scholarly journals 775Nosocomial Influenza (NI) in cancer patients during a high activity season in Mexico City

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S219-S219
Author(s):  
Diana Vilar-Compte ◽  
Carolina Perez-Jimenez ◽  
Alexandra Martin-Onraet ◽  
Patricia Cornejo-Juarez ◽  
Marco Antonio Lopez-Velazquez ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1235-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Avilés-Robles ◽  
Rohit P. Ojha ◽  
Miriam González ◽  
Karla Ojeda-Diezbarroso ◽  
Elisa Dorantes-Acosta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Indira Judith Arreguín-González ◽  
Farina Esther Arreguín-González ◽  
Andrea López-Soule ◽  
Delfino Eduardo Ordaz-Velázquez ◽  
Juan Miguel Salgado-Ramírez

Aim: Determine if childhood cancer patients suffer bullying and identify its causes Compare what patients say about bullying, when they are alone versus presence of their parents. Method: We studied 47 childhood cancer patients ages varied between 5 and 17 years old. With previous parental authorization we applied a questionnaire called “That´s how we hang out at school” in two moments, first one in presence of their parents, and the second one without them. Results: Scholar childhood cancer survivors suffer bullying in 89.4%, in contrast with 25.8% of children without cancer suffered bullying according to literature. Secquelae and alopecia were the main causes for bullying, also teacher´s and Student´s lack of knowledge thinking that cancer is contagious. We also observed that children accepted being bullied in presence of the doctor, but not in front of their parents. Conclusion: Childhood cancer patients are more harassed than children without cancer due to secqueale, atipya or consumption that they present, also, fear of contagion enhances harassment and lack of teacher´s intervention. Children deny being bullied in front of their parents, but accept it without them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Indira Judith Arreguín-González ◽  
Farina Esther Arreguín-González ◽  
Andrea López-Soule ◽  
Delfino Eduardo Ordaz-Velázquez ◽  
Juan Miguel Salgado-Ramírez

Aim: Determine if childhood cancer patients suffer bullying and identify its causes Compare what patients say about bullying, when they are alone versus presence of their parents. Method: We studied 47 childhood cancer patients ages varied between 5 and 17 years old. With previous parental authorization we applied a questionnaire called “That´s how we hang out at school” in two moments, first one in presence of their parents, and the second one without them. Results: Scholar childhood cancer survivors suffer bullying in 89.4%, in contrast with 25.8% of children without cancer suffered bullying according to literature. Secquelae and alopecia were the main causes for bullying, also teacher´s and Student´s lack of knowledge thinking that cancer is contagious. We also observed that children accepted being bullied in presence of the doctor, but not in front of their parents. Conclusion: Childhood cancer patients are more harassed than children without cancer due to secqueale, atipya or consumption that they present, also, fear of contagion enhances harassment and lack of teacher´s intervention. Children deny being bullied in front of their parents, but accept it without them.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1547-1554
Author(s):  
Víctor Granados-García ◽  
Patricia Piña-Sánchez ◽  
Nancy Reynoso-Noveron ◽  
Yvonne N Flores ◽  
Filiberto Toledano-Toledano ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 221s-221s
Author(s):  
K. Unger-Saldaña ◽  
A. Alvarez-Meneses ◽  
D. Isla-Ortiz

Background: Even though cancer of the cervix uteri is a preventable and highly curable disease, in Mexico it is the second cause of cancer mortality among women. According to the last National Survey of Health and Nutrition (2012) , Papanicolaou test screening coverage in Mexico is estimated at 45%. Additionally, studies have revealed quality problems in the taking and interpretation of Papanicolaou test tests and a lack of follow-up in ∼60% of women with positive Pap smears. To date there is no information on the time intervals of care for cervical cancer patients in Mexico. Aims: To quantify the intervals of care from the detection of a possible cervical cancer to the beginning of cancer treatment, describe the form of presentation and identify perceived barriers to timely care. Methods: We surveyed 427 patients that received a new cervical cancer diagnosis between 6.01.16 and 5.31.17 in the 2 largest public hospitals located in Mexico City available for uninsured cancer patients. Approximately 2/3 patients reside in Mexico City metropolitan area and 1/3 in surrounding states. All patients signed informed consent. Participants' medical files were reviewed. We gathered data on: dates necessary to estimate the intervals of care, sociodemographic characteristics, form of cancer identification (symptoms vs screening), perceived barriers of care and cancer clinical stage. Results: Clinical stages at diagnosis were: 9.5% in situ, 16.9% stage I, 25.2% stage II, 20.2% stage III, 17.8% stage IV and 10.5% not known. The median duration of the patient interval (time between symptom discovery and first medical consultation) was 24 days (IQR = 5.5-72), in comparison with 175 days (IQR = 101-272) for the health system interval (time between first medical consultation and treatment start). The diagnosis interval (first consultation to diagnosis) had a median duration of 99 days (IQR = 43-204) and the treatment interval (time between diagnosis and treatment start) a median of 57 days (IQR = 37-78). Only 15% (64/427) patients identified the problem through screening. The most common symptom of presentation was vaginal bleeding in 65.9% (236/363) cases. The main perceived barriers of diagnostic delay were: lack of information of available health services (63%), long waiting times between appointments (52%) and diagnostic medical errors in the first services consulted (38%). Conclusion: The vast majority of cervical cancer cases among uninsured women in the Mexico City metropolitan area have symptomatic presentations. Additionally, these patients face delays of ∼6 months between the first medical consultation and the confirmation of cancer. Low coverage of screening and diagnostic delays are the most likely explanations of the high mortality rates of cervical cancer that persist in Mexico despite the 30-year implementation of the national screening program.


2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas ◽  
María Teresa Carrillo ◽  
Horacio Tovalín-Ahumada ◽  
Linda Elting

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilda Hernández Orozco ◽  
Esperanza Lucas Resendiz ◽  
Jose Luis Castañeda ◽  
Agustin De Colsa ◽  
Jaime Ramirez Mayans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document