1187. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Children with Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) Infection: Does Antiviral Treatment Matter?

Abstract Background cCMV infection is a major contributor to childhood neurologic and cognitive disabilities including sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Neonatal treatment with ganciclovir/valganciclovir improves hearing outcomes, but its impact on neurodevelopmental outcomes remains an important knowledge gap. We describe the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with cCMV infection and evaluate the effect of neonatal antiviral therapy on outcomes. Methods Since 2013, infants with cCMV infection referred to Nationwide Children’s Hospital’s NEO-ID Clinic have had a complete evaluation at diagnosis as well as follow-up neurodevelopmental assessments. Pertinent demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and follow-up data were obtained and managed using REDCap. Neurodevelopmental assessments were performed using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) III/IV (cognitive, language, motor domains) at ~ 24 months of age. The Gross Motor Function Classification System was used to classify functional motor impairment. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were compared by receipt of antiviral therapy in early infancy. Results 95 infants (mean ± SD; gestational age 35 ± 5 wk, birth weight 2121 ± 948 g; Table 1) with cCMV infection had follow-up neurodevelopmental assessments. 62% had central nervous system involvement, 37% had SNHL, 23% developed cerebral palsy (CP), and 6% were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The majority had normal BSID scores (≥ 85) in cognitive and motor domains (65% and 54%, respectively) while 48% had normal scores in the language domain. 35% had severe impairment (< 70) in ≥ 1 domain (Table 2). 9 children had clinically inapparent cCMV infection; 2 (22%) had abnormalities on BSID testing (1, cognitive score: 80; 1, cognitive, language, and motor scores: 65, 68, 73, respectively). 11 (12%) children, including 6 who received antiviral therapy, had severe neurodevelopmental impairment, with CP and severe (< 70) BSID scores in both the cognitive and motor domains. Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of 95 Children with Congenital CMV Infection by Receipt of Antiviral Treatment Table 2. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Based on Testing with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) III/IV Conclusion A substantial proportion of children with cCMV infection had moderate (29%) or severe (33%) neurodevelopmental impairment, CP, or autism spectrum disorder, irrespective of antiviral treatment. Urgency exists for antenatal preventive strategies and vaccine development. Disclosures Asuncion Mejias, MD, PhD, MsCS, Janssen (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Roche (Advisor or Review Panel member)Sanofi (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

639. Time to Recurrence of Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI) is Rapid Following Completion of Standard of Care Antibiotics: Results from ECOSPOR-III, a Phase 3 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of SER-109, an Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.836 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S422-S422

Author(s):

Thomas J Louie ◽

Matthew Sims ◽

Richard Nathan ◽

Steven O'Marro ◽

Princy N Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Panel Member ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Oral Microbiome ◽

Research Support ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Review Panel ◽

