scholarly journals Staphylococcus aureus - selective reporting of antibiogram results and its impact on antibiotic use: Interventional study with a reference group on the effect of switching from non-selective to selective antibiotic reporting

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franka Lestin-Bernstein ◽  
Ramona Harberg ◽  
Ingo Schumacher ◽  
Lutz Briedigkeit ◽  
Oliver Heese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Selective Reporting ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies worldwide focus on optimising the use of antibiotics. Selective susceptibility reporting is recommended as an effective AMS tool although there is a lack of representative studies investigating the impact of selective susceptibility reporting on antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of selective susceptibility reporting of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) on antibiotic consumption. Enhancing the use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics such as flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin is one of the main goals in optimising antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections. Methods This interventional study with control group was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Germany. During the one-year interventional period susceptibility reports for all methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) were restricted to flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, gentamicin and rifampin/fosfomycin, instead of reporting all tested antibiotics. The impact of implementing selective reporting was analysed by monitoring total monthly antibiotic consumption in our hospital and in a reference hospital (recommended daily dose/100 occupied bed days: RDD/100 BD), as well as on an individual patient level by analysing days of therapy adjusted for bed days (DOT/ 100 BD) for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) and respectively skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Results MSSA-antibiograms were acquired for 2836 patients. The total use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactams more than doubled after implementing selective reporting (from 1.2 to 2.8 RDD/100 BD, P < 0.001). The use of intravenous flucloxacillin/cefazolin for SAB rose significantly from 52 to 75 DOT/100 BD (plus 42%), just as the use of oral cefalexin for SSTI (from 1.4 to 9.4 DOT/100 BD, from 3 to 17 of 85/88 patients). Considering the overall consumption, there was no decrease in antibiotics omitted from the antibiogram. This was probably due to their wide use for other infections. Conclusions As narrow-spectrum beta-lactams are not widely used for other infections, their increase in the overall consumption of the entire hospital was a strong indicator that selective reporting guided clinicians to an optimised antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections. On a patient level, this assumption was verified by a significant improved treatment of S. aureus infections in the subgroups of SAB and SSTI. As useful AMS tool, we recommend implementing selective reporting rules into the national/international standards for susceptibility reporting.

scholarly journals Staphylococcus Aureus: Selective Reporting of Antibiogram Results and Its Impact on Antibiotic Use. Interventional Study with a Reference Group on the Effect of Switching from Non-Selective to Selective Antibiotic Reporting

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franka Lestin-Bernstein ◽  
Ramona Harberg ◽  
Ingo Schumacher ◽  
Lutz Briedigkeit ◽  
Oliver Heese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Selective Reporting ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Beta Lactams ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background:Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies worldwide focus on optimised antibiotic use. Selective susceptibility reporting is recommended as an effective AMS tool, although there is a lack of representative studies investigating the impact of selective susceptibility reporting on antibiotic use.The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of selective susceptibility reporting of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) on antibiotic consumption. Enhancing the use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics such as flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin is one of the main goals in optimising antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections.Methods:This interventional study with control group was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Germany. During the one-year interventional period, susceptibility reports for all methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) were restricted to flucloxacillin/cefazolin/oral cefalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, gentamicin and rifampin/fosfomycin; instead of reporting all tested antibiotics during the year before the intervention and in the reference clinic. The impact of the intervention was analysed by monitoring antibiotic consumption (recommended daily dose/100 occupied bed days: RDD/100 BD).Results:MSSA-antibiograms were reported for 2836 patients. Total use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactams more than doubled during the intervention (from 1.2 to 2.8 RDD/100 BD, P<0.001; P<0.001 compared to the reference clinic); the percentage of total antibiotic use increased from 2.6% to 6.2%. A slight, but significant increase in the use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was also observed (+ 0.37 RDD/100 BD).There was no decrease in antibiotics withdrawn from the antibiogram, probably as a consequence of their wide use for indications other than S. aureus infections.Conclusions:As narrow-spectrum beta-lactams are not widely used for other infections, there is a strong indication that selective reporting guided clinicians to optimised antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections.As useful AMS tool, we recommend implementing selective reporting rules into the national/international standards for susceptibility reporting.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Consumption in the Latvian Teaching Hospital 2000-2008

