scholarly journals 29. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Unrestricted Meropenem Use Upon Transitions of Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S137-S137
Author(s):  
Noor Zaidan ◽  
Rachel S Britt ◽  
David Reynoso ◽  
Emmanuel Enwere ◽  
Kathryn Rucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Levels Of Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Surgical Unit ◽  
Continue Therapy

Abstract Background Broad-spectrum antimicrobials, like carbapenems, are often initiated empirically and can be continued for long periods of time, which may increase rates of multi-drug resistant organisms. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have been shown to decrease the duration of antimicrobial therapy. Since July 2017 at UTMB Health, meropenem use has been restricted to infectious diseases and intensive care unit (ICU) providers. This study evaluated the impact of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based ASP intervention on meropenem days of therapy (DOT) in patients transitioning from the ICU to the general floors. Methods Patients aged at least 18 years with an active medication order for meropenem upon transition from an ICU to a medical/surgical unit were included. Once transitioned, the active meropenem order appeared in the “review” column of the pharmacists’ queue. Pharmacists contacted the primary team, requested infectious diseases or ASP approval to continue therapy, and documented communication in the chart. Data for the pre- and post-intervention groups was collected retrospectively for the months of November 2017 to April 2018 and March 2020 to August 2020. The primary outcome of the study was meropenem DOT after transition from the ICU to the medical/surgical unit. Secondary outcomes of the study included meropenem total DOT, total number of meropenem doses after transfer to the medical unit, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission. Results A total of 163 patients were evaluated in both the pre-intervention (n = 87) and post-intervention groups (n = 76). Median meropenem DOT after transition of care (3 days vs. 2 days, P = 0.0004) and number of meropenem doses after transition (6 doses vs. 4 doses, P = 0.014) were significantly lower after TOC intervention implementation. However, total meropenem DOTs were not different at 5 days in both groups. Recommendations for de-escalation or discontinuation were accepted 60% of the time among providers. Conclusion An EMR-based ASP intervention did decrease meropenem DOT after patients were transitioned from the ICU to the medical/surgical floors. Results of the meropenem EMR-based ASP intervention may be used to expand to other broad-spectrum antimicrobials/antifungals in patients transitioning levels of care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Evaluating a Pharmacy-Driven 72-Hour Antibiotic Monitoring Program Implemented in a Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
pp. 001857871986766
Author(s):  
Vishal Patel ◽  
Shaina Doyen
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Broad Spectrum Antibiotic ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs commonly utilize infectious diseases pharmacists to guide appropriate utilization of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Strategies should be developed to increase staff pharmacist’s participation in decreasing broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacy-driven 72-hour antimicrobial stewardship initiative. Methods: A pharmacy-driven 72-hour antibiotic review policy was implemented at a community hospital. Targeted antibiotics included ertapenem, meropenem, and daptomycin. The hospital’s infectious diseases pharmacist provided policy education to staff pharmacists. All pharmacists provided prospective audit and feedback to physicians. Preimplementation and postimplementation data were collected through a retrospective chart review to analyze the impact of the initiative. Results: There were a total of 570 targeted antibiotic orders for review, of which 155 antibiotic orders met criteria for inclusion; 97 in the preimplementation group and 58 in the postimplementation group. Targeted antibiotic orders decreased postimplementation during the study period. Days of therapy per 1000 patient days decreased between the 2 groups, although this was statistically significant neither for the pooled targeted antibiotics nor for each individual antibiotic. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of appropriately prescribed targeted antibiotics from preimplementation compared to postimplementation (from 35% to 64%, P < .01). Pharmacist interventions documented for patients receiving the targeted antibiotics increased significantly during the intervention period ( P < .01). In addition, there was a total of $28 795.96 in cost avoidance based on the difference in antibiotic use between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Implementation of a pharmacy-driven 72-hour broad-spectrum antibiotic review in a large community-based hospital resulted in a reduction in utilization and hospital spending and a significant increase in appropriate use of targeted antibiotics, while also increasing pharmacist engagement with antimicrobial stewardship.

scholarly journals 114. Optimization of Inpatient Antibiotic Use via an Electronic Antimicrobial Stewardship Module and an Infectious Diseases Pharmacy Resident