Material Support ◽

Time To Recurrence ◽

Study Population

Abstract Background The natural history of CDI recurrence after antibiotics may be helpful to understand the window of opportunity for microbiome repair. ECOSPOR III evaluated the efficacy of SER-109, an investigational microbiome therapeutic, compared to placebo with rates of rCDI as the primary endpoint. SER-109 was superior to placebo in reducing the rate of rCDI following standard-of-care antibiotics at 8 weeks (12.4% vs 39.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Herein, we describe results from the secondary endpoint, time to recurrence, in this well-characterized study population. Methods A total of 182 C. difficile toxin+ adults with ≥ 3 CDI episodes and symptom resolution on CDI antibiotics were randomly assigned to SER-109 (4 capsules orally x 3 days) or placebo. Recurrence for this analysis was defined as ≥ 3 unformed stools/day for ≥ 48 hours, ± C. difficile stool toxin test, and an investigator decision to treat. Time to CDI recurrence was analyzed using observed data and Kaplan-Meier methods. Data were not imputed for subjects lost to follow-up or discontinued from study. Subjects who did not have a CDI recurrence were censored on the date of study completion, study discontinuation or death. Results Through 24 weeks, 11/89 (12.4%) SER-109 and 36/93 (38.7%) placebo subjects had rCDI (P < 0.001). Of all recurrence events in the study population, 16/47 (34.0%) were observed within 1 week; 30/47 (63.8%) within 2 weeks; and 34/47 (72.3%) within 4 weeks after randomization, highlighting the rapid onset of recurrence. On the other hand, 12/47 (25.5%) recurrences occurred between 4 and 12 weeks, highlighting late onset of recurrence in a subset of patients (Table). Significantly lower rates of recurrence in patients on SER-109 compared to placebo was maintained throughout the 24-week follow-up (Figure). Time of rCDI K-M Plot Conclusion SER-109, an investigational oral microbiome therapeutic, maintained significant efficacy in reducing rCDI vs placebo through 24 weeks. About two-thirds of all recurrences occurred within 14 days of antibiotic completion highlighting the need for rapid repair of the disrupted microbiome. However, the significant number of late recurrences in the placebo arm also highlights that rCDI trials limited to 4 weeks of follow-up after treatment completion may underestimate recurrences. Disclosures Thomas J. Louie, MD, Artugen (Advisor or Review Panel member)Crestone (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Da Volterra (Advisor or Review Panel member)Finch Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)MGB Biopharma (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Rebiotix (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres Therapeutics (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Summit PLC (Grant/Research Support)Vedanta (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Matthew Sims, MD, PhD, Astra Zeneca (Independent Contractor)Diasorin Molecular (Independent Contractor)Epigenomics Inc (Independent Contractor)Finch (Independent Contractor)Genentech (Independent Contractor)Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV (Independent Contractor)Kinevant Sciences gmBH (Independent Contractor)Leonard-Meron Biosciences (Independent Contractor)Merck and Co (Independent Contractor)OpGen (Independent Contractor)Prenosis (Independent Contractor)Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc (Independent Contractor)Seres Therapeutics Inc (Independent Contractor)Shire (Independent Contractor)Summit Therapeutics (Independent Contractor) Richard Nathan, DO, none (Other Financial or Material Support, I am PI on several clinical trials. If you need that information, I would be happy to supply it.) Princy N. Kumar, MD, AMGEN (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Eli Lilly (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)GSK (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria) Elaine E. Wang, MD, Seres Therapeutics (Employee) Elaine E. Wang, MD, Seres Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Robert Stevens, PharmD, Seres Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Kelly Brady, MS, Seres Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Barbara McGovern, MD, Seres Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Lisa von Moltke, MD, Seres Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder)

Download Full-text

127. Development of a Kinetic ELISA (kELISA) and Reactive B-cell Frequency (RBF) Assay to Detect Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Pre-Fusion F Protein-Specific Immune Responses in Infants

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.127 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S77-S78

Author(s):

Stephanie L Rolsma ◽

Sandy M Yoder ◽

Rachel S Nargi ◽

Eric Brady ◽

Natalia Jimenez-Truque ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Panel Member ◽

Multiple Time ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Cell Frequency ◽

Material Support ◽

F Protein ◽

Multiple Time Points ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background RSV is a major cause of pediatric respiratory disease. Antibodies to the prefusion conformation of the RSV fusion (pre-F) protein are needed for virus neutralization. Methods We measured RSV-specific responses in two groups of children < 3 years of age; subjects with laboratory-confirmed RSV (RSV-infected) or infants born in the period May to September and enrolled prior to their first RSV season (RSV-uninfected). RSV-infected infants had blood samples obtained at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months after infection. RSV-uninfected infants had blood samples obtained at enrollment, at the end of their first RSV season, and 6 months later. A kELISA to measure RSV pre-F-specific antibodies and an RBF assay to identify RSV F-specific B cells were developed. Results 102 subjects were enrolled; 11 were excluded due to missed visits or withdrawal. Of the 65 subjects in the RSV-uninfected group, all were kELISA positive at enrollment, consistent with maternal antibody transfer. 53 subjects had sufficient samples for analysis at multiple time points; 29 became seronegative and 24 remained seropositive. In the seronegative group, the kELISA value decreased rapidly to < 0.25 by 6 months after the RSV season in 27/29 (93%), (Figure 1a). In the persistently seropositive group, all 24 subjects maintained a positive kELISA value, with some developing higher values over time, consistent with asymptomatic infection (Figure 1b). An RBF assay was used to determine whether antibodies were due to persistent maternal antibodies or endogenous production (Figure 2). In the seronegative group, 24/29 (80%) had a negative RBF; in the seropositive group, 23/24 (96%) had a positive RBF during follow-up. There were 26 subjects in the RSV-infected group; 22 had sufficient samples for analysis at multiple time points. All were seropositive by kELISA at one month post-infection with variable kELISA values during follow-up (Figure 3). 17/22 (77%) had a positive RBF, although 4 of the subjects without a positive RBF had indeterminate results at ≥ 1 visit. Figure 1. kELISA values of baseline RSV-negative subjects, by subject age at time of sample. Panel A: Subjects classified as seronegative (n=29). Panel B: Subjects without known RSV classified as persistently seropositive (n=24). Figure 2. Reactive B-cell frequency assay. The first step in the RBF assay is growth of Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines (LCLs), as shown over days 1-3 (Left-Day 1, Middle-Day 2, Right-Day 3, magnification 200X). The cells circled in the figure indicate a single LCL’s growth over time. LCL supernatant is used to detect RSV F-protein specific antibodies using traditional ELISA, resulting in a positive, indeterminate, or negative result. Indeterminate results occur due to a lack of cell viability and/or failure to form LCLs, resulting in failure to exceed an optical density of 5x background. Figure 3. kELISA values of RSV-infected subjects, by subject age at time of sample. First sample was obtained at approximately one month after laboratory-confirmed RSV. Conclusion Assays measuring F-specific immune responses in infants will be critical for RSV vaccine development. A kELISA targeting RSV pre-F epitopes, with an RBF assay targeting RSV F-specific B cells, may allow discrimination for maternal and infant-derived antibodies. Disclosures Isaac Thomsen, MD, MSCI, Horizon Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant James E. Crowe, Jr., MD, Astra Zeneca (Grant/Research Support)IDBiologics (Board Member, Grant/Research Support, Shareholder)Luna Biologics (Consultant)Meissa Vaccines (Advisor or Review Panel member)Takeda Vaccines (Grant/Research Support) Kathryn M. Edwards, MD, Bionet (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; CDC (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; IBM (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; Moderna (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; NIH (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMC, Other Financial or Material Support; Roche (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member of DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; Sanofi Pasteur (Individual(s) Involved: Self): member DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; Sequiras (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Member DSMB, Other Financial or Material Support; X4 Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Buddy Creech, MD, MPH, Altimmune (Consultant)Astellas (Other Financial or Material Support, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee)Diotheris (Consultant)GSK (Consultant)Horizon (Consultant)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Premier Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member)Vir (Consultant)

