scholarly journals Blurred Molecular Epidemiological Lines Between the Two Dominant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C Dupper ◽  
Mitchell J Sullivan ◽  
Kieran I Chacko ◽  
Aaron Mishkin ◽  
Brianne Ciferri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes life-threatening infections in both community and hospital settings and is a leading cause of health care–associated infections (HAIs). We sought to describe the molecular epidemiological landscape of patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs) at an urban medical center by evaluating the clinical characteristics associated with the two dominant endemic clones. Methods Comprehensive clinical data from the electronic health records of 227 hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with MRSA BSI over a 33-month period in New York City were collected. The descriptive epidemiology and mortality associated with the two dominant clones were compared using logistic regression. Results Molecular analysis revealed that 91% of all single-patient MRSA BSIs were due to two equally represented genotypes, clonal complex (CC) 5 (n = 117) and CC8 (n = 110). MRSA BSIs were associated with a 90-day mortality rate of 27%. CC8 caused disease more frequently in younger age groups (56 ± 17 vs 67 ± 17 years old; P < .001) and in those of nonwhite race (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51–7.87; P = .003), with few other major distinguishing features. Morbidity and mortality also did not differ significantly between the two clones. CC8 caused BSIs more frequently in the setting of peripheral intravenous catheters (OR, 5.96; 95% CI, 1.51–23.50; P = .01). Conclusions The clinical features distinguishing dominant MRSA clones continue to converge. The association of CC8 with peripheral intravenous catheter infections underscores the importance of classical community clones causing hospital-onset infections. Ongoing monitoring and analysis of the dynamic epidemiology of this endemic pathogen are crucial to inform management and prevent disease.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Dupper ◽  
Mitchell J. Sullivan ◽  
Kieran I. Chacko ◽  
Aaron Mishkin ◽  
Brianne Ciferri ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes life-threatening infections in both community and hospital settings and is a leading cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We sought to describe the molecular epidemiological landscape of patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs) at an urban medical center by evaluating the clinical characteristics associated with the two dominant endemic clones.MethodsComprehensive clinical data extraction from the electronic health records of 227 hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with MRSA BSI over a 33-month period in New York City were collected. The descriptive epidemiology and mortality associated with the two dominant clones was compared using logistic regression.ResultsMolecular analysis revealed that 91% of all single-patient MRSA BSIs were due to two equally represented genotypes, clonal complex (CC) 5 (N=117) and CC8 (N=110). MRSA BSIs were associated with a 90-day mortality of 27%. CC8 caused disease more frequently in younger age groups (56 ± 17 vs 67 ± 17 years old; p<0.001) and in non-White race (OR=3.45 95% CI [1.51-7.87]; p=0.003), with few other major distinguishing features. Morbidity and mortality also did not differ significantly between the two clones. CC8 caused BSIs more frequently in the setting of peripheral intravenous catheters (OR=5.96; 95% CI [1.51-23.50]; p=0.01).ConclusionThe clinical features distinguishing dominant MRSA clones continue to converge. The association of CC8 with peripheral intravenous catheter infections underscores the importance of classical community clones causing hospital-onset infections. Ongoing monitoring and analysis of the dynamic epidemiology of this endemic pathogen is crucial to inform management to prevent disease.


Author(s):  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Abdalhamid M Lagnf ◽  
Taylor Morrisette ◽  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) management remains challenging for clinicians. Numerous in vitro studies report synergy when vancomycin (VAN)/daptomycin (DAP) were combined with beta-lactams (BL), which has led to clinical implementation of these combinations. While shorter durations of bacteremia have often been reported, there has been no significant impact on mortality. Methods The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) developed and implemented a clinical pathway algorithm for MRSA BSI treatment in 2016 that included the early use of BL combination therapy with standard-of-care (VAN or DAP) and a mandatory infectious diseases consultation. This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study at the DMC between 2013-2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between pathway implementation and 30-day mortality while adjusting for confounding variables. Results Overall, 813 adult patients treated for MRSA BSI were evaluated. Compared to pre-pathway (PRE) patients (n=379), those treated post-pathway (POST) (n=434) had a significant reduction in 30-day and 90-day mortality; 9.7% in POST vs. 15.6% in PRE (p=0.011) and 12.2% in POST vs. 19.0% in PRE (p=0.007), respectively. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in the PRE compared to POST; 9.6% vs. 7.2% (p=0.282), respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables including infectious diseases consult, POST was independently associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.608; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.375-0.986). Conclusions Implementation of a MRSA BSI treatment pathway with early use of BL reduced mortality with no increased in AKI. Further prospective evaluation of this pathway approach is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S582-S582
Author(s):  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Abdulhamid Lagnf ◽  
Evan J Zasowski ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Persistent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the treatment of choice for invasive MRSA BSI. Current guidelines for the treatment of MRSA BSI recommend a VAN AUC24h/MIC ratio ≥400. The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) implemented an AUC guided dosing strategy. However, data on the association between AUC24h and clinical outcomes in MRSA BSI are limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between VAN AUC24h and persistent bacteremia (PB) among patients with BSI. Methods Multi-center, retrospective cohort study from January 2015 to November 2018. We included adult patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with VAN for which AUC24h monitoring was performed. AUC was measured using 2-level guided dosing. The primary outcome was PB defined as continued positive cultures >72 hours after VAN initiation. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine the AUC24h breakpoint (BP) most predictive of PB in the cohort. Mann–Whitney and Fischer exact tests were used for univariate analysis. The independent association between AUC24h, dichotomized at the CART-derived cut-point, was then examined through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results Overall, 137 patients were included. The median age was 59 (18–85) years, 69.3% male, and 75.2% African American predominance. Most common sources of BSI were skin/soft tissue (39.4%), pneumonia (25.5%), and osteoarticular (16.8%). The median APACHE II score was 13 (8–20). Median time to microbiological clearance was 2.5 days (0.5–12). Patients with AUC24h ≤ 406.25 were more likely to have PB compared with those with AUC24h > 406.25 (59.4% and 35.2%, respectively; P = 0.002). After controlling for age, intensive care stay, and concomitant β-lactam therapy; AUC of ≤ 406.25 (aOR 2.767, 95% CI 1.212–6.318) and endocarditis (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.079–7.638) were independently associated with PB. Conclusion VAN AUC24h BP of <406.25 was independently associated with PB in patients with MRSA BSI. Our findings underscore the importance of VAN dose optimization to achieve timely bacterial clearance in MRSA bacteremia. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Katarina Pomorska ◽  
Vladislav Jakubu ◽  
Lucia Malisova ◽  
Marta Fridrichova ◽  
Martin Musilek ◽  
...  

