Promoting Justice Across Borders

Author(s):  
Lucia M. Rafanelli

This book develops a theory of the ethics of “reform intervention,” a category that includes any attempt to promote justice in a society other than one’s own. It identifies several dimensions along which reform interventions can vary (the degree of control interveners exercise over recipients, the urgency of interveners’ objectives, the costs an intervention poses to recipients, and how interveners interact with recipients’ existing political institutions) and examines how these variations affect the moral permissibility of reform intervention. The book argues that, once one acknowledges the variety of forms reform intervention can take, it becomes clear that not all of them are vulnerable to the objections usually leveled against intervention. In particular, not all reform interventions treat recipients with intolerance, disrespect recipients’ legitimate institutions, or undermine recipients’ collective self-determination. Combining philosophical analysis and discussion of several real-world cases, the book investigates which kinds of reform intervention are or are not vulnerable to these objections. In so doing, it also develops new understandings of the roles toleration, legitimacy, and collective self-determination should play in global politics. After developing principles to specify when different kinds of reform interventions are morally permissible, the book investigates how these principles could be applied in the real world. Ultimately, it argues that some reform interventions are, all things considered, morally permissible and that sometimes reform intervention is morally required. It argues we should reconceive the ordinary boundaries of political activity and begin to see the pursuit of justice via political contestation as humanity’s collective project.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lucia M. Rafanelli

This chapter proposes that we need a new political theory of global politics to guide us in a world increasingly marked by global interconnection, transnational activism on the part of nonstate actors, and political actors that utilize many different means (besides force and coercion) to exert influence on the world stage. The book develops such a theory by examining how justice-promoting intervention (reform intervention) implicates the values of toleration, legitimacy, and collective self-determination. The book then examines how this theory could be put into practice in the real world. Ultimately, the book argues that some reform interventions are morally permissible and may even be morally required. Moreover, we are sometimes morally required to open our own societies to reform intervention. The book presents a vision of conscientious global political contestation in which the achievement of justice everywhere can be the legitimate political concern of people anywhere.


2021 ◽  
pp. 11-58
Author(s):  
Lucia M. Rafanelli

This chapter argues it is important to move beyond the focus of most scholarship on the ethics of intervention (on states intervening militarily or with other coercive means) and pay closer attention to interventions undertaken by nonstate actors and/or using less adversarial or coercive means. It clearly delineates the boundaries of the category “reform intervention.” It identifies several dimensions along which reform interventions can vary: the degree of control interveners exercise over recipients, the urgency of interveners’ objectives, the costs an intervention poses to recipients, and how interveners interact with recipients’ existing political institutions. It sketches some preliminary ideas on how these variations might affect an intervention’s permissibility. In so doing, the chapter also introduces several real-world cases of reform intervention.


2019 ◽  
pp. 9-46
Author(s):  
Anna Stilz

While most traditional liberal theories hold that the justice of a state’s institutions suffices to ground a right to govern its population and territory, I argue that these theories face an important challenge: They are unable to distinguish between domestic and foreign rule, and they may even license benign colonialism. Drawing on Kant’s political writings, I argue that we should revise these traditional liberal theories, recognizing the importance of a second, self-determination dimension to state legitimacy. To be legitimate, a state must not only provide certain minimum conditions of justice to its population; it must also satisfy their interest in collective self-determination, in being authors of their political institutions. This chapter offers a specific account of this interest, which I call the political autonomy theory. To fully respect autonomy, individuals must not only enjoy certain rights over their own personal lives; they must also be part of a collective that pursues justice through rules they choose through the exercise of their own rational deliberative agency.


2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 552-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L Streiner

Studies that investigate the usefulness of various therapies fall along a continuum that ranges from those looking at whether an intervention can work under ideal circumstances (efficacy trials) to those that focus on whether a treatment works when applied in the real world (effectiveness trials). Whether a study is closer to one end of the spectrum or the other affects almost every aspect of the trial. These aspects include which patients are eligible for enrolment, the degree of control over the way the intervention is delivered, which patients are or are not included in the analyses, how missing data are handled, and even which statistical tests may be used. The 2 types of trials may yield different results, but both provide useful information. This paper explores these issues, shows the decisions researchers must take at each phase of a trial, and discusses how clinicians should interpret the results.


Author(s):  
Andreas Samartzis

Main justifications for regarding common nationality as a necessary condition for holding equal political rights – Critique of collective self-determination, equal stakes, nature of political activity, and stability justifications – Rejection of the incommensurability of legitimacy and justice – Socioeconomic interdependence and liberal democratic values as the normative grounds for equal stakes – Risk of entrenchment of hostility among national groups as a consequence of a competitive conception of political activity – Instrumental value of stability – Stability through democratic inclusion – Possibility of sustainable pluralism through deliberative democracy – Modified version of the equal stakes argument – Equal political rights on the basis of long-term residence – Association of citizenship with nationality in contemporary European states – Redefinition of citizenship as top-down redefinition of nationality – Need to reconceptualise equal political rights independently of citizenship – Legal argument for interpreting references to popular sovereignty in national constitutions in accordance with long-term residence, rather than nationality – Available legal remedies


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Bothe

This article presents some streamlined and intentionally oversimplified ideas about educating future communication disorders professionals to use some of the most basic principles of evidence-based practice. Working from a popular five-step approach, modifications are suggested that may make the ideas more accessible, and therefore more useful, for university faculty, other supervisors, and future professionals in speech-language pathology, audiology, and related fields.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
LEE SAVIO BEERS
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document