Download Full-text

LB13. The Efficacy and Impact in Heathy Infants of Nirsevimab on Medically Attended RSV Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1649 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S811-S812

Author(s):

Laura Hammitt ◽

Ron Dagan ◽

Yuan Yuan ◽

Manuel Baca Cots ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Term Infants ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Support Research ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. Nirsevimab is a single-dose monoclonal antibody with extended half-life that was shown to protect preterm infants 29 to < 35 weeks gestation against RSV LRTI. However, most medically attended (MA) cases occur in otherwise healthy, term infants for whom there is currently no effective RSV prevention strategy. We report the primary analysis of efficacy and safety, along with the impact of nirsevimab in late preterm and term infants (≥ 35 weeks gestation) in the phase 3 MELODY study (NCT03979313). Methods Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive one intramuscular injection of nirsevimab (50 mg if < 5 kg; 100 mg if ≥ 5 kg at dosing) or placebo entering their first RSV season. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MA RSV LRTI over 150 days postdose. Cases met predefined clinical criteria of disease severity and were confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR. Safety was evaluated through 360 days postdose. Enrollment started on 23 July 2019 and was suspended following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020. Results Overall, 1490 infants were randomized and included in the intent-to-treat population; 1465 (98%) completed the 150-day efficacy follow-up, and 1367 (92%) completed the 360-day safety follow-up. The incidence of MA RSV LRTI was 1.2% (n=12/994) in the nirsevimab group and 5.0% (n=25/496) in the placebo group, giving nirsevimab an efficacy of 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.6, 87.1; p< 0.0001). Nirsevimab averted 93.6 (95% CI 63.0, 124.0) MA LRTIs per 1000 infants dosed. Nirsevimab was well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events (87.4% nirsevimab; 86.8% placebo) and serious adverse events (6.8% nirsevimab; 7.3% placebo) between groups. Conclusion In this phase 3 study, a single dose of nirsevimab protected late preterm and term infants against MA RSV LRTI over an RSV season with a favorable safety profile. Approximately 11 infants need to be immunized to prevent 1 case of LRTI; nirsevimab has the potential to be an important intervention to reduce the burden of RSV LRTI in healthy infants. Disclosures Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution Ron Dagan, MD, Medimmune/AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Yuan Yuan, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Shabhir A. Mahdi, PhD, BMGF (Research Grant or Support)EDCTP (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melody (Research Grant or Support)Minervax (Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Research Grant or Support)SAMRC (Research Grant or Support) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Astellas (Scientific Research Study Investigator)AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Genentech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Karius (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Melinta (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Nabriva (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Seqirus (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Tetraphase (Scientific Research Study Investigator) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; AstraZeneca (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; BD (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Eli Lilly (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Karius, Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Melinta (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Moderna (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Nabriva (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Seqirus (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Tetraphase (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Heather J. Zar, PhD, AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Dennis Brooks, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Amy Grenham, MSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Ulrika Wählby Hamrén, PhD, AstraZeneca R&D (Employee, Shareholder) Vaishali S. Mankad, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Therese Takas, BSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Own stock in AstraZeneca) Jon Heinrichs, PhD, AstraZeneca (Shareholder)Bristol Myers Squibb (Shareholder)J&J (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Organon (Shareholder)Procter & Gamble (Shareholder)Sanofi (Shareholder)Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Amanda Leach, MRCPCH, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) M. Pamela Griffin, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Tonya L. Villafana, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee)