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S171-S171
Author(s):  
Victor Chen ◽  
Lauren Allen ◽  
Hongkai Bao ◽  
Kelsie Cowman ◽  
Priya Nori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Cost Reduction ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Antibiotic resistance is a public health crisis and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacists serve a crucial role in preventing inappropriate use. At Montefiore Medical Center (1,500-bed hospital), a new electronic medical record AMS module was implemented with assistance from an infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy resident in October 2020. The module utilizes a dynamic scoring system to assist in prioritizing interventions, including bug-drug mismatches, insufficient coverage, or de-escalation. The AMS module is operationalized by ID pharmacists during the week and an ID pharmacy resident every other weekend. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an ID pharmacy resident performing AMS module interventions on broad spectrum antibiotic use. Methods An observational study of AMS module interventions on antibiotic use (AU) in days of therapy per 1,000 days present and standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) was performed. AU data for piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T) and SAAR prior to (October 2019– December 2019) and after (October 2020 – December 2020) the integration of an ID pharmacy resident and the AMS module was compared. Additional data collected included total number and type of interventions. Results A total of 539 interventions were made by AMS pharmacists and 36.5% of these were completed by the ID pharmacy resident. Across 6 different units, there was a statistically significant decrease in the SAAR for broad spectrum antibacterial agents (Figure 1), and a decrease of at least 10% in P/T use during the two different time periods (Table 1). An estimated P/T cost reduction of 26% of (&48,708 to &36,235.80) was observed. AMS pharmacists made 63 interventions in respective units. The top three intervention types were dose/frequency/duration recommendations, pharmacokinetic vancomycin dosing/monitoring, and de-escalation. The acceptance rate of interventions was 99% (534 accepted interventions/539 total interventions). Figure 1. SAAR Comparison of Broad-Spectrum Agents Table 1. AU Rate of Piperacillin-tazobactam Conclusion Overall, there was a statistically significant impact on SAARs and a &gt;10% change in P/T AU rate with an estimated cost reduction &gt;25% on select units after implementation of the AMS module with an ID pharmacy resident. Disclosures Kelsie Cowman, MPH, Merck (Research Grant or Support) Priya Nori, MD, Merck (Grant/Research Support) Priya Nori, MD, Nothing to disclose Yi Guo, PharmD, BCIDP, Merck (Research Grant or Support)

scholarly journals Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D Robinson ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Lindsay E Donohue ◽  
Megan D Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. Results Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P &lt; .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P &lt; .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P &lt; .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Conclusions While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals 102. Effects of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-guided MRSA Nasal Screening Review on Vancomycin Utilization for Respiratory Infections: A Quasi-Experimental Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S65-S65
Author(s):  
Ross Pineda ◽  
Meganne Kanatani ◽  
Jaime Deville
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a significant pathogen in patients with respiratory infections. Guidelines recommend empiric MRSA coverage in patients at increased risk, resulting in substantial vancomycin use. Recent literature highlights the use of MRSA nasal assays as a rapid screening tool for MRSA pneumonia, demonstrating high negative predictive values and allowing for shorter empiric coverage. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MRSA nasal screening review by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on vancomycin utilization for respiratory infections. Methods This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study. The intervention saw the addition of an MRSA screening review tool into the ASP electronic record, highlighting patients on vancomycin (actively or recently administered) with a negative MRSA screening. Vancomycin days of therapy (DOT) was collected for all orders indicated for a respiratory infection in the two weeks following a negative screening. Additional outcomes include vancomycin total dose and DOT per 1,000 patient days. Outcomes were compared via independent samples t-tests. Results 1,110 MRSA screenings resulted across 2 months, of which the majority were excluded for either not having vancomycin ordered, or for having vancomycin ordered for a non-respiratory indication, leaving 37 and 35 evaluable screenings in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Regarding vancomycin DOT, we did not identify a significant difference between pre- and post-intervention groups with respective means of 2.45 (SD=1.52) and 2.14 (SD=1.12) (p=0.35). We identified a total 8.78 vancomycin DOT per 1,000 patient days in the pre-intervention group versus 6.69 in the post-intervention group. Conclusion ASP-guided review of MRSA screenings was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mean vancomycin DOT and lower total DOT per 1,000 patient days for respiratory infections following a negative screen. Given the recent implementation of our intervention, our analysis covered a small sample size, highlighting the need for continued data collection. MRSA screenings are not always fully or immediately utilized in our institution, demonstrating room to de-escalate MRSA-targeted antibiotics. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1092. Impact of Relieving Infectious Diseases Fellows from Off-Hour/Weekend Antimicrobial Stewardship Coverage

