Neurointerventions and Criminal Justice Practice
This chapter takes the step from traditional abstract ethical considerations to the more practical question as to what should be expected if one imagines that treatment in the form of neurointerventions is further developed and were to be implemented within a framework such as the one we know from current criminal justice practice. The discussion in the chapter is based on the widely accepted view among penal theorists, namely, that current penal practice in the United States, and also in many other Western countries, deviates significantly from what is ideally desirable. But if this is the case, what does it mean for the idea of applying neurointerventions within such a practice? This question is examined by reconsidering many of the conclusions that have been drawn in preceding chapters in the light of non-ideal real-life penal practice.