Download Full-text

854. Long-term Outcomes of Participants on F/TAF for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Results for 144 Weeks of Follow-Up in the DISCOVER Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1049 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S517-S518

Author(s):

Moti Ramgopal ◽

Peter Ruane ◽

Yongwu Shao ◽

Ramin Ebrahimi ◽

Alex Kintu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Mineral Density ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background In DISCOVER, a multinational randomized controlled trial, F/TAF demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared to F/TDF for HIV prevention with improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at the primary endpoint (when all participants had reached 48 weeks and 50% had reached 96 weeks) and at week (W) 96, the end of the blinded phase. We now report W144 outcomes for participants who were randomized to F/TAF and continued F/TAF in the open-label extension (OLE) phase. Methods All participants who completed the randomized blinded phase could opt to receive F/TAF for at least 48 weeks in the OLE phase. We evaluated HIV incidence in participants on F/TAF through W144 and assessed changes in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) and in glomerular function (eGFR) from baseline to W144. Results 2,080 of the 2,694 participants initially randomized to F/TAF opted into the OLE phase, and 1,933 were still on study drug through W144, thereby leading to a total of 7,885 person-years (PY) of follow-up on F/TAF. Eight participants taking F/TAF acquired HIV in the blinded phase and 3 in the OLE phase. Dried blood spot analyses on the 3 OL infections found tenofovir diphosphate levels consistent with low adherence. Genotypic resistance testing showed no relevant resistance mutations for the 3 new infections. Among participants taking F/TAF, HIV incidence was 0.16/100 PY (95% CI 0.06-0.33) at the primary endpoint, 0.16/100 PY (95% CI 0.07-0.31) through 96 weeks and 0.14/100 PY (95% CI 0.07-0.25) through 144 weeks. Participants taking F/TAF had increases in hip BMD (mean percentage change +0.54%) and in spine BMD (mean percentage change +1.02%) from baseline to W144 (Figure 1). Median eGFR increased over 144 weeks, with a median increase of 2.6 mL/min from baseline to week 144. Participants in the F/TAF arm gained a median 2.3 kg (IQR -0.9-5.8) over 3 years of follow up. Figure 1. Changes in hip and spine bone mineral density and in eGFR through Week 144 Conclusion The OLE of DISCOVER allowed for a long-term assessment (144 wks.) of F/TAF for PrEP. HIV incidence remained low with BMD and renal function parameters remaining stable through 144 weeks of follow-up. These findings demonstrate that F/TAF is a safe and effective option for long-term use in people who would benefit from PrEP. Disclosures Moti Ramgopal, MD FACP FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau) Peter Ruane, MD, AbbVie (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Shareholder, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Yongwu Shao, PhD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Ramin Ebrahimi, MSc, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Alex Kintu, MD, ScD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Christoph C. Carter, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Moupali Das, MD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jared Baeten, MD, PHD, Gilead Sciences Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Cynthia Brinson, MD, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator)BI (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau, Personal fees)GSK (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Novo Nordisk (Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV Healthcare (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Peter Shalit, MD, PhD, Abbvie (Grant/Research Support)Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Glaxo Smithkline (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Thera (Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Speaker’s Bureau) Karam Mounzer, MD, Epividian (Advisor or Review Panel member)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)

Download Full-text

21. Efficacy and Safety of Maribavir as a Rescue Treatment for Investigator Assigned Therapy in Transplant Recipients With Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in the SOLSTICE Study: Phase 3 Trial Results

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.021 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S14-S15

Author(s):

Marcus Pereira ◽

Carlos Cervera ◽

Camille Kotton ◽

Joseph Sasadeusz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Study ◽

Symptom Control ◽

Scientific Research ◽

Panel Member ◽

Cmv Infection ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Material Support ◽