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S388-S388
Author(s):  
Matthew S L Lee ◽  
Ryan Chapin ◽  
Howard Gold ◽  
Christopher McCoy
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Dose Interval ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Interval Optimization ◽  
Fellowship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Choice Of Therapy

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) often utilize Infectious Diseases fellows (IDFs) to cover pre-authorization processes during evening and weekend hours. IDFs often provide ASP coverage in addition to their inpatient consult roles. In response to increasing consult volume, we worked with our fellowship program to relieve IDFs of evening and weekend coverage (a decrease in fellow coverage by 26 hours per week) starting in October 2017. Members of the ASP assumed the majority of these evening and weekend hours. Additional post-prescriptive activities and a rotation in Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship were implemented in response. We sought to analyze the impact of this intervention. Methods Intervention and medication data were extracted from the electronic medical record during 1 July 2017 through 30 September of 2017 (IDF Coverage) and the same 3 months of 2018 (ASP Coverage). Comparisons between the two periods were performed using descriptive statistics of the number of interventions, number of weekend interventions, types of interventions, and days of therapy (DOT; per 1000 patient-days). Results Comparing July-September of 2017 and 2018, total ASP interventions increased 16% (1192 to 1391); weekend ASP interventions increased 75% (139 to 243). The most common interventions were “Choice of Therapy” (41% in both years), “De-Escalation” (17% in 2017, 16% in 2018), and “Dose/Interval Optimization” (10% in both years). The most intervened agents were piperacillin–tazobactam, cefepime, vancomycin, meropenem, and ceftazidime. Comparing the same time periods, total antibiotic DOT decreased 4% (714.1 to 684.9). There was a 28% decrease in piperacillin–tazobactam (41.47 to 29.85), 19% decrease in meropenem (28.08 to 22.61), and 7% decrease in vancomycin (125.09 to 116.17) use. Ceftazidime was unchanged (18.13 to 18.08). Cefepime increased by 9% (56.78 to 61.97). Conclusion Relieving IDFs of evening and weekend ASP coverage during busy inpatient consult rotations may help decrease burnout. The assumption of these hours by dedicated members of ASP led to an increase in documented total and weekend ASP interventions. In addition, the change was associated with a relative decrease in piperacillin–tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin use. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S368-S369
Author(s):  
April Chan ◽  
Ajay Kapur ◽  
Bradley Langford ◽  
Mark Downing
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Antibiotic Usage ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Electronic Order

Abstract Background The use of facility-specific guidelines and clinical decision-making tools are recommended by a number of organizations to improve the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial prescribing; however, how to increase usage is not clear. We evaluated the impact of embedding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) electronic order sets (EOS) into the general medicine admission EOS in the context of an established AS program. Methods The standalone EOS for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), urinary tract infection (UTI) and cellulitis were reviewed and simplified to only include the antibiotic section prior to embedding. The intervention was introduced on March 30, 2017 with pre-intervention period defined as January 1, 2016 to March 29, 2017 and post-intervention period as of March 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The primary outcome was the change in usage of embedded AS EOS compared with the corresponding standalone EOS using counts. In addition, other standalone AS EOS (i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), etc) were used as a control. The secondary outcomes were the change in antibiotic usage de-emphasized in embedded EOS (i.e., ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin) and predicted prescribing shifts to antibiotics in the embedded EOS (i.e., amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) using Days of Therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days (PD). Paired t-test was used to compare antibiotic usage pre- and post-intervention. Results The usage of standalone EOS remained similar pre- and post-intervention except for a 16-fold increased usage of CDI EOS. There were large increases in uptake of the embedded EOS compared with the standalone EOS: 11-fold () increase for CAP, 47-fold () increase for UTI and 24-fold () increase for cellulitis. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in ciprofloxacin (mean 16.6 DOT/1000-PD vs. 13.6 DOT/1000-PD, P = 0.026) and moxifloxacin usage (mean 9.3 DOT/1000-PD vs. 5.2 DOT/1000-PD) during the study time period. Conclusion Our study showed that simplifying AS EOS and embedding these into a more commonly used EOS is associated with a significant increase in EOS usage and uptake of AS recommended empiric antibiotics with a decrease in fluoroquinolone usage. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 1877. Evaluation of Antibiotic Utilization After Introduction of a Dedicated Infectious Diseases-Critical Care Medicine Service in Critical Care Units