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major causes of bloodstream infections. The aim of our study was to characterize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from blood of patients hospitalized in the Czech Republic between 2016 and 2018. All MRSA strains were tested for antibiotic susceptibility, analyzed by spa typing and clustered using a Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP) algorithm. The representative isolates of the four most common spa types and representative isolates of all spa clonal complexes were further typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. The majority of MRSA strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin (94%), erythromycin (95.5%) and clindamycin (95.6%). Among the 618 strains analyzed, 52 different spa types were detected. BURP analysis divided them into six different clusters. The most common spa types were t003, t586, t014 and t002, all belonging to the CC5 (clonal complex). CC5 was the most abundant MLST CC of our study, comprising of 91.7% (n = 565) of spa-typeable isolates. Other CCs present in our study were CC398, CC22, CC8, CC45 and CC97. To our knowledge, this is the biggest nationwide study aimed at typing MRSA blood isolates from the Czech Republic.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S144
Author(s):  
Michelle Vu ◽  
Kenneth Smith ◽  
Sherrie L Aspinall ◽  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Deanna Buehrle

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. We compared cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens as MRSAB treatment. Methods We estimated cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/daptomycin, dalbavancin) for Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation at 7-days. Results In base-case analyses, linezolid and daptomycin were less expensive and had fewer treatment failures than other regimens at 4 and 6-weeks. Compared to linezolid, daptomycin incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were ~$45,000 (4-weeks) and ~$61,000 (6-weeks) per composite failure avoided, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analyses, daptomycin (4-weeks) was favored over linezolid if linezolid microbiological failure or ADE-related discontinuation rates were &gt;14.8% (base case: 14.0%) or &gt;14.3% (base case: 14.0%), respectively, assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/ composite treatment failure avoided. Vancomycin was favored if its microbiological failure risk was &lt; 16.4% (base case: 27.2%). In two-way sensitivity analyses, daptomycin was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were &gt;19% and &gt; 16%, respectively. Linezolid, daptomycin and vancomycin were favored in 47%, 39%, and 11% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP. Conclusion Daptomycin or linezolid are likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed to support safety of linezolid in MRSAB patients. Disclosures Cornelius J. Clancy, MD, Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Melinta (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Needham Associates (Consultant)Qpex (Consultant)Scynexis (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)


Author(s):  
Evan J Zasowski ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
Kimberly C Claeys ◽  
Abdalhamid M Lagnf ◽  
Sahil Bhatia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Observational data suggest ceftaroline may be effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) but comparative data with standard of care are limited. This analysis compares the outcomes of MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients with MRSA BSI from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with ≥ 72 hours of ceftaroline or daptomycin were included. Those clearing BSI before study drug and those with a pneumonia source were excluded. The primary outcome was composite treatment failure, defined as 30-day mortality, BSI duration ≥ 7 days on study drug, and 60-day MRSA BSI recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighted risk difference in composite failure between daptomycin and ceftaroline groups was computed and 15% non-inferiority margin applied. Results Two hundred seventy patients were included; 83 ceftaroline and 187 daptomycin. Ceftaroline was non-inferior to daptomycin with respect to composite failure [39% daptomycin, 32.5% ceftaroline; weighted risk difference (95% CI) 7.0% (-5.0 – 19.0%)]. No differences between treatment groups was observed for 30-day mortality or other secondary efficacy outcomes. Creatine phosphokinase elevation was significantly more common among daptomycin patients (5.3% vs 0%, P = 0.034). Rash was significantly more common among ceftaroline patients (10.8 vs 1.1%, P = 0.001). Conclusions No difference in treatment failure or mortality was observed between MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. These data support future study of ceftaroline as a primary MRSA BSI treatment and current use of ceftaroline when an alternative to vancomycin and daptomycin is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document