Study Investigator

Abstract Background Refractory or resistant (R/R) cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) cause serious, potentially fatal complications; therapeutic options are limited. In a Phase 3 study (NCT02931539), maribavir (MBV) was superior to investigator-assigned therapy (IAT; val/ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) for CMV clearance (Wk 8) and clearance plus symptom control (Wk 8 through Wk 16) in HCT/SOT recipients with R/R CMV infections. Here we present further study results on efficacy and safety of MBV in the rescue arm. Methods Patients (pts) were stratified and randomized 2:1 to MBV (400 mg/bid) or IAT for 8-wk treatment then 12-wk follow-up. After minimum 3 wks’ treatment, pts in the IAT group meeting criteria (worsening/lack of improvement of CMV infection or failure to achieve viremia clearance plus IAT intolerance) could enter a MBV rescue arm (8-wk treatment, 12-wk follow-up). In the rescue arm, efficacy was evaluated by confirmed CMV viremia clearance (plasma CMV DNA < 137 IU/mL in 2 consecutive tests ≥ 5 days apart) at end of Wk 8 and confirmed clearance with symptom control at Wk 8 through Wk 16. Safety was assessed. Results A total of 352 pts were randomized (MBV: 235, IAT: 117, randomized set). Confirmed CMV viremia clearance at Wk 8 was achieved in 131 (55.7%) and 28 (23.9%) pts, respectively, in the randomized set. Having met criteria, 22 (18.8%) pts entered the MBV rescue arm; at entry, 6 (27.3%) pts had developed neutropenia and 9 (40.9%) had increased serum creatinine (Table 1). At Wk 8 of rescue therapy, 11 (50.0%) pts achieved confirmed CMV viremia clearance; 6 (27.3%) pts had CMV clearance with symptom control at Wk 8 maintained through Wk 16 (Table 2). All 22 pts reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; Table 3); most common TEAEs of special interest were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (54.5%), and taste disturbance (50.0%). Neutropenia and acute kidney injury TEAEs were reported by 0 and 3 pts in the rescue arm, respectively. Table 1. Summary of patients from IAT-randomized group meeting criteria for entry into MBV rescue arm* Table 2. Patients achieving confirmed CMV viremia clearance at end of Wk 8 (end of treatment) or achieving confirmed CMV viremia clearance and symptom control at end of Wk 8 maintained through Wk 16 Table 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events during the on-rescue observation period Conclusion Rescue arm data show MBV was efficacious for R/R CMV infection in HCT/SOT recipients inadequately responding to IAT with/without intolerance and had a similar safety profile to that reported for pts in the randomized MBV group. Disclosures Marcus Pereira, MD, Hologic (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Takeda (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member) Carlos Cervera, MD, PhD, Avir Pharma (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Lilly (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Merck (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Sunovion (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Takeda (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Veritas Pharma (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member) Camille Kotton, MD, Shire/Takeda (Advisor or Review Panel member) Camille Kotton, MD, UpToDate (Individual(s) Involved: Self): I write chapters on zoonoses for UpToDate., Independent Contractor Joseph Sasadeusz, MBBS, PhD, Abbvie (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Consulting fee: speaker)Gilead (Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Merck (Grant/Research Support, Consulting fee: speaker)Takeda (Grant/Research Support) Jingyang Wu, MS, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc., a Takeda company (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Holds stock/stock options) Martha Fournier, MD, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc., a Takeda company (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Holds stock/stock options)Shire ViroPharma, a Takeda company (Other Financial or Material Support, This study was funded by Shire ViroPharma, a Takeda company)

Download Full-text

29. Sustained Recovery in Patients Admitted to Hospital With COVID-19

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.029 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S20-S21

Author(s):

Kasper S Moestrup ◽

Adrian G Zucco ◽

Joanne Reekie ◽

Cameron MacPherson ◽

Sisse R Otrowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Discharge ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Severe Disease ◽

Panel Member ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Sustained Recovery ◽