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S48-S48
Author(s):  
Polina Trachuk ◽  
Vagish Hemmige ◽  
Victor Chen ◽  
Gregory Weston ◽  
Kelsie Cowman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Critical Care Medicine ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Broad Spectrum Antibiotics ◽  
Antibiotic Utilization ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Infection is a leading cause of admission to intensive care units (ICU), with critically ill patients often receiving a high volume of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nevertheless, a dedicated infectious diseases (ID) consultation and stewardship team is not routinely implemented. An ID-Critical Care Medicine (ID-CCM) pilot program was designed at a large tertiary hospital in which an ID attending was assigned to participate in daily rounds with the ICU team, as well as provide an ID consult on select patients. We sought to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ID consultation and stewardship program on antibiotic utilization in the ICU. Methods This is an IRB-approved single-site retrospective study. We analyzed antibiotic utilization in the ICU during the post-intervention period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 and compared it to antibiotic utilization in the same ICU during the pre-intervention period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. Using Poisson regression analysis, we evaluated antibiotic utilization of each agent, expressed as days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days, between the two groups. Results The six most commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotic agents were included in the final analysis. During the intervention period, statistically significant reductions were seen in cefepime (131 vs. 101 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.01), piperacillin-tazobactam (268 vs. 251 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.02) and vancomycin (265 vs. 228 DOT per 1,000 patient-days, P = 0.01). The utilization of other antibiotics including daptomycin, linezolid, and meropenem did not differ significantly (Figure 1). Conclusion With this multidisciplinary intervention, we saw a decrease in the use of the most frequently administered broad-spectrum antibiotics. Our study shows that the implementation of an ID-CCM service is a feasible way to promote antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and can be used as a strategy to reduce unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum agents. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals 1044. Impact of Interdisciplinary Rounds on Antimicrobial Use at a Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S368-S368
Author(s):  
Emma Castillo ◽  
Luke Heuts ◽  
Elizabeth Dodds Ashley ◽  
Rebekah W Moehring ◽  
Michael E Yarrington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Post Intervention Period ◽  
Interdisciplinary Rounds ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) implementation is challenging in resource-limited settings such as smaller community hospitals that may lack dedicated personnel resources or have limited access to infectious diseases experts with dedicated time for AS. Few studies have evaluated the impact of interdisciplinary rounds as a strategy to optimize antimicrobial use (AU) in the community hospital setting. Methods We evaluated the impact of interdisciplinary rounds in a 280-bed acute care nonteaching, community hospital with an established ASP. The primary outcome was facility-wide antibiotic utilization pre- and post-implementation. Rounds included key healthcare personnel (hospitalists, clinical pharmacists, case managers, nurses) reviewing all patients on inpatient wards Monday through Friday, with a discussion of diagnosis, antibiotic selection, dosing, duration, and anticipated discharge plans. AU was compared for a 7-month post-intervention period (June 1, 2018–December 31, 2018) vs. similar months in 2017 based on days of therapy (DOT)/1,000 patient-days and length of therapy (LOT) per antimicrobial use admission. In addition, trends in AU for the post-intervention period were compared with the previous 17 months (January 1, 2017–May 31, 2018) using segmented binomial regression. Results Interdisciplinary rounds incorporating AS principles was associated with a decrease in overall AU in this facility, with a significant decrease of 16.33% (P < 0.0001) in DOT/1,000 pd in the first month and was stable (decrease of 1.1% per month, P = 0.15) thereafter (Figure 1). There was no significant change in LOT/admission after the first month of the intervention, but the trend demonstrated a 2% per month decrease (P < 0.03) thereafter (Figure 2). Comparing 2018 intervention months with similar months of 2017, the use of antibacterial agents decreased on average by 191.3 (95% CI −128.2 to −254.4) DOT/1,000 patient-days (Figure 3) and 0.546 (95% CI: −0.28 to −0.81) days per admission (Figure 4). Conclusion In this community hospital with an existing antimicrobial stewardship program, implementation of interdisciplinary rounds was associated with a substantial decrease in antimicrobial use. This was sustained for at least a 7-month period. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 83. Staff Pharmacist-driven Prospective Audit and Feedback at a Community Hospital: Assessing an all Hands on Deck Approach to Antimicrobial Stewardship