2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 253-256
Author(s):  
Elīna Dimiņa ◽  
Mārtiņš Akermanis ◽  
Uga Dumpis
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Resistance Selection ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Multiresistant Bacteria ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Impact

Antibiotic Consumption in the Latvian Teaching Hospital 2000-2008 Antibiotics are one of the most commonly used drugs in hospital care and significantly contribute to healthcare costs. Recently, there has been significant interest raised on the environmental impact of antibiotic use, in particular on how it effects resistance selection pressure. Rapid global spread of multiresistant bacteria requires improved understanding on how changes in antibiotic use affect resistance selection. We present a unique study on antibiotic consumption and its trends over an eight-year period. Data were obtained from the pharmaceutical database system. The study period extended from January 2000 through December 2008. Antibiotic use was expressed as a rate — defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100) in a quarter year. The total amount of antibiotics used for systemic treatment at the beginning of the period (first quarter of 2000) was 38.7 DDD per 100 bed days and increased to 72.6 DDD per 100 bed days (r = 0.81) by the 4th quarter of 2008. Despite variability during the study period, a significant trend was observed with an average increase of 0.97 (95% CI: 1.2; 3.2) per quarter. Penicillin was the most common antibiotic group used at the hospital in the study period and demonstrated the greatest increase in consumption (r = 0.92). The consumption rates of fluoroquinolones were high and also showed a significant increase (r = 0.76). We observed a significant increase of antibiotic consumption in our hospital during the study period, which lacked a clear explanation. This increase was mostly due to increased use of amoxicillinum/enzyme inhibitor and ceftriaxone. Analysis of consumption should be continued to assess the impact of educational interventions.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Reduction Campaigns Do Not Necessarily Decrease Bacterial Resistance: the Example of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 4410-4416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Kardaś-Słoma ◽  
Pierre-Yves Boëlle ◽  
Lulla Opatowski ◽  
Didier Guillemot ◽  
Laura Temime
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Antibiotic Prescription ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Prescription Changes

ABSTRACTInterventions designed to reduce antibiotic consumption are under way worldwide. While overall reductions are often achieved, their impact on the selection of antibiotic-resistant selection cannot be assessed accurately from currently available data. We developed a mathematical model of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MSSA and MRSA) transmission inside and outside the hospital. A systematic simulation study was then conducted with two objectives: to assess the impact of antibiotic class-specific changes during an antibiotic reduction period and to investigate the interactions between antibiotic prescription changes in the hospital and the community. The model reproduced the overall reduction in MRSA frequency in French intensive-care units (ICUs) with antibiotic consumption in France from 2002 to 2003 as an input. However, the change in MRSA frequency depended on which antibiotic classes changed the most, with the same overall 10% reduction in antibiotic use over 1 year leading to anywhere between a 69% decrease and a 52% increase in MRSA frequency in ICUs and anywhere between a 37% decrease and a 46% increase in the community. Furthermore, some combinations of antibiotic prescription changes in the hospital and the community could act in a synergistic or antagonistic way with regard to overall MRSA selection. This study shows that class-specific changes in antibiotic use, rather than overall reductions, need to be considered in order to properly anticipate the impact of an antibiotic reduction campaign. It also highlights the fact that optimal gains will be obtained by coordinating interventions in hospitals and in the community, since the effect of an intervention in a given setting may be strongly affected by exogenous factors.

scholarly journals Risk-adjusted antibiotic consumption in 34 public acute hospitals in Ireland, 2006 to 2014

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (32) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Oza ◽  
Fionnuala Donohue ◽  
Howard Johnson ◽  
Robert Cunney
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Data ◽  
Risk Adjustment ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Acute Hospitals ◽  
Consumption Rates ◽  
Hospital Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Impact