Second Wave

Abstract Background Several interventional Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) studies assess outcomes at day 28, but this follow-up time can be too short, since COVID-19 often cause protracted disease. Further, data on mortality and readmissions after discharge are scarse. Methods Patients aged 18-100 years and hospitalized with COVID-19 in Eastern Denmark between March 18th, 2020 and January 12th, 2021, were followed for 91 days after admission. Patients were stratified in a first and second wave, by admissions before or after June 15th, 2020, app. when remdesivir and dexamethasone were introduced as standard of care. Sustained recovery was defined as the first date, achieving 14 consecutive days after hospital discharge without an event of readmission or death. Cumulative incidences of sustained recovery were estimated in both waves and in subgroups based on the patient’s maximum level of respiratory support in the first 14 days of admission as a proxy for disease severity. Risk factors for poor outcomes were assessed in a multivariable cox proportional hazards model. Results Overall 3,386 patients were included in the study; 1,137 and 2,249 patients were admitted in the first and second wave, respectively (Table 1). The cumulative incidence of sustained recovery at day 91 was higher in the second (0.79, 95% CI: 0.77,0.81) than in the first wave (0.72, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.75) (Fig. 1A). In both waves, those with more severe disease recovered at a slower rate (Fig. 2B). There were no differences in cumulative incidences of readmissions or deaths at day 91 after discharge between the two waves, cumulative incidence (0.20, 95% CI: 0.19,0.21) and (0.11, 95% CI: 0.09,0.12), respectively (Fig 1C, Fig 1D). Male sex, high age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, renal disease, malignancies and neurological disease were associated with lower rates of sustained recovery (Table 2). Conclusion A follow-up period of 28 days in clinical trials for COVID-19 treatments is too short, especially for patients with severe disease. Rates of adverse outcomes after hospital discharge are non-neglible. In-hospital mortality was reduced with improvements in treatment, but post discharge mortality and readmissions rates did not change significantly. Disclosures Carsten Utoft Niemann, PhD MD, Abbvie (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)Astra Zeneca (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, teaching)CSL Behring (Consultant)Genmab (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Grant/Research Support, teaching)Novo Nordisk Foundation (Grant/Research Support)Roche (Grant/Research Support)Sunesis (Grant/Research Support)

Download Full-text

1012. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected virologically-suppressed older adults in a real-world setting

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1198 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S534-S535

Author(s):

Charlotte-Paige M Rolle ◽

Vu Nguyen ◽

Kiran Patel ◽

Dan Cruz ◽

Federico Hinestrosa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Drug Interactions ◽

Real World ◽

Research Study ◽

Panel Member ◽

Median Number ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Study Investigator ◽

Hiv 1

Abstract Background Approximately 50% of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are ≥50 years old. Efforts are ongoing to identify antiretrovirals associated with fewer drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and long-term side effects in this group. Clinical trials of B/F/TAF demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in older adults, however, data from real-word settings are needed to validate these results. Methods This retrospective analysis evaluated records from PLWH aged ≥ 50 years at the Orlando Immunology Center who were switched to B/F/TAF between 2/7/2018 and 5/31/2019. Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks post-switch. The primary endpoint was maintenance of HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL at week 48. The impact of switching to B/F/TAF on DDIs, adverse events (AEs) and safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study. Results 306 patients met inclusion criteria. 62 (20%) were female, 126 (41%) were non-white, median age was 58 years (range [r] 50-81), median duration of HIV infection was 19.5 years (r 2-40), median number of chronic co-morbid conditions was 5 (r 0-20), and median number of baseline concomitant medications was 4 (r 0-23). 159 (52%) patients were switched from regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat. The most commonly documented reason for switch was simplification (Table 1). At Week 48, 287 (94%) patients maintained an HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/ml and 19 (6%) had an HIV-1 RNA between 50-200 copies/mL (Figure 1). 1 patient discontinued due to lack of efficacy. A total of 123 potential DDIs were identified in 104 (34%) patients taking a boosting agent or rilpivirine at baseline (Table 2). At Week 48, there was a significant median decline in total cholesterol (15.5 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.5; 21.5), LDL cholesterol (9.5 mg/dL, 95% CI: 4; 15.5) and triglycerides (20 mg/dL, 95% CI: 9.5; 32.5), and median weight increased by 2.5 pounds (95% CI: 1.5; 3.5). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 33 (11%) patients (all Grade 1-2) and led to 7 (2%) discontinuations. Table 1-Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics Table 2-Avoidance of Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) following switch to B/F/TAF Figure 1-Subgroup analysis of virologic outcomes at Week 48 Conclusion In this real-world cohort, switching to B/F/TAF was associated with maintenance of virologic control, improvement in lipid parameters, and avoidance of DDIs in a large proportion of patients. These data support use of B/F/TAF as a treatment option in older PLWH. Disclosures Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Kiran Patel, PharmD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Federico Hinestrosa, MD, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Theratechnologies (Speaker’s Bureau) Edwin DeJesus, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

1104. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Refractory and/or Resistant Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1290 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S582-S583

Author(s):

Eleni Karantoni ◽

Yiqi Su ◽

Anat Stern ◽

Phaedon D Zavras ◽

Sergio Giralt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Overall Survival ◽