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S58-S59
Author(s):  
Casey J Dempsey ◽  
Natasha Weiner ◽  
Michele Riccardi ◽  
Kristin Linder
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Small Community ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Feedback Program

Abstract Background Facilities with robust antimicrobial stewardship programs often have infectious disease (ID) pharmacists with devoted time to complete antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Smaller facilities with limited resources or lacking ID pharmacists, may encounter challenges meeting antimicrobial stewardship regulatory requirements. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective audit and feedback program in a small community hospital. Methods A pre- and post-intervention study was performed to assess the primary outcome of days of therapy per 1,000 patient days (DOT) for targeted antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime). Secondary outcomes were antibiotic expenditures and rates of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results Significant decreases in DOT were observed for piperacillin/tazobactam (29.88 vs. 9.25; p &lt; 0.001), ciprofloxacin (23.22 vs. 9.97; p &lt; 0.001), levofloxacin (11.2 vs. 5.07; p &lt; 0.001) and overall antipseudomonal DOT (62.91 vs. 51.67; p &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in ceftazidime DOT (8.75 vs. 6.47; p= 0.083) and an increase in cefepime DOT (20.47 vs. 34.35; p &lt; 0.001). A trend towards decreased rates of CDI was seen (4.9/10,000 patient days vs. 2.64/10,000 patient days; p= 0.931). There were significant decreases in antibiotic expenditures for piperacillin/tazobactam ($52,498 vs. $10,937; p &lt; 0.001), levofloxacin ($2,168 vs. $672; p &lt; 0.001), ciprofloxacin ($6,700 vs. $1,954; p &lt; 0.001). Lower expenditures for ceftazidime were seen ($9,952 vs. $7,457; p= 0.29). Cefepime expenditures increased ($25,638 vs. $40,097; p= 0.001). An overall decrease in the expenditure for the targeted antibiotics was seen ($95,715 vs. $62,837; p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective authorization and feedback program led to a significant decrease in DOT and antibiotic expenditures for several targeted antibiotics and a trend towards decreased rates of CDI. Despite increased DOT and expenditures for cefepime, there was an overall decrease amongst the targeted antibiotics. With proper implementation, staff pharmacists can significantly benefit antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1075. The Impact of Physician Peer Comparison of a Novel Inpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric: the Start-Stop Ratio (SSR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S381-S381
Author(s):  
Stacy Volk ◽  
Michelle Fagenstrom
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
High Ratio ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Diagnostic Uncertainty ◽  
Open Disclosure ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The 48-hour “Antibiotic Timeout” (ATO), one of the CDC’s interventions defined in the Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP), has not reliably proven to impact inpatient antibiotic use. Given the reported history of utilizing peer-comparison data to change prescribing behavior, it was hypothesized that open disclosure of individual inpatient antibiotic start-stop ratios (SSR) would be an effective tool to increase prescribers’ tendency to (1) observe patients off antibiotics upon admission while pursuing treatments perceived more likely to provide syndromic resolution and (2) discontinue antibiotics in the setting of diagnostic uncertainty at 48 hours, or possibly even earlier, without introducing harm. Methods In a community, nonteaching hospital, all adult systemic antibiotic orders initiated by an inpatient hospitalist with at least one administration during the baseline period of January - March of 2018 were retrieved. A prescriber-specific count of all antibiotic orders (“starts”) and discontinuations (“stops”) was collected. Each provider received a document with their baseline SSR compared with the group SSR and was assigned a visual cue that corresponded to the quartile in which they performed at baseline. The same antibiotic data were then collected and evaluated for the post-intervention period of February–April 2019 to determine whether open disclosure of inpatient SSRs impacted antibiotic prescribing. Results Of 19 providers that were included in both study periods, there was no significant difference in the pre- and post-intervention SSR (1.93 to 2.09, P = 0.19). However, in the pre-intervention high-ratio target group (n = 10) for whom we felt open SSR reporting would impact the most, the SSR decreased from 2.41 to 2.26 (P = 0.24). In the entire study population, 68% of providers had a reduction or no change in their SSR. Overall facility-wide antibiotic utilization decreased from 561 to 478 days of therapy per 1,000 days present (P < 0.05). Conclusion Open reporting of antibiotic SSRs to an inpatient provider group may be utilized as an ASP tool to reduce overall inpatient antibiotic consumption, especially by providers that are found to be high-ratio prescribers at baseline. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document