scholarly journals 1387. Impact of Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis on Healthcare Resource Use and Costs among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A United States Renal Data System-Medicare Linked Database Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S779-S779
Author(s):  
Amit D Raval ◽  
Michael Ganz ◽  
Priya Saravanan ◽  
Yuexin Tang ◽  
Carlos Santos

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) management requires a balance between reducing the risk of CMV infection and avoiding anti-viral toxicities. Limited information is available on the impact of CMV prophylaxis on the healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs among adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in the United States. Therefore, we examined HCRU and cost associated with CMV prophylaxis stratified by the CMV risk categories among KTRs at 1-year post-KT. Methods We identified a cohort of 22,918 adults first-time KTRs during 2011–2017 using the US Renal Data System registry-linked Medicare data. Additional inclusion criteria were to have continuous coverage in Medicare Part A & B for ≥ 6-month pre- and ≥ 12-month post KT and Medicare Part D for ≥12-month post-KT. CMV prophylaxis was confirmed as ≥ 1 prescription fill for valacyclovir/(val)ganciclovir prophylaxis doses within 28 days post-KT. Results CMV prophylaxis was utilized in 86%, 82%, and 32% of high, intermediate, and low-risk KTRs with an average cost of prophylaxis per KTRs of &16,241, &9481, and &8,648, respectively. In no prophylaxis groups, valganciclovir was utilized in 52%, 34%, and 36% of KTRs (as either pre-emptive or deferred therapy) with an average cost of &6,719, &2,722, and &431 among high, intermediate, and low-risk KTRs, respectively. Among high-risk KTRs, CMV prophylaxis group had a significantly higher prescription drug cost (&26,060 vs. &13,433) but a lower average direct healthcare medical cost (&84,914 vs. &101,268), mainly due to lower all-cause hospitalization cost (&56,758 vs. &69,852) (Table 1). CMV prophylaxis group had lower rates of all-cause rehospitalization, and CMV-and opportunistic infection (OIs)-related hospitalization compared to no prophylaxis (Table 2). In high-risk KTRs, nearly 32% had myelosuppressive events-related hospitalization, and 15% filled granulocyte colony-stimulating factors with an average cost of &4,695 per treated KTR. Conclusion CMV prophylaxis had a higher cost of medications but had a lower medical cost with including all-cause and CMV-related hospitalizations. Myelosuppressive events were frequent and resource-intensive especially in high and intermediate-risk KTRs. Disclosures Amit D. Raval, PhD, Merck and Co., Inc. (Employee) Yuexin Tang, PhD, JnJ (Other Financial or Material Support, Spouse’s employment)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S153
Author(s):  
M. Sellos-Moura ◽  
J.F. Glavin ◽  
D. Lapidus ◽  
P.T. Horn ◽  
K.A. Evans ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016930
Author(s):  
Osama O Zaidat ◽  
Marc Ribo ◽  
Heinrich Paul Mattle ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Hormozd Bozorgchami ◽  
...  

BackgroundFirst-pass effect (FPE), restoring complete or near complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3) in a single pass, is an independent predictor for good functional outcomes in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The economic implications of achieving FPE have not been assessed.ObjectiveTo assess the economic impact of achieving complete or near complete reperfusion after the first pass.MethodsPost hoc analyses were conducted using ARISE II study data. The target population consisted of patients in whom mTICI 2c–3 was achieved, stratified into two groups: (1) mTICI 2c–3 achieved after the first pass (FPE group) or (2) after multiple passes (non-FPE group). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use were compared between groups. Costs from peer-reviewed literature were applied to assess cost consequences from the perspectives of the United States (USA), France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom (UK).ResultsAmong patients who achieved mTICI 2c–3 (n=172), FPE was achieved in 53% (n=91). A higher proportion of patients in the FPE group reached good functional outcomes (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 80.46% vs 61.04%, p<0.01). The patients in the FPE group had a shorter mean length of stay (6.10 vs 9.48 days, p<0.01) and required only a single stent retriever, whereas 35% of patients in the non-FPE group required at least one additional device. Driven by improvement in clinical outcomes, the FPE group had lower procedural/hospitalization-related (24–33% reduction) and annual care (11–27% reduction) costs across all countries.ConclusionsFPE resulted in improved clinical outcomes, translating into lower healthcare resource use and lower estimated costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document