As antibiotic consumption rates between hospitals can vary depending on the characteristics of the patients treated, risk-adjustment that compensates for the patient-based variation is required to assess the impact of any stewardship measures. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of patient-based administrative data variables for adjusting aggregate hospital antibiotic consumption rates. Data on total inpatient antibiotics and six broad subclasses were sourced from 34 acute hospitals from 2006 to 2014. Aggregate annual patient administration data were divided into explanatory variables, including major diagnostic categories, for each hospital. Multivariable regression models were used to identify factors affecting antibiotic consumption. Coefficient of variation of the root mean squared errors (CV-RMSE) for the total antibiotic usage model was very good (11%), however, the value for two of the models was poor (> 30%). The overall inpatient antibiotic consumption increased from 82.5 defined daily doses (DDD)/100 bed-days used in 2006 to 89.2 DDD/100 bed-days used in 2014; the increase was not significant after risk-adjustment. During the same period, consumption of carbapenems increased significantly, while usage of fluoroquinolones decreased. In conclusion, patient-based administrative data variables are useful for adjusting hospital antibiotic consumption rates, although additional variables should also be employed.

scholarly journals Impact of national interventions to promote responsible antibiotic use: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Mingjie Lim ◽  
Shweta Rajkumar Singh ◽  
Minh Cam Duong ◽  
Helena Legido-Quigley ◽  
Li Yang Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
National Level ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Policy Interventions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Global recognition of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as an urgent public health problem has galvanized national and international efforts. Chief among these are interventions to curb the overuse and misuse of antibiotics. However, the impact of these initiatives is not fully understood, making it difficult to assess the expected effectiveness and sustainability of further policy interventions. We conducted a systematic review to summarize existing evidence for the impact of nationally enforced interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in humans. Methods We searched seven databases and examined reference lists of retrieved articles. To be included, articles had to evaluate the impact of national responsible use initiatives. We excluded studies that only described policy implementations. Results We identified 34 articles detailing interventions in 21 high- and upper-middle-income countries. Interventions addressing inappropriate antibiotic access included antibiotic committees, clinical guidelines and prescribing restrictions. There was consistent evidence that these were effective at reducing antibiotic consumption and prescription. Interventions targeting inappropriate antibiotic demand consisted of education campaigns for healthcare professionals and the general public. Evidence for this was mixed, with several studies showing no impact on overall antibiotic consumption. Conclusions National-level interventions to reduce inappropriate access to antibiotics can be effective. However, evidence is limited to high- and upper-middle-income countries, and more evidence is needed on the long-term sustained impact of interventions. There should also be a simultaneous push towards standardized outcome measures to enable comparisons of interventions in different settings.