T Cell ◽

Panel Member ◽

Multivariable Model ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Material Support ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background The epidemiology of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in the era of preemptive therapy (PET) is defined. In contrast, less data exists on refractory and/or resistant (R/R) CMV. We report on 1) the incidence; 2) risk factors and outcomes of R/R CMV by 1-year post HCT. Methods Retrospective review of 167 CMV seropositive (R+) recipients of first marrow or peripheral blood HCT from 1/2014 - 12/2017 managed by PET. Refractory CMV was defined as failure to achieve >1 log10 decrease in CMV viral load (VL) and having VL >1,000 IU/mL after ≥14 day of PET. Resistant CMV required genotypic confirmation of resistance mutation(s) in UL54 and/or UL97 genes. End organ disease (EOD) was defined by standard criteria. Patients (pts) were followed through 1-year post HCT and were categorized in two mutually exclusive groups as R/R and no R/R. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records and hospital databases. Univariable and multivariable logistic models were used to identify risk factors for R/R CMV. Results Of 167 PET recipients, 91 (54.5%) received ex vivo T cell depleted (TCD) HCT; 40 (24.0%) had mismatched donor; and 26 (15.6%) had multiple myeloma. 66/167 (39.5%) pts developed refractory CMV (6 pts also had resistant CMV). Time from HCT to CMV viremia was shorter in R/R group: median (IQR) 21.5 (17.2-27.8) days compared to no R/R group: 26 (19-32) days (p=0.031). Maximum VL was higher for R/R compared to no R/R: median (IQR) 9,118 (2,849-18,456) and 868 (474-1,908), respectively (p< 0.001). In multivariable model, risk factors for R/R included TCD HCT (p< 0.0001) and higher VL at PET initiation (p=0.0002). In contrast, CMV seropositive donor (p=0.035) was protective (Figure 1). CMV EOD developed in 28.2% of R/R and 16.2% of no R/R groups (p=0.085) (Figure 2). Overall survival at 1 year was 59.1% for R/R compared to 83.1% for no R/R group (p=0.00027) (Figure 3). Figure 1. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) from multivariable model evaluating risk factors of refractory/resistant (R/R) CMV. Figure 2. Cumulative incidence curves of CMV end-organ disease (EOD) at 1-year post HCT Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of overall survival (OS) at 1-year post HCT Conclusion 1) Refractory and/or resistant CMV occurred in 39,5% of PET recipients. 2) T-cell depletion and higher CMV VL at PET initiation were risk factors for R/R CMV in multivariable models. 3) R/R CMV was associated with more EOD and worse overall survival. Disclosures Sergio Giralt, MD, Amgen (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Served an advisory board for Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, JAZZ pharmaceutical, Takeda, Novartis, KITE, and Spectrum pharma and has received research support from Amgen, Actinuum, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Miltenyi, Takeda.) Miguel-Angel Perales, MD, Abbvie (Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria from Abbvie, Bellicum, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Nektar Therapeutics, Omeros, and Takeda.)ASTCT (Other Financial or Material Support, Volunteer member of the Board of Directors of American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), Be The Match (National Marrow Donor Program, NMDP), and the CIBMTR Cellular Immunotherapy Data Resource (CIDR) Committee)Cidara Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Serve on DSMBs for Cidara Therapeutics, Servier and Medigene, and the scientific advisory boards of MolMed and NexImmune.)Kite/Gilead (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Received research support for clinical trials from Incyte, Kite/Gilead and Miltenyi Biotec.) Genovefa Papanicolaou, MD, Chimerix (Research Grant or Support)Merck&Co (Research Grant or Support, Investigator and received funding and consulting fees from Merck, Chimerix, Shire and Astellas)

Download Full-text

652. Comparison of fosfomycin (FOF) activity and prevalence of subpopulations between Escherichia coli (EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) during susceptibility testing

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.846 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S384-S384

Author(s):

Jadyn C Anderson ◽

Amanda R Krueger ◽

Elizabeth C Smith ◽

Morgan L Bixby ◽

Hunter V Brigman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Inhibitory Concentration ◽

Panel Member ◽

Colony Growth ◽

The United States ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Agreement Rate ◽

