admission, emergency admission and emergency department attendance charges. Patients in NUHS TCP did not have lower mortality rate, but had higher emergency admission and SOC attendance charges.ConclusionsBoth NICE and NUHS TCP had no improvements in 1 year healthcare utilisation across various setting and metrics. Singular interventions might not be as impactful in effecting utilisation without an overhauling transformation and restructuring of the hospital and healthcare system.

scholarly journals Managing chronic conditions care across primary care and hospital systems: lessons from an Australian Hospital Avoidance Risk Program using the Flinders Chronic Condition Management Program

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Lawn ◽  
Sara Zabeen ◽  
David Smith ◽  
Ellen Wilson ◽  
Cathie Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Chronic Condition ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Psychosocial Needs ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
The Impact

Objective The study aimed to determine the impact of the Flinders Chronic Condition Management Program for chronic condition self-management care planning and how to improve its use with Bendigo Health’s Hospital Admission Risk Program (HARP). Methods A retrospective analysis of hospital admission data collected by Bendigo Health from July 2012 to September 2013 was undertaken. Length of stay during admission and total contacts post-discharge by hospital staff for 253 patients with 644 admissions were considered as outcome variables. For statistical modelling we used the generalised linear model. Results The combination of the HARP and Flinders Program was able to achieve significant reductions in hospital admissions and non-significant reduction in emergency department presentations and length of stay. The generalised linear model predicted that vulnerable patient groups such as those with heart disease (P = 0.037) and complex needs (P < 0.001) received more post-discharge contacts by HARP staff than those suffering from diabetes, renal conditions and psychosocial needs when they lived alone. Similarly, respiratory (P < 0.001), heart disease (P = 0.015) and complex needs (P = 0.050) patients had more contacts, with an increased number of episodes than those suffering from diabetes, renal conditions and psychosocial needs. Conclusion The Flinders Program appeared to have significant positive impacts on HARP patients that could be more effective if high-risk groups, such as respiratory patients with no carers and respiratory and heart disease patients aged 0–65, had received more targeted care. What is known about the topic? Chronic conditions are common causes of premature death and disability in Australia. Besides mental and physical impacts at the individual level, chronic conditions are strongly linked to high costs and health service utilisation. Hospital avoidance programs such as HARP can better manage chronic conditions through a greater focus on coordination and integration of care across primary care and hospital systems. In support of HARP, self-management interventions such as the Flinders Program aim to help individuals better manage their medical treatment and cope with the impact of the condition on their physical and mental wellbeing and thus reduce health services utilisation. What does this paper add? This paper sheds light on which patients might be more or less likely to benefit from the combination of the HARP and Flinders Program, with regard to their impact on reductions in hospital admissions, emergency department presentations and length of stay. This study also sheds light on how the Flinders Program could be better targeted towards and implemented among high-need and high-cost patients to lessen chronic disease burden on Australia’s health system. What are the implications for practitioners? Programs targeting vulnerable populations and applying evidence-based chronic condition management and self-management support achieve significant reductions in potentially avoidable hospitalisation and emergency department presentation rates, though sex, type of chronic condition and living situation appear to matter. Benefits might also accrue from the combination of contextual factors (such as the Flinders Program, supportive service management, clinical champions in the team) that work synergistically.

scholarly journals Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 936-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siobhan Harding
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Secondary Care ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Completing comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) for frail patients admitted to acute hospitals has well-established benefits and is advocated by national guidelines. There is high-quality evidence demonstrating an association between inpatient CGAs and the patient being alive and community-dwelling at 12-month follow-up. However, less well-known is the effectiveness of CGAs conducted within the emergency department (ED), with the primary purpose of facilitating admission avoidance, on reducing 30-day reattendance or readmission. This commentary provides an overview of five studies that measure the impact of conducting an ED-CGA on subsequent secondary care attendance. Two randomised-controlled trials, one case-matched cohort study and two quasi-experimental pre- and post-intervention studies were reviewed. The studies reported variable success in preventing subsequent secondary care use. No studies meeting the criteria had been conducted within the UK, affecting generalisability of the findings. There is no clear evidence that conducting a CGA within ED reduced reattendances or admissions 30 days post-discharge. The existing evidence base is methodologically and clinically heterogeneous and is vulnerable to multiple sources of bias. Further research is needed to understand whether screening to identify target populations or whether increased intensity of interventions delivered improves outcomes. ED-CGA may not have a beneficial effect on cost improvement or service delivery metrics, but it may have positive outcomes that are of high importance to the patients. This warrants further study.

scholarly journals Pediatric Patients in a Local Nepali Emergency Department: Presenting Complaints, Triage and Post-Discharge Mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2333794X2094792
Author(s):  
Samita Giri ◽  
Tine Halvas-Svendsen ◽  
Tormod Rogne ◽  
Sanu Krishna Shrestha ◽  
Henrik Døllner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Care

Background. In low-income countries, pediatric emergency care is largely underdeveloped although child mortality in emergency care is more than twice that of adults, and mortality after discharge is high. Aim. We aimed at describing characteristics, triage categories, and post-discharge mortality in a pediatric emergency population in Nepal. Methods. We prospectively assessed characteristics and triage categories of pediatric patients who entered the emergency department (ED) in a local hospital. Patient households were followed-up by telephone interviews at 90 days. Results. The majority of pediatric emergency patients presented with injuries and infections (~40% each). Girls attended ED less frequent than boys. High triage priority categories (orange and red) were strong indicators for intensive care need and for mortality after discharge. Conclusion. The study supports the use and development of a pediatric triage systems in a low-resource general ED setting. We identify a need for interventions that can reduce mortality after pediatric emergency care. Interventions to reduce pediatric emergency disease burden in this setting should emphasize prevention and effective treatment of infections and injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document