scholarly journals 1017. Scratching the Surface with NHSN Data: Defining High Impact Stewardship Targets in Critical Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S357-S358
Author(s):  
Kelsie Cowman ◽  
Victor Chen ◽  
Nidhi Saraiya ◽  
Yi Guo ◽  
Rachel Bartash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Chart Audit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) provides risk-adjusted Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratios (SAAR) as a benchmark for medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Antibiotic use (AU) data does not provide patient-level information (e.g., antibiotic appropriateness, indications, durations, etc.). However, we hypothesize that AU data can help define high impact stewardship targets, particularly in the context of critical care Clostridioides difficile rates. Methods Units with high rates of AU and hospital-onset (HO) C. difficile were selected for review. A monthly AU and C. difficile dashboard was created for ICU providers, inclusive of data from May 2018 onwards. We also performed chart audits for indication, duration, and location of initiation for all medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) or vancomycin (Van) during February 2019 per request of ICU stakeholders. Data were used to obtain stewardship buy-in from local MICU champions. Results AU data indicated that (1) all 3 MICUs consistently had SAARs >1 for broad-spectrum categories and (2) Van and P/T were the highest volume agents on these units (Figure 1). Chart audit of 135 MICU patients showed that 17 patients received P/T, 34 Van, and 84 (62%) both agents; median duration was 2 days for Van and 3 days for P/T (Figure 2). Approximately half of initiations occurred in the emergency department (ED) (50% Van, 47% P/T); most common indications were “respiratory tract infection” and “severe sepsis/septic shock” for both P/T (77%) and Van (74%) (Figure 2). HO C. difficile in MICUs accounted for 6%, 13%, and 16% of total HO C. difficile cases in campuses A, B, and C, respectively during the time frame (Figure 1). Conclusion We feel that NHSN data scratches the surface of the deep-rooted challenges of ICU stewardship. However, it can identify AU trends and most frequently prescribed antibiotics in the context of unit-specific C. difficile rates. Intensive stewardship audit can further uncover areas for intervention, such as ED Van and P/T overprescribing. We suggest presenting clinical stakeholders with a quarterly “stewardship dashboard” combining AU rates, patient-level data, and C. difficile rates to maximize the impact of stewardship endeavors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Impact of simplified therapeutic guidelines on antibiotic prescriptions: a prospective multicentre comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-755
Author(s):  
Pierre-Marie Roger ◽  
Ingrid Peyraud ◽  
Michel Vitris ◽  
Valérie Romain ◽  
Laura Bestman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Therapeutic Guidelines ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanic Acid ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Third Generation Cephalosporins

Abstract Objectives We studied the impact of simplified therapeutic guidelines (STGs) associated with accompanied self-antibiotic reassessment (ASAR) on antibiotic use. Methods Prospective antibiotic audits and feedback took place at 15 hospitals for 12 months, allowing STGs with ≤15 drugs to be devised. STGs were explained to prescribers through sessions referred to as ASAR. Optimal therapy was defined by the conjunction of a diagnosis and the drug specified in the STGs. Analysis of consumption focused on critical drugs: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Results We compared prescriptions in five hospitals before (n = 179) and after (n = 168) the implementation of STGs + ASAR. These tools were associated with optimal therapies and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid prescriptions [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.28, 95% CI 1.82–5.92 and 2.18, 95% CI 1.38–3.44, respectively] and fewer prescriptions for urine colonization [AOR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06–0.61)]. Comparison of prescriptions (n = 1221) from 10 departments of three clinics with STGs + ASAR for the first quarters of 2018 and 2019 revealed that the prescriptions by 23 ASAR participants more often complied with STGs than those by 28 other doctors (71% versus 60%, P = 0.003). STGs alone were adopted by 10 clinics; comparing the prescriptions (n = 311) with the 5 clinics with both tools, we observed fewer unnecessary therapies in the latter [AOR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34–0.80)]. The variation in critical antibiotic consumption between 2017 and 2018 was −16% for the 5 clinics with both tools and +20% for the other 10 (P = 0.020). Conclusions STGs + ASAR promote optimal antibiotic therapy and reduce antibiotic use.

scholarly journals Broad Spectrum project: factors determining the quality of antibiotic use in primary care: an observational study protocol from Italy

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e038843
Author(s):  
Peter Konstantin Kurotschka ◽  
Alice Serafini ◽  
Marco Massari ◽  
Roberto Da Cas ◽  
Adolfo Figueiras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Prescription ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Prescription Data ◽  
Italian Region ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe overuse of antibiotics is causing worldwide spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Compared with other countries, Italy has both high antibiotic consumption rates and high rates of AMR. Due to the fact that around 90% of antibiotics are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs), this study aims to measure the impact of knowledge, attitudes and sociodemographic and workplace-related factors on the quality of antibiotic prescriptions filled by GPs in the Italian Region of Sardinia.Methods and analysisKnowledge, attitude, sociodemographic and workplace-related factors deemed to influence physicians prescribing behaviour will be evaluated in a cross-sectional study conducted among all GPs of the Italian Region of Sardinia (n=1200). A knowledge and attitudes questionnaire (Knowledge and Attitudes on Antibiotics and Resistance - Italian version: ITA-KAAR) accompanied by a sociodemographic form will be linked to drug prescription data reimbursed by the National Health System. European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic use will be calculated from drug prescription records. Every GP will be deemed to have demonstrated an adequate quality of prescriptions of antibiotics if half of the indicator score plus one is better than the median of the region. A multivariate Poisson regression model with robust variance estimation will be used to evaluate the impact of the determinants of antibiotic prescriptions on the actual prescribing quality of each physician.Ethics and disseminationThe project has been approved by the ethics committee of the Regional Health Trust of Sardinia (176/2019/CE, 24 September 2019). The results will be useful to inform evidence-based interventions to tackle irrational antibiotic use in the community.