Future Studies ◽

Agar Dilution

Abstract Background In the United States, interpretive criteria for FOF are established only for EC, yet those criteria are often extrapolated to KP. Recent studies have highlighted both inferior clinical outcomes after FOF treatment and difficulties in interpretation of inner colony subpopulations, the presence of which may affect clinical efficacy. We sought to compare FOF activity against EC and KP and to determine the prevalence of inner colony subpopulations following disk diffusion (DD) testing of the two species. Methods A convenience collection of 73 KP and 42 EC isolates from 3 U.S. institutions were included. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was performed in duplicate on separate days using agar dilution (AD) and DD as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, with application of EC susceptibility (≤ 64mg/L) breakpoints. The frequency and counts of inner colonies observed during DD testing was calculated, and colonies were subcultured for use in future studies. Results MIC50/90 values were 1/16 mg/L and 32/256 mg/L for EC and KP respectively. All EC isolates were considered susceptible and therefore categorical agreement was 100%. The majority of KP isolates were considered susceptible (83.6% with AD and 86.3% with DD) and categorical agreement between the methods was 84.9%. Inner colonies were observed during DD testing in 88.1% of EC isolates and 80.8% of KP isolates during at least one replicate, with 47.6% of EC isolates and 39.7% of KP isolates showing inner colony growth during both DD test replicates. More than 10 inner colonies were observed in 50% of EC isolates compared to 12.3% of KP isolates. Conclusion KP isolates demonstrated considerably higher FOF MIC values compared to EC, as evidenced by MIC50/90 values 4-5 dilutions higher than those for EC. The categorical agreement rate was higher among EC than KP, highlighting concerns regarding the practice of extrapolating FOF susceptibility breakpoints for EC to KP. The high frequency of inner colonies observed in DD for both species necessitates further studies to determine best practices for interpreting their relevance, fitness, and resistance in order to identify potential impacts to clinical efficacy of FOF. Disclosures Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, Merck (Grant/Research Support)Nabriva Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text

108. Selective Decay of Intact HIV-1 Proviral DNA on Antiretroviral Therapy

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.418 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S183-S183

Author(s):

Rajesh Gandhi ◽

Joshua Cyktor ◽

Ronald Bosch ◽

Hanna Mar ◽

Gregory Laird ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antiretroviral Therapy ◽

Panel Member ◽

Plasma Viremia ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Proviral Dna ◽

Hiv 1 ◽

Over Time ◽

Residual Plasma Viremia ◽

Research Grant

Abstract Background HIV-1 proviruses persist in people on antiretroviral therapy (ART) but most are defective and do not constitute a replication-competent reservoir. The decay of infected cells carrying intact compared with defective HIV-1 proviruses has not been well-defined in people on ART. Methods We separately quantified intact and defective proviruses (using an intact proviral DNA assay), residual plasma viremia, and markers of inflammation and activation in people on long-term ART. Longitudinal measurements were done at three timepoints: timepoint 1 was a median of 7.1 years on ART; timepoint 2 was a median of 3.7 years later; timepoint 3 was a median of 5.5 years after timepoint 1 and a median 12 years after starting ART (Figure 1). Figure 1: Study timepoints Results Among 40 participants tested longitudinally from a median of 7.1 years to 12 years after ART initiation, intact provirus levels declined significantly over time (median half-life 7.1 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9, 18), whereas defective provirus levels did not decrease. The median half-life of total HIV-1 DNA was 41.6 years (95% CI, 13.6, 75). When we evaluated the change in proviral DNA per year, intact proviral DNA declined significantly more (p< 0.001) than defective proviral DNA (the latter did not change) (Figure 2). The proportion of all proviruses that were intact diminished over time on ART, from about 10% at the first on-ART timepoint to about 5% at the last timepoint (Figure 3). At timepoint 1, intact provirus levels on ART correlated with total HIV-1 DNA and residual plasma viremia, but there was no evidence for associations between intact provirus levels and inflammation or immune activation. Figure 2: Percent change in HIV-1 proviral DNA per year Figure 3: Total HIV-1 proviruses (grey bars) and the percentage of intact proviruses (red lines, displaying median, Q1, Q3) by timepoint. Conclusion Cells containing intact, replication-competent proviruses are selectively lost during suppressive ART. Defining the mechanisms involved should inform strategies to accelerate HIV-1 reservoir depletion. Disclosures Rajesh Gandhi, MD, Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member) Gregory Laird, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Albine Martin, PhD, Accelevir Diagnostics (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Employee) Bernard Macatangay, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support) Joseph J. Eron, MD, Gilead Sciences (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant)ViiV Healthcare (Consultant, Research Grant or Support) Janet Siliciano, PhD, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member)US Military HIV Research Program (Advisor or Review Panel member) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio (Shareholder)Accelevir Diagnostics (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant)

Download Full-text