scholarly journals Topical Antibiotic Use Coselects for the Carriage of Mobile Genetic Elements Conferring Resistance to Unrelated Antimicrobials in Staphylococcus aureus

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen P. Carter ◽  
Mark B. Schultz ◽  
Sarah L. Baines ◽  
Anders Gonçalves da Silva ◽  
Helen Heffernan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Topical Antibiotic ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Topical Antibiotics ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTTopical antibiotics, such as mupirocin and fusidic acid, are commonly used in the prevention and treatment of skin infections, particularly those caused by staphylococci. However, the widespread use of these agents is associated with increased resistance to these agents, potentially limiting their efficacy. Of particular concern is the observation that resistance to topical antibiotics is often associated with multidrug resistance, suggesting that topical antibiotics may play a role in the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. New Zealand (NZ) has some of the highest globally recorded rates of topical antibiotic usage and resistance. Using a combination of Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time (SMRT) whole-genome sequencing, Illumina short-read sequencing, and Bayesian phylogenomic modeling on 118 new multilocus sequence type 1 (ST1) communityStaphylococcus aureusisolates from New Zealand and 61 publically available international ST1 genome sequences, we demonstrate a strong correlation between the clinical introduction of topical antibiotics and the emergence of MDR ST1S. aureus. We also providein vitroexperimental evidence showing that exposure to topical antibiotics can lead to the rapid selection of MDRS. aureusisolates carrying plasmids that confer resistance to multiple unrelated antibiotics, from within a mixed population of competitor strains. These findings have important implications regarding the impact of the indiscriminate use of topical antibiotics.

Effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in neonatology: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-568
Author(s):  
André Ricardo Araujo da Silva ◽  
Amanda Marques ◽  
Clara Di Biase ◽  
Monique Faitanin ◽  
Indah Murni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Broad Spectrum ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionAntimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are recommended to improve antibiotic use in healthcare and reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of ASPs in reducing antibiotic consumption, use of broad-spectrum/restricted antibiotics, antibiotic resistance and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in neonates.MethodsWe searched PUBMED, SCIELO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database (January 2000–April 2019) to identify studies on the effectiveness of ASPs in neonatal wards and/or neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Outcomes were as follows: reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and of broad-spectrum/target antibiotics, inappropriate antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance and HAIs. ASPs conducted in settings other than acute care hospitals, for children older than 1 month, and ASPs addressing antifungal and antiviral agents, were excluded.ResultsThe initial search identified 53 173 titles and abstracts; following the application of filters and inclusion criteria, a total of six publications were included in the final analysis. All studies, of which one was multi-centre study, were published after 2010. Five studies were conducted exclusively in NICUs. Four articles applied multimodal interventions. Reduction of antibiotic consumption overall and/or inappropriate antibiotic use were reported by four articles; reduction of broad-spectrum/targeted antibiotics were reported by four studies; No article evaluated the impact of ASPs on AMR or the incidence of HAI in neonates.ConclusionASPs can be effectively applied in neonatal settings. Limiting the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and shorting the duration of antibiotic treatment are the most promising approaches. The impact of ASPs on AMR and HAI needs to be evaluated in